Mia Bonta (listed in Progressive Voters Guide)

Re-elect President Joe Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris to keep America on track.

President Joe Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris have a track record and policy positions that demonstrate that they will continue to govern effectively in the best interests of this diverse nation.

Progressive endorsements: President Biden and Vice President Harris have the endorsement of some progressive groups, including the Sierra Club, Reproductive Freedom for All America, League of Conservation Voters, National Center for Transgender Equality, and Students Demand Action. They have also received the endorsement of a significant number of labor unions, including United Auto Workers, Actors’ Equity Association, AFL-CIO, IATSE, National Nurses United, and the American Federation of Teachers. President Biden and Vice President Harris also have the backing of the Democratic National Committee and a significant number of current and former Democratic officials, including former President Barack Obama, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, former Climate Envoy John Kerry, 14 current governors, 30 sitting U.S. senators, and over 70 members of the House of Representatives. This list includes California’s elected leaders Gov. Gavin Newsom, Lt. Gov. Eleni Kounalakis, Sen. Alex Padilla, Rep. Katie Porter, Rep. Eric Swalwell, and LA Mayor Karen Bass.

Priority policies: The Biden administration has had policy successes across a diversity of issue areas during their first term. Immediately after taking office during the height of the COVID-19 pandemic, President Biden worked to move the American Rescue Plan through Congress and successfully passed legislation to provide stimulus checks, boosts to unemployment payments, and increased funds for education and small-business loans. The plan also ramped up the distribution and administration of vaccines. This legislative effort was followed by the Bi-Partisan Infrastructure Law that made a $1 billion investment in electric vehicle infrastructure, national road and bridge repair, clean drinking water modifications, and power grid updates. In addition to these investments, the administration passed President Biden’s signature Inflation Reduction Act, an expansive bill to provide needed funding to cap prescription drug costs for the elderly, increase corporate taxes, invest in clean energy and climate protections, reduce the federal deficit, and increase tax accountability by provided additional funding to the IRS. The White House has indicated that nearly 170,000 clean energy jobs have been created by this legislation, clean energy investments have increased by $110 billion, and insulin has been capped at $35 a month. After years of inaction from the federal government, President Biden signed a significant gun-safety bill into law, which strengthens background check laws, incentivizes state-based red flag laws, and expands limitations on the acquisition of firearms by perpetrators of domestic abuse. President Biden also signed the CHIPS Act into law to increase domestic production of the semiconductors used in the manufacturing of many of the products Americans use daily.

The Biden administration’s economic policies have contributed to the lowest unemployment rate in over 50 years, at 3.4% as of January 2024, economic growth of 3.1% in 2023, and an inflation rate that dropped below 3% at the end of December. The administration has led the U.S. back into the Paris Climate Accord, forgiven $136 billion in education debt, and provided consistent support to striking labor unions across the country. While many of these accomplishments came during the first two years of the administration, when Democrats controlled both chambers of Congress, President Biden and Vice President Harris have worked across the aisle to move impactful legislation forward for the American people with a divided Congress.

While the administration’s legislative successes have been substantial, they have been subject to significant criticism from progressives during this first term. While President Biden has maintained strong support for Israel during the October 7 Hamas attacks and the Israeli government’s retaliatory attacks on Palestinians in Gaza, the electorate and congressional representatives have expressed concerns about the U.S. government providing continued funding to the Israeli military, and activists and leaders have called on the Biden administration to advocate for a ceasefire in Gaza. On immigration and the southern border, the federal government’s failure to act has effectively continued the anti-immigrant policies enacted under the Trump administration and caused big city mayors and Democratic governors to publicly request that the White House and Congress pass meaningful legislation to reform an increasingly overwhelmed asylum and immigration system. Under Republican control, Congress has not passed any immigration reforms, and Republican leaders have advocated for more punitive and inhumane immigration policies.

Governance and community leadership experience: President Biden and Vice President Harris have served in the White House since 2020, when they were elected on a joint ticket with 306 electoral votes and over 51% of the national popular vote. Their campaign won six critical swing states—Michigan, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Georgia, Nevada, and Arizona—to secure the electoral college victory.

Prior to his election, President Biden had a long and prominent political career. He served two terms as former President Barack Obama’s vice president and was responsible for managing the 2009 economic recovery, helping to expand health care through the Affordable Care Act, and acting as the administration’s liaison to the Senate. Before joining the Obama administration, he spent 36 years representing Delaware in the Senate. He was often critiqued as being an unremarkable, status quo Democrat, and mid-career votes in favor of the Defense of Marriage Act, anti-drug legislation, and the Iraq War reaffirm that characterization. In 1991, Vice President Biden was the chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee and presided over the Supreme Court confirmation hearings for Justice Clarence Thomas, who had been credibly accused of sexual harassment by a former colleague, Anita Hill. Vice President Biden’s mismanagement of the hearing resulted in a targeted and unfair character assassination of Anita Hill and remains a reminder of his complicity in the patriarchal and racist systems on which our American government is built.

