Skip to main content
  • Democrat

    Jena Griswold

  • Incumbent Secretary of State Jena Griswold is an attorney with experience in voting rights and accessibility. Before winning office in 2018, Griswold served as the director of Gov. John Hickenlooper's federal liaison in Washington, D.C. and as an attorney for President Barack Obama's presidential campaign.

    As Secretary of State, Griswold has overseen elections featuring some of the highest rates of voter participation in America, while defending Colorado's gold standard mail ballot election system from repeated baseless attacks from President Donald Trump and election conspiracy theorists. Griswold conducted the initial investigation into a breach of election security by Mesa County Clerk Tina Peters that resulted in numerous felony charges against Peters.

    Griswold's opponent, former Jefferson County Clerk Pam Anderson, severely damaged her once-commendable reputation for standing up to right-wing misinformation by campaigning with Republicans who dispute the results of the 2020 elections. Anderson has refused to condemn election deniers who support her campaign, claiming that would “divide or ostracize people.” Less than two years after Donald Trump's attempt to overturn the results of the 2020 presidential elections, Coloradans cannot responsibly entrust Pam Anderson and the Party of Trump with control over our elections.

    Secretary Griswold is the clear progressive choice in this important statewide race.

    Jena Griswold

    La secretaria de Estado Titular Jena Griswold es una abogada con experiencia en derecho al voto y accesibilidad. Antes de ganar el cargo en 2018, Griswold se desempeñó como director de enlace federal del gobernador John Hickenlooper en Washington, D.C.
    Incumbent Secretary of State Jena Griswold is an attorney with experience in voting rights and accessibility. Before winning office in 2018, Griswold served as the director of Gov. John Hickenlooper's federal liaison in Washington, D.C. and as an attorney for President Barack Obama's presidential campaign.

    As Secretary of State, Griswold has overseen elections featuring some of the highest rates of voter participation in America, while defending Colorado's gold standard mail ballot election system from repeated baseless attacks from President Donald Trump and election conspiracy theorists. Griswold conducted the initial investigation into a breach of election security by Mesa County Clerk Tina Peters that resulted in numerous felony charges against Peters.

    Griswold's opponent, former Jefferson County Clerk Pam Anderson, severely damaged her once-commendable reputation for standing up to right-wing misinformation by campaigning with Republicans who dispute the results of the 2020 elections. Anderson has refused to condemn election deniers who support her campaign, claiming that would “divide or ostracize people.” Less than two years after Donald Trump's attempt to overturn the results of the 2020 presidential elections, Coloradans cannot responsibly entrust Pam Anderson and the Party of Trump with control over our elections.

    Secretary Griswold is the clear progressive choice in this important statewide race.

    Jena Griswold

    La secretaria de Estado Titular Jena Griswold es una abogada con experiencia en derecho al voto y accesibilidad. Antes de ganar el cargo en 2018, Griswold se desempeñó como director de enlace federal del gobernador John Hickenlooper en Washington, D.C.
  • Incumbent Sen. Michael Bennet joined the U.S. Senate in 2009 after Colorado Gov. Bill Ritter appointed him to succeed Sen. Ken Salazar after Salazar was appointed Secretary of the Interior by President Barack Obama. Prior to his appointment, Bennet served as Superintendent of Denver Public Schools, presiding over increased student enrollment and graduation rates.

    Sen. Bennet won his first full term in office in the close 2010 election against Rep. Ken Buck. In 2013, Bennet played a key role as a member of the Gang of Eight in the passage of comprehensive immigration reform out of the U.S. Senate. In twelve years of service in the Senate, Sen. Bennet has been a consistent supporter of voting rights, abortion rights, nondiscrimination and LGBTQ+ rights, reducing gun violence, environmental protection and confronting human-caused climate change, and ending the failed War on Drugs.

    Sen. Bennet's signature policy achievement in office came with the March 2021 passage of the Child Tax Credit expansion as part of the American Rescue Plan. The expanded Child Tax Credit resulted in an historic reduction in child poverty for the one-year period in which the program was fully funded. Sen. Bennet's top priority in 2023 is to make the Child Tax Credit expansion permanent. In 2019, Sen. Bennet joined with Republican Sen. Mitt Romney to call for a universal basic income standard for children.

    Sen. Bennet can negotiate with Republicans across the aisle and influence policy with the Democratic Senate majority and the White House. Bennet was the driving force behind President Joe Biden's establishment of a new national monument at Camp Hale and drilling protections in the ecologically sensitive Thompson Divide.

    Sen. Bennet's opponent, concrete executive Joe O'Dea, tried and failed to hide his far-right agenda from Colorado voters. During the Republican primary, O'Dea claimed to be "personally very pro-life," and proudly admitted after winning the nomination that he was a supporter of Proposition 115, an abortion restriction measure that failed overwhelmingly in 2020. Despite this, O'Dea has falsely claimed to be "pro choice" in deceptive campaign ads. O'Dea was proud to claim the support of members of the Trump administration during the primary, then tried to back away from Trump after winning the nomination.

    The contrast between Michael Bennet's record of service and policy wins in the U.S. Senate and Joe O'Dea's empty promises concealing a right-wing agenda could not be greater. Bennet is the clear progressive choice.

    Michael Bennet

    El senador titular Michael Bennet se unió al Senado de los EE. UU. en 2009 después de que el gobernador de Colorado, Bill Ritter, lo designara para suceder al senador Ken Salazar después de que Salazar fuera nombrado Secretario del Interior por el presidente Barack Obama.
    Incumbent Sen. Michael Bennet joined the U.S. Senate in 2009 after Colorado Gov. Bill Ritter appointed him to succeed Sen. Ken Salazar after Salazar was appointed Secretary of the Interior by President Barack Obama. Prior to his appointment, Bennet served as Superintendent of Denver Public Schools, presiding over increased student enrollment and graduation rates.

    Sen. Bennet won his first full term in office in the close 2010 election against Rep. Ken Buck. In 2013, Bennet played a key role as a member of the Gang of Eight in the passage of comprehensive immigration reform out of the U.S. Senate. In twelve years of service in the Senate, Sen. Bennet has been a consistent supporter of voting rights, abortion rights, nondiscrimination and LGBTQ+ rights, reducing gun violence, environmental protection and confronting human-caused climate change, and ending the failed War on Drugs.

    Sen. Bennet's signature policy achievement in office came with the March 2021 passage of the Child Tax Credit expansion as part of the American Rescue Plan. The expanded Child Tax Credit resulted in an historic reduction in child poverty for the one-year period in which the program was fully funded. Sen. Bennet's top priority in 2023 is to make the Child Tax Credit expansion permanent. In 2019, Sen. Bennet joined with Republican Sen. Mitt Romney to call for a universal basic income standard for children.

    Sen. Bennet can negotiate with Republicans across the aisle and influence policy with the Democratic Senate majority and the White House. Bennet was the driving force behind President Joe Biden's establishment of a new national monument at Camp Hale and drilling protections in the ecologically sensitive Thompson Divide.

    Sen. Bennet's opponent, concrete executive Joe O'Dea, tried and failed to hide his far-right agenda from Colorado voters. During the Republican primary, O'Dea claimed to be "personally very pro-life," and proudly admitted after winning the nomination that he was a supporter of Proposition 115, an abortion restriction measure that failed overwhelmingly in 2020. Despite this, O'Dea has falsely claimed to be "pro choice" in deceptive campaign ads. O'Dea was proud to claim the support of members of the Trump administration during the primary, then tried to back away from Trump after winning the nomination.

    The contrast between Michael Bennet's record of service and policy wins in the U.S. Senate and Joe O'Dea's empty promises concealing a right-wing agenda could not be greater. Bennet is the clear progressive choice.

    Michael Bennet

    El senador titular Michael Bennet se unió al Senado de los EE. UU. en 2009 después de que el gobernador de Colorado, Bill Ritter, lo designara para suceder al senador Ken Salazar después de que Salazar fuera nombrado Secretario del Interior por el presidente Barack Obama.

Congress

Depending on where you live, you may have one of the below congressional districts on your ballot.

  • Incumbent U.S. Rep. Diana DeGette is seeking her 14th term representing Colorado’s 1st Congressional District. DeGette, a lawyer, is Colorado’s most senior national legislator, the dean of its nine-member delegation, and the state’s only female Democrat in Congress.

    A lifelong Denverite, she has dedicated her career to protecting the environment, expanding access to health care, and fighting for reproductive justice. Before being elected to Congress, DeGette served two terms in the Colorado House of Representatives, where she protected access to abortion clinics. She continues this work in Congress as co-chair of the Pro-Choice Caucus.

    DeGette has been recognized for her ability to work across party lines to deliver results. Some of her biggest achievements include playing an important role in the passage of the Affordable Care Act, co-authoring legislation that modernized medical research, and spearheading improvements in protecting our nation’s food supply. As chair of a key oversight panel, DeGette has led the effort to hold the Trump administration accountable for separating undocumented children from their families. DeGette has also been an outspoken advocate for enacting commonsense gun safety measures, safeguarding Colorado’s public lands, and protecting American consumers. 

    DeGette's Republican opponent, Jennifer Qualteri, is an accountant for the State of Colorado. Qualteri has no political or earned media record other than her nomination to run in one of the state's Democratic strongholds. Qualteri's social media posts include references to baseless claims of election fraud in 2020.

    Diana DeGette is one of the state's longest-serving and most effective progressive leaders. If reelected, DeGette will continue being the strong, progressive voice that Denver needs in Washington. 

    We recommend she be retained in office to continue serving the people of Denver.

    Diana DeGette

    La actual representante de los EE. UU., Diana DeGette, busca su decimocuarto mandato en representación del primer distrito del Congreso de Colorado. DeGette, abogada, es la legisladora nacional de mayor rango de Colorado, la decana de su delegación de nueve miembros y la única mujer demócrata del estado en el Congreso.

    Vivió en Denver toda su vida y ha dedicado su carrera a proteger el medio ambiente, ampliar el acceso a la atención médica y luchar por la justicia reproductiva. Antes de ser elegida para el Congreso, DeGette sirvió dos mandatos en la Cámara de Representantes de Colorado, donde protegió el acceso a las clínicas de aborto. Continúa este trabajo en el Congreso como copresidenta de la Camarilla de Pro-Opción.

    DeGette ha sido reconocida por su capacidad de trabajar a través de las líneas partidarias para lograr resultados. Algunos de sus mayores logros incluyen desempeñar un papel importante en la aprobación de la Ley del Cuidado de Salud a Bajo Precio, ser coautora de la legislación que modernizó la investigación médica y encabezar mejoras en la protección del suministro de alimentos de nuestra nación. Como presidente de un panel de supervisión clave, DeGette ha liderado el esfuerzo para responsabilizar a la administración Trump por separar a los niños indocumentados de sus familias. DeGette también ha sido un defensor abierto de la promulgación de medidas de seguridad de armas de fuego de sentido común, salvaguardar las tierras públicas de Colorado y proteger a los consumidores estadounidenses.

    La oponente republicana de DeGette, Jennifer Qualteri, es contadora del estado de Colorado. Qualteri no tiene ningún historial político o mediático aparte de su nominación para postularse en uno de los bastiones demócratas del estado. Las publicaciones de Qualteri en las redes sociales incluyen referencias a afirmaciones infundadas de fraude electoral en 2020.

    Diana DeGette es una de las líderes progresistas más efectivas y con más años de servicio en el estado. Si es reelecto, DeGette seguirá siendo la voz fuerte y progresista que Denver necesita en Washington.

    Recomendamos que se mantenga en el cargo para continuar sirviendo a la gente de Denver.

    Incumbent U.S. Rep. Diana DeGette is seeking her 14th term representing Colorado’s 1st Congressional District. DeGette, a lawyer, is Colorado’s most senior national legislator, the dean of its nine-member delegation, and the state’s only female Democrat in Congress.

    A lifelong Denverite, she has dedicated her career to protecting the environment, expanding access to health care, and fighting for reproductive justice. Before being elected to Congress, DeGette served two terms in the Colorado House of Representatives, where she protected access to abortion clinics. She continues this work in Congress as co-chair of the Pro-Choice Caucus.

    DeGette has been recognized for her ability to work across party lines to deliver results. Some of her biggest achievements include playing an important role in the passage of the Affordable Care Act, co-authoring legislation that modernized medical research, and spearheading improvements in protecting our nation’s food supply. As chair of a key oversight panel, DeGette has led the effort to hold the Trump administration accountable for separating undocumented children from their families. DeGette has also been an outspoken advocate for enacting commonsense gun safety measures, safeguarding Colorado’s public lands, and protecting American consumers. 

    DeGette's Republican opponent, Jennifer Qualteri, is an accountant for the State of Colorado. Qualteri has no political or earned media record other than her nomination to run in one of the state's Democratic strongholds. Qualteri's social media posts include references to baseless claims of election fraud in 2020.

    Diana DeGette is one of the state's longest-serving and most effective progressive leaders. If reelected, DeGette will continue being the strong, progressive voice that Denver needs in Washington. 

    We recommend she be retained in office to continue serving the people of Denver.

    Diana DeGette

    La actual representante de los EE. UU., Diana DeGette, busca su decimocuarto mandato en representación del primer distrito del Congreso de Colorado. DeGette, abogada, es la legisladora nacional de mayor rango de Colorado, la decana de su delegación de nueve miembros y la única mujer demócrata del estado en el Congreso.

    Vivió en Denver toda su vida y ha dedicado su carrera a proteger el medio ambiente, ampliar el acceso a la atención médica y luchar por la justicia reproductiva. Antes de ser elegida para el Congreso, DeGette sirvió dos mandatos en la Cámara de Representantes de Colorado, donde protegió el acceso a las clínicas de aborto. Continúa este trabajo en el Congreso como copresidenta de la Camarilla de Pro-Opción.

    DeGette ha sido reconocida por su capacidad de trabajar a través de las líneas partidarias para lograr resultados. Algunos de sus mayores logros incluyen desempeñar un papel importante en la aprobación de la Ley del Cuidado de Salud a Bajo Precio, ser coautora de la legislación que modernizó la investigación médica y encabezar mejoras en la protección del suministro de alimentos de nuestra nación. Como presidente de un panel de supervisión clave, DeGette ha liderado el esfuerzo para responsabilizar a la administración Trump por separar a los niños indocumentados de sus familias. DeGette también ha sido un defensor abierto de la promulgación de medidas de seguridad de armas de fuego de sentido común, salvaguardar las tierras públicas de Colorado y proteger a los consumidores estadounidenses.

