City of Snohomish

Not in City of Snohomish? Click here to choose your customized guide.

Statewide Ballot Measures

Initiative #1366

  • VOTE NO

    No on Tim Eyman's I-1366

    Website Facebook Endorsements
  • Initiative-1366 from Tim Eyman orders the legislature to send a constitutional amendment to the voters next year requiring a two-thirds supermajority vote to close tax loopholes or raise revenue. If legislators refuse, Eyman’s initiative would create an $8 billion hole in our state budget over the next six years by cutting the sales tax by a full 1 percent.

    The timing for I-1366 is very bad. Our state is being fined $100,000 a day for failing to fully fund education, yet Eyman’s initiative would make it nearly impossible to close wasteful corporate tax loopholes or fix our state’s upside down tax system. Not surprisingly, Initiative 1366’s largest donors are big developers and Wall Street interests who have given Eyman hundreds of thousands of dollars to protect their special tax loopholes.

    Eyman proposed nearly the exact same initiative last year and it was broadly criticized. The Spokane Spokesman-Review referred to his previous effort as Eyman’s “worst ever” idea. Others called this initiative “extortion” (Walla Walla Union Bulletin) and “disingenuous” (Everett Herald), saying it is simply a ploy to keep Eyman’s initiative promotion business up and running.

    We oppose I-1366 because it would prevent us from fixing our state’s upside down tax system or fully funding our kids’ schools. Join this broad coalition listed below and vote NO on I-1366.
    Last updated: 2023-04-05
    Initiative-1366 from Tim Eyman orders the legislature to send a constitutional amendment to the voters next year requiring a two-thirds supermajority vote to close tax loopholes or raise revenue. If legislators refuse, Eyman’s initiative would create an $8 billion hole in our state budget over the next six years by cutting the sales tax by a full 1 percent.

    The timing for I-1366 is very bad. Our state is being fined $100,000 a day for failing to fully fund education, yet Eyman’s initiative would make it nearly impossible to close wasteful corporate tax loopholes or fix our state’s upside down tax system. Not surprisingly, Initiative 1366’s largest donors are big developers and Wall Street interests who have given Eyman hundreds of thousands of dollars to protect their special tax loopholes.

    Eyman proposed nearly the exact same initiative last year and it was broadly criticized. The Spokane Spokesman-Review referred to his previous effort as Eyman’s “worst ever” idea. Others called this initiative “extortion” (Walla Walla Union Bulletin) and “disingenuous” (Everett Herald), saying it is simply a ploy to keep Eyman’s initiative promotion business up and running.

    We oppose I-1366 because it would prevent us from fixing our state’s upside down tax system or fully funding our kids’ schools. Join this broad coalition listed below and vote NO on I-1366.
    Initiative-1366 from Tim Eyman orders the legislature to send a constitutional amendment to the voters next year requiring a two-thirds supermajority vote to close tax loopholes or raise revenue. If legislators refuse, Eyman’s initiative would create an $8 billion hole in our state budget over the next six years by cutting the sales tax by a full 1 percent.

    The timing for I-1366 is very bad. Our state is being fined $100,000 a day for failing to fully fund education, yet Eyman’s initiative would make it nearly impossible to close wasteful corporate tax loopholes or fix our state’s upside down tax system. Not surprisingly, Initiative 1366’s largest donors are big developers and Wall Street interests who have given Eyman hundreds of thousands of dollars to protect their special tax loopholes.

    Eyman proposed nearly the exact same initiative last year and it was broadly criticized. The Spokane Spokesman-Review referred to his previous effort as Eyman’s “worst ever” idea. Others called this initiative “extortion” (Walla Walla Union Bulletin) and “disingenuous” (Everett Herald), saying it is simply a ploy to keep Eyman’s initiative promotion business up and running.

    We oppose I-1366 because it would prevent us from fixing our state’s upside down tax system or fully funding our kids’ schools. Join this broad coalition listed below and vote NO on I-1366.