Prior to her election, Vice President Harris was the first woman of color elected to represent California in the United States Senate. She sponsored legislation on climate and environmental protections, rental and housing protections, women’s health, and pandemic relief. She was also an original cosponsor of the progressive Green New Deal authored by Rep. Alexandria Ocasio Cortez and Sen. Ed Markey. Before serving in the Senate, Vice President Harris had a long legal career in California, serving for 8 years in the Alameda County District Attorney’s Office before transitioning to a role as a prosecutor in the San Francisco District Attorney’s Office. In 2003, she won her bid to become district attorney of the City and County of San Francisco, where she served two terms before being elected as the attorney general for the state of California in 2010. She was the first woman and the first person of color to hold this seat. Vice President Harris’s record was both progressive for the time and complicated by her moderate approach to policing and criminal justice. She has been criticized for failing to institute comprehensive police accountability measures, for not establishing meaningful prison reform, and for taking a hands-off approach to cases related to police misconduct. However, her lenient approach to policing was often punctuated by decidedly progressive support for social justice issues, including the establishment of an education and workforce reentry program designed to diminish recidivism.

Other background: President Biden is from Scranton, PA, and moved to Delaware with his family when he was 10 years old. He has been a resident of Wilmington, Delaware, for most of his adult life. Vice President Harris grew up in Berkeley, CA, and was a longtime resident of Los Angeles. She is the daughter of a Jamaican father and an Indian mother, who both emigrated to the Bay Area in the 1960s.

The Race

Primary election: Eight candidates are running in the March 5 Democratic primary, including incumbent President Joe Biden (D), Rep. Dean Phillips (D), and Marianne Williamson (D). The candidate who receives the most delegates in the national Democratic primary will formally become the party’s designated Presidential candidate in August 2024.

Candidate fundraising and pledges: President Biden’s campaign has raised $56 million as of December 2023, and is not funded by police, real estate, corporate PAC, or fossil fuel interests.

Opposing candidate: Rep. Dean Phillips
Opposing candidate’s fundraising and pledges: Rep. Phillips’s campaign has not filed any campaign fundraising receipts with the FEC as of December 2023.

Opposing candidate: Marianne Williamson
Opposing candidate’s fundraising and pledges: Williamson’s campaign has raised $2.6 million as of December 2023, and is funded by corporate PAC interests. A significant amount of her campaign funding has been through candidate donations and loans taken out by the candidate.

The Position

The President of the United States is the head of the executive branch of the federal government, and the commander-in-chief for all branches of the armed forces. A president has the power to make diplomatic, executive, and judicial appointments, and can sign into law or veto legislation. Presidential administrations are responsible for both foreign and domestic policy priorities. Presidents are limited to serving two four-year terms in office.

Re-elect President Joe Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris to keep America on track.

President Joe Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris have a track record and policy positions that demonstrate that they will continue to govern effectively in the best interests of this diverse nation.

Progressive endorsements: President Biden and Vice President Harris have the endorsement of some progressive groups, including the Sierra Club, Reproductive Freedom for All America, League of Conservation Voters, National Center for Transgender Equality, and Students Demand Action. They have also received the endorsement of a significant number of labor unions, including United Auto Workers, Actors’ Equity Association, AFL-CIO, IATSE, National Nurses United, and the American Federation of Teachers. President Biden and Vice President Harris also have the backing of the Democratic National Committee and a significant number of current and former Democratic officials, including former President Barack Obama, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, former Climate Envoy John Kerry, 14 current governors, 30 sitting U.S. senators, and over 70 members of the House of Representatives. This list includes California’s elected leaders Gov. Gavin Newsom, Lt. Gov. Eleni Kounalakis, Sen. Alex Padilla, Rep. Katie Porter, Rep. Eric Swalwell, and LA Mayor Karen Bass.

Priority policies: The Biden administration has had policy successes across a diversity of issue areas during their first term. Immediately after taking office during the height of the COVID-19 pandemic, President Biden worked to move the American Rescue Plan through Congress and successfully passed legislation to provide stimulus checks, boosts to unemployment payments, and increased funds for education and small-business loans. The plan also ramped up the distribution and administration of vaccines. This legislative effort was followed by the Bi-Partisan Infrastructure Law that made a $1 billion investment in electric vehicle infrastructure, national road and bridge repair, clean drinking water modifications, and power grid updates. In addition to these investments, the administration passed President Biden’s signature Inflation Reduction Act, an expansive bill to provide needed funding to cap prescription drug costs for the elderly, increase corporate taxes, invest in clean energy and climate protections, reduce the federal deficit, and increase tax accountability by provided additional funding to the IRS. The White House has indicated that nearly 170,000 clean energy jobs have been created by this legislation, clean energy investments have increased by $110 billion, and insulin has been capped at $35 a month. After years of inaction from the federal government, President Biden signed a significant gun-safety bill into law, which strengthens background check laws, incentivizes state-based red flag laws, and expands limitations on the acquisition of firearms by perpetrators of domestic abuse. President Biden also signed the CHIPS Act into law to increase domestic production of the semiconductors used in the manufacturing of many of the products Americans use daily.

The Biden administration’s economic policies have contributed to the lowest unemployment rate in over 50 years, at 3.4% as of January 2024, economic growth of 3.1% in 2023, and an inflation rate that dropped below 3% at the end of December. The administration has led the U.S. back into the Paris Climate Accord, forgiven $136 billion in education debt, and provided consistent support to striking labor unions across the country. While many of these accomplishments came during the first two years of the administration, when Democrats controlled both chambers of Congress, President Biden and Vice President Harris have worked across the aisle to move impactful legislation forward for the American people with a divided Congress.

