Ciudad de Mukilteo

Not in Ciudad de Mukilteo? Haga clic aquí para elegir su guía personalizada.

Medidas sometidas a votación a nivel estatal

Initiative #1366

  • VOTO NO

    No on Tim Eyman's I-1366

    Sitio web Facebook Apoyos
  • Initiative-1366 from Tim Eyman orders the legislature to send a constitutional amendment to the voters next year requiring a two-thirds supermajority vote to close tax loopholes or raise revenue. If legislators refuse, Eyman’s initiative would create an $8 billion hole in our state budget over the next six years by cutting the sales tax by a full 1 percent.

    The timing for I-1366 is very bad. Our state is being fined $100,000 a day for failing to fully fund education, yet Eyman’s initiative would make it nearly impossible to close wasteful corporate tax loopholes or fix our state’s upside down tax system. Not surprisingly, Initiative 1366’s largest donors are big developers and Wall Street interests who have given Eyman hundreds of thousands of dollars to protect their special tax loopholes.

    Eyman proposed nearly the exact same initiative last year and it was broadly criticized. The Spokane Spokesman-Review referred to his previous effort as Eyman’s “worst ever” idea. Others called this initiative “extortion” (Walla Walla Union Bulletin) and “disingenuous” (Everett Herald), saying it is simply a ploy to keep Eyman’s initiative promotion business up and running.

    We oppose I-1366 because it would prevent us from fixing our state’s upside down tax system or fully funding our kids’ schools. Join this broad coalition listed below and vote NO on I-1366.
    Ultima actualización 2023-04-05
    Initiative-1366 from Tim Eyman orders the legislature to send a constitutional amendment to the voters next year requiring a two-thirds supermajority vote to close tax loopholes or raise revenue. If legislators refuse, Eyman’s initiative would create an $8 billion hole in our state budget over the next six years by cutting the sales tax by a full 1 percent.

    The timing for I-1366 is very bad. Our state is being fined $100,000 a day for failing to fully fund education, yet Eyman’s initiative would make it nearly impossible to close wasteful corporate tax loopholes or fix our state’s upside down tax system. Not surprisingly, Initiative 1366’s largest donors are big developers and Wall Street interests who have given Eyman hundreds of thousands of dollars to protect their special tax loopholes.

    Eyman proposed nearly the exact same initiative last year and it was broadly criticized. The Spokane Spokesman-Review referred to his previous effort as Eyman’s “worst ever” idea. Others called this initiative “extortion” (Walla Walla Union Bulletin) and “disingenuous” (Everett Herald), saying it is simply a ploy to keep Eyman’s initiative promotion business up and running.

    We oppose I-1366 because it would prevent us from fixing our state’s upside down tax system or fully funding our kids’ schools. Join this broad coalition listed below and vote NO on I-1366.
    Initiative-1366 from Tim Eyman orders the legislature to send a constitutional amendment to the voters next year requiring a two-thirds supermajority vote to close tax loopholes or raise revenue. If legislators refuse, Eyman’s initiative would create an $8 billion hole in our state budget over the next six years by cutting the sales tax by a full 1 percent.

    The timing for I-1366 is very bad. Our state is being fined $100,000 a day for failing to fully fund education, yet Eyman’s initiative would make it nearly impossible to close wasteful corporate tax loopholes or fix our state’s upside down tax system. Not surprisingly, Initiative 1366’s largest donors are big developers and Wall Street interests who have given Eyman hundreds of thousands of dollars to protect their special tax loopholes.

    Eyman proposed nearly the exact same initiative last year and it was broadly criticized. The Spokane Spokesman-Review referred to his previous effort as Eyman’s “worst ever” idea. Others called this initiative “extortion” (Walla Walla Union Bulletin) and “disingenuous” (Everett Herald), saying it is simply a ploy to keep Eyman’s initiative promotion business up and running.

    We oppose I-1366 because it would prevent us from fixing our state’s upside down tax system or fully funding our kids’ schools. Join this broad coalition listed below and vote NO on I-1366.

    Initiative 1366

    Initiative-1366 from Tim Eyman orders the legislature to send a constitutional amendment to the voters next year requiring a two-thirds supermajority vote to close tax loopholes or raise revenue. If legislators refuse, Eyman’s initiative would create an $8 billion hole in our state budget over the next six years by cutting the sales tax by a full 1 percent.