    Initiative 1366

    Initiative-1366 from Tim Eyman orders the legislature to send a constitutional amendment to the voters next year requiring a two-thirds supermajority vote to close tax loopholes or raise revenue. If legislators refuse, Eyman’s initiative would create an $8 billion hole in our state budget over the next six years by cutting the sales tax by a full 1 percent.



Initiative #1401

  • VOTE YES

    Vote Yes on Saving Animals from Extinction

    Website Facebook Endorsements
  • Initiative 1401 seeks to help save endangered animals from extinction by making the selling, purchasing, trading, or distributing of animals threatened with extinction punishable by law. From African Elephants to the Javan Tiger, animals are disappearing from our planet at an alarming rate. Passing Initiative 1401 means that our last remaining elephants, rhinos, tigers, lions, cheetahs, leopards, pangolins, marine turtles, sharks, and rays will at least be somewhat protected from the illegal animal trade here in our home state.

    Help save animals facing extinction: vote YES on Initiative 1401.
    Last updated: 2023-04-05
    Initiative 1401 seeks to help save endangered animals from extinction by making the selling, purchasing, trading, or distributing of animals threatened with extinction punishable by law. From African Elephants to the Javan Tiger, animals are disappearing from our planet at an alarming rate. Passing Initiative 1401 means that our last remaining elephants, rhinos, tigers, lions, cheetahs, leopards, pangolins, marine turtles, sharks, and rays will at least be somewhat protected from the illegal animal trade here in our home state.

    Help save animals facing extinction: vote YES on Initiative 1401.
    Initiative 1401 seeks to help save endangered animals from extinction by making the selling, purchasing, trading, or distributing of animals threatened with extinction punishable by law. From African Elephants to the Javan Tiger, animals are disappearing from our planet at an alarming rate. Passing Initiative 1401 means that our last remaining elephants, rhinos, tigers, lions, cheetahs, leopards, pangolins, marine turtles, sharks, and rays will at least be somewhat protected from the illegal animal trade here in our home state.

    Help save animals facing extinction: vote YES on Initiative 1401.

    Initiative 1401

    Initiative 1401 seeks to help save endangered animals from extinction by making the selling, purchasing, trading, or distributing of animals threatened with extinction punishable by law. From African Elephants to the Javan Tiger, animals are disappearing from our planet at an alarming rate. Passing Initiative 1401 means that our last remaining elephants, rhinos, tigers, lions, cheetahs, leopards, pangolins, marine turtles, sharks, and rays will at least be somewhat protected from the illegal animal trade here in our home state.



    • Endorsed By Washington Conservation Action, Sierra Club, Humane Voters of Washington, Conservation Northwest, Audubon Washington

Advisory Vote #10

  • VOTE MAINTAINED

    Vote "Maintain" on Tax Advisory Vote No. 10

  • Legislators voted nearly unanimously for new oil train safety regulations, including directing some oil taxes to help pay for oil-train spill response. Senate Bill 1449 passed the legislature 141 to 1 with 5 excused. Thanks to a Tim Eyman initiative, the state legislature is required to submit any bill it passes that closes tax loopholes or raises revenue to a non-binding advisory vote. Vote to "maintain" this measure.
    Last updated: 2023-04-05
    Legislators voted nearly unanimously for new oil train safety regulations, including directing some oil taxes to help pay for oil-train spill response. Senate Bill 1449 passed the legislature 141 to 1 with 5 excused. Thanks to a Tim Eyman initiative, the state legislature is required to submit any bill it passes that closes tax loopholes or raises revenue to a non-binding advisory vote. Vote to "maintain" this measure.
    Legislators voted nearly unanimously for new oil train safety regulations, including directing some oil taxes to help pay for oil-train spill response. Senate Bill 1449 passed the legislature 141 to 1 with 5 excused. Thanks to a Tim Eyman initiative, the state legislature is required to submit any bill it passes that closes tax loopholes or raises revenue to a non-binding advisory vote. Vote to "maintain" this measure.

    Advisory Vote No. 10

    Legislators voted nearly unanimously for new oil train safety regulations, including directing some oil taxes to help pay for oil-train spill response. Senate Bill 1449 passed the legislature 141 to 1 with 5 excused. Thanks to a Tim Eyman initiative, the state legislature is required to submit any bill it passes that closes tax loopholes or raises revenue to a non-binding advisory vote. Vote to "maintain" this measure.