While the administration’s legislative successes have been substantial, they have been subject to significant criticism from progressives during this first term. While President Biden has maintained strong support for Israel during the October 7 Hamas attacks and the Israeli government’s retaliatory attacks on Palestinians in Gaza, the electorate and congressional representatives have expressed concerns about the U.S. government providing continued funding to the Israeli military, and activists and leaders have called on the Biden administration to advocate for a ceasefire in Gaza. On immigration and the southern border, the federal government’s failure to act has effectively continued the anti-immigrant policies enacted under the Trump administration and caused big city mayors and Democratic governors to publicly request that the White House and Congress pass meaningful legislation to reform an increasingly overwhelmed asylum and immigration system. Under Republican control, Congress has not passed any immigration reforms, and Republican leaders have advocated for more punitive and inhumane immigration policies.

Governance and community leadership experience: President Biden and Vice President Harris have served in the White House since 2020, when they were elected on a joint ticket with 306 electoral votes and over 51% of the national popular vote. Their campaign won six critical swing states—Michigan, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Georgia, Nevada, and Arizona—to secure the electoral college victory.

Prior to his election, President Biden had a long and prominent political career. He served two terms as former President Barack Obama’s vice president and was responsible for managing the 2009 economic recovery, helping to expand health care through the Affordable Care Act, and acting as the administration’s liaison to the Senate. Before joining the Obama administration, he spent 36 years representing Delaware in the Senate. He was often critiqued as being an unremarkable, status quo Democrat, and mid-career votes in favor of the Defense of Marriage Act, anti-drug legislation, and the Iraq War reaffirm that characterization. In 1991, Vice President Biden was the chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee and presided over the Supreme Court confirmation hearings for Justice Clarence Thomas, who had been credibly accused of sexual harassment by a former colleague, Anita Hill. Vice President Biden’s mismanagement of the hearing resulted in a targeted and unfair character assassination of Anita Hill and remains a reminder of his complicity in the patriarchal and racist systems on which our American government is built.

Prior to her election, Vice President Harris was the first woman of color elected to represent California in the United States Senate. She sponsored legislation on climate and environmental protections, rental and housing protections, women’s health, and pandemic relief. She was also an original cosponsor of the progressive Green New Deal authored by Rep. Alexandria Ocasio Cortez and Sen. Ed Markey. Before serving in the Senate, Vice President Harris had a long legal career in California, serving for 8 years in the Alameda County District Attorney’s Office before transitioning to a role as a prosecutor in the San Francisco District Attorney’s Office. In 2003, she won her bid to become district attorney of the City and County of San Francisco, where she served two terms before being elected as the attorney general for the state of California in 2010. She was the first woman and the first person of color to hold this seat. Vice President Harris’s record was both progressive for the time and complicated by her moderate approach to policing and criminal justice. She has been criticized for failing to institute comprehensive police accountability measures, for not establishing meaningful prison reform, and for taking a hands-off approach to cases related to police misconduct. However, her lenient approach to policing was often punctuated by decidedly progressive support for social justice issues, including the establishment of an education and workforce reentry program designed to diminish recidivism.

Other background: President Biden is from Scranton, PA, and moved to Delaware with his family when he was 10 years old. He has been a resident of Wilmington, Delaware, for most of his adult life. Vice President Harris grew up in Berkeley, CA, and was a longtime resident of Los Angeles. She is the daughter of a Jamaican father and an Indian mother, who both emigrated to the Bay Area in the 1960s.

The Race

Primary election: Eight candidates are running in the March 5 Democratic primary, including incumbent President Joe Biden (D), Rep. Dean Phillips (D), and Marianne Williamson (D). The candidate who receives the most delegates in the national Democratic primary will formally become the party’s designated Presidential candidate in August 2024.

Candidate fundraising and pledges: President Biden’s campaign has raised $56 million as of December 2023, and is not funded by police, real estate, corporate PAC, or fossil fuel interests.

Opposing candidate: Rep. Dean Phillips
Opposing candidate’s fundraising and pledges: Rep. Phillips’s campaign has not filed any campaign fundraising receipts with the FEC as of December 2023.

Opposing candidate: Marianne Williamson
Opposing candidate’s fundraising and pledges: Williamson’s campaign has raised $2.6 million as of December 2023, and is funded by corporate PAC interests. A significant amount of her campaign funding has been through candidate donations and loans taken out by the candidate.

The Position

The President of the United States is the head of the executive branch of the federal government, and the commander-in-chief for all branches of the armed forces. A president has the power to make diplomatic, executive, and judicial appointments, and can sign into law or veto legislation. Presidential administrations are responsible for both foreign and domestic policy priorities. Presidents are limited to serving two four-year terms in office.

Re-elect President Joe Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris to keep America on track.

President Joe Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris have a track record and policy positions that demonstrate that they will continue to govern effectively in the best interests of this diverse nation.

Progressive endorsements: President Biden and Vice President Harris have the endorsement of some progressive groups, including the Sierra Club, Reproductive Freedom for All America, League of Conservation Voters, National Center for Transgender Equality, and Students Demand Action. They have also received the endorsement of a significant number of labor unions, including United Auto Workers, Actors’ Equity Association, AFL-CIO, IATSE, National Nurses United, and the American Federation of Teachers. President Biden and Vice President Harris also have the backing of the Democratic National Committee and a significant number of current and former Democratic officials, including former President Barack Obama, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, former Climate Envoy John Kerry, 14 current governors, 30 sitting U.S. senators, and over 70 members of the House of Representatives. This list includes California’s elected leaders Gov. Gavin Newsom, Lt. Gov. Eleni Kounalakis, Sen. Alex Padilla, Rep. Katie Porter, Rep. Eric Swalwell, and LA Mayor Karen Bass.