Initiative #1401

  • VOTO YES

    Vote Yes on Saving Animals from Extinction

    Sitio web Facebook Apoyos
  • Initiative 1401 seeks to help save endangered animals from extinction by making the selling, purchasing, trading, or distributing of animals threatened with extinction punishable by law. From African Elephants to the Javan Tiger, animals are disappearing from our planet at an alarming rate. Passing Initiative 1401 means that our last remaining elephants, rhinos, tigers, lions, cheetahs, leopards, pangolins, marine turtles, sharks, and rays will at least be somewhat protected from the illegal animal trade here in our home state.

    Help save animals facing extinction: vote YES on Initiative 1401.
    Ultima actualización 2023-04-05
    Initiative 1401 seeks to help save endangered animals from extinction by making the selling, purchasing, trading, or distributing of animals threatened with extinction punishable by law. From African Elephants to the Javan Tiger, animals are disappearing from our planet at an alarming rate. Passing Initiative 1401 means that our last remaining elephants, rhinos, tigers, lions, cheetahs, leopards, pangolins, marine turtles, sharks, and rays will at least be somewhat protected from the illegal animal trade here in our home state.

    Help save animals facing extinction: vote YES on Initiative 1401.
    Initiative 1401 seeks to help save endangered animals from extinction by making the selling, purchasing, trading, or distributing of animals threatened with extinction punishable by law. From African Elephants to the Javan Tiger, animals are disappearing from our planet at an alarming rate. Passing Initiative 1401 means that our last remaining elephants, rhinos, tigers, lions, cheetahs, leopards, pangolins, marine turtles, sharks, and rays will at least be somewhat protected from the illegal animal trade here in our home state.

    Help save animals facing extinction: vote YES on Initiative 1401.

    Initiative 1401

    Initiative 1401 seeks to help save endangered animals from extinction by making the selling, purchasing, trading, or distributing of animals threatened with extinction punishable by law. From African Elephants to the Javan Tiger, animals are disappearing from our planet at an alarming rate. Passing Initiative 1401 means that our last remaining elephants, rhinos, tigers, lions, cheetahs, leopards, pangolins, marine turtles, sharks, and rays will at least be somewhat protected from the illegal animal trade here in our home state.



    • Apoyadas Por Washington Conservation Action, Sierra Club, Humane Voters of Washington, Conservation Northwest, Audubon Washington

Advisory Vote #10

  • VOTO MAINTAINED

    Vote "Maintain" on Tax Advisory Vote No. 10

  • Legislators voted nearly unanimously for new oil train safety regulations, including directing some oil taxes to help pay for oil-train spill response. Senate Bill 1449 passed the legislature 141 to 1 with 5 excused. Thanks to a Tim Eyman initiative, the state legislature is required to submit any bill it passes that closes tax loopholes or raises revenue to a non-binding advisory vote. Vote to "maintain" this measure.
    Ultima actualización 2023-04-05
    Legislators voted nearly unanimously for new oil train safety regulations, including directing some oil taxes to help pay for oil-train spill response. Senate Bill 1449 passed the legislature 141 to 1 with 5 excused. Thanks to a Tim Eyman initiative, the state legislature is required to submit any bill it passes that closes tax loopholes or raises revenue to a non-binding advisory vote. Vote to "maintain" this measure.
    Legislators voted nearly unanimously for new oil train safety regulations, including directing some oil taxes to help pay for oil-train spill response. Senate Bill 1449 passed the legislature 141 to 1 with 5 excused. Thanks to a Tim Eyman initiative, the state legislature is required to submit any bill it passes that closes tax loopholes or raises revenue to a non-binding advisory vote. Vote to "maintain" this measure.

    Advisory Vote No. 10

    Legislators voted nearly unanimously for new oil train safety regulations, including directing some oil taxes to help pay for oil-train spill response. Senate Bill 1449 passed the legislature 141 to 1 with 5 excused. Thanks to a Tim Eyman initiative, the state legislature is required to submit any bill it passes that closes tax loopholes or raises revenue to a non-binding advisory vote. Vote to "maintain" this measure.