Advisory Vote #11

  • VOTE MAINTAINED

    Vote "Maintain" on Tax Advisory Vote No. 11

  • A bipartisan majority of legislators came together earlier this year to clarify that the marijuana excise tax should also apply to medical marijuana sales. There are a number of progressives who disagree with this tax, but unfortunately, the time to lobby against it was during the 2014 legislative session. Senate Bill 5052 passed the legislature 101 to 44 with 2 excused. Per Eyman’s initiative, the state legislature is required to submit any bill it passes that closes tax loopholes or raises revenue to a non-binding advisory vote. Even if 100 percent of voters rejected this advisory measure, it would remain a tax, as Eyman's advisory votes are purely intended to push an anti-tax message. Vote to "maintain" this measure, and push back against Eyman's anti-tax message.
    Last updated: 2023-04-05
    A bipartisan majority of legislators came together earlier this year to clarify that the marijuana excise tax should also apply to medical marijuana sales. There are a number of progressives who disagree with this tax, but unfortunately, the time to lobby against it was during the 2014 legislative session. Senate Bill 5052 passed the legislature 101 to 44 with 2 excused. Per Eyman’s initiative, the state legislature is required to submit any bill it passes that closes tax loopholes or raises revenue to a non-binding advisory vote. Even if 100 percent of voters rejected this advisory measure, it would remain a tax, as Eyman's advisory votes are purely intended to push an anti-tax message. Vote to "maintain" this measure, and push back against Eyman's anti-tax message.
    A bipartisan majority of legislators came together earlier this year to clarify that the marijuana excise tax should also apply to medical marijuana sales. There are a number of progressives who disagree with this tax, but unfortunately, the time to lobby against it was during the 2014 legislative session. Senate Bill 5052 passed the legislature 101 to 44 with 2 excused. Per Eyman’s initiative, the state legislature is required to submit any bill it passes that closes tax loopholes or raises revenue to a non-binding advisory vote. Even if 100 percent of voters rejected this advisory measure, it would remain a tax, as Eyman's advisory votes are purely intended to push an anti-tax message. Vote to "maintain" this measure, and push back against Eyman's anti-tax message.

    Advisory Vote No. 11

    A bipartisan majority of legislators came together earlier this year to clarify that the marijuana excise tax should also apply to medical marijuana sales. There are a number of progressives who disagree with this tax, but unfortunately, the time to lobby against it was during the 2014 legislative session. Senate Bill 5052 passed the legislature 101 to 44 with 2 excused. Per Eyman’s initiative, the state legislature is required to submit any bill it passes that closes tax loopholes or raises revenue to a non-binding advisory vote.

Advisory Vote #12

  • VOTE MAINTAINED

    Vote "Maintain" on Tax Advisory Vote No. 12

  • A broad majority of legislators voted for a comprehensive transportation bill to improve state and local roads, transit, bike paths, and pedestrian walkways. The package was funded with a small increase in the gas tax. Senate Bill 5987 passed the legislature 91 to 51 with 5 excused. While we were not thrilled with some aspects of the final transportation package, we still recommend a non-binding vote to "maintain" this measure. Per Eyman’s initiative, the state legislature is required to submit any bill it passes that closes tax loopholes or raises revenue to a non-binding advisory vote. Vote to “maintain” this measure.
    Last updated: 2023-04-05
    A broad majority of legislators voted for a comprehensive transportation bill to improve state and local roads, transit, bike paths, and pedestrian walkways. The package was funded with a small increase in the gas tax. Senate Bill 5987 passed the legislature 91 to 51 with 5 excused. While we were not thrilled with some aspects of the final transportation package, we still recommend a non-binding vote to "maintain" this measure. Per Eyman’s initiative, the state legislature is required to submit any bill it passes that closes tax loopholes or raises revenue to a non-binding advisory vote. Vote to “maintain” this measure.
    A broad majority of legislators voted for a comprehensive transportation bill to improve state and local roads, transit, bike paths, and pedestrian walkways. The package was funded with a small increase in the gas tax. Senate Bill 5987 passed the legislature 91 to 51 with 5 excused. While we were not thrilled with some aspects of the final transportation package, we still recommend a non-binding vote to "maintain" this measure. Per Eyman’s initiative, the state legislature is required to submit any bill it passes that closes tax loopholes or raises revenue to a non-binding advisory vote. Vote to “maintain” this measure.