    La oponente republicana de DeGette, Jennifer Qualteri, es contadora del estado de Colorado. Qualteri no tiene ningún historial político o mediático aparte de su nominación para postularse en uno de los bastiones demócratas del estado. Las publicaciones de Qualteri en las redes sociales incluyen referencias a afirmaciones infundadas de fraude electoral en 2020.

    Diana DeGette es una de las líderes progresistas más efectivas y con más años de servicio en el estado. Si es reelecto, DeGette seguirá siendo la voz fuerte y progresista que Denver necesita en Washington.

    Recomendamos que se mantenga en el cargo para continuar sirviendo a la gente de Denver.
  • Incumbent U.S. Rep. Joe Neguse is running for reelection in Colorado’s 2nd Congressional District. Neguse, a lawyer and the son of Eritrean refugees, is the first and so far only Black American to serve Colorado in Congress. Prior to his election to Congress, Neguse served as a University of Colorado Regent representing the 2nd District and a legislative aide under Colorado Speaker of the House Andrew Romanoff.

    As a vice-chair of the Congressional Progressive Caucus, Neguse advocates for bold progressive policies to address the most pressing issues facing our nation, such as Medicare for All and the Green New Deal. His priorities to date in Congress have included lowering prescription drug prices, raising workers’ wages, ensuring greater accountability in government, and protecting public lands, which make up over 50% of his district.

    In Rep. Neguse's first two-year term in office, he introduced more legislation than any freshman lawmaker in the country and has had more legislation signed into law than any member of Colorado’s congressional delegation. As a member of the House Judiciary Committee, Neguse played a key role in holding former President Donald Trump accountable in Trump's second impeachment trial. Before Congress, Neguse fought to expand opportunities for families across Colorado in a variety of roles: as a co-founder of New Era Colorado, the state’s largest youth voter registration and mobilization nonprofit; as a six-term member of CU’s Board of Regents; and as leader of the state’s consumer protection agency for two years.

    Neguse is a self-described eternal optimist who will continue to provide Colorado’s 2nd Congressional District with enthusiastic, diligent, and bold representation if reelected. 

    Rep. Neguse's Republican opponent, Marshall Dawson, is the vice-chairman of the Boulder County Republicans with no elected experience, and is considered a placeholder candidate in a race where Republicans have no realistic chance at winning.

    Progressive voters should vote for Joe Neguse.

    Joe Neguse

    El representante estadounidense titular Joe Neguse se postula para la reelección en el segundo distrito del Congreso de Colorado. Neguse, abogado e hijo de refugiados eritreos, es el primer y hasta ahora único afroamericano en servir a Colorado en el Congreso. Antes de su elección al Congreso, Neguse se desempeñó como regente de la Universidad de Colorado en representación del segundo distrito y asistente legislativo bajo el presidente de la Cámara de Representantes de Colorado, Andrew Romanoff.

    Como vicepresidente del Caucus Progresista del Congreso, Neguse aboga por políticas progresistas audaces para abordar los problemas más apremiantes que enfrenta nuestra nación, como Medicare para todos y el Green New Deal. Sus prioridades hasta la fecha en el Congreso han incluido bajar los precios de los medicamentos recetados, aumentar los salarios de los trabajadores, garantizar una mayor responsabilidad en el gobierno y proteger las tierras públicas, que representan más del 50 % de su distrito.

    En el primer mandato de dos años del representante Neguse, presentó más legislación que cualquier legislador novato en el país y ha promulgado más legislación que cualquier miembro de la delegación del Congreso de Colorado. Como miembro del Comité Judicial de la Cámara de Representantes, Neguse desempeñó un papel clave en responsabilizar al expresidente Donald Trump en el segundo juicio de destitución de Trump. Antes del Congreso, Neguse luchó para ampliar las oportunidades para las familias en todo Colorado en una variedad de roles: como cofundador de New Era Colorado, la organización sin fines de lucro de registro y movilización de votantes jóvenes más grande del estado; como miembro por seis períodos de la Junta de Regentes de CU; y como líder de la agencia de protección al consumidor del estado durante dos años.

    Neguse se describe a sí mismo como un eterno optimista que continuará brindando al 2.º Distrito Congresional de Colorado una representación entusiasta, diligente y audaz si es reelegido.

    El oponente republicano del representante Neguse, Marshall Dawson, es el vicepresidente de los republicanos del condado de Boulder sin experiencia en elecciones, y es considerado un candidato de marcador de posición en una contienda en la que los republicanos no tienen posibilidades reales de ganar.

    Los votantes progresistas deberían votar por Joe Neguse.

    Incumbent U.S. Rep. Joe Neguse is running for reelection in Colorado’s 2nd Congressional District. Neguse, a lawyer and the son of Eritrean refugees, is the first and so far only Black American to serve Colorado in Congress. Prior to his election to Congress, Neguse served as a University of Colorado Regent representing the 2nd District and a legislative aide under Colorado Speaker of the House Andrew Romanoff.

    As a vice-chair of the Congressional Progressive Caucus, Neguse advocates for bold progressive policies to address the most pressing issues facing our nation, such as Medicare for All and the Green New Deal. His priorities to date in Congress have included lowering prescription drug prices, raising workers’ wages, ensuring greater accountability in government, and protecting public lands, which make up over 50% of his district.

    In Rep. Neguse's first two-year term in office, he introduced more legislation than any freshman lawmaker in the country and has had more legislation signed into law than any member of Colorado’s congressional delegation. As a member of the House Judiciary Committee, Neguse played a key role in holding former President Donald Trump accountable in Trump's second impeachment trial. Before Congress, Neguse fought to expand opportunities for families across Colorado in a variety of roles: as a co-founder of New Era Colorado, the state’s largest youth voter registration and mobilization nonprofit; as a six-term member of CU’s Board of Regents; and as leader of the state’s consumer protection agency for two years.

    Neguse is a self-described eternal optimist who will continue to provide Colorado’s 2nd Congressional District with enthusiastic, diligent, and bold representation if reelected. 

    Rep. Neguse's Republican opponent, Marshall Dawson, is the vice-chairman of the Boulder County Republicans with no elected experience, and is considered a placeholder candidate in a race where Republicans have no realistic chance at winning.

    Progressive voters should vote for Joe Neguse.

    Joe Neguse

    El representante estadounidense titular Joe Neguse se postula para la reelección en el segundo distrito del Congreso de Colorado. Neguse, abogado e hijo de refugiados eritreos, es el primer y hasta ahora único afroamericano en servir a Colorado en el Congreso. Antes de su elección al Congreso, Neguse se desempeñó como regente de la Universidad de Colorado en representación del segundo distrito y asistente legislativo bajo el presidente de la Cámara de Representantes de Colorado, Andrew Romanoff.

    Como vicepresidente del Caucus Progresista del Congreso, Neguse aboga por políticas progresistas audaces para abordar los problemas más apremiantes que enfrenta nuestra nación, como Medicare para todos y el Green New Deal. Sus prioridades hasta la fecha en el Congreso han incluido bajar los precios de los medicamentos recetados, aumentar los salarios de los trabajadores, garantizar una mayor responsabilidad en el gobierno y proteger las tierras públicas, que representan más del 50 % de su distrito.

    En el primer mandato de dos años del representante Neguse, presentó más legislación que cualquier legislador novato en el país y ha promulgado más legislación que cualquier miembro de la delegación del Congreso de Colorado. Como miembro del Comité Judicial de la Cámara de Representantes, Neguse desempeñó un papel clave en responsabilizar al expresidente Donald Trump en el segundo juicio de destitución de Trump. Antes del Congreso, Neguse luchó para ampliar las oportunidades para las familias en todo Colorado en una variedad de roles: como cofundador de New Era Colorado, la organización sin fines de lucro de registro y movilización de votantes jóvenes más grande del estado; como miembro por seis períodos de la Junta de Regentes de CU; y como líder de la agencia de protección al consumidor del estado durante dos años.

    Neguse se describe a sí mismo como un eterno optimista que continuará brindando al 2.º Distrito Congresional de Colorado una representación entusiasta, diligente y audaz si es reelegido.

    El oponente republicano del representante Neguse, Marshall Dawson, es el vicepresidente de los republicanos del condado de Boulder sin experiencia en elecciones, y es considerado un candidato de marcador de posición en una contienda en la que los republicanos no tienen posibilidades reales de ganar.

    Los votantes progresistas deberían votar por Joe Neguse.
  • Adam Frisch is running for Congress in Colorado's 3rd Congressional District, a seat currently held by one of the most controversial members of Congress, freshman Rep. Lauren Boebert. Before running for Congress, Frisch served the residents of Aspen and Pitkin County as an Aspen city councillor and the chairman of the Pitkin County financial review committee. Frisch is a graduate of the University of Colorado at Boulder with a degree in economics.

    Frisch is running as a moderate Democrat with a large coalition of bipartisan support holding the common goal of removing Rep. Boebert from office. Frisch has been endorsed by Rep. Boebert's Republican opponent in this year's primary elections, state Sen. Don Coram. If elected, Frisch has promised to lead with the priorities of the Third District first and partisan considerations second, and has vowed to represent stakeholders on all sides of the economic and environmental issues affecting Western and Southern Colorado. 

    Rep. Lauren Boebert is one of the most polarizing and least effective members of Congress ever elected by Colorado voters. Rep. Boebert's first term in office was totally devoid of accomplishments for the Third District, with Boebert repeatedly claiming credit for funding she voted against. Rep. Boebert spends all of her time in office engaging in social media battles to please her fans in other states while ignoring the needs of her constituents. Rep. Boebert has aligned herself with the most controversial and discredited far-right members of Congress like Reps. Matt Gaetz and Marjorie Taylor Greene. Rep. Boebert has also been repeatedly cited by campaign finance regulators for use of campaign funds for personal interests.

    The Third Congressional District is drawn with a significant but not insurmountable Republican advantage. Adam Frisch is without question the better candidate to represent the Third Congressional District.

    Adam Frisch

    Adam Frisch se postula para el Congreso en el 3er Distrito Congresional de Colorado, un escaño que actualmente ocupa uno de los miembros más controvertidos del Congreso, la representante Lauren Boebert. Antes de postularse para el Congreso, Frisch sirvió a los residentes de Aspen y del condado de Pitkin como concejal de la ciudad de Aspen y presidente del comité de revisión financiera del condado de Pitkin. Frisch se graduó de la Universidad de Colorado en Boulder con una licenciatura en economía.

    Frisch se postula como un demócrata moderado con una gran coalición de apoyo bipartidista que tiene el objetivo común de destituir al representante Boebert de su cargo. Frisch ha sido respaldado por el oponente republicano del representante Boebert en las elecciones primarias de este año, el senador estatal Don Coram. Si es elegido, Frisch prometió liderar con las prioridades del Tercer Distrito en primer lugar y las consideraciones partidistas en segundo lugar, y prometió representar a las partes interesadas en todos los aspectos de los problemas económicos y ambientales que afectan el oeste y el sur de Colorado.

    La representante Lauren Boebert es uno de los miembros del Congreso más polarizadores y menos efectivos jamás elegidos por los votantes de Colorado. El primer mandato de la representante Boebert estuvo totalmente desprovisto de logros para el Tercer Distrito, y Boebert reclamó repetidamente el crédito por la financiación contra la que votó. La representante Boebert pasa todo su tiempo en el cargo participando en batallas en las redes sociales para complacer a sus fanáticos en otros estados mientras ignora las necesidades de sus electores. La representante Boebert se ha alineado con los miembros de extrema derecha más controvertidos y desacreditados del Congreso, como los representantes Matt Gaetz y Marjorie Taylor Greene. El representante Boebert también ha sido citado repetidamente por los reguladores de finanzas de campaña por el uso de fondos de campaña para intereses personales.

    El Tercer Distrito del Congreso se dibuja con una ventaja republicana significativa pero no insuperable. Adam Frisch es sin duda el mejor candidato para representar al Tercer Distrito del Congreso.

    Adam Frisch is running for Congress in Colorado's 3rd Congressional District, a seat currently held by one of the most controversial members of Congress, freshman Rep. Lauren Boebert. Before running for Congress, Frisch served the residents of Aspen and Pitkin County as an Aspen city councillor and the chairman of the Pitkin County financial review committee. Frisch is a graduate of the University of Colorado at Boulder with a degree in economics.

    Frisch is running as a moderate Democrat with a large coalition of bipartisan support holding the common goal of removing Rep. Boebert from office. Frisch has been endorsed by Rep. Boebert's Republican opponent in this year's primary elections, state Sen. Don Coram. If elected, Frisch has promised to lead with the priorities of the Third District first and partisan considerations second, and has vowed to represent stakeholders on all sides of the economic and environmental issues affecting Western and Southern Colorado. 

    Rep. Lauren Boebert is one of the most polarizing and least effective members of Congress ever elected by Colorado voters. Rep. Boebert's first term in office was totally devoid of accomplishments for the Third District, with Boebert repeatedly claiming credit for funding she voted against. Rep. Boebert spends all of her time in office engaging in social media battles to please her fans in other states while ignoring the needs of her constituents. Rep. Boebert has aligned herself with the most controversial and discredited far-right members of Congress like Reps. Matt Gaetz and Marjorie Taylor Greene. Rep. Boebert has also been repeatedly cited by campaign finance regulators for use of campaign funds for personal interests.

    The Third Congressional District is drawn with a significant but not insurmountable Republican advantage. Adam Frisch is without question the better candidate to represent the Third Congressional District.

    Adam Frisch

    Adam Frisch se postula para el Congreso en el 3er Distrito Congresional de Colorado, un escaño que actualmente ocupa uno de los miembros más controvertidos del Congreso, la representante Lauren Boebert. Antes de postularse para el Congreso, Frisch sirvió a los residentes de Aspen y del condado de Pitkin como concejal de la ciudad de Aspen y presidente del comité de revisión financiera del condado de Pitkin. Frisch se graduó de la Universidad de Colorado en Boulder con una licenciatura en economía.