Advisory Vote #11

  • VOTO MAINTAINED

    Vote "Maintain" on Tax Advisory Vote No. 11

  • A bipartisan majority of legislators came together earlier this year to clarify that the marijuana excise tax should also apply to medical marijuana sales. There are a number of progressives who disagree with this tax, but unfortunately, the time to lobby against it was during the 2014 legislative session. Senate Bill 5052 passed the legislature 101 to 44 with 2 excused. Per Eyman’s initiative, the state legislature is required to submit any bill it passes that closes tax loopholes or raises revenue to a non-binding advisory vote. Even if 100 percent of voters rejected this advisory measure, it would remain a tax, as Eyman's advisory votes are purely intended to push an anti-tax message. Vote to "maintain" this measure, and push back against Eyman's anti-tax message.
    Ultima actualización 2023-04-05
    A bipartisan majority of legislators came together earlier this year to clarify that the marijuana excise tax should also apply to medical marijuana sales. There are a number of progressives who disagree with this tax, but unfortunately, the time to lobby against it was during the 2014 legislative session. Senate Bill 5052 passed the legislature 101 to 44 with 2 excused. Per Eyman’s initiative, the state legislature is required to submit any bill it passes that closes tax loopholes or raises revenue to a non-binding advisory vote. Even if 100 percent of voters rejected this advisory measure, it would remain a tax, as Eyman's advisory votes are purely intended to push an anti-tax message. Vote to "maintain" this measure, and push back against Eyman's anti-tax message.
    A bipartisan majority of legislators came together earlier this year to clarify that the marijuana excise tax should also apply to medical marijuana sales. There are a number of progressives who disagree with this tax, but unfortunately, the time to lobby against it was during the 2014 legislative session. Senate Bill 5052 passed the legislature 101 to 44 with 2 excused. Per Eyman’s initiative, the state legislature is required to submit any bill it passes that closes tax loopholes or raises revenue to a non-binding advisory vote. Even if 100 percent of voters rejected this advisory measure, it would remain a tax, as Eyman's advisory votes are purely intended to push an anti-tax message. Vote to "maintain" this measure, and push back against Eyman's anti-tax message.

    Advisory Vote No. 11

    A bipartisan majority of legislators came together earlier this year to clarify that the marijuana excise tax should also apply to medical marijuana sales. There are a number of progressives who disagree with this tax, but unfortunately, the time to lobby against it was during the 2014 legislative session. Senate Bill 5052 passed the legislature 101 to 44 with 2 excused. Per Eyman’s initiative, the state legislature is required to submit any bill it passes that closes tax loopholes or raises revenue to a non-binding advisory vote.

Advisory Vote #12

  • VOTO MAINTAINED

    Vote "Maintain" on Tax Advisory Vote No. 12

  • A broad majority of legislators voted for a comprehensive transportation bill to improve state and local roads, transit, bike paths, and pedestrian walkways. The package was funded with a small increase in the gas tax. Senate Bill 5987 passed the legislature 91 to 51 with 5 excused. While we were not thrilled with some aspects of the final transportation package, we still recommend a non-binding vote to "maintain" this measure. Per Eyman’s initiative, the state legislature is required to submit any bill it passes that closes tax loopholes or raises revenue to a non-binding advisory vote. Vote to “maintain” this measure.
    Ultima actualización 2023-04-05
    A broad majority of legislators voted for a comprehensive transportation bill to improve state and local roads, transit, bike paths, and pedestrian walkways. The package was funded with a small increase in the gas tax. Senate Bill 5987 passed the legislature 91 to 51 with 5 excused. While we were not thrilled with some aspects of the final transportation package, we still recommend a non-binding vote to "maintain" this measure. Per Eyman’s initiative, the state legislature is required to submit any bill it passes that closes tax loopholes or raises revenue to a non-binding advisory vote. Vote to “maintain” this measure.
    A broad majority of legislators voted for a comprehensive transportation bill to improve state and local roads, transit, bike paths, and pedestrian walkways. The package was funded with a small increase in the gas tax. Senate Bill 5987 passed the legislature 91 to 51 with 5 excused. While we were not thrilled with some aspects of the final transportation package, we still recommend a non-binding vote to "maintain" this measure. Per Eyman’s initiative, the state legislature is required to submit any bill it passes that closes tax loopholes or raises revenue to a non-binding advisory vote. Vote to “maintain” this measure.