    Advisory Vote No. 12

    A broad majority of legislators voted for a comprehensive transportation bill to improve state and local roads, transit, bike paths, and pedestrian walkways. The package was funded with a small increase in the gas tax. Senate Bill 5987 passed the legislature 91 to 51 with 5 excused. While we were not thrilled with some aspects of the final transportation package, we still recommend a non-binding vote to "maintain" this measure. Per Eyman’s initiative, the state legislature is required to submit any bill it passes that closes tax loopholes or raises revenue to a non-binding advisory vote.

Advisory Vote #13

  • VOTE MAINTAINED

    Vote "Maintain" on Tax Advisory Vote No. 13

  • A large majority of legislators voted to close $150 million in unnecessary tax loopholes in order to generate revenue for education funding. This legislation, Senate Bill 6138, passed the legislature 95 to 48 with 4 excused. Per Eyman’s initiative, the state legislature is required to submit any bill it passes that closes tax loopholes or raises revenue to a non-binding advisory vote. Vote to "maintain" this important measure.
    Last updated: 2023-04-05
    A large majority of legislators voted to close $150 million in unnecessary tax loopholes in order to generate revenue for education funding. This legislation, Senate Bill 6138, passed the legislature 95 to 48 with 4 excused. Per Eyman’s initiative, the state legislature is required to submit any bill it passes that closes tax loopholes or raises revenue to a non-binding advisory vote. Vote to "maintain" this important measure.
    A large majority of legislators voted to close $150 million in unnecessary tax loopholes in order to generate revenue for education funding. This legislation, Senate Bill 6138, passed the legislature 95 to 48 with 4 excused. Per Eyman’s initiative, the state legislature is required to submit any bill it passes that closes tax loopholes or raises revenue to a non-binding advisory vote. Vote to "maintain" this important measure.

    Advisory Vote No. 13

    A large majority of legislators voted to close $150 million in unnecessary tax loopholes in order to generate revenue for education funding. This legislation, Senate Bill 6138, passed the legislature 95 to 48 with 4 excused. Per Eyman’s initiative, the state legislature is required to submit any bill it passes that closes tax loopholes or raises revenue to a non-binding advisory vote. Vote to "maintain" this important measure.

Snohomish County Ballot Measures

Snohomish County Proposition #1

  • VOTE APPROVED

    Vote YES on Snohomish County Community Transit: Proposition No. 1

    Website
  • Snohomish County is one of the nation’s fastest growing areas, resulting in longer commutes and traffic gridlock impacting our families and quality of life. Proposition 1 would add bus service and reduce transit wait times, extend bus hours, and expand routes to serve more communities throughout Snohomish County. Proposition 1 funds these important improvements through a 0.3 percent increase in the county sales and use tax.

    We need transportation solutions that reduce congestion and move people efficiently. Vote YES on Proposition 1.
    Last updated: 2023-04-05
    Snohomish County is one of the nation’s fastest growing areas, resulting in longer commutes and traffic gridlock impacting our families and quality of life. Proposition 1 would add bus service and reduce transit wait times, extend bus hours, and expand routes to serve more communities throughout Snohomish County. Proposition 1 funds these important improvements through a 0.3 percent increase in the county sales and use tax.

    We need transportation solutions that reduce congestion and move people efficiently. Vote YES on Proposition 1.
    Snohomish County is one of the nation’s fastest growing areas, resulting in longer commutes and traffic gridlock impacting our families and quality of life. Proposition 1 would add bus service and reduce transit wait times, extend bus hours, and expand routes to serve more communities throughout Snohomish County. Proposition 1 funds these important improvements through a 0.3 percent increase in the county sales and use tax.