    Frisch se postula como un demócrata moderado con una gran coalición de apoyo bipartidista que tiene el objetivo común de destituir al representante Boebert de su cargo. Frisch ha sido respaldado por el oponente republicano del representante Boebert en las elecciones primarias de este año, el senador estatal Don Coram. Si es elegido, Frisch prometió liderar con las prioridades del Tercer Distrito en primer lugar y las consideraciones partidistas en segundo lugar, y prometió representar a las partes interesadas en todos los aspectos de los problemas económicos y ambientales que afectan el oeste y el sur de Colorado.

    La representante Lauren Boebert es uno de los miembros del Congreso más polarizadores y menos efectivos jamás elegidos por los votantes de Colorado. El primer mandato de la representante Boebert estuvo totalmente desprovisto de logros para el Tercer Distrito, y Boebert reclamó repetidamente el crédito por la financiación contra la que votó. La representante Boebert pasa todo su tiempo en el cargo participando en batallas en las redes sociales para complacer a sus fanáticos en otros estados mientras ignora las necesidades de sus electores. La representante Boebert se ha alineado con los miembros de extrema derecha más controvertidos y desacreditados del Congreso, como los representantes Matt Gaetz y Marjorie Taylor Greene. El representante Boebert también ha sido citado repetidamente por los reguladores de finanzas de campaña por el uso de fondos de campaña para intereses personales.

    El Tercer Distrito del Congreso se dibuja con una ventaja republicana significativa pero no insuperable. Adam Frisch es sin duda el mejor candidato para representar al Tercer Distrito del Congreso.
  • Endorsed By: Colorado AFL-CIO
  • Ike McCorkle is challenging the Republican incumbent for Colorado’s 4th Congressional District. The single father of three kids believes the people in the district deserve a representative who is dedicated to them, not the elite. In order to get Big Money out of politics, he supports a publicly funded, transparent system of campaign financing and wants to see the Supreme Court’s Citizens United ruling overturned to limit the influence of special interest groups that are buying much of our governmental leadership.

    McCorkle is also an unabashed environmentalist who intends to fight for a Green New Deal not just to address the existential threat of climate change and rapidly transition energy production but to reinvest in rural America and create thousands of good-paying jobs in his district. Other policies he supports are ones that will expand equity and opportunity for everyone, including Medicare for All, tuition-free public college, reducing college debt by imposing a tax on Wall Street speculators, and a universal basic income system.

    A retired Marine Corps officer and special operator who served for 18 years, six deployments, and four combat tours, McCorkle seeks to bring dignity and integrity to Congress and restore trust and confidence in government. He is a clear progressive choice who, if elected, plans to bring people with diverse backgrounds and beliefs together to build an American society where we lift each other up so that we all benefit together.

    The incumbent he faces is U.S. Sen. Ken Buck, a former prosecutor and district attorney in Weld County who has been in Congress since 2014. His legal career has been marred by numerous ethical scandals, including compromising a case against Republican donors and declining to prosecute a sexual assault, instead blaming the victim. Since he has been in Congress, Buck has toed the party’s extreme right-wing line. He is anti-choice, opposes reasonable gun safety legislation, and has said that being gay is a choice. Buck also voted in favor of the 2017 tax reform bill, which heavily favored the wealthy and corporations while increasing tax burdens on the middle class. 

    With all this in mind, Buck must not remain in office. Progressives should cast their vote for McCorkle.

    Ike McCorkle

    Ike McCorkle está desafiando al titular republicano por el 4º distrito del Congreso de Colorado. El padre soltero de tres hijos cree que la gente del distrito merece un representante que se dedique a ellos, no a la élite. Para sacar el Dinero Grande de la política, apoya un sistema transparente y financiado con fondos públicos de financiamiento de campañas y quiere que se revoque el fallo de Ciudadanos Unidos de la Corte Suprema para limitar la influencia de grupos de intereses especiales que están comprando gran parte de nuestro liderazgo gubernamental.

    McCorkle también es un ambientalista dedicado que tiene la intención de luchar por un Nuevo Acuerdo Verde no solo para abordar la amenaza existencial del cambio climático y la transición rápida de la producción de energía, sino para reinvertir en las zonas rurales de Estados Unidos y crear miles de empleos bien remunerados en su distrito. Otras políticas que apoya son las que ampliarán la equidad y las oportunidades para todos, incluido Medicare para todos, la universidad pública gratuita, la reducción de la deuda universitaria mediante la imposición de un impuesto a los especuladores de Wall Street y un sistema universal de ingresos básicos.

    Oficial retirado del Cuerpo de Marines y operador especial que sirvió durante 18 años, seis despliegues y cuatro giras de combate, McCorkle busca traer dignidad e integridad al Congreso y restaurar la confianza en el gobierno. Es una clara elección progresista que, si es elegido, planea unir a personas con diversos orígenes y creencias para construir una sociedad estadounidense en la que nos apoyemos unos a otros para que todos nos beneficiemos juntos.

    El titular al que se enfrenta es el senador estadounidense Ken Buck, exfiscal y fiscal de distrito en el condado de Weld que ha estado en el Congreso desde 2014. Su carrera legal se ha visto empañada por numerosos escándalos éticos, incluido comprometer un caso contra donantes republicanos y negarse a procesar. Una agresión sexual, en lugar de culpar a la víctima. Desde que estuvo en el Congreso, Buck ha seguido la línea de extrema derecha del partido. Está en contra de la elección, se opone a una legislación razonable sobre la seguridad de las armas y ha dicho que ser gay es una elección. Buck también votó a favor del proyecto de ley de reforma fiscal de 2017, que favoreció en gran medida a los ricos y las corporaciones al tiempo que aumentaba la carga fiscal de la clase media.

    Con todo esto en mente, Buck no debe permanecer en el cargo. Los progresistas deberían emitir su voto por McCorkle.

    Ike McCorkle is challenging the Republican incumbent for Colorado’s 4th Congressional District. The single father of three kids believes the people in the district deserve a representative who is dedicated to them, not the elite. In order to get Big Money out of politics, he supports a publicly funded, transparent system of campaign financing and wants to see the Supreme Court’s Citizens United ruling overturned to limit the influence of special interest groups that are buying much of our governmental leadership.

    McCorkle is also an unabashed environmentalist who intends to fight for a Green New Deal not just to address the existential threat of climate change and rapidly transition energy production but to reinvest in rural America and create thousands of good-paying jobs in his district. Other policies he supports are ones that will expand equity and opportunity for everyone, including Medicare for All, tuition-free public college, reducing college debt by imposing a tax on Wall Street speculators, and a universal basic income system.

    A retired Marine Corps officer and special operator who served for 18 years, six deployments, and four combat tours, McCorkle seeks to bring dignity and integrity to Congress and restore trust and confidence in government. He is a clear progressive choice who, if elected, plans to bring people with diverse backgrounds and beliefs together to build an American society where we lift each other up so that we all benefit together.

    The incumbent he faces is U.S. Sen. Ken Buck, a former prosecutor and district attorney in Weld County who has been in Congress since 2014. His legal career has been marred by numerous ethical scandals, including compromising a case against Republican donors and declining to prosecute a sexual assault, instead blaming the victim. Since he has been in Congress, Buck has toed the party’s extreme right-wing line. He is anti-choice, opposes reasonable gun safety legislation, and has said that being gay is a choice. Buck also voted in favor of the 2017 tax reform bill, which heavily favored the wealthy and corporations while increasing tax burdens on the middle class. 

    With all this in mind, Buck must not remain in office. Progressives should cast their vote for McCorkle.

    Ike McCorkle

    Ike McCorkle está desafiando al titular republicano por el 4º distrito del Congreso de Colorado. El padre soltero de tres hijos cree que la gente del distrito merece un representante que se dedique a ellos, no a la élite. Para sacar el Dinero Grande de la política, apoya un sistema transparente y financiado con fondos públicos de financiamiento de campañas y quiere que se revoque el fallo de Ciudadanos Unidos de la Corte Suprema para limitar la influencia de grupos de intereses especiales que están comprando gran parte de nuestro liderazgo gubernamental.

    McCorkle también es un ambientalista dedicado que tiene la intención de luchar por un Nuevo Acuerdo Verde no solo para abordar la amenaza existencial del cambio climático y la transición rápida de la producción de energía, sino para reinvertir en las zonas rurales de Estados Unidos y crear miles de empleos bien remunerados en su distrito. Otras políticas que apoya son las que ampliarán la equidad y las oportunidades para todos, incluido Medicare para todos, la universidad pública gratuita, la reducción de la deuda universitaria mediante la imposición de un impuesto a los especuladores de Wall Street y un sistema universal de ingresos básicos.

    Oficial retirado del Cuerpo de Marines y operador especial que sirvió durante 18 años, seis despliegues y cuatro giras de combate, McCorkle busca traer dignidad e integridad al Congreso y restaurar la confianza en el gobierno. Es una clara elección progresista que, si es elegido, planea unir a personas con diversos orígenes y creencias para construir una sociedad estadounidense en la que nos apoyemos unos a otros para que todos nos beneficiemos juntos.

    El titular al que se enfrenta es el senador estadounidense Ken Buck, exfiscal y fiscal de distrito en el condado de Weld que ha estado en el Congreso desde 2014. Su carrera legal se ha visto empañada por numerosos escándalos éticos, incluido comprometer un caso contra donantes republicanos y negarse a procesar. Una agresión sexual, en lugar de culpar a la víctima. Desde que estuvo en el Congreso, Buck ha seguido la línea de extrema derecha del partido. Está en contra de la elección, se opone a una legislación razonable sobre la seguridad de las armas y ha dicho que ser gay es una elección. Buck también votó a favor del proyecto de ley de reforma fiscal de 2017, que favoreció en gran medida a los ricos y las corporaciones al tiempo que aumentaba la carga fiscal de la clase media.

    Con todo esto en mente, Buck no debe permanecer en el cargo. Los progresistas deberían emitir su voto por McCorkle.
  • David Torres is the progressive candidate running in Colorado's 5th Congressional District against the far-right conservative incumbent Rep. Doug Lamborn. Torres grew up in Colorado Springs and served in the Air Force Reserves at Petersen Air Force Base. A political newcomer, Torres is focused on helping veterans, reducing gun violence, and making education and health care accessible to all.

    Torres' opponent, incumbent Rep. Doug Lamborn, is a reliable vote for the far-right agenda who has recently became ensnared in ethics investigations over his misuse of staff for personal errands and even allowing his son to live rent-free in a U.S. Capitol storage lot. Despite Lamborn's slavish devotion to Donald Trump, Trump chose to move the U.S. Space Command away from Colorado Springs to reward more reliable supporters in Alabama. Rep. Lamborn was also one of the members of Congress who voted against certification of President Joe Biden's victory on January 6th, 2021.

    Rep. Lamborn is a prime example of safe-seat corruption and contempt for the dignity of their office. David Torres would be a welcome and long-overdue change in the 5th Congressional District's leadership.

    David Torres

    David Torres es el candidato progresista que se postula en el quinto distrito del Congreso de Colorado contra el actual representante conservador de extrema derecha Doug Lamborn. Torres creció en Colorado Springs y sirvió en las Reservas de la Fuerza Aérea en la Base de la Fuerza Aérea Petersen. Un recién llegado a la política, Torres se enfoca en ayudar a los veteranos, reducir la violencia armada y hacer que la educación y la atención médica sean accesibles para todos.

    El oponente de Torres, el representante titular Doug Lamborn, es un voto confiable para la agenda de la extrema derecha que recientemente quedó atrapado en investigaciones de ética por el mal uso del personal para diligencias personales e incluso por permitir que su hijo viva sin pagar alquiler en un lote de almacenamiento del Capitolio de los EE. UU.. A pesar de la devoción servil de Lamborn por Donald Trump, Trump decidió trasladar el Comando Espacial de EE. UU. lejos de Colorado Springs para recompensar a los partidarios más confiables en Alabama. El representante Lamborn también fue uno de los miembros del Congreso que votó en contra de la certificación de la victoria del presidente Joe Biden el 6 de enero de 2021.

    El representante Lamborn es un excelente ejemplo de corrupción segura y desprecio por la dignidad de su cargo. David Torres sería un cambio bienvenido y esperado desde hace mucho tiempo en el liderazgo del 5º Distrito Congresional.

    David Torres is the progressive candidate running in Colorado's 5th Congressional District against the far-right conservative incumbent Rep. Doug Lamborn. Torres grew up in Colorado Springs and served in the Air Force Reserves at Petersen Air Force Base. A political newcomer, Torres is focused on helping veterans, reducing gun violence, and making education and health care accessible to all.

    Torres' opponent, incumbent Rep. Doug Lamborn, is a reliable vote for the far-right agenda who has recently became ensnared in ethics investigations over his misuse of staff for personal errands and even allowing his son to live rent-free in a U.S. Capitol storage lot. Despite Lamborn's slavish devotion to Donald Trump, Trump chose to move the U.S. Space Command away from Colorado Springs to reward more reliable supporters in Alabama. Rep. Lamborn was also one of the members of Congress who voted against certification of President Joe Biden's victory on January 6th, 2021.

    Rep. Lamborn is a prime example of safe-seat corruption and contempt for the dignity of their office. David Torres would be a welcome and long-overdue change in the 5th Congressional District's leadership.

    David Torres

    David Torres es el candidato progresista que se postula en el quinto distrito del Congreso de Colorado contra el actual representante conservador de extrema derecha Doug Lamborn. Torres creció en Colorado Springs y sirvió en las Reservas de la Fuerza Aérea en la Base de la Fuerza Aérea Petersen. Un recién llegado a la política, Torres se enfoca en ayudar a los veteranos, reducir la violencia armada y hacer que la educación y la atención médica sean accesibles para todos.

    El oponente de Torres, el representante titular Doug Lamborn, es un voto confiable para la agenda de la extrema derecha que recientemente quedó atrapado en investigaciones de ética por el mal uso del personal para diligencias personales e incluso por permitir que su hijo viva sin pagar alquiler en un lote de almacenamiento del Capitolio de los EE. UU.. A pesar de la devoción servil de Lamborn por Donald Trump, Trump decidió trasladar el Comando Espacial de EE. UU. lejos de Colorado Springs para recompensar a los partidarios más confiables en Alabama. El representante Lamborn también fue uno de los miembros del Congreso que votó en contra de la certificación de la victoria del presidente Joe Biden el 6 de enero de 2021.