    Advisory Vote No. 12

    A broad majority of legislators voted for a comprehensive transportation bill to improve state and local roads, transit, bike paths, and pedestrian walkways. The package was funded with a small increase in the gas tax. Senate Bill 5987 passed the legislature 91 to 51 with 5 excused. While we were not thrilled with some aspects of the final transportation package, we still recommend a non-binding vote to "maintain" this measure. Per Eyman’s initiative, the state legislature is required to submit any bill it passes that closes tax loopholes or raises revenue to a non-binding advisory vote.

Advisory Vote #13

  • VOTO MAINTAINED

    Vote "Maintain" on Tax Advisory Vote No. 13

  • A large majority of legislators voted to close $150 million in unnecessary tax loopholes in order to generate revenue for education funding. This legislation, Senate Bill 6138, passed the legislature 95 to 48 with 4 excused. Per Eyman’s initiative, the state legislature is required to submit any bill it passes that closes tax loopholes or raises revenue to a non-binding advisory vote. Vote to "maintain" this important measure.
    Ultima actualización 2023-04-05
    A large majority of legislators voted to close $150 million in unnecessary tax loopholes in order to generate revenue for education funding. This legislation, Senate Bill 6138, passed the legislature 95 to 48 with 4 excused. Per Eyman’s initiative, the state legislature is required to submit any bill it passes that closes tax loopholes or raises revenue to a non-binding advisory vote. Vote to "maintain" this important measure.
    A large majority of legislators voted to close $150 million in unnecessary tax loopholes in order to generate revenue for education funding. This legislation, Senate Bill 6138, passed the legislature 95 to 48 with 4 excused. Per Eyman’s initiative, the state legislature is required to submit any bill it passes that closes tax loopholes or raises revenue to a non-binding advisory vote. Vote to "maintain" this important measure.

    Advisory Vote No. 13

    A large majority of legislators voted to close $150 million in unnecessary tax loopholes in order to generate revenue for education funding. This legislation, Senate Bill 6138, passed the legislature 95 to 48 with 4 excused. Per Eyman’s initiative, the state legislature is required to submit any bill it passes that closes tax loopholes or raises revenue to a non-binding advisory vote. Vote to "maintain" this important measure.

Medidas sometidas a votación en el Condado de Snohomish

Snohomish County Proposition #1

  • VOTO APPROVED

    Vote YES on Snohomish County Community Transit: Proposition No. 1

    Sitio web
  • Snohomish County is one of the nation’s fastest growing areas, resulting in longer commutes and traffic gridlock impacting our families and quality of life. Proposition 1 would add bus service and reduce transit wait times, extend bus hours, and expand routes to serve more communities throughout Snohomish County. Proposition 1 funds these important improvements through a 0.3 percent increase in the county sales and use tax.

    We need transportation solutions that reduce congestion and move people efficiently. Vote YES on Proposition 1.
    Ultima actualización 2023-04-05
    Snohomish County is one of the nation’s fastest growing areas, resulting in longer commutes and traffic gridlock impacting our families and quality of life. Proposition 1 would add bus service and reduce transit wait times, extend bus hours, and expand routes to serve more communities throughout Snohomish County. Proposition 1 funds these important improvements through a 0.3 percent increase in the county sales and use tax.

    We need transportation solutions that reduce congestion and move people efficiently. Vote YES on Proposition 1.
    Snohomish County is one of the nation’s fastest growing areas, resulting in longer commutes and traffic gridlock impacting our families and quality of life. Proposition 1 would add bus service and reduce transit wait times, extend bus hours, and expand routes to serve more communities throughout Snohomish County. Proposition 1 funds these important improvements through a 0.3 percent increase in the county sales and use tax.

    We need transportation solutions that reduce congestion and move people efficiently. Vote YES on Proposition 1.
    • Apoyadas Por Snohomish County Labor Council, United Way of Snohomish County

Condado de Snohomish

County Executive Snohomish

  • Dave Somers photo
    Democrat

    Dave Somers

    Sitio web Facebook Apoyos
  • Current Snohomish County Council President Dave Somers is running for Snohomish County Executive. Somers is an experienced and capable member of the Snohomish County Council with an exceptional track-record on environmental and smart growth issues. He worked as a fisheries biologist before joining the Council. He's supported measures to create parks and open spaces, protect farmland, increase transit funding, and invest in alternative fuels. Somers also supports focusing new development in urban areas with easy transportation access.