Priority policies: The Biden administration has had policy successes across a diversity of issue areas during their first term. Immediately after taking office during the height of the COVID-19 pandemic, President Biden worked to move the American Rescue Plan through Congress and successfully passed legislation to provide stimulus checks, boosts to unemployment payments, and increased funds for education and small-business loans. The plan also ramped up the distribution and administration of vaccines. This legislative effort was followed by the Bi-Partisan Infrastructure Law that made a $1 billion investment in electric vehicle infrastructure, national road and bridge repair, clean drinking water modifications, and power grid updates. In addition to these investments, the administration passed President Biden’s signature Inflation Reduction Act, an expansive bill to provide needed funding to cap prescription drug costs for the elderly, increase corporate taxes, invest in clean energy and climate protections, reduce the federal deficit, and increase tax accountability by provided additional funding to the IRS. The White House has indicated that nearly 170,000 clean energy jobs have been created by this legislation, clean energy investments have increased by $110 billion, and insulin has been capped at $35 a month. After years of inaction from the federal government, President Biden signed a significant gun-safety bill into law, which strengthens background check laws, incentivizes state-based red flag laws, and expands limitations on the acquisition of firearms by perpetrators of domestic abuse. President Biden also signed the CHIPS Act into law to increase domestic production of the semiconductors used in the manufacturing of many of the products Americans use daily.

The Biden administration’s economic policies have contributed to the lowest unemployment rate in over 50 years, at 3.4% as of January 2024, economic growth of 3.1% in 2023, and an inflation rate that dropped below 3% at the end of December. The administration has led the U.S. back into the Paris Climate Accord, forgiven $136 billion in education debt, and provided consistent support to striking labor unions across the country. While many of these accomplishments came during the first two years of the administration, when Democrats controlled both chambers of Congress, President Biden and Vice President Harris have worked across the aisle to move impactful legislation forward for the American people with a divided Congress.

While the administration’s legislative successes have been substantial, they have been subject to significant criticism from progressives during this first term. While President Biden has maintained strong support for Israel during the October 7 Hamas attacks and the Israeli government’s retaliatory attacks on Palestinians in Gaza, the electorate and congressional representatives have expressed concerns about the U.S. government providing continued funding to the Israeli military, and activists and leaders have called on the Biden administration to advocate for a ceasefire in Gaza. On immigration and the southern border, the federal government’s failure to act has effectively continued the anti-immigrant policies enacted under the Trump administration and caused big city mayors and Democratic governors to publicly request that the White House and Congress pass meaningful legislation to reform an increasingly overwhelmed asylum and immigration system. Under Republican control, Congress has not passed any immigration reforms, and Republican leaders have advocated for more punitive and inhumane immigration policies.

Governance and community leadership experience: President Biden and Vice President Harris have served in the White House since 2020, when they were elected on a joint ticket with 306 electoral votes and over 51% of the national popular vote. Their campaign won six critical swing states—Michigan, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Georgia, Nevada, and Arizona—to secure the electoral college victory.

Prior to his election, President Biden had a long and prominent political career. He served two terms as former President Barack Obama’s vice president and was responsible for managing the 2009 economic recovery, helping to expand health care through the Affordable Care Act, and acting as the administration’s liaison to the Senate. Before joining the Obama administration, he spent 36 years representing Delaware in the Senate. He was often critiqued as being an unremarkable, status quo Democrat, and mid-career votes in favor of the Defense of Marriage Act, anti-drug legislation, and the Iraq War reaffirm that characterization. In 1991, Vice President Biden was the chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee and presided over the Supreme Court confirmation hearings for Justice Clarence Thomas, who had been credibly accused of sexual harassment by a former colleague, Anita Hill. Vice President Biden’s mismanagement of the hearing resulted in a targeted and unfair character assassination of Anita Hill and remains a reminder of his complicity in the patriarchal and racist systems on which our American government is built.

Prior to her election, Vice President Harris was the first woman of color elected to represent California in the United States Senate. She sponsored legislation on climate and environmental protections, rental and housing protections, women’s health, and pandemic relief. She was also an original cosponsor of the progressive Green New Deal authored by Rep. Alexandria Ocasio Cortez and Sen. Ed Markey. Before serving in the Senate, Vice President Harris had a long legal career in California, serving for 8 years in the Alameda County District Attorney’s Office before transitioning to a role as a prosecutor in the San Francisco District Attorney’s Office. In 2003, she won her bid to become district attorney of the City and County of San Francisco, where she served two terms before being elected as the attorney general for the state of California in 2010. She was the first woman and the first person of color to hold this seat. Vice President Harris’s record was both progressive for the time and complicated by her moderate approach to policing and criminal justice. She has been criticized for failing to institute comprehensive police accountability measures, for not establishing meaningful prison reform, and for taking a hands-off approach to cases related to police misconduct. However, her lenient approach to policing was often punctuated by decidedly progressive support for social justice issues, including the establishment of an education and workforce reentry program designed to diminish recidivism.

Other background: President Biden is from Scranton, PA, and moved to Delaware with his family when he was 10 years old. He has been a resident of Wilmington, Delaware, for most of his adult life. Vice President Harris grew up in Berkeley, CA, and was a longtime resident of Los Angeles. She is the daughter of a Jamaican father and an Indian mother, who both emigrated to the Bay Area in the 1960s.

The Race

Primary election: Eight candidates are running in the March 5 Democratic primary, including incumbent President Joe Biden (D), Rep. Dean Phillips (D), and Marianne Williamson (D). The candidate who receives the most delegates in the national Democratic primary will formally become the party’s designated Presidential candidate in August 2024.