    We need transportation solutions that reduce congestion and move people efficiently. Vote YES on Proposition 1.
    • Endorsed By Snohomish County Labor Council, United Way of Snohomish County

Snohomish County

Snohomish County Executive

  • Dave Somers photo
    Democrat

    Dave Somers

    Website Facebook Endorsements
  • Current Snohomish County Council President Dave Somers is running for Snohomish County Executive. Somers is an experienced and capable member of the Snohomish County Council with an exceptional track-record on environmental and smart growth issues. He worked as a fisheries biologist before joining the Council. He's supported measures to create parks and open spaces, protect farmland, increase transit funding, and invest in alternative fuels. Somers also supports focusing new development in urban areas with easy transportation access.

    Although the candidates do not have deep ideological differences, Somers is challenging Lovick because he believes Lovick has been a poor manager of the County’s finances. Somers is campaigning on providing stronger fiscal management, transportation improvements, and supporting manufacturing jobs. But Somers has frustrated many progressives by opposing a proposal that would tie Boeing’s tax breaks to keeping jobs in Washington.

    If you’re looking for a candidate with an impressive track record on smart growth, transportation, and environmental protection in Snohomish County, Somers is a good choice.

    Last updated: 2023-04-05

    Dave Somers

    Current Snohomish County Council President Dave Somers is running for Snohomish County Executive. Somers is an experienced and capable member of the Snohomish County Council with an exceptional track-record on environmental and smart growth issues.

    Current Snohomish County Council President Dave Somers is running for Snohomish County Executive. Somers is an experienced and capable member of the Snohomish County Council with an exceptional track-record on environmental and smart growth issues. He worked as a fisheries biologist before joining the Council. He's supported measures to create parks and open spaces, protect farmland, increase transit funding, and invest in alternative fuels. Somers also supports focusing new development in urban areas with easy transportation access.

    Although the candidates do not have deep ideological differences, Somers is challenging Lovick because he believes Lovick has been a poor manager of the County’s finances. Somers is campaigning on providing stronger fiscal management, transportation improvements, and supporting manufacturing jobs. But Somers has frustrated many progressives by opposing a proposal that would tie Boeing’s tax breaks to keeping jobs in Washington.

    If you’re looking for a candidate with an impressive track record on smart growth, transportation, and environmental protection in Snohomish County, Somers is a good choice.

    Dave Somers

    Current Snohomish County Council President Dave Somers is running for Snohomish County Executive. Somers is an experienced and capable member of the Snohomish County Council with an exceptional track-record on environmental and smart growth issues.

  • John Lovick photo
    Democrat

    John Lovick

    Website Facebook Endorsements
  • Incumbent County Executive John Lovick was appointed to the position in 2013 and elected in 2014. He has previously represented Snohomish County’s 44th Legislative District in the state House, and served as a state trooper for 31 years before being elected as Sheriff in 2007. Lovick’s first term has been rocky at times as he has sought to clean up the mess left by disgraced former executive Aaron Reardon.

    Although there are not deep ideological differences between the candidates, they have taken a different approach to some policies. Unlike Somers, Lovick sided with conservative developers by proposing updates to the county’s growth management plan that would worsen sprawl as the county grows. On the other hand, Lovick has been an outspoken supporter of requiring Boeing to keep jobs in Washington state in order to receive tax incentives, earning him organized labor’s support in this election.

    If you’re looking for a candidate with a strong track record on public safety who is willing to challenge Boeing to keep jobs in Washington, Lovick is a good choice.

    Last updated: 2023-04-05

    John Lovick

    Incumbent County Executive John Lovick was appointed to the position in 2013 and elected in 2014. He has previously represented Snohomish County’s 44th Legislative District in the state House, and served as a state trooper for 31 years before being elected as Sheriff in 2007.

    Incumbent County Executive John Lovick was appointed to the position in 2013 and elected in 2014. He has previously represented Snohomish County’s 44th Legislative District in the state House, and served as a state trooper for 31 years before being elected as Sheriff in 2007. Lovick’s first term has been rocky at times as he has sought to clean up the mess left by disgraced former executive Aaron Reardon.