    El representante Lamborn es un excelente ejemplo de corrupción segura y desprecio por la dignidad de su cargo. David Torres sería un cambio bienvenido y esperado desde hace mucho tiempo en el liderazgo del 5º Distrito Congresional.
  • Incumbent U.S. Rep. Jason Crow, a lawyer and former Army Ranger who completed three tours in Iraq and Afghanistan, is running for reelection in Colorado's 6th Congressional District. In 2018, he defeated longtime Republican incumbent Mike Coffman to become the first Democrat ever to represent this district.

    Before serving in Congress, Crow spent years helping veterans like himself who struggled to receive benefits, focusing his work on veteran homelessness and substance abuse issues. Then, during his first term, Crow stepped into the national spotlight as one of the seven impeachment managers who argued for Donald Trump’s removal from office during the Senate trial. Crow made the case that Trump put both Ukraine’s safety and the U.S.’s national security at risk by withholding military aid in exchange for political favors.

    Crow’s district is the most diverse in Colorado, with 1 in 5 residents being born outside the United States; Crow has said this is what makes his community such a special place to live. He supports protecting DREAMers and passing comprehensive immigration reform and has called for Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) to end its contracts with private prison companies.

    Crow has worked on instituting campaign finance reform. The first bill he sponsored, the End Dark Money Act, would prevent mega-donors from being able to hide their political contributions. His other priorities include preventing gun violence, combatting the effects of climate change, ensuring small businesses are able to thrive, and fighting for a bold investment in America’s infrastructure.

    Rep. Crow's opponent Steven Monahan is a political newcomer and officer in the U.S. Naval Reserve. In Monahan's candidate questionnaire from the Denver Post, Monahan repeated discredited talking points about the Inflation Reduction Act and expressed support for the overturning of Roe v. Wade.

    Rep. Crow has served the residents of the 6th Congressional District with distinction and is the clear progressive choice in this race.

    Jason Crow

    El actual representante de EE. UU. Jason Crow, abogado y ex guardabosques del ejército que realizó tres giras en Irak y Afganistán, se postula para la reelección en el sexto distrito del Congreso de Colorado. En 2018, derrotó al titular republicano Mike Coffman para convertirse en el primer demócrata en representar este distrito.

    Antes de servir en el Congreso, Crow pasó años ayudando a veteranos como él que luchaban por recibir beneficios, enfocando su trabajo en problemas de abuso de sustancias y personas sin hogar de veteranos. Luego, durante su primer mandato, Crow pasó a ser el centro de atención nacional como uno de los siete encargados del juicio político que abogaron por la destitución de Donald Trump durante el juicio en el Senado. Crow argumentó que Trump puso en riesgo tanto la seguridad de Ucrania como la seguridad nacional de los EE. UU. al retener la ayuda militar a cambio de favores políticos.

    El distrito de Crow es el más diverso de Colorado, con 1 de cada 5 residentes nacidos fuera de los Estados Unidos; Crow ha dicho que esto es lo que hace de su comunidad un lugar tan especial para vivir. Apoya la protección de los DREAMers y la aprobación de una reforma migratoria integral y ha pedido que el Servicio de Inmigración y Control de Aduanas (ICE, por sus siglas en inglés) termine sus contratos con las empresas de prisiones privadas.

    Crow ha trabajado en la institución de la reforma del financiamiento de campañas. El primer proyecto de ley que patrocinó, End Dark Money Act, evitaría que los megadonantes pudieran ocultar sus contribuciones políticas. Sus otras prioridades incluyen prevenir la violencia armada, combatir los efectos del cambio climático, garantizar que las pequeñas empresas puedan prosperar y luchar por una inversión audaz en la infraestructura de Estados Unidos.

    El oponente del representante Crow, Steven Monahan, es un recién llegado a la política y oficial de la Reserva Naval de EE. UU. En el cuestionario de candidato de Monahan del Denver Post, Monahan repitió puntos de conversación desacreditados sobre la Ley de Reducción de la Inflación y expresó su apoyo a la anulación de Roe v. Wade.

    El representante Crow ha servido a los residentes del 6º Distrito Congresional con distinción y es la clara opción progresista en esta contienda.

    Incumbent U.S. Rep. Jason Crow, a lawyer and former Army Ranger who completed three tours in Iraq and Afghanistan, is running for reelection in Colorado's 6th Congressional District. In 2018, he defeated longtime Republican incumbent Mike Coffman to become the first Democrat ever to represent this district.

    Before serving in Congress, Crow spent years helping veterans like himself who struggled to receive benefits, focusing his work on veteran homelessness and substance abuse issues. Then, during his first term, Crow stepped into the national spotlight as one of the seven impeachment managers who argued for Donald Trump’s removal from office during the Senate trial. Crow made the case that Trump put both Ukraine’s safety and the U.S.’s national security at risk by withholding military aid in exchange for political favors.

    Crow’s district is the most diverse in Colorado, with 1 in 5 residents being born outside the United States; Crow has said this is what makes his community such a special place to live. He supports protecting DREAMers and passing comprehensive immigration reform and has called for Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) to end its contracts with private prison companies.

    Crow has worked on instituting campaign finance reform. The first bill he sponsored, the End Dark Money Act, would prevent mega-donors from being able to hide their political contributions. His other priorities include preventing gun violence, combatting the effects of climate change, ensuring small businesses are able to thrive, and fighting for a bold investment in America’s infrastructure.

    Rep. Crow's opponent Steven Monahan is a political newcomer and officer in the U.S. Naval Reserve. In Monahan's candidate questionnaire from the Denver Post, Monahan repeated discredited talking points about the Inflation Reduction Act and expressed support for the overturning of Roe v. Wade.

    Rep. Crow has served the residents of the 6th Congressional District with distinction and is the clear progressive choice in this race.

    Jason Crow

    El actual representante de EE. UU. Jason Crow, abogado y ex guardabosques del ejército que realizó tres giras en Irak y Afganistán, se postula para la reelección en el sexto distrito del Congreso de Colorado. En 2018, derrotó al titular republicano Mike Coffman para convertirse en el primer demócrata en representar este distrito.

    Antes de servir en el Congreso, Crow pasó años ayudando a veteranos como él que luchaban por recibir beneficios, enfocando su trabajo en problemas de abuso de sustancias y personas sin hogar de veteranos. Luego, durante su primer mandato, Crow pasó a ser el centro de atención nacional como uno de los siete encargados del juicio político que abogaron por la destitución de Donald Trump durante el juicio en el Senado. Crow argumentó que Trump puso en riesgo tanto la seguridad de Ucrania como la seguridad nacional de los EE. UU. al retener la ayuda militar a cambio de favores políticos.

    El distrito de Crow es el más diverso de Colorado, con 1 de cada 5 residentes nacidos fuera de los Estados Unidos; Crow ha dicho que esto es lo que hace de su comunidad un lugar tan especial para vivir. Apoya la protección de los DREAMers y la aprobación de una reforma migratoria integral y ha pedido que el Servicio de Inmigración y Control de Aduanas (ICE, por sus siglas en inglés) termine sus contratos con las empresas de prisiones privadas.

    Crow ha trabajado en la institución de la reforma del financiamiento de campañas. El primer proyecto de ley que patrocinó, End Dark Money Act, evitaría que los megadonantes pudieran ocultar sus contribuciones políticas. Sus otras prioridades incluyen prevenir la violencia armada, combatir los efectos del cambio climático, garantizar que las pequeñas empresas puedan prosperar y luchar por una inversión audaz en la infraestructura de Estados Unidos.

    El oponente del representante Crow, Steven Monahan, es un recién llegado a la política y oficial de la Reserva Naval de EE. UU. En el cuestionario de candidato de Monahan del Denver Post, Monahan repitió puntos de conversación desacreditados sobre la Ley de Reducción de la Inflación y expresó su apoyo a la anulación de Roe v. Wade.

    El representante Crow ha servido a los residentes del 6º Distrito Congresional con distinción y es la clara opción progresista en esta contienda.
  • State Sen. Brittany Pettersen is the progressive candidate running for the open 7th Congressional District seat being vacated by retiring long-time Rep. Ed Perlmutter. Pettersen has represented the west Denver suburbs since her original election in 2012 to the Colorado House, then succeeding Sen. Andy Kerr in Senate District 22 in 2019. Pettersen is opposed by Erik Aadland, an avowed election conspiracy theorist with no experience in public office.

    In the Colorado General Assembly, Pettersen has been a leading advocate for criminal justice reform and combating the opioid addiction crisis that threatens communities across the state and nation. Pettersen helped pass landmark Equal Pay for Equal Work legislation which has been modeled in other states. Pettersen was one of the sponsors of the Colorado Option health insurance reform measure intended to reduce premiums on the individual market by up to 20%. In Congress, Petterson has promised to fight for the repeal of the 2017 Trump Tax Cuts and a fairer tax policy for all Americans.

    Erik Aadland is an Army veteran with no political experience best known for his belief that the 2020 presidential election was "rigged." Aadland supports sweeping cuts to federal spending that would endanger social safety nets like Medicare and Social Security, and refuses to confirm that humans are impacting the global climate. Aadland also opposed Colorado's law codifying abortion rights while supporting the repeal of Roe v. Wade.

    Pettersen is far and away the superior candidate to succeed Rep. Perlmutter and continue to provide strong progressive leadership to the 7th Congressional District.

    Brittany Pettersen

    La senadora estatal Brittany Pettersen es la candidata progresista que se postula para el escaño vacante del 7º distrito del Congreso que dejará vacante el representante Ed Perlmutter, que se jubila desde hace mucho tiempo. Pettersen ha representado a los suburbios del oeste de Denver desde su elección original en 2012 a la Cámara de Representantes de Colorado, y luego sucedió al senador Andy Kerr en el Distrito Senatorial 22 en 2019. Erik Aadland, un teórico declarado de la conspiración electoral sin experiencia en cargos públicos se opone a Pettersen.

    En la Asamblea General de Colorado, Pettersen ha sido un destacado defensor de la reforma de la justicia penal y de la lucha contra la crisis de adicción a los opioides que amenaza a las comunidades en todo el estado y la nación. Pettersen ayudó a aprobar la legislación histórica Igualdad de salario por trabajo igual que se ha modelado en otros estados. Pettersen fue uno de los patrocinadores de la medida de reforma del seguro de salud Colorado Option destinada a reducir las primas en el mercado individual hasta en un 20%. En el Congreso, Petterson prometió luchar por la derogación de los recortes de impuestos de Trump de 2017 y una política fiscal más justa para todos los estadounidenses.

    Erik Aadland es un veterano del ejército sin experiencia política, mejor conocido por su creencia de que las elecciones presidenciales de 2020 fueron "manipuladas". Aadland apoya los recortes radicales en el gasto federal que pondrían en peligro las redes de seguridad social como Medicare y la Seguridad Social, y se niega a confirmar que los humanos están afectando el clima global. Aadland también se opuso a la ley de Colorado que codifica el derecho al aborto y apoyó la derogación de Roe v. Wade.

    Pettersen es, de lejos, el mejor candidato para suceder al representante Perlmutter y continuar brindando un sólido liderazgo progresista al 7.º distrito del Congreso

    State Sen. Brittany Pettersen is the progressive candidate running for the open 7th Congressional District seat being vacated by retiring long-time Rep. Ed Perlmutter. Pettersen has represented the west Denver suburbs since her original election in 2012 to the Colorado House, then succeeding Sen. Andy Kerr in Senate District 22 in 2019. Pettersen is opposed by Erik Aadland, an avowed election conspiracy theorist with no experience in public office.

    In the Colorado General Assembly, Pettersen has been a leading advocate for criminal justice reform and combating the opioid addiction crisis that threatens communities across the state and nation. Pettersen helped pass landmark Equal Pay for Equal Work legislation which has been modeled in other states. Pettersen was one of the sponsors of the Colorado Option health insurance reform measure intended to reduce premiums on the individual market by up to 20%. In Congress, Petterson has promised to fight for the repeal of the 2017 Trump Tax Cuts and a fairer tax policy for all Americans.

    Erik Aadland is an Army veteran with no political experience best known for his belief that the 2020 presidential election was "rigged." Aadland supports sweeping cuts to federal spending that would endanger social safety nets like Medicare and Social Security, and refuses to confirm that humans are impacting the global climate. Aadland also opposed Colorado's law codifying abortion rights while supporting the repeal of Roe v. Wade.

    Pettersen is far and away the superior candidate to succeed Rep. Perlmutter and continue to provide strong progressive leadership to the 7th Congressional District.

    Brittany Pettersen

    La senadora estatal Brittany Pettersen es la candidata progresista que se postula para el escaño vacante del 7º distrito del Congreso que dejará vacante el representante Ed Perlmutter, que se jubila desde hace mucho tiempo. Pettersen ha representado a los suburbios del oeste de Denver desde su elección original en 2012 a la Cámara de Representantes de Colorado, y luego sucedió al senador Andy Kerr en el Distrito Senatorial 22 en 2019. Erik Aadland, un teórico declarado de la conspiración electoral sin experiencia en cargos públicos se opone a Pettersen.

    En la Asamblea General de Colorado, Pettersen ha sido un destacado defensor de la reforma de la justicia penal y de la lucha contra la crisis de adicción a los opioides que amenaza a las comunidades en todo el estado y la nación. Pettersen ayudó a aprobar la legislación histórica Igualdad de salario por trabajo igual que se ha modelado en otros estados. Pettersen fue uno de los patrocinadores de la medida de reforma del seguro de salud Colorado Option destinada a reducir las primas en el mercado individual hasta en un 20%. En el Congreso, Petterson prometió luchar por la derogación de los recortes de impuestos de Trump de 2017 y una política fiscal más justa para todos los estadounidenses.