Candidate fundraising and pledges: President Biden’s campaign has raised $56 million as of December 2023, and is not funded by police, real estate, corporate PAC, or fossil fuel interests.

Opposing candidate: Rep. Dean Phillips
Opposing candidate’s fundraising and pledges: Rep. Phillips’s campaign has not filed any campaign fundraising receipts with the FEC as of December 2023.

Opposing candidate: Marianne Williamson
Opposing candidate’s fundraising and pledges: Williamson’s campaign has raised $2.6 million as of December 2023, and is funded by corporate PAC interests. A significant amount of her campaign funding has been through candidate donations and loans taken out by the candidate.

The Position

The President of the United States is the head of the executive branch of the federal government, and the commander-in-chief for all branches of the armed forces. A president has the power to make diplomatic, executive, and judicial appointments, and can sign into law or veto legislation. Presidential administrations are responsible for both foreign and domestic policy priorities. Presidents are limited to serving two four-year terms in office.

U.S. Senator

No Recommendation

There are 22 candidates running for California’s open U.S. Senate seat. Based on our analysis, three qualified candidates for this position have a distinct vision for the state. We recommend that you choose the candidate who best aligns to your values in this race.

The Race

Primary election: In October 2022, Governor Newsom appointed labor leader, political advisor, and former Emily’s List President Laphonza Butler to serve the remainder of the six-year term of Sen. Dianne Feinstein, who died September 2022 after serving in the U.S. Senate since 1992. There are 22 candidates running in the March 5 primary, including Rep. Barbara Lee (D), Rep. Katie Porter (D), and Rep. Adam Schiff (D). The top two vote recipients will advance to the general election on November 5.

The Candidates

Key Initiatives: Representative Barbara Lee is a longtime Congresswoman and has been a consistent progressive voice in Congress. She has been a prolific author of legislation related to ending AIDS/HIV, malaria, and tuberculosis, has moved efforts to reduce poverty forward, and was the only member of Congress to vote against the authorization for the use of military force after the attacks on September 11, 2001, a controversial position at the time. In recent legislative sessions, she has authored and sponsored legislation to curtail CEO overpay, improve research and public awareness of sickle cell disease, address the national backlog of unprocessed rape kits, and improve mental health resources for students. Prior to her election to the House of Representatives, Rep. Lee worked as a social worker and founded a mental-health service organization, Community Health Alliance for Neighborhood Growth and Education, to benefit her local East Bay community. She then spent eleven years working on the staff of Rep. Ron Dellums, eventually serving as his chief of staff. After her tenure in congressional staffing, she founded a facilities-management company. A few years later, in 1990, Rep. Lee launched a successful bid for a seat in the California Assembly, where she served for six years, before she was elected to the state Senate.

Representative Katie Porter is an attorney and public servant and has been a strong advocate for consumer protection, corporate accountability, and government transparency. She has gained notoriety for her meticulous and expert style of questioning in congressional hearings, and exercises this skill during Oversight and Reform Committee sessions. Her legislative successes include bills to lower prescription drug prices, increase the fee oil and gas companies pay to drill on public lands, lower the income threshold for out-of-pocket healthcare costs, and extend mental healthcare coverage. She has also recently supported efforts to ban members of Congress and their families from trading stocks. Prior to her election to Congress, Rep. Porter spent twenty years as a consumer-protection attorney. Ahead of the housing crisis in 2008, she issued early warnings of the financial system’s predatory lending, and has a strong track record of winning cases related to financial regulation. In 2012, then California Attorney General Kamala Harris appointed Rep. Porter to oversee banks as they returned over $18 billion to cheated homeowners in the state.

Representative Adam Schiff is an attorney and public official and has been a consistent legislator on issues of government accountability, voting access, healthcare, and voting access. He rose to prominence as the Chair of the House Intelligence Committee who led the first impeachment inquiry of the Trump Administration. He has had legislative success on bills to increase pension payments for teachers, expand labor organizing protections, secure nearly $200 million in funding to address affordable housing development and homelessness in the state, create the patient bill of rights, and limit corporate spending to influence elections. He is also the lead author of legislation to end the NRA and the gun industry’s immunity from liability, which prevented victims and their families from seeking legal recourse. Prior to his election to Congress, Rep. Schiff worked as a law clerk and then as Assistant United States Attorney before being elected to California’s State Senate in 1996. He is a longtime supporter of progressive education, immigration, and environmental policies, but has cast unfavorable votes on issues pertaining to military spending and the use of military force, including a 2002 vote in favor of authorizing the use of military force against Iraq.

Community Leadership Experience, Fundraising, and Endorsements: Rep. Lee has served in Congress since 1998, when she was elected with over 66% of the vote. In 2022, she won her reelection to CD-12 over a Republican challenger by 81 points. Her campaign has raised $3.3 million as of December 2023, and is not funded by police, fossil fuel, or corporate PAC interests. Rep. Lee has the endorsement of many progressive groups, including California Working Families Party, Black Women Organized for Political Action PAC, Gen Z for Change, Feminist Majority PAC, Our Revolution, and Reproductive Freedom for All California (formerly NARAL Pro-Choice California). She has also received the endorsement of some community and elected leaders, including Dolores Huerta, State Attorney General Rob Bonta, State Controller Malia Cohen, California Secretary of State Dr. Shirley Weber, Rep. Ro Khanna, Rep. Pramila Jayapal, State Senator Lola Smallwood-Cuevas, Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass, and San Francisco Mayor London Breed.