    Although there are not deep ideological differences between the candidates, they have taken a different approach to some policies. Unlike Somers, Lovick sided with conservative developers by proposing updates to the county’s growth management plan that would worsen sprawl as the county grows. On the other hand, Lovick has been an outspoken supporter of requiring Boeing to keep jobs in Washington state in order to receive tax incentives, earning him organized labor’s support in this election.

    If you’re looking for a candidate with a strong track record on public safety who is willing to challenge Boeing to keep jobs in Washington, Lovick is a good choice.

    John Lovick

    Incumbent County Executive John Lovick was appointed to the position in 2013 and elected in 2014. He has previously represented Snohomish County’s 44th Legislative District in the state House, and served as a state trooper for 31 years before being elected as Sheriff in 2007.

Charter Review Commission, Snohomish County, District #5

The Charter Review Commission is elected every 10 years and is responsible for writing the rules for how the government operates, much like a county constitution. Depending on where you live you may have the following races on your ballot.

Charter Review Commission, District #5

  • Gregory Pratt photo

    Gregory Pratt

  • Voters are allowed to choose up to three candidates for Snohomish County Charter Review Commission. We recommend Kristin Kelly, Gregory Pratt, and Wendy Valentine. 

    Gregory Pratt is a progressive software developer who has been active in local government issues ranging from running for school board to helping draw the 2011 Snohomish County redistricting plan. 

    Pratt is opposed by 12 other people for this seat, including progressives Kristin Kelly, Snohomish County Program Director at Futurewise, a land use and conservation advocacy organization, Wendy Valentine, a nurse who served along with Kelly on the previous commission, and Seth Pikey, the former president of the Snohomish County Young Democrats. Also in this race are Chris Kuehn, a water quality expert, and James Quinton Little, a professional hip hop dancer. Additionally, conservatives Jim Upton, Jim Kellett, Charles (Chuck) Whitfield, Jeff Sax, Kurt Goering, Douglas Roulstone, and Chris Vallo are running.

    Last updated: 2023-07-28

    Gregory Pratt

    Submitted by sara on

    Voters are allowed to choose up to three candidates for Snohomish County Charter Review Commission. We recommend Kristin Kelly, Gregory Pratt, and Wendy Valentine. 

    Gregory Pratt is a progressive software developer who has been active in local government issues ranging from running for school board to helping draw the 2011 Snohomish County redistricting plan. 

    Voters are allowed to choose up to three candidates for Snohomish County Charter Review Commission. We recommend Kristin Kelly, Gregory Pratt, and Wendy Valentine. 

    Gregory Pratt is a progressive software developer who has been active in local government issues ranging from running for school board to helping draw the 2011 Snohomish County redistricting plan. 

    Pratt is opposed by 12 other people for this seat, including progressives Kristin Kelly, Snohomish County Program Director at Futurewise, a land use and conservation advocacy organization, Wendy Valentine, a nurse who served along with Kelly on the previous commission, and Seth Pikey, the former president of the Snohomish County Young Democrats. Also in this race are Chris Kuehn, a water quality expert, and James Quinton Little, a professional hip hop dancer. Additionally, conservatives Jim Upton, Jim Kellett, Charles (Chuck) Whitfield, Jeff Sax, Kurt Goering, Douglas Roulstone, and Chris Vallo are running.

    Gregory Pratt

    Submitted by sara on

    Voters are allowed to choose up to three candidates for Snohomish County Charter Review Commission. We recommend Kristin Kelly, Gregory Pratt, and Wendy Valentine. 

    Gregory Pratt is a progressive software developer who has been active in local government issues ranging from running for school board to helping draw the 2011 Snohomish County redistricting plan. 

  • Kristin Kelly photo

    Kristin Kelly

  • Voters are allowed to choose up to three candidates for Snohomish County Charter Review Commission. We recommend Kristin Kelly and Wendy Valentine.