    Although the candidates do not have deep ideological differences, Somers is challenging Lovick because he believes Lovick has been a poor manager of the County’s finances. Somers is campaigning on providing stronger fiscal management, transportation improvements, and supporting manufacturing jobs. But Somers has frustrated many progressives by opposing a proposal that would tie Boeing’s tax breaks to keeping jobs in Washington.

    If you’re looking for a candidate with an impressive track record on smart growth, transportation, and environmental protection in Snohomish County, Somers is a good choice.

    Ultima actualización 2023-04-05

    Dave Somers

    Current Snohomish County Council President Dave Somers is running for Snohomish County Executive. Somers is an experienced and capable member of the Snohomish County Council with an exceptional track-record on environmental and smart growth issues.

    Current Snohomish County Council President Dave Somers is running for Snohomish County Executive. Somers is an experienced and capable member of the Snohomish County Council with an exceptional track-record on environmental and smart growth issues. He worked as a fisheries biologist before joining the Council. He's supported measures to create parks and open spaces, protect farmland, increase transit funding, and invest in alternative fuels. Somers also supports focusing new development in urban areas with easy transportation access.

    Although the candidates do not have deep ideological differences, Somers is challenging Lovick because he believes Lovick has been a poor manager of the County’s finances. Somers is campaigning on providing stronger fiscal management, transportation improvements, and supporting manufacturing jobs. But Somers has frustrated many progressives by opposing a proposal that would tie Boeing’s tax breaks to keeping jobs in Washington.

    If you’re looking for a candidate with an impressive track record on smart growth, transportation, and environmental protection in Snohomish County, Somers is a good choice.

    Dave Somers

    Current Snohomish County Council President Dave Somers is running for Snohomish County Executive. Somers is an experienced and capable member of the Snohomish County Council with an exceptional track-record on environmental and smart growth issues.

  • John Lovick photo
    Democrat

    John Lovick

    Sitio web Facebook Apoyos
  • Incumbent County Executive John Lovick was appointed to the position in 2013 and elected in 2014. He has previously represented Snohomish County’s 44th Legislative District in the state House, and served as a state trooper for 31 years before being elected as Sheriff in 2007. Lovick’s first term has been rocky at times as he has sought to clean up the mess left by disgraced former executive Aaron Reardon.

    Although there are not deep ideological differences between the candidates, they have taken a different approach to some policies. Unlike Somers, Lovick sided with conservative developers by proposing updates to the county’s growth management plan that would worsen sprawl as the county grows. On the other hand, Lovick has been an outspoken supporter of requiring Boeing to keep jobs in Washington state in order to receive tax incentives, earning him organized labor’s support in this election.

    If you’re looking for a candidate with a strong track record on public safety who is willing to challenge Boeing to keep jobs in Washington, Lovick is a good choice.

    Ultima actualización 2023-04-05

    John Lovick

    Incumbent County Executive John Lovick was appointed to the position in 2013 and elected in 2014. He has previously represented Snohomish County’s 44th Legislative District in the state House, and served as a state trooper for 31 years before being elected as Sheriff in 2007.

    Incumbent County Executive John Lovick was appointed to the position in 2013 and elected in 2014. He has previously represented Snohomish County’s 44th Legislative District in the state House, and served as a state trooper for 31 years before being elected as Sheriff in 2007. Lovick’s first term has been rocky at times as he has sought to clean up the mess left by disgraced former executive Aaron Reardon.

    Although there are not deep ideological differences between the candidates, they have taken a different approach to some policies. Unlike Somers, Lovick sided with conservative developers by proposing updates to the county’s growth management plan that would worsen sprawl as the county grows. On the other hand, Lovick has been an outspoken supporter of requiring Boeing to keep jobs in Washington state in order to receive tax incentives, earning him organized labor’s support in this election.

    If you’re looking for a candidate with a strong track record on public safety who is willing to challenge Boeing to keep jobs in Washington, Lovick is a good choice.

    John Lovick

    Incumbent County Executive John Lovick was appointed to the position in 2013 and elected in 2014. He has previously represented Snohomish County’s 44th Legislative District in the state House, and served as a state trooper for 31 years before being elected as Sheriff in 2007.

Snohomish County, District #2

Depending on the county district you live in, you may have the following races on your ballot.