Rep. Porter has served in Congress since 2018, when she was elected with over 52% of the vote. In 2022, she won her reelection against a Republican challenger by 3 points. Her campaign has raised $22 million as of December 2023, and is not funded by police, fossil fuel, or real estate interests. Rep. Porter has the endorsement of many progressive groups, including California Labor Federation, National Union of Healthcare Workers, and Women in Leadership PAC. She has also received the endorsement of many elected leaders, including Sen. Elizabeth Warren, Attorney General Rob Bonta, Assm. Alex Lee, State Sen. Scott Wiener, Rep. Robert Garcia, and State Sen. Catherine Blakespear.

Rep. Schiff has served in Congress since 2000, when he was elected with over 52% of the vote. In 2022, he won his reelection against a Democratic challenger by 42 points. His campaign has raised $21 million as of December 2023, and is not funded by police, or fossil fuel interests. Rep. Schiff has the endorsement of some labor groups, including IATSE California Council, IAFF, and Amalgamated Transit Union. He has also received the endorsement of many elected officials, including former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, Rep. Kamlager-Dove, State Sen. Maria Elena Durazo, Assm. Tina McKinnor, Assm. Rick Chavez Zbur, and San Diego Mayor Todd Gloria.

Other background: Rep. Lee is from El Paso, TX, and moved to the San Fernando Valley when she was a child. She attended Mills College, where she served as president of the Black Student Union and invited Congresswoman Shirley Chisholm to speak on campus. Her interaction with Rep. Chisholm was an early inspiration for her pursuit of a career in public service.

Rep. Porter is from Fort Dodge, IA, and now resides in Irvine, CA. Along with her legal practice, she is a longtime tenured professor of law at University of California-Irvine.

Rep. Schiff is from the Bay Area. He holds a law degree from Harvard University.

The District

State: California is the most populous state in the United States, and includes 58 counties and 39 million residents.

Voter registration: Of the 22 million registered voters in the state, 47% are Democrat, 24% are Republican, and 22% have no party preference. Democrats have held the Governor’s seat in the state since 2011.

District demographics: 40% Latino, 16% Asian, and 7% Black

Recent election results: California voted for Joe Biden for president in 2020 by 29 points and Gavin Newsom for governor in 2022 by 18 points. Sen. Feinstein won her 2018 reelection against now-Los Angeles City Councilmember Kevin de León by 8 points.

The Position

Members of the Senate represent and advocate for the needs of their state constituency and share legislative responsibility with the House of Representatives. They are responsible for creating, debating, and voting on legislation that addresses issues of national importance. Senators have the exclusive responsibility of providing advice and consent to the executive branch on treaties, and on the nomination and approval of cabinet secretaries, ambassadors, and federal judges. The Senate also has the sole authority to bring and try an impeachment of a high official, up to and including removal from office with a two-thirds majority vote.

Each state, regardless of population, is represented by two senators. Senate elections are statewide, and senators are elected to serve a six-year term. There is no term limit for this position.

There are 22 candidates running for California’s open U.S. Senate seat. Based on our analysis, three qualified candidates for this position have a distinct vision for the state. We recommend that you choose the candidate who best aligns to your values in this race.

The Race

Primary election: In October 2022, Governor Newsom appointed labor leader, political advisor, and former Emily’s List President Laphonza Butler to serve the remainder of the six-year term of Sen. Dianne Feinstein, who died September 2022 after serving in the U.S. Senate since 1992. There are 22 candidates running in the March 5 primary, including Rep. Barbara Lee (D), Rep. Katie Porter (D), and Rep. Adam Schiff (D). The top two vote recipients will advance to the general election on November 5.

The Candidates

Key Initiatives: Representative Barbara Lee is a longtime Congresswoman and has been a consistent progressive voice in Congress. She has been a prolific author of legislation related to ending AIDS/HIV, malaria, and tuberculosis, has moved efforts to reduce poverty forward, and was the only member of Congress to vote against the authorization for the use of military force after the attacks on September 11, 2001, a controversial position at the time. In recent legislative sessions, she has authored and sponsored legislation to curtail CEO overpay, improve research and public awareness of sickle cell disease, address the national backlog of unprocessed rape kits, and improve mental health resources for students. Prior to her election to the House of Representatives, Rep. Lee worked as a social worker and founded a mental-health service organization, Community Health Alliance for Neighborhood Growth and Education, to benefit her local East Bay community. She then spent eleven years working on the staff of Rep. Ron Dellums, eventually serving as his chief of staff. After her tenure in congressional staffing, she founded a facilities-management company. A few years later, in 1990, Rep. Lee launched a successful bid for a seat in the California Assembly, where she served for six years, before she was elected to the state Senate.

Representative Katie Porter is an attorney and public servant and has been a strong advocate for consumer protection, corporate accountability, and government transparency. She has gained notoriety for her meticulous and expert style of questioning in congressional hearings, and exercises this skill during Oversight and Reform Committee sessions. Her legislative successes include bills to lower prescription drug prices, increase the fee oil and gas companies pay to drill on public lands, lower the income threshold for out-of-pocket healthcare costs, and extend mental healthcare coverage. She has also recently supported efforts to ban members of Congress and their families from trading stocks. Prior to her election to Congress, Rep. Porter spent twenty years as a consumer-protection attorney. Ahead of the housing crisis in 2008, she issued early warnings of the financial system’s predatory lending, and has a strong track record of winning cases related to financial regulation. In 2012, then California Attorney General Kamala Harris appointed Rep. Porter to oversee banks as they returned over $18 billion to cheated homeowners in the state.