    Erik Aadland es un veterano del ejército sin experiencia política, mejor conocido por su creencia de que las elecciones presidenciales de 2020 fueron "manipuladas". Aadland apoya los recortes radicales en el gasto federal que pondrían en peligro las redes de seguridad social como Medicare y la Seguridad Social, y se niega a confirmar que los humanos están afectando el clima global. Aadland también se opuso a la ley de Colorado que codifica el derecho al aborto y apoyó la derogación de Roe v. Wade.

    Pettersen es, de lejos, el mejor candidato para suceder al representante Perlmutter y continuar brindando un sólido liderazgo progresista al 7.º distrito del Congreso
  • Dr. Yadira Caraveo, who has served in the Colorado House of Representatives since 2019, is the progressive candidate in Colorado's brand-new 8th Congressional District, one of the most evenly-divided and competitive congressional districts in the nation. Her race is proving to be one of the most important 2022 electoral battlegrounds.

    Caraveo is a pediatrician who graduated from the University of Colorado School of Medicine. In the Colorado House, Caraveo has played a major role in the passage of health coverage, prescription drug affordability, education, economic development, and legislation to reduce toxic air pollution. Caraveo is a proven supporter of abortion rights, helping pass legislation to protect abortion rights in Colorado ahead of the Supreme Court's reversal of Roe v. Wade. Caraveo has a reputation at the state capitol as a tireless organizer who is constantly in touch with her constituents through town halls and other outreach campaigns.

    State Sen. Barbara Kirkmeyer first became known outside Weld County when she helped organize a ballot initiative campaign to begin the process of seceding from the state of Colorado and forming the new state of "North Colorado" with Greeley as its capital city. As a Weld County Commissioner and then in the Colorado Senate, Kirkmeyer earned a reputation for uncompromising anti-abortion grandstanding and total devotion to the oil and gas industry over the best interests of her constituents. Kirkmeyer was criticized as county commissioner for reimbursing herself over $70,000 in taxpayer dollars for vehicle expenses.

    Yadira Caraveo represents the very best in elected leadership in Colorado today, and is the easy choice to recommend for Colorado's 8th Congressional District.

    Yadira Caraveo

    La Dra. Yadira Caraveo, quien se ha desempeñado en la Cámara de Representantes de Colorado desde 2019, es la candidata progresista en el nuevo Distrito Congresional 8 de Colorado, uno de los distritos congresionales más divididos y competitivos de la nación. Su carrera está demostrando ser uno de los campos de batalla electorales más importantes de 2022.

    Caraveo es un pediatra que se graduó de la Facultad de Medicina de la Universidad de Colorado. En la Cámara de Representantes de Colorado, Caraveo ha desempeñado un papel importante en la aprobación de la cobertura médica, la asequibilidad de los medicamentos recetados, la educación, el desarrollo económico y la legislación para reducir la contaminación tóxica del aire. Caraveo es un partidario comprobado del derecho al aborto, ayudando a aprobar legislación para proteger el derecho al aborto en Colorado antes de que la Corte Suprema revoque Roe v. Wade. Caraveo tiene una reputación en el capitolio estatal como una organizadora incansable que está constantemente en contacto con sus electores a través de ayuntamientos y otras campañas de divulgación.

    La senadora estatal Barbara Kirkmeyer se hizo conocida por primera vez fuera del condado de Weld cuando ayudó a organizar una campaña de iniciativa electoral para comenzar el proceso de separación del estado de Colorado y formar el nuevo estado de "Colorado del Norte" con Greeley como su ciudad capital. Como comisionada del condado de Weld y luego en el Senado de Colorado, Kirkmeyer se ganó una reputación por su intransigente fanfarronería contra el aborto y su total devoción a la industria del petróleo y el gas por encima de los mejores intereses de sus electores. Kirkmeyer fue criticada como comisionada del condado por reembolsarse a sí misma más de $70,000 en dólares de los contribuyentes por gastos de vehículos.

    Yadira Caraveo representa lo mejor en liderazgo electo en Colorado en la actualidad, y es la opción fácil de recomendar para el Distrito 8 del Congreso de Colorado.

    Dr. Yadira Caraveo, who has served in the Colorado House of Representatives since 2019, is the progressive candidate in Colorado's brand-new 8th Congressional District, one of the most evenly-divided and competitive congressional districts in the nation. Her race is proving to be one of the most important 2022 electoral battlegrounds.

    Caraveo is a pediatrician who graduated from the University of Colorado School of Medicine. In the Colorado House, Caraveo has played a major role in the passage of health coverage, prescription drug affordability, education, economic development, and legislation to reduce toxic air pollution. Caraveo is a proven supporter of abortion rights, helping pass legislation to protect abortion rights in Colorado ahead of the Supreme Court's reversal of Roe v. Wade. Caraveo has a reputation at the state capitol as a tireless organizer who is constantly in touch with her constituents through town halls and other outreach campaigns.

    State Sen. Barbara Kirkmeyer first became known outside Weld County when she helped organize a ballot initiative campaign to begin the process of seceding from the state of Colorado and forming the new state of "North Colorado" with Greeley as its capital city. As a Weld County Commissioner and then in the Colorado Senate, Kirkmeyer earned a reputation for uncompromising anti-abortion grandstanding and total devotion to the oil and gas industry over the best interests of her constituents. Kirkmeyer was criticized as county commissioner for reimbursing herself over $70,000 in taxpayer dollars for vehicle expenses.

    Yadira Caraveo represents the very best in elected leadership in Colorado today, and is the easy choice to recommend for Colorado's 8th Congressional District.

    Yadira Caraveo

    La Dra. Yadira Caraveo, quien se ha desempeñado en la Cámara de Representantes de Colorado desde 2019, es la candidata progresista en el nuevo Distrito Congresional 8 de Colorado, uno de los distritos congresionales más divididos y competitivos de la nación. Su carrera está demostrando ser uno de los campos de batalla electorales más importantes de 2022.

    Caraveo es un pediatra que se graduó de la Facultad de Medicina de la Universidad de Colorado. En la Cámara de Representantes de Colorado, Caraveo ha desempeñado un papel importante en la aprobación de la cobertura médica, la asequibilidad de los medicamentos recetados, la educación, el desarrollo económico y la legislación para reducir la contaminación tóxica del aire. Caraveo es un partidario comprobado del derecho al aborto, ayudando a aprobar legislación para proteger el derecho al aborto en Colorado antes de que la Corte Suprema revoque Roe v. Wade. Caraveo tiene una reputación en el capitolio estatal como una organizadora incansable que está constantemente en contacto con sus electores a través de ayuntamientos y otras campañas de divulgación.

    La senadora estatal Barbara Kirkmeyer se hizo conocida por primera vez fuera del condado de Weld cuando ayudó a organizar una campaña de iniciativa electoral para comenzar el proceso de separación del estado de Colorado y formar el nuevo estado de "Colorado del Norte" con Greeley como su ciudad capital. Como comisionada del condado de Weld y luego en el Senado de Colorado, Kirkmeyer se ganó una reputación por su intransigente fanfarronería contra el aborto y su total devoción a la industria del petróleo y el gas por encima de los mejores intereses de sus electores. Kirkmeyer fue criticada como comisionada del condado por reembolsarse a sí misma más de $70,000 en dólares de los contribuyentes por gastos de vehículos.

    Yadira Caraveo representa lo mejor en liderazgo electo en Colorado en la actualidad, y es la opción fácil de recomendar para el Distrito 8 del Congreso de Colorado.
  • Incumbent Gov. Jared Polis' record of public service to the state of Colorado goes back over two decades to his election in 2000 to serve as at-large member of the Colorado State Board of Education. After helping found the New America Schools to serve recent immigrant students focused on English language instruction, Polis was elected in 2008 to represent Colorado's 2nd Congressional District, succeeding Mark Udall who was elected to the U.S. Senate that year.

    In the U.S. House, Polis was a strong advocate for health care and immigration reform, serving on the House Education, Natural Resources, and Rules Committees. Polis received an 89% lifetime score from the League of Conservation Voters after leading the fight for a variety of important environmental reform initiatives including reducing methane pollution, protecting clean water resources, and addressing the threat of human-caused global climate change.

    Elected to his first term as Governor of Colorado in 2018, Polis quickly went to work with the progressive majority in the Colorado General Assembly to successfully enact a comprehensive agenda of health care reform, inclusive economic development, education funding, anti-discrimination and equal wage protections, and environmental justice legislation. Senate Bill 19-181, a fossil fuel extraction reform measure, fundamentally changed the purpose of Colorado's oil and gas oversight authorities to prioritize public health and environmental protection over industry profits.

    During the COVID-19 pandemic, Polis' leadership and deliberate work to minimize partisan conflict with the Trump administration helped the state reduce economic harm while keeping the state's overall death rate from the pandemic well below the national average. Once the threat of the pandemic's spread without vaccines and effective treatments was past, Polis was at the head of the curve nationally in working to re-open Colorado's economy.

    Polis' opponent, University of Colorado Regent Heidi Ganahl, is the only remaining statewide Republican elected official after years of losses in recent elections. Ganahl described herself as "The MAGA candidate Colorado has been waiting for," and is by for the most openly pro-Trump candidate on the statewide ballot in Colorado. As CU Regent, Ganahl enthusiastically supported Trump coup plotter John Eastman's paid appointment as the school's "Visiting Conservative Scholar." Ganahl's campaign has employed key members of Trump's former legal team. Ganahl's platform of slashing state revenue while promising to pay for crucial state services has been widely denounced as unrealistic. As governor, Ganahl has pledged to roll back recently-passed legislation protecting abortion rights in Colorado.

    Jared Polis has served the state of Colorado with distinction during one of the greatest period of crisis in the entire nation's history. The choice between Polis and Ganahl's Trump-style bad faith could not be easier. Polis deserves your vote.
    Incumbent Gov. Jared Polis' record of public service to the state of Colorado goes back over two decades to his election in 2000 to serve as at-large member of the Colorado State Board of Education. After helping found the New America Schools to serve recent immigrant students focused on English language instruction, Polis was elected in 2008 to represent Colorado's 2nd Congressional District, succeeding Mark Udall who was elected to the U.S. Senate that year.

    In the U.S. House, Polis was a strong advocate for health care and immigration reform, serving on the House Education, Natural Resources, and Rules Committees. Polis received an 89% lifetime score from the League of Conservation Voters after leading the fight for a variety of important environmental reform initiatives including reducing methane pollution, protecting clean water resources, and addressing the threat of human-caused global climate change.

    Elected to his first term as Governor of Colorado in 2018, Polis quickly went to work with the progressive majority in the Colorado General Assembly to successfully enact a comprehensive agenda of health care reform, inclusive economic development, education funding, anti-discrimination and equal wage protections, and environmental justice legislation. Senate Bill 19-181, a fossil fuel extraction reform measure, fundamentally changed the purpose of Colorado's oil and gas oversight authorities to prioritize public health and environmental protection over industry profits.

    During the COVID-19 pandemic, Polis' leadership and deliberate work to minimize partisan conflict with the Trump administration helped the state reduce economic harm while keeping the state's overall death rate from the pandemic well below the national average. Once the threat of the pandemic's spread without vaccines and effective treatments was past, Polis was at the head of the curve nationally in working to re-open Colorado's economy.

    Polis' opponent, University of Colorado Regent Heidi Ganahl, is the only remaining statewide Republican elected official after years of losses in recent elections. Ganahl described herself as "The MAGA candidate Colorado has been waiting for," and is by for the most openly pro-Trump candidate on the statewide ballot in Colorado. As CU Regent, Ganahl enthusiastically supported Trump coup plotter John Eastman's paid appointment as the school's "Visiting Conservative Scholar." Ganahl's campaign has employed key members of Trump's former legal team. Ganahl's platform of slashing state revenue while promising to pay for crucial state services has been widely denounced as unrealistic. As governor, Ganahl has pledged to roll back recently-passed legislation protecting abortion rights in Colorado.

    Jared Polis has served the state of Colorado with distinction during one of the greatest period of crisis in the entire nation's history. The choice between Polis and Ganahl's Trump-style bad faith could not be easier. Polis deserves your vote.
  • Incumbent Secretary of State Jena Griswold is an attorney with experience in voting rights and accessibility. Before winning office in 2018, Griswold served as the director of Gov. John Hickenlooper's federal liaison in Washington, D.C. and as an attorney for President Barack Obama's presidential campaign.

    As Secretary of State, Griswold has overseen elections featuring some of the highest rates of voter participation in America, while defending Colorado's gold standard mail ballot election system from repeated baseless attacks from President Donald Trump and election conspiracy theorists. Griswold conducted the initial investigation into a breach of election security by Mesa County Clerk Tina Peters that resulted in numerous felony charges against Peters.

    Griswold's opponent, former Jefferson County Clerk Pam Anderson, severely damaged her once-commendable reputation for standing up to right-wing misinformation by campaigning with Republicans who dispute the results of the 2020 elections. Anderson has refused to condemn election deniers who support her campaign, claiming that would “divide or ostracize people.” Less than two years after Donald Trump's attempt to overturn the results of the 2020 presidential elections, Coloradans cannot responsibly entrust Pam Anderson and the Party of Trump with control over our elections.

    Secretary Griswold is the clear progressive choice in this important statewide race.

    Jena Griswold

    La secretaria de Estado Titular Jena Griswold es una abogada con experiencia en derecho al voto y accesibilidad. Antes de ganar el cargo en 2018, Griswold se desempeñó como director de enlace federal del gobernador John Hickenlooper en Washington, D.C.
    Incumbent Secretary of State Jena Griswold is an attorney with experience in voting rights and accessibility. Before winning office in 2018, Griswold served as the director of Gov. John Hickenlooper's federal liaison in Washington, D.C. and as an attorney for President Barack Obama's presidential campaign.

    As Secretary of State, Griswold has overseen elections featuring some of the highest rates of voter participation in America, while defending Colorado's gold standard mail ballot election system from repeated baseless attacks from President Donald Trump and election conspiracy theorists. Griswold conducted the initial investigation into a breach of election security by Mesa County Clerk Tina Peters that resulted in numerous felony charges against Peters.

    Griswold's opponent, former Jefferson County Clerk Pam Anderson, severely damaged her once-commendable reputation for standing up to right-wing misinformation by campaigning with Republicans who dispute the results of the 2020 elections. Anderson has refused to condemn election deniers who support her campaign, claiming that would “divide or ostracize people.” Less than two years after Donald Trump's attempt to overturn the results of the 2020 presidential elections, Coloradans cannot responsibly entrust Pam Anderson and the Party of Trump with control over our elections.