County Council, District #2 Snohomish

  • Brian Sullivan photo
    Democrat

    Brian Sullivan

    Sitio web Facebook Apoyos
  • Brian Sullivan is running for re-election to Snohomish County Council, District 2. A small business owner who now chairs the County Council's Finance and Economic Committee, Sullivan has worked to promote the economy of Snohomish County and supports living wages for all. He has previously served in the state House, where he was recognized as an environmental champion, and has served as Mukilteo's Mayor, and as a Mukilteo City Councilman. Sullivan is a strong supporter of requiring Boeing to maintain a certain number of jobs in Washington in order to receive tax breaks.

    Sullivan's opponent, Greg Tisdale, is a moderate businessman from Everett who supports commercial passenger flights from Paine Field, which Sullivan opposes. Some progressives are supporting Tisdale because of concern for Growth Management Act votes Sullivan has taken. However, Tisdale is also being backed by a number of far-right conservatives in the area. We think Sullivan is the better choice in this race due to his endorsements from our progressive partners and for his strong record supporting working people.
    Ultima actualización 2023-04-05

    Brian Sullivan

    Brian Sullivan is running for re-election to Snohomish County Council, District 2. A small business owner who now chairs the County Council's Finance and Economic Committee, Sullivan has worked to promote the economy of Snohomish County and supports living wages for all.

    Brian Sullivan is running for re-election to Snohomish County Council, District 2. A small business owner who now chairs the County Council's Finance and Economic Committee, Sullivan has worked to promote the economy of Snohomish County and supports living wages for all. He has previously served in the state House, where he was recognized as an environmental champion, and has served as Mukilteo's Mayor, and as a Mukilteo City Councilman. Sullivan is a strong supporter of requiring Boeing to maintain a certain number of jobs in Washington in order to receive tax breaks.

    Sullivan's opponent, Greg Tisdale, is a moderate businessman from Everett who supports commercial passenger flights from Paine Field, which Sullivan opposes. Some progressives are supporting Tisdale because of concern for Growth Management Act votes Sullivan has taken. However, Tisdale is also being backed by a number of far-right conservatives in the area. We think Sullivan is the better choice in this race due to his endorsements from our progressive partners and for his strong record supporting working people.

    Brian Sullivan

    Brian Sullivan is running for re-election to Snohomish County Council, District 2. A small business owner who now chairs the County Council's Finance and Economic Committee, Sullivan has worked to promote the economy of Snohomish County and supports living wages for all.

Snohomish County, District #2 de la Comisión de Revisión de Estatutos

Dependiendo de su lugar de residencia, es posible que en su papeleta figure una de las elecciones que se indican a continuación.

Charter Review Commission, District #2

  • Charlene Rawson photo

    Charlene Rawson

  • Charlene Rawson is a progressive neighborhood advocate who wants to ensure that living wages, great schools, transit options, and sustainable environmental policy is included in the county's road map to the future. Due to her strong progressive values, Rawson is a good choice in this race.

    Rawson, Harrison, and Gregerson face 16 other candidates in this crowded race. Among them is another progressive, Joshua Wixson, who is a $15 Now supporter.
    Ultima actualización 2023-04-05

    Charlene Rawson

    Enviado por sara el

    Charlene Rawson is a progressive neighborhood advocate who wants to ensure that living wages, great schools, transit options, and sustainable environmental policy is included in the county's road map to the future. Due to her strong progressive values, Rawson is a good choice in this race.


    Rawson, Harrison, and Gregerson face 16 other candidates in this crowded race. Among them is another progressive, Joshua Wixson, who is a $15 Now supporter.

    Charlene Rawson is a progressive neighborhood advocate who wants to ensure that living wages, great schools, transit options, and sustainable environmental policy is included in the county's road map to the future. Due to her strong progressive values, Rawson is a good choice in this race.

    Rawson, Harrison, and Gregerson face 16 other candidates in this crowded race. Among them is another progressive, Joshua Wixson, who is a $15 Now supporter.

    Charlene Rawson

    Enviado por sara el

    Charlene Rawson is a progressive neighborhood advocate who wants to ensure that living wages, great schools, transit options, and sustainable environmental policy is included in the county's road map to the future. Due to her strong progressive values, Rawson is a good choice in this race.


    Rawson, Harrison, and Gregerson face 16 other candidates in this crowded race. Among them is another progressive, Joshua Wixson, who is a $15 Now supporter.