Representative Adam Schiff is an attorney and public official and has been a consistent legislator on issues of government accountability, voting access, healthcare, and voting access. He rose to prominence as the Chair of the House Intelligence Committee who led the first impeachment inquiry of the Trump Administration. He has had legislative success on bills to increase pension payments for teachers, expand labor organizing protections, secure nearly $200 million in funding to address affordable housing development and homelessness in the state, create the patient bill of rights, and limit corporate spending to influence elections. He is also the lead author of legislation to end the NRA and the gun industry’s immunity from liability, which prevented victims and their families from seeking legal recourse. Prior to his election to Congress, Rep. Schiff worked as a law clerk and then as Assistant United States Attorney before being elected to California’s State Senate in 1996. He is a longtime supporter of progressive education, immigration, and environmental policies, but has cast unfavorable votes on issues pertaining to military spending and the use of military force, including a 2002 vote in favor of authorizing the use of military force against Iraq.

Community Leadership Experience, Fundraising, and Endorsements: Rep. Lee has served in Congress since 1998, when she was elected with over 66% of the vote. In 2022, she won her reelection to CD-12 over a Republican challenger by 81 points. Her campaign has raised $3.3 million as of December 2023, and is not funded by police, fossil fuel, or corporate PAC interests. Rep. Lee has the endorsement of many progressive groups, including California Working Families Party, Black Women Organized for Political Action PAC, Gen Z for Change, Feminist Majority PAC, Our Revolution, and Reproductive Freedom for All California (formerly NARAL Pro-Choice California). She has also received the endorsement of some community and elected leaders, including Dolores Huerta, State Attorney General Rob Bonta, State Controller Malia Cohen, California Secretary of State Dr. Shirley Weber, Rep. Ro Khanna, Rep. Pramila Jayapal, State Senator Lola Smallwood-Cuevas, Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass, and San Francisco Mayor London Breed.

Rep. Porter has served in Congress since 2018, when she was elected with over 52% of the vote. In 2022, she won her reelection against a Republican challenger by 3 points. Her campaign has raised $22 million as of December 2023, and is not funded by police, fossil fuel, or real estate interests. Rep. Porter has the endorsement of many progressive groups, including California Labor Federation, National Union of Healthcare Workers, and Women in Leadership PAC. She has also received the endorsement of many elected leaders, including Sen. Elizabeth Warren, Attorney General Rob Bonta, Assm. Alex Lee, State Sen. Scott Wiener, Rep. Robert Garcia, and State Sen. Catherine Blakespear.

Rep. Schiff has served in Congress since 2000, when he was elected with over 52% of the vote. In 2022, he won his reelection against a Democratic challenger by 42 points. His campaign has raised $21 million as of December 2023, and is not funded by police, or fossil fuel interests. Rep. Schiff has the endorsement of some labor groups, including IATSE California Council, IAFF, and Amalgamated Transit Union. He has also received the endorsement of many elected officials, including former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, Rep. Kamlager-Dove, State Sen. Maria Elena Durazo, Assm. Tina McKinnor, Assm. Rick Chavez Zbur, and San Diego Mayor Todd Gloria.

Other background: Rep. Lee is from El Paso, TX, and moved to the San Fernando Valley when she was a child. She attended Mills College, where she served as president of the Black Student Union and invited Congresswoman Shirley Chisholm to speak on campus. Her interaction with Rep. Chisholm was an early inspiration for her pursuit of a career in public service.

Rep. Porter is from Fort Dodge, IA, and now resides in Irvine, CA. Along with her legal practice, she is a longtime tenured professor of law at University of California-Irvine.

Rep. Schiff is from the Bay Area. He holds a law degree from Harvard University.

The District

State: California is the most populous state in the United States, and includes 58 counties and 39 million residents.

Voter registration: Of the 22 million registered voters in the state, 47% are Democrat, 24% are Republican, and 22% have no party preference. Democrats have held the Governor’s seat in the state since 2011.

District demographics: 40% Latino, 16% Asian, and 7% Black

Recent election results: California voted for Joe Biden for president in 2020 by 29 points and Gavin Newsom for governor in 2022 by 18 points. Sen. Feinstein won her 2018 reelection against now-Los Angeles City Councilmember Kevin de León by 8 points.

The Position

Members of the Senate represent and advocate for the needs of their state constituency and share legislative responsibility with the House of Representatives. They are responsible for creating, debating, and voting on legislation that addresses issues of national importance. Senators have the exclusive responsibility of providing advice and consent to the executive branch on treaties, and on the nomination and approval of cabinet secretaries, ambassadors, and federal judges. The Senate also has the sole authority to bring and try an impeachment of a high official, up to and including removal from office with a two-thirds majority vote.

Each state, regardless of population, is represented by two senators. Senate elections are statewide, and senators are elected to serve a six-year term. There is no term limit for this position.

Congress

Depending on where you live, you may have one of the below congressional districts on your ballot.

10th Congressional District

Member of the House of Representatives

Democrat

Mark DeSaulnier

Website

Re-elect Congressional Representative Mark DeSaulnier to keep CD-10 on the right track for progress.

Rep. Mark DeSaulnier’s track record and policy positions demonstrate that he will continue to be a progressive voice for the constituents of CD-10 and will govern effectively in the best interests of this diverse district.

Progressive endorsements: Rep. DeSaulnier has the endorsement of some progressive groups, including California Environmental Voters and Equality California.

Top issues: Health care, transportation and transit, and education and school services.