    Secretary Griswold is the clear progressive choice in this important statewide race.

    Jena Griswold

    La secretaria de Estado Titular Jena Griswold es una abogada con experiencia en derecho al voto y accesibilidad. Antes de ganar el cargo en 2018, Griswold se desempeñó como director de enlace federal del gobernador John Hickenlooper en Washington, D.C.
  • Incumbent Treasurer Dave Young is running for his second term as Colorado Treasurer after winning office in 2018. Prior to Young's election as Treasurer, he served as a state legislature representing House District 50 in Weld County. In the legislature, Young served on the powerful Joint Budget Committee and chaired the House Appropriations Committee, some of the most important fiscal posts in the General Assembly. On the JBC, Young worked across the aisle each year to hammer out the state's most important annual piece of legislation, the "Long Bill" general fund budget. In 2013, Young helped communities he represents recover from that year's devastating floods.

    As Treasurer, Young worked closely with Gov. Jared Polis to successfully manage the COVID-19 pandemic, with an emphasis on keeping Colorado's small business afloat during the worst of the crisis and swiftly reopening Colorado's economy once it was safe to do so. Young has also worked to streamline and expedite payments to Colorado property owners under the Great Colorado Payback program.

    Young's opponent is Lang Sias, a perennial candidate for a variety of elected offices in Colorado who most recently lost the election to serve as lieutenant governor under Walker Stapleton in 2018. While serving in the U.S. Navy, Lang Sias attended a pilot's convention known as "Tailhook" in 1991 that resulted in nationwide scandal, with allegations of sexual assault committed against 83 women and seven men. Currently a FedEx pilot, Sias' run for this office is due to its availability, not Sias' fiscal policy experience.

    Re-electing Treasurer Dave Young should be one of the easiest choices on this year's ballot.

    Dave Young

    El tesorero titular Dave Young se postula para su segundo mandato como tesorero de Colorado después de ganar el cargo en 2018. Antes de la elección de Young como tesorero, se desempeñó como legislador estatal en representación del Distrito 50 de la Cámara en el condado de Weld.
    Incumbent Treasurer Dave Young is running for his second term as Colorado Treasurer after winning office in 2018. Prior to Young's election as Treasurer, he served as a state legislature representing House District 50 in Weld County. In the legislature, Young served on the powerful Joint Budget Committee and chaired the House Appropriations Committee, some of the most important fiscal posts in the General Assembly. On the JBC, Young worked across the aisle each year to hammer out the state's most important annual piece of legislation, the "Long Bill" general fund budget. In 2013, Young helped communities he represents recover from that year's devastating floods.

    As Treasurer, Young worked closely with Gov. Jared Polis to successfully manage the COVID-19 pandemic, with an emphasis on keeping Colorado's small business afloat during the worst of the crisis and swiftly reopening Colorado's economy once it was safe to do so. Young has also worked to streamline and expedite payments to Colorado property owners under the Great Colorado Payback program.

    Young's opponent is Lang Sias, a perennial candidate for a variety of elected offices in Colorado who most recently lost the election to serve as lieutenant governor under Walker Stapleton in 2018. While serving in the U.S. Navy, Lang Sias attended a pilot's convention known as "Tailhook" in 1991 that resulted in nationwide scandal, with allegations of sexual assault committed against 83 women and seven men. Currently a FedEx pilot, Sias' run for this office is due to its availability, not Sias' fiscal policy experience.

    Re-electing Treasurer Dave Young should be one of the easiest choices on this year's ballot.

    Dave Young

    El tesorero titular Dave Young se postula para su segundo mandato como tesorero de Colorado después de ganar el cargo en 2018. Antes de la elección de Young como tesorero, se desempeñó como legislador estatal en representación del Distrito 50 de la Cámara en el condado de Weld.
  • Incumbent Colorado Attorney General Phil Weiser is seeking his second term after winning office in 2018. Prior to serving as Colorado Attorney General, Weiser served as Deputy Assistant Attorney General at the U.S. Justice Department during the Obama administration. Weiser also served as a senior counsel at the Justice Department Antitrust Division during the Clinton Administration. Early in his career, Weiser served as a law clerk for Justices Byron White and Ruth Bader Ginsburg.

    As Colorado's Attorney General, Weiser has fought to defend Colorado's historic recent progress on health care reform, protecting consumers from exploitation, anti-discrimination laws and Colorado's gold standard election system. Weiser was a nationwide leader in holding drug manufacturers accountable for their role in the opioid addiction crisis, as well as legal action to forgive the student loans of thousands of victims of predatory lenders and scam for-profit colleges.

    Weiser's opponent is District Attorney John Kellner, who succeeded George Brauchler as Arapahoe County DA after Brauchler lost his race for Attorney General in 2018. Kellner's dishonest attacks on Weiser over Colorado's crime rate ignore the stark increase that has occurred in Kellner's own district during the same period. Kellner has expressed his support for the U.S. Supreme Court's overturning of Roe v. Wade, and has promised to "support Colorado law" despite his fellow Republicans' determination to repeal Colorado laws protecting abortion rights.

    Phil Weiser has done an examplary job as the state's chief attorney, and has earned a second term in office.

    Phil Weiser

    El fiscal general titular de Colorado, Phil Weiser, busca su segundo mandato después de ganar el cargo en 2018. Antes de desempeñarse como fiscal general de Colorado, Weiser se desempeñó como fiscal general adjunto en el Departamento de Justicia de EE. UU. durante la administración de Obama.
    Incumbent Colorado Attorney General Phil Weiser is seeking his second term after winning office in 2018. Prior to serving as Colorado Attorney General, Weiser served as Deputy Assistant Attorney General at the U.S. Justice Department during the Obama administration. Weiser also served as a senior counsel at the Justice Department Antitrust Division during the Clinton Administration. Early in his career, Weiser served as a law clerk for Justices Byron White and Ruth Bader Ginsburg.

    As Colorado's Attorney General, Weiser has fought to defend Colorado's historic recent progress on health care reform, protecting consumers from exploitation, anti-discrimination laws and Colorado's gold standard election system. Weiser was a nationwide leader in holding drug manufacturers accountable for their role in the opioid addiction crisis, as well as legal action to forgive the student loans of thousands of victims of predatory lenders and scam for-profit colleges.

    Weiser's opponent is District Attorney John Kellner, who succeeded George Brauchler as Arapahoe County DA after Brauchler lost his race for Attorney General in 2018. Kellner's dishonest attacks on Weiser over Colorado's crime rate ignore the stark increase that has occurred in Kellner's own district during the same period. Kellner has expressed his support for the U.S. Supreme Court's overturning of Roe v. Wade, and has promised to "support Colorado law" despite his fellow Republicans' determination to repeal Colorado laws protecting abortion rights.

    Phil Weiser has done an examplary job as the state's chief attorney, and has earned a second term in office.

    Phil Weiser

    El fiscal general titular de Colorado, Phil Weiser, busca su segundo mandato después de ganar el cargo en 2018. Antes de desempeñarse como fiscal general de Colorado, Weiser se desempeñó como fiscal general adjunto en el Departamento de Justicia de EE. UU. durante la administración de Obama.
  • Kathy Plomar has been heavily invested in public education as former President of the Adams 12 Board of Education and former President of the Parent Teacher Organization. Plomar believes in bringing people together with different life experiences to ensure all kids receive an excellent education. Plomar lists three key priorities that will define her work as an at-large State Board of Education member: academic excellence, respecting teachers, and transparency and accountability. Plomar is a solid progressive choice for the State Board of Education.

    The Republican candidate for this seat is Dan Maloit, a parent of three and a medical device sales manager. Maloit recently became involved in politics when he organized for the reopening of schools for full-time, in-person learning in August of 2020, before the development of any COVID-19 vaccines or effective treatments. We recommend voting for Plomar.

    Kathy Plomer

    Kathy Plomar ha invertido mucho en la educación pública como expresidenta de la Junta de Educación de Adams 12 y expresidenta de la Organización de Padres y Maestros.
    Kathy Plomar has been heavily invested in public education as former President of the Adams 12 Board of Education and former President of the Parent Teacher Organization. Plomar believes in bringing people together with different life experiences to ensure all kids receive an excellent education. Plomar lists three key priorities that will define her work as an at-large State Board of Education member: academic excellence, respecting teachers, and transparency and accountability. Plomar is a solid progressive choice for the State Board of Education.

    The Republican candidate for this seat is Dan Maloit, a parent of three and a medical device sales manager. Maloit recently became involved in politics when he organized for the reopening of schools for full-time, in-person learning in August of 2020, before the development of any COVID-19 vaccines or effective treatments. We recommend voting for Plomar.

    Kathy Plomer

    Kathy Plomar ha invertido mucho en la educación pública como expresidenta de la Junta de Educación de Adams 12 y expresidenta de la Organización de Padres y Maestros.
  • No Position

    No Recommendation

  • Until 2022, Colorado's 18th Judicial District was comprised of Arapahoe, Douglas, Elbert and Lincoln Counties. The Colorado state Legislature passed House Bill 1026 (HB 1026) in 2020, which split the 18th Judicial District, moving Douglas, Elbert, and Lincoln Counties to the new 23rd Judicial District on January 7, 2025. The 23rd Judicial District will include eight judges.

    Amendment D would direct the governor to assign judges from the 18th Judicial District to the new 23rd Judicial District by November 30, 2024. These judges would be required to establish residence in the new judicial district by January 7, 2025.

    Amendment D needs 55% of the votes cast to be "yes" votes to pass.
    Until 2022, Colorado's 18th Judicial District was comprised of Arapahoe, Douglas, Elbert and Lincoln Counties. The Colorado state Legislature passed House Bill 1026 (HB 1026) in 2020, which split the 18th Judicial District, moving Douglas, Elbert, and Lincoln Counties to the new 23rd Judicial District on January 7, 2025. The 23rd Judicial District will include eight judges.

    Amendment D would direct the governor to assign judges from the 18th Judicial District to the new 23rd Judicial District by November 30, 2024. These judges would be required to establish residence in the new judicial district by January 7, 2025.

    Amendment D needs 55% of the votes cast to be "yes" votes to pass.
    Until 2022, Colorado's 18th Judicial District was comprised of Arapahoe, Douglas, Elbert and Lincoln Counties. The Colorado state Legislature passed House Bill 1026 (HB 1026) in 2020, which split the 18th Judicial District, moving Douglas, Elbert, and Lincoln Counties to the new 23rd Judicial District on January 7, 2025. The 23rd Judicial District will include eight judges.

    Amendment D would direct the governor to assign judges from the 18th Judicial District to the new 23rd Judicial District by November 30, 2024. These judges would be required to establish residence in the new judicial district by January 7, 2025.

    Amendment D needs 55% of the votes cast to be "yes" votes to pass.

    Amendment D - Twenty-Third Judicial District Amendment

    Hasta 2022, el Distrito Judicial 18 de Colorado estaba compuesto por los condados de Arapahoe, Douglas, Elbert y Lincoln. La Legislatura del estado de Colorado aprobó el Proyecto de Ley 1026 (HB 1026) de la Cámara de Representantes en 2020, que dividió el Distrito Judicial 18, trasladando los condados de Douglas, Elbert y Lincoln al nuevo Distrito Judicial 23 el 7 de enero de 2025. El Distrito Judicial 23 incluirá ocho jueces.

    La Enmienda D ordenaría al gobernador que asigne jueces del Distrito Judicial 18 al nuevo Distrito Judicial 23 antes del 30 de noviembre de 2024. Estos jueces deberán establecer su residencia en el nuevo distrito judicial antes del 7 de enero de 2025.

    La Enmienda D necesita que el 55% de los votos emitidos sean votos "sí" para ser aprobada.
    Support / Oppose / Neutral
  • No Position

    No Recommendation

  • Colorado offers special property tax exemptions for veterans with permanently disabilities. Amendment E would extend this benefit to the surviving spouse of a U.S. Armed Forces members who died while serving in the military or from a service-related injury or disease.
    Colorado offers special property tax exemptions for veterans with permanently disabilities. Amendment E would extend this benefit to the surviving spouse of a U.S. Armed Forces members who died while serving in the military or from a service-related injury or disease.
    Colorado offers special property tax exemptions for veterans with permanently disabilities. Amendment E would extend this benefit to the surviving spouse of a U.S. Armed Forces members who died while serving in the military or from a service-related injury or disease.

    Amendment E - Homestead Exemption to Surviving Spouses of U.S. Armed Forces Members and Veterans Amendment

    Colorado ofrece exenciones especiales de impuestos a la propiedad para veteranos con discapacidades permanentes. La Enmienda E extendería este beneficio al cónyuge sobreviviente de un miembro de las Fuerzas Armadas de los EE. UU. que murió mientras prestaba servicio militar o debido a una lesión o enfermedad relacionada con el servicio.
    Support / Oppose / Neutral
  • No Position

    No Recommendation

  • Amendment F if passed, would repeal a ban that limited managers and operators of charitable gaming activities (like bingo, pull-tab games, and raffles to fundraise) of making more than minimum wage until July 1st, 2024. Previously, organizations had to exist for a longer amount of time in order to obtain their charitable gaming license - often used to fundraise for the organization.

    This amendment gives state lawmakers and the legislature the authority to determine how long an organization must exist before obtaining a charitable gaming license after January 1, 2025. Currently, organizations must have existed for five years to get a license and Amendment F reduces that time to three years. The forms of charitable gaming listed above in parenthesis are commonly used by smaller organizations and often, women of color led organizations.
    Amendment F if passed, would repeal a ban that limited managers and operators of charitable gaming activities (like bingo, pull-tab games, and raffles to fundraise) of making more than minimum wage until July 1st, 2024. Previously, organizations had to exist for a longer amount of time in order to obtain their charitable gaming license - often used to fundraise for the organization.