  • Jennifer Gregerson photo

    Jennifer Gregerson

    Sitio web Facebook Apoyos
  • Voters are allowed to select up to three candidates in this race. We recommend Jennifer Gregerson, Marian Harrison, and Charlene Rawson.

    Jennifer Gregerson is running for Snohomish Charter Review Commission, District 2. Gregerson is a qualified, proven leader who has served on the Mukilteo City Council since 2004, including as Mayor. She led the fight to bring homegrown paramedic services into Mukilteo fire stations. She is known for working against commercial air service, and led the first efforts to invest in the city's Paine Field defense fund.

    Due to her experience and leadership in the community, Gregerson is a good choice in this race.
    Ultima actualización 2023-04-05

    Jennifer Gregerson

    Enviado por sara el

    Voters are allowed to select up to three candidates in this race. We recommend Jennifer Gregerson, Marian Harrison, and Charlene Rawson.



    Jennifer Gregerson is running for Snohomish Charter Review Commission, District 2. Gregerson is a qualified, proven leader who has served on the Mukilteo City Council since 2004, including as Mayor. She led the fight to bring homegrown paramedic services into Mukilteo fire stations. She is known for working against commercial air service, and led the first efforts to invest in the city's Paine Field defense fund.



    Voters are allowed to select up to three candidates in this race. We recommend Jennifer Gregerson, Marian Harrison, and Charlene Rawson.

    Jennifer Gregerson is running for Snohomish Charter Review Commission, District 2. Gregerson is a qualified, proven leader who has served on the Mukilteo City Council since 2004, including as Mayor. She led the fight to bring homegrown paramedic services into Mukilteo fire stations. She is known for working against commercial air service, and led the first efforts to invest in the city's Paine Field defense fund.

    Due to her experience and leadership in the community, Gregerson is a good choice in this race.

    Jennifer Gregerson

    Enviado por sara el

    Voters are allowed to select up to three candidates in this race. We recommend Jennifer Gregerson, Marian Harrison, and Charlene Rawson.



    Jennifer Gregerson is running for Snohomish Charter Review Commission, District 2. Gregerson is a qualified, proven leader who has served on the Mukilteo City Council since 2004, including as Mayor. She led the fight to bring homegrown paramedic services into Mukilteo fire stations. She is known for working against commercial air service, and led the first efforts to invest in the city's Paine Field defense fund.



    • Apoyadas Por: Snohomish County Labor Council, Mukilteo Firefighters
  • Marian Harrison photo

    Marian Harrison

  • Marian Harrison is a lifelong resident of Snohomish County who has been active in progressive politics for multiple decades, working for everything from equitable pay for school teachers to campaigning for champions like state Sen. John McCoy. She is a hard worker and a dedicated advocate of the residents of this county, including her service as Chair of the Affirmative Action Committee of the Snohomish County Democrats.

    Due to her committed service and knowledge of Snohomish County government, Harrison deserves your vote.
    Ultima actualización 2023-04-05

    Marian Harrison

    Enviado por sara el

    Marian Harrison is a lifelong resident of Snohomish County who has been active in progressive politics for multiple decades, working for everything from equitable pay for school teachers to campaigning for champions like state Sen. John McCoy. She is a hard worker and a dedicated advocate of the residents of this county, including her service as Chair of the Affirmative Action Committee of the Snohomish County Democrats.


    Due to her committed service and knowledge of Snohomish County government, Harrison deserves your vote.

    Marian Harrison is a lifelong resident of Snohomish County who has been active in progressive politics for multiple decades, working for everything from equitable pay for school teachers to campaigning for champions like state Sen. John McCoy. She is a hard worker and a dedicated advocate of the residents of this county, including her service as Chair of the Affirmative Action Committee of the Snohomish County Democrats.

    Due to her committed service and knowledge of Snohomish County government, Harrison deserves your vote.

    Marian Harrison

    Enviado por sara el

    Marian Harrison is a lifelong resident of Snohomish County who has been active in progressive politics for multiple decades, working for everything from equitable pay for school teachers to campaigning for champions like state Sen. John McCoy. She is a hard worker and a dedicated advocate of the residents of this county, including her service as Chair of the Affirmative Action Committee of the Snohomish County Democrats.


    Due to her committed service and knowledge of Snohomish County government, Harrison deserves your vote.