    Kristin Kelly, Snohomish County Program Director at Futurewise, a land use and conservation advocacy organization, and Smart Growth Executive Director for Pilchuck Audubon Society, is running for Snohomish Charter Review Commission District 5. Kelly has a firm grasp on the needs and direction of our county and its charter. She previously served on the Charter Review Commission 10 years ago. One of Kelly's objectives for running again is to ensure the changes implemented previously remain and to advocate for more transparency in council meetings, including night time meetings that the public is able to attend as opposed to 10:30 am hearings.

    For her experience and commitment to our county's future, Kelly deserves your vote.​
    Last updated: 2023-04-05

    Kristin Kelly

    Submitted by sara on

    Voters are allowed to choose up to three candidates for Snohomish County Charter Review Commission. We recommend Kristin Kelly and Wendy Valentine.



    Voters are allowed to choose up to three candidates for Snohomish County Charter Review Commission. We recommend Kristin Kelly and Wendy Valentine.

    Kristin Kelly, Snohomish County Program Director at Futurewise, a land use and conservation advocacy organization, and Smart Growth Executive Director for Pilchuck Audubon Society, is running for Snohomish Charter Review Commission District 5. Kelly has a firm grasp on the needs and direction of our county and its charter. She previously served on the Charter Review Commission 10 years ago. One of Kelly's objectives for running again is to ensure the changes implemented previously remain and to advocate for more transparency in council meetings, including night time meetings that the public is able to attend as opposed to 10:30 am hearings.

    For her experience and commitment to our county's future, Kelly deserves your vote.​

    Kristin Kelly

    Submitted by sara on

    Voters are allowed to choose up to three candidates for Snohomish County Charter Review Commission. We recommend Kristin Kelly and Wendy Valentine.



  • Wendy Valentine photo

    Wendy Valentine

  • Wendy Valentine is a progressive nurse who also runs Soaring Hearts Farm, a biodiverse dairy goat farm and educational center in Snohomish County. Valentine previously served on the Charter Review Commission alongside fellow running mate Kristin Kelly 10 years ago. Due to her experience and support from progressives, Valentine deserves your vote.

    Valentine and Kelly are opposed by 12 other people for this seat, including progressives Gregory Pratt, a Microsoft employee who served on the Snohomish County Council Redistricting Committee, and Seth Pikey, the former president of the Snohomish County Young Democrats. Also in this race are Chris Kuehn, a water quality expert, and James Quinton Little, a professional hip hop dancer. Additionally, conservatives Jim Upton, Jim Kellett, Charles (Chuck) Whitfield, Jeff Sax, Kurt Goering, Douglas Roulstone, and Chris Vallo are running.
    Last updated: 2023-04-05

    Wendy Valentine

    Submitted by sara on

    Wendy Valentine is a progressive nurse who also runs Soaring Hearts Farm, a biodiverse dairy goat farm and educational center in Snohomish County. Valentine previously served on the Charter Review Commission alongside fellow running mate Kristin Kelly 10 years ago. Due to her experience and support from progressives, Valentine deserves your vote.



    Wendy Valentine is a progressive nurse who also runs Soaring Hearts Farm, a biodiverse dairy goat farm and educational center in Snohomish County. Valentine previously served on the Charter Review Commission alongside fellow running mate Kristin Kelly 10 years ago. Due to her experience and support from progressives, Valentine deserves your vote.

    Valentine and Kelly are opposed by 12 other people for this seat, including progressives Gregory Pratt, a Microsoft employee who served on the Snohomish County Council Redistricting Committee, and Seth Pikey, the former president of the Snohomish County Young Democrats. Also in this race are Chris Kuehn, a water quality expert, and James Quinton Little, a professional hip hop dancer. Additionally, conservatives Jim Upton, Jim Kellett, Charles (Chuck) Whitfield, Jeff Sax, Kurt Goering, Douglas Roulstone, and Chris Vallo are running.

    Wendy Valentine

    Submitted by sara on

    Wendy Valentine is a progressive nurse who also runs Soaring Hearts Farm, a biodiverse dairy goat farm and educational center in Snohomish County. Valentine previously served on the Charter Review Commission alongside fellow running mate Kristin Kelly 10 years ago. Due to her experience and support from progressives, Valentine deserves your vote.