    This amendment gives state lawmakers and the legislature the authority to determine how long an organization must exist before obtaining a charitable gaming license after January 1, 2025. Currently, organizations must have existed for five years to get a license and Amendment F reduces that time to three years. The forms of charitable gaming listed above in parenthesis are commonly used by smaller organizations and often, women of color led organizations.
    Amendment F if passed, would repeal a ban that limited managers and operators of charitable gaming activities (like bingo, pull-tab games, and raffles to fundraise) of making more than minimum wage until July 1st, 2024. Previously, organizations had to exist for a longer amount of time in order to obtain their charitable gaming license - often used to fundraise for the organization.

    This amendment gives state lawmakers and the legislature the authority to determine how long an organization must exist before obtaining a charitable gaming license after January 1, 2025. Currently, organizations must have existed for five years to get a license and Amendment F reduces that time to three years. The forms of charitable gaming listed above in parenthesis are commonly used by smaller organizations and often, women of color led organizations.

    Amendment F - Charitable Gaming Amendment

    Si se aprueba la Enmienda F, derogaría una prohibición que limitaba a los gerentes y operadores de actividades de juegos benéficos (como bingo, juegos con lengüeta y rifas para recaudar fondos) de ganar más del salario mínimo hasta el 1 de julio de 2024. Anteriormente, las organizaciones tenían que existir durante más tiempo para obtener su licencia de juego caritativo, que a menudo se usa para recaudar fondos para la organización.

    Esta enmienda también permitiría a los legisladores estatales y a la legislatura determinar cuánto tiempo debe existir una organización antes de obtener una licencia de juegos de caridad después del 1 de enero de 2025. Además, esta enmienda reduciría ese tiempo requerido de 5 años a 3 años como la duración de tiempo que debe existir una organización antes de obtener una licencia de juegos benéficos hasta el 1 de enero de 2025. Las formas de juegos benéficos enumeradas anteriormente entre paréntesis son comúnmente utilizadas por organizaciones más pequeñas y, a menudo, organizaciones dirigidas por mujeres de color.
    Support / Oppose / Neutral
  • VOTE YES

    Vote YES to feed all of Colorado's students.

  • Proposition FF would create and fund the "Healthy School Meals for All" program under the Colorado Department of Education. Starting in the 2023-2024 school year, this fund would provide free breakfast and lunch to all Colorado public school students, regardless of income. In 2024-2025, the fund would expand to provide grants for schools to buy local Colorado food, increase wages for employees who prepare and serve school meals, and increase community education and engagement around healthy meals.

    The program is funded by closing a tax loophole for households making $300,000 or more a year. Colorado's flat income tax rate means that the wealthy pay less of their income in taxes than the average Coloradan. This measure creates a fairer tax code by closing loopholes for the wealthiest 5% of Coloradans in a way that benefits every child.

    Research shows that well-fed children perform better academically, have fewer behavioral issues, and develop properly with access to nutritious meals. According to the Colorado Department of Education, 42% of public school students, around 355,000 kids, qualified for either free or reduced-priced school meals. However, the current income threshold for free and reduced-price meals ($51,388 for a family of four) can exclude students facing food insecurity, especially with inflation and a higher cost of living. If passed, this measure will feed every student and remove a daily expense from families' plates.

    Proposition FF creates a fairer tax code, saves working families money, and feeds our kids. We recommend a YES vote.
    Proposition FF would create and fund the "Healthy School Meals for All" program under the Colorado Department of Education. Starting in the 2023-2024 school year, this fund would provide free breakfast and lunch to all Colorado public school students, regardless of income. In 2024-2025, the fund would expand to provide grants for schools to buy local Colorado food, increase wages for employees who prepare and serve school meals, and increase community education and engagement around healthy meals.

    The program is funded by closing a tax loophole for households making $300,000 or more a year. Colorado's flat income tax rate means that the wealthy pay less of their income in taxes than the average Coloradan. This measure creates a fairer tax code by closing loopholes for the wealthiest 5% of Coloradans in a way that benefits every child.

    Research shows that well-fed children perform better academically, have fewer behavioral issues, and develop properly with access to nutritious meals. According to the Colorado Department of Education, 42% of public school students, around 355,000 kids, qualified for either free or reduced-priced school meals. However, the current income threshold for free and reduced-price meals ($51,388 for a family of four) can exclude students facing food insecurity, especially with inflation and a higher cost of living. If passed, this measure will feed every student and remove a daily expense from families' plates.

    Proposition FF creates a fairer tax code, saves working families money, and feeds our kids. We recommend a YES vote.
    Proposition FF would create and fund the "Healthy School Meals for All" program under the Colorado Department of Education. Starting in the 2023-2024 school year, this fund would provide free breakfast and lunch to all Colorado public school students, regardless of income. In 2024-2025, the fund would expand to provide grants for schools to buy local Colorado food, increase wages for employees who prepare and serve school meals, and increase community education and engagement around healthy meals.

    The program is funded by closing a tax loophole for households making $300,000 or more a year. Colorado's flat income tax rate means that the wealthy pay less of their income in taxes than the average Coloradan. This measure creates a fairer tax code by closing loopholes for the wealthiest 5% of Coloradans in a way that benefits every child.

    Research shows that well-fed children perform better academically, have fewer behavioral issues, and develop properly with access to nutritious meals. According to the Colorado Department of Education, 42% of public school students, around 355,000 kids, qualified for either free or reduced-priced school meals. However, the current income threshold for free and reduced-price meals ($51,388 for a family of four) can exclude students facing food insecurity, especially with inflation and a higher cost of living. If passed, this measure will feed every student and remove a daily expense from families' plates.

    Proposition FF creates a fairer tax code, saves working families money, and feeds our kids. We recommend a YES vote.

    Proposition FF - Healthy Meals For All Public School Students

    La propuesta FF crearía y financiaría el programa "Comidas escolares saludables para todos" bajo el Departamento de Educación de Colorado. A partir del año escolar 2023-2024, este fondo proporcionaría desayuno y almuerzo gratis a todos los estudiantes de las escuelas públicas de Colorado, independientemente de sus ingresos. En 2024-2025, el fondo se expandiría para otorgar subvenciones a las escuelas para comprar alimentos locales de Colorado, aumentar los salarios de los empleados que preparan y sirven comidas escolares y aumentar la educación comunitaria y la participación en torno a las comidas saludables.

    El programa se financia cerrando una laguna fiscal para los hogares que ganan $300,000 o más al año. La tasa fija del impuesto sobre la renta de Colorado significa que los ricos pagan menos de sus ingresos en impuestos que el colorado promedio. Esta medida crea un código tributario más justo al cerrar las lagunas para el 5% más rico de los habitantes de Colorado de una manera que beneficia a todos los niños.

    Las investigaciones muestran que los niños bien alimentados se desempeñan mejor académicamente, tienen menos problemas de comportamiento y se desarrollan adecuadamente con acceso a comidas nutritivas. Según el Departamento de Educación de Colorado, el 42% de los estudiantes de escuelas públicas, alrededor de 355,000 niños, calificaron para recibir comidas escolares gratuitas o de precio reducido. Sin embargo, el umbral de ingresos actual para comidas gratuitas y de precio reducido ($51,388 para una familia de cuatro) puede excluir a los estudiantes que enfrentan inseguridad alimentaria, especialmente con la inflación y un costo de vida más alto. Si se aprueba, esta medida alimentará a todos los estudiantes y eliminará un gasto diario de los platos de las familias.

    La Proposición FF crea un código fiscal más justo, ahorra dinero a las familias trabajadoras y alimenta a nuestros niños. Recomendamos un voto SÍ.
    Support / Oppose / Neutral
  • VOTE YES

    Vote YES for increased transparency and knowledge.

  • Proposition GG would require a tax information table on all ballots and petitions for measures that change any Coloradan’s income tax rate. This table would list the average change in taxes owed for eight income brackets. Any tax changes would be listed with a dollar amount and a plus sign [+] for increased taxes or a negative sign [-] for lower taxes.

    Under the Taxpayer's Bill of Rights, any measure that increases taxes must start with the total dollar amount raised. But that big, total dollar amount doesn't tell voters how much they, individually, would pay. When taxpayers know exactly how much an initiative would cost them, they can make better-informed decisions about an initiative's cost/benefit. It is vital that voters understand what they are voting for, and this measure only helps to clarify complicated information on how tax policy impacts every Colorado voter.

    We recommend a YES vote on Proposition GG.
    Proposition GG would require a tax information table on all ballots and petitions for measures that change any Coloradan’s income tax rate. This table would list the average change in taxes owed for eight income brackets. Any tax changes would be listed with a dollar amount and a plus sign [+] for increased taxes or a negative sign [-] for lower taxes.

    Under the Taxpayer's Bill of Rights, any measure that increases taxes must start with the total dollar amount raised. But that big, total dollar amount doesn't tell voters how much they, individually, would pay. When taxpayers know exactly how much an initiative would cost them, they can make better-informed decisions about an initiative's cost/benefit. It is vital that voters understand what they are voting for, and this measure only helps to clarify complicated information on how tax policy impacts every Colorado voter.

    We recommend a YES vote on Proposition GG.
    Proposition GG would require a tax information table on all ballots and petitions for measures that change any Coloradan’s income tax rate. This table would list the average change in taxes owed for eight income brackets. Any tax changes would be listed with a dollar amount and a plus sign [+] for increased taxes or a negative sign [-] for lower taxes.

    Under the Taxpayer's Bill of Rights, any measure that increases taxes must start with the total dollar amount raised. But that big, total dollar amount doesn't tell voters how much they, individually, would pay. When taxpayers know exactly how much an initiative would cost them, they can make better-informed decisions about an initiative's cost/benefit. It is vital that voters understand what they are voting for, and this measure only helps to clarify complicated information on how tax policy impacts every Colorado voter.

    We recommend a YES vote on Proposition GG.

    Proposition GG - Amount Of Tax Owed Table For Initiatives

    La Proposición GG requeriría una tabla de información fiscal en todas las boletas y peticiones de medidas que cambien la tasa del impuesto sobre la renta de cualquier Colorado. Esta tabla enumeraría el cambio promedio en los impuestos adeudados para ocho tramos de ingresos. Cualquier cambio de impuestos se enumeraría con un monto en dólares y un signo más [+] para impuestos más altos o un signo negativo [-] para impuestos más bajos.

    Bajo la Declaración de Derechos del Contribuyente, cualquier medida que aumente los impuestos debe comenzar con el monto total en dólares recaudado. Pero esa gran cantidad total en dólares no les dice a los votantes cuánto pagarían ellos, individualmente. Cuando los contribuyentes saben exactamente cuánto les costaría una iniciativa, pueden tomar decisiones mejor informadas sobre el costo/beneficio de una iniciativa. Es vital que los votantes entiendan por qué están votando, y esta medida solo ayuda a aclarar información complicada sobre cómo la política fiscal afecta a cada votante de Colorado.

    Recomendamos votar SÍ a la Proposición GG.
    Support / Oppose / Neutral
  • VOTE NO

    Vote NO on a tax cut that goes overwhelmingly to the richest 1%.

  • Proposition 121 permanently cuts Colorado's individual and corporate income tax rate from 4.55 percent to 4.40 percent. Colorado's flat tax code means that low income and wealthier Coloradans pay the same amount in percentage of their income, and our rate is too low to adequately fund our schools, and other tax-funded services. Of course, we all want to pay less, but, what is hidden here is that our taxes pay for services like schools, health, and public safety. Colorado schools are underfunded.

    Taxes are unfair and tricky in Colorado. Lower income tax payers pay more in taxes, than wealthier Coloradans do - due to the flat tax rate in Colorado. Colorado also has other limitations on changing taxes due to the limitations of the Taxpayer’s Bill Of Rights, and ranks 35th in state and local tax burden as a percentage of personal income, meaning taxing the wealthy more than lower income and working class Coloradans is really the only direction tax policy should go in Colorado. This measure only changes everyone’s taxes and continues with a flat tax rate - perpetuating the issue that lower income tax payers will pay more in taxes than wealthier Coloradans.
    Proposition 121 permanently cuts Colorado's individual and corporate income tax rate from 4.55 percent to 4.40 percent. Colorado's flat tax code means that low income and wealthier Coloradans pay the same amount in percentage of their income, and our rate is too low to adequately fund our schools, and other tax-funded services. Of course, we all want to pay less, but, what is hidden here is that our taxes pay for services like schools, health, and public safety. Colorado schools are underfunded.

    Taxes are unfair and tricky in Colorado. Lower income tax payers pay more in taxes, than wealthier Coloradans do - due to the flat tax rate in Colorado. Colorado also has other limitations on changing taxes due to the limitations of the Taxpayer’s Bill Of Rights, and ranks 35th in state and local tax burden as a percentage of personal income, meaning taxing the wealthy more than lower income and working class Coloradans is really the only direction tax policy should go in Colorado. This measure only changes everyone’s taxes and continues with a flat tax rate - perpetuating the issue that lower income tax payers will pay more in taxes than wealthier Coloradans.
    Proposition 121 permanently cuts Colorado's individual and corporate income tax rate from 4.55 percent to 4.40 percent. Colorado's flat tax code means that low income and wealthier Coloradans pay the same amount in percentage of their income, and our rate is too low to adequately fund our schools, and other tax-funded services. Of course, we all want to pay less, but, what is hidden here is that our taxes pay for services like schools, health, and public safety. Colorado schools are underfunded.

    Taxes are unfair and tricky in Colorado. Lower income tax payers pay more in taxes, than wealthier Coloradans do - due to the flat tax rate in Colorado. Colorado also has other limitations on changing taxes due to the limitations of the Taxpayer’s Bill Of Rights, and ranks 35th in state and local tax burden as a percentage of personal income, meaning taxing the wealthy more than lower income and working class Coloradans is really the only direction tax policy should go in Colorado. This measure only changes everyone’s taxes and continues with a flat tax rate - perpetuating the issue that lower income tax payers will pay more in taxes than wealthier Coloradans.

    Proposition 121 - State Income Tax Rate Reduction

    La Proposición 121 recorta de forma permanente la tasa impositiva sobre los ingresos individuales y corporativos de Colorado del 4,55 por ciento al 4,40 por ciento. El código de impuesto único de Colorado significa que los habitantes de Colorado con bajos ingresos y los más ricos pagan la misma cantidad en porcentaje de sus ingresos, y nuestra tasa es demasiado baja para financiar adecuadamente nuestras escuelas y otros servicios financiados con impuestos. Por supuesto, todos queremos pagar menos, pero lo que se esconde aquí es que nuestros impuestos pagan servicios como escuelas, salud y seguridad pública. Las escuelas de Colorado tienen fondos insuficientes.

    Los impuestos son injustos y complicados en Colorado. Los contribuyentes de impuestos sobre ingresos más bajos pagan más en impuestos que los habitantes de Colorado más ricos, debido a la tasa impositiva fija en Colorado. Colorado también tiene otras limitaciones en el cambio de impuestos debido a las limitaciones de la Declaración de Derechos del Contribuyente, y ocupa el puesto 35 en la carga fiscal estatal y local como porcentaje de los ingresos personales, lo que significa que gravar a los ricos más que a los de bajos ingresos y a la clase trabajadora de Colorado es realmente es la única dirección que debería tomar la política fiscal en Colorado. Esta medida solo cambia los impuestos de todos y continúa con una tasa impositiva fija, lo que perpetúa el problema de que los contribuyentes de impuestos sobre ingresos más bajos pagarán más impuestos que los habitantes de Colorado más ricos.
    Support / Oppose / Neutral
  • VOTE YES

    Vote YES to support access to natural medicine.

  • Proposition 122 advances criminal justice reform by legalizing the use of natural medicines - including dimethyltryptamine (DMT); ibogaine; mescaline (excluding peyote); psilocybin; and psilocybin.

    Proposition 122 decriminalizes personal use, possession growth, and transport of natural medicines for people who are 21 years and older and legalizes multiple natural medicines - and defines them as natural medicine. This ballot measure also creates the Regulated Natural Medicine Access Program for licensed healing centers to support the administration and use of natural medicine services.

    Proposition 122 only requires a simple majority of "yes" votes to pass. We endorse this measure because decriminalizing psilocybin and natural medicines is an important step in criminal justice reform.
    Proposition 122 advances criminal justice reform by legalizing the use of natural medicines - including dimethyltryptamine (DMT); ibogaine; mescaline (excluding peyote); psilocybin; and psilocybin.

    Proposition 122 decriminalizes personal use, possession growth, and transport of natural medicines for people who are 21 years and older and legalizes multiple natural medicines - and defines them as natural medicine. This ballot measure also creates the Regulated Natural Medicine Access Program for licensed healing centers to support the administration and use of natural medicine services.

    Proposition 122 only requires a simple majority of "yes" votes to pass. We endorse this measure because decriminalizing psilocybin and natural medicines is an important step in criminal justice reform.
    Proposition 122 advances criminal justice reform by legalizing the use of natural medicines - including dimethyltryptamine (DMT); ibogaine; mescaline (excluding peyote); psilocybin; and psilocybin.

    Proposition 122 decriminalizes personal use, possession growth, and transport of natural medicines for people who are 21 years and older and legalizes multiple natural medicines - and defines them as natural medicine. This ballot measure also creates the Regulated Natural Medicine Access Program for licensed healing centers to support the administration and use of natural medicine services.

    Proposition 122 only requires a simple majority of "yes" votes to pass. We endorse this measure because decriminalizing psilocybin and natural medicines is an important step in criminal justice reform.

    Proposition 122 - Access to Natural Medicine

    La Proposición 122 promueve la reforma de la justicia penal al legalizar el uso de medicamentos naturales, incluida la dimetiltriptamina (DMT); ibogaína; mescalina (excepto peyote); psilocibina; y psilocibina.

    La Proposición 122 despenaliza el uso personal, el crecimiento de la posesión y el transporte de medicamentos naturales para personas mayores de 21 años y legaliza múltiples medicamentos naturales, y los define como medicina natural. Esta medida electoral también crea el Programa de acceso regulado a la medicina natural para centros de curación con licencia para apoyar la administración y el uso de los servicios de medicina natural.

    La Proposición 122 solo requiere una mayoría simple de votos a favor para ser aprobada. Respaldamos esta medida porque despenalizar la psilocibina y las medicinas naturales es un paso importante en la reforma de la justicia penal.
    Support / Oppose / Neutral
  • Endorsed By ProgressNow Colorado
  • VOTE YES

    Vote YES for more affordable housing.

  • This ballot measure would create the State Affordable Housing Fund. This fund would be made by dedicating one-tenth of one percent (0.01%) of federal taxable income to fund housing programs. This is not a tax increase, it is using federal taxable income to fund housing programs and housing initiatives. For example, this funding would pay for 5 main things: a housing equity program, debt programs for low to middle income multi family rental developments, an affordable home ownership program by providing down payment assistance, and creating grants to local governments and loans to nonprofit organizations to acquire and maintain land for the development of affordable housing.

    It is no secret Colorado faces unprecedented housing issues, it is vital we have multi-pronged approaches to our common and complex housing issues. We recommend a YES vote.
    This ballot measure would create the State Affordable Housing Fund. This fund would be made by dedicating one-tenth of one percent (0.01%) of federal taxable income to fund housing programs. This is not a tax increase, it is using federal taxable income to fund housing programs and housing initiatives. For example, this funding would pay for 5 main things: a housing equity program, debt programs for low to middle income multi family rental developments, an affordable home ownership program by providing down payment assistance, and creating grants to local governments and loans to nonprofit organizations to acquire and maintain land for the development of affordable housing.

    It is no secret Colorado faces unprecedented housing issues, it is vital we have multi-pronged approaches to our common and complex housing issues. We recommend a YES vote.
    This ballot measure would create the State Affordable Housing Fund. This fund would be made by dedicating one-tenth of one percent (0.01%) of federal taxable income to fund housing programs. This is not a tax increase, it is using federal taxable income to fund housing programs and housing initiatives. For example, this funding would pay for 5 main things: a housing equity program, debt programs for low to middle income multi family rental developments, an affordable home ownership program by providing down payment assistance, and creating grants to local governments and loans to nonprofit organizations to acquire and maintain land for the development of affordable housing.

    It is no secret Colorado faces unprecedented housing issues, it is vital we have multi-pronged approaches to our common and complex housing issues. We recommend a YES vote.

    Proposition 123 - Dedicated State Income Tax Revenue for Affordable Housing Programs

    Esta medida de la boleta crearía el Fondo Estatal de Vivienda Asequible. Este fondo se haría dedicando una décima parte del uno por ciento (0.01%) del ingreso tributable federal para financiar programas de vivienda. Esto no es un aumento de impuestos, está utilizando ingresos sujetos a impuestos federales para financiar programas de vivienda e iniciativas de vivienda. Por ejemplo, este financiamiento pagaría 5 cosas principales: un programa de equidad de vivienda, programas de deuda para desarrollos de alquiler multifamiliares de ingresos bajos a medianos, un programa de propiedad de vivienda asequible al proporcionar asistencia para el pago inicial y crear subvenciones para gobiernos locales y préstamos para organizaciones sin fines de lucro. organizaciones para adquirir y mantener terrenos para el desarrollo de viviendas asequibles.

    No es ningún secreto que Colorado enfrenta problemas de vivienda sin precedentes, es vital que tengamos enfoques múltiples para nuestros problemas de vivienda comunes y complejos. Recomendamos un voto SÍ.
    Support / Oppose / Neutral
  • No Position

    No Recommendation

  • Proposition 124 will incrementally increase the number of retail liquor store licenses that any individual may own or hold a share in, as follows, up to eight licenses by December 31, 2026, up to 13 licenses by December 31, 2031, up to 20 licenses by December 31, 2036; and an unlimited number of licenses on or after January 1, 2037.” A store with a retail liquor license cannot currently be within 500 feet of another store with that same license.
    Proposition 124 will incrementally increase the number of retail liquor store licenses that any individual may own or hold a share in, as follows, up to eight licenses by December 31, 2026, up to 13 licenses by December 31, 2031, up to 20 licenses by December 31, 2036; and an unlimited number of licenses on or after January 1, 2037.” A store with a retail liquor license cannot currently be within 500 feet of another store with that same license.
    Proposition 124 will incrementally increase the number of retail liquor store licenses that any individual may own or hold a share in, as follows, up to eight licenses by December 31, 2026, up to 13 licenses by December 31, 2031, up to 20 licenses by December 31, 2036; and an unlimited number of licenses on or after January 1, 2037.” A store with a retail liquor license cannot currently be within 500 feet of another store with that same license.

    Proposition 124 - Concerning Liquor Licenses

    La Proposición 124 aumentará gradualmente la cantidad de licencias de licorerías minoristas que cualquier persona puede poseer o tener una participación, de la siguiente manera, hasta ocho licencias para el 31 de diciembre de 2026, hasta 13 licencias para el 31 de diciembre de 2031, hasta 20 licencias antes del 31 de diciembre de 2036; y un número ilimitado de licencias a partir del 1 de enero de 2037”. Una tienda con una licencia de venta de licores no puede estar actualmente a menos de 500 pies de otra tienda con la misma licencia.
    Support / Oppose / Neutral
  • No Position

    No recommendation

  • Proposition 125 would make it so any grocery store or convenience store that is licensed to sell beer would be allowed to also sell wine. When considering this bill it is important to note that a new fermented malt beverage and wine retailer's license could not be issued to a location within 500 feet of a retail liquor store, and likewise.
    Proposition 125 would make it so any grocery store or convenience store that is licensed to sell beer would be allowed to also sell wine. When considering this bill it is important to note that a new fermented malt beverage and wine retailer's license could not be issued to a location within 500 feet of a retail liquor store, and likewise.
    Proposition 125 would make it so any grocery store or convenience store that is licensed to sell beer would be allowed to also sell wine. When considering this bill it is important to note that a new fermented malt beverage and wine retailer's license could not be issued to a location within 500 feet of a retail liquor store, and likewise.

    Proposition 125 - Sales of Alcohol Beverages

    La Proposición 125 haría que cualquier tienda de abarrotes o tienda de conveniencia que tenga licencia para vender cerveza también pueda vender vino. Al considerar este proyecto de ley, es importante tener en cuenta que no se podría emitir una nueva licencia de minorista de bebidas de malta fermentada y vino para un lugar dentro de los 500 pies de una tienda minorista de licores, y de la misma manera.
    Support / Oppose / Neutral
  • No Position

    No recommendation

  • Proposition 126 would allow alcohol retailers and liquor-licensed businesses such as grocery stores, convenience stores, liquor stores, bars, and restaurants to offer third-party delivery services for alcohol deliveries beginning March 1, 2023. Similar to the temporary order we saw in COVID-19 - under this ballot measure - bars and restaurants would be allowed to offer alcohol takeout and delivery. While alcohol delivery sounds nice, we are not clear how this ballot measure will impact (negatively or positively) our gig workers, low wage workers, and the larger labor force.

    Right now in Colorado, retailers are allowed to deliver alcohol using a store-owned vehicle by an employee who is at least 21 years old. Alcohol delivery has been allowed by liquor stores since 1994, by wineries since 1997, and by grocery and convenience stores since 2019. In 2020, Colorado allowed takeout and delivery of alcohol by bars and restaurants through July 1, 2025.
    Proposition 126 would allow alcohol retailers and liquor-licensed businesses such as grocery stores, convenience stores, liquor stores, bars, and restaurants to offer third-party delivery services for alcohol deliveries beginning March 1, 2023. Similar to the temporary order we saw in COVID-19 - under this ballot measure - bars and restaurants would be allowed to offer alcohol takeout and delivery. While alcohol delivery sounds nice, we are not clear how this ballot measure will impact (negatively or positively) our gig workers, low wage workers, and the larger labor force.

    Right now in Colorado, retailers are allowed to deliver alcohol using a store-owned vehicle by an employee who is at least 21 years old. Alcohol delivery has been allowed by liquor stores since 1994, by wineries since 1997, and by grocery and convenience stores since 2019. In 2020, Colorado allowed takeout and delivery of alcohol by bars and restaurants through July 1, 2025.
    Proposition 126 would allow alcohol retailers and liquor-licensed businesses such as grocery stores, convenience stores, liquor stores, bars, and restaurants to offer third-party delivery services for alcohol deliveries beginning March 1, 2023. Similar to the temporary order we saw in COVID-19 - under this ballot measure - bars and restaurants would be allowed to offer alcohol takeout and delivery. While alcohol delivery sounds nice, we are not clear how this ballot measure will impact (negatively or positively) our gig workers, low wage workers, and the larger labor force.

    Right now in Colorado, retailers are allowed to deliver alcohol using a store-owned vehicle by an employee who is at least 21 years old. Alcohol delivery has been allowed by liquor stores since 1994, by wineries since 1997, and by grocery and convenience stores since 2019. In 2020, Colorado allowed takeout and delivery of alcohol by bars and restaurants through July 1, 2025.

    Proposition 126 - Third-Party Delivery of Alcohol Beverages

    La Propuesta 126 permitiría a los minoristas de bebidas alcohólicas y a las empresas con licencia de licor, como supermercados, tiendas de conveniencia, licorerías, bares y restaurantes, ofrecer servicios de entrega de terceros para las entregas de alcohol a partir del 1 de marzo de 2023. Similar a la orden temporal que vimos en COVID-19: según esta medida electoral, los bares y restaurantes podrían ofrecer bebidas alcohólicas para llevar y entregar. Si bien la entrega de alcohol suena bien, no tenemos claro cómo esta medida electoral afectará (negativa o positivamente) a nuestros trabajadores temporales, trabajadores con salarios bajos y la fuerza laboral en general.

    En este momento, en Colorado, los minoristas pueden entregar alcohol utilizando un vehículo propiedad de la tienda por un empleado que tenga al menos 21 años. Las licorerías permiten la entrega de alcohol desde 1994, las bodegas desde 1997 y las tiendas de comestibles y de conveniencia desde 2019. En 2020, Colorado permitió la entrega y entrega de alcohol en bares y restaurantes hasta el 1 de julio de 2025.
    Support / Oppose / Neutral

Locate My Guide

Find your guide by automatically detecting your location or by entering your voting address.

Choose My Guide

You can also choose your jurisdiction from the following list below

Denver County

All Denver County Races

State House District Guides

If you know your house district, pick it below.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

City Guides

If you know your city, pick your local guide below.

Denver