Priority bills: This year, Rep. DeSaulnier’s priorities for CD-10 have included 19 bills about health care for immunocompromised individuals and those with disabilities, improving education and school services, and developing sustainable and equitable transportation. All currently remain in committee.

Member of the Congressional Progressive Caucus?: Yes.

Committee leadership/membership: Rep. DeSaulnier currently sits on 3 committees, including the House Ethics Committee, the Committee on Education and Labor, and the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure.

Governance and community leadership experience: Rep. DeSaulnier has served in this congressional seat since 2014, when he was elected with over 70% of the vote. In 2022, he won his re-election against a Green Party challenger by 58 points.

Prior to his election to Congress, Rep. DeSaulnier was first a union member with Teamsters International and Hotel Employees and Restaurant Employees International, and then a restaurant manager and owner. He maintains strong connections with organized labor. He was elected to the city council of Concord, CA, in 1991, served as mayor from 1993 to 1994, and was then appointed to the Contra Costa Board of Supervisors, on which he served until 2002. DeSaulnier was then elected to the California State Assembly for one year, followed by the state Senate for one year.

Other background: Rep. DeSaulnier is from Massachusetts and has lived in Concord for more than 3 decades.

The Race

Primary election: There are 7 candidates running in the March 5 primary, including incumbent Rep. Mark DeSaulnier (D), Katherine Piccinini (R), and Nolan Chen (R). The top two vote recipients will advance to the general election on November 5.

Candidate fundraising and pledges: Rep. DeSaulnier’s campaign has raised $226,502 and is not funded by the police. He has accepted donations from corporate PACs, the fossil fuel industry, and the real estate industry.

Opposing candidate: Republican Nolan Chen
Opposing candidate’s fundraising and pledges: Chen has raised $2,850. However, his campaign is largely self-funded, and he has loaned $2,500 of his own money. No other candidate has filed any campaign receipts for the current election cycle.

The District

Counties in district: California’s 10th Congressional District includes parts of Alameda and Contra Costa Counties.

Voter registration: 50% Democrat, 21% Republican, and 23% No Party Preference. Democrats typically hold this district.

District demographics: 13% Latino, 17% Asian, and 5% Black.

Recent election results: CD-10 voted for Joe Biden for president in 2020 by 39 points and Gavin Newsom for governor in 2022 by 30 points.

The Position

Congressmembers represent and advocate for the needs of their district constituents at the United States Capitol. They are responsible for creating, debating, and voting on legislation that addresses issues within their district.

The United States is divided into 435 congressional districts, each with a population of about 710,000 individuals. Each district elects a representative to the House of Representatives for a two-year term. California has 52 congressional representatives, the largest delegation in the country. There is no term limit for this position.

Re-elect Congressional Representative Mark DeSaulnier to keep CD-10 on the right track for progress.

Rep. Mark DeSaulnier’s track record and policy positions demonstrate that he will continue to be a progressive voice for the constituents of CD-10 and will govern effectively in the best interests of this diverse district.

Progressive endorsements: Rep. DeSaulnier has the endorsement of some progressive groups, including California Environmental Voters and Equality California.

Top issues: Health care, transportation and transit, and education and school services.

Priority bills: This year, Rep. DeSaulnier’s priorities for CD-10 have included 19 bills about health care for immunocompromised individuals and those with disabilities, improving education and school services, and developing sustainable and equitable transportation. All currently remain in committee.

Member of the Congressional Progressive Caucus?: Yes.

Committee leadership/membership: Rep. DeSaulnier currently sits on 3 committees, including the House Ethics Committee, the Committee on Education and Labor, and the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure.

Governance and community leadership experience: Rep. DeSaulnier has served in this congressional seat since 2014, when he was elected with over 70% of the vote. In 2022, he won his re-election against a Green Party challenger by 58 points.

Prior to his election to Congress, Rep. DeSaulnier was first a union member with Teamsters International and Hotel Employees and Restaurant Employees International, and then a restaurant manager and owner. He maintains strong connections with organized labor. He was elected to the city council of Concord, CA, in 1991, served as mayor from 1993 to 1994, and was then appointed to the Contra Costa Board of Supervisors, on which he served until 2002. DeSaulnier was then elected to the California State Assembly for one year, followed by the state Senate for one year.

Other background: Rep. DeSaulnier is from Massachusetts and has lived in Concord for more than 3 decades.

The Race

Primary election: There are 7 candidates running in the March 5 primary, including incumbent Rep. Mark DeSaulnier (D), Katherine Piccinini (R), and Nolan Chen (R). The top two vote recipients will advance to the general election on November 5.

Candidate fundraising and pledges: Rep. DeSaulnier’s campaign has raised $226,502 and is not funded by the police. He has accepted donations from corporate PACs, the fossil fuel industry, and the real estate industry.

Opposing candidate: Republican Nolan Chen
Opposing candidate’s fundraising and pledges: Chen has raised $2,850. However, his campaign is largely self-funded, and he has loaned $2,500 of his own money. No other candidate has filed any campaign receipts for the current election cycle.

The District

Counties in district: California’s 10th Congressional District includes parts of Alameda and Contra Costa Counties.

Voter registration: 50% Democrat, 21% Republican, and 23% No Party Preference. Democrats typically hold this district.

District demographics: 13% Latino, 17% Asian, and 5% Black.

Recent election results: CD-10 voted for Joe Biden for president in 2020 by 39 points and Gavin Newsom for governor in 2022 by 30 points.

The Position

Congressmembers represent and advocate for the needs of their district constituents at the United States Capitol. They are responsible for creating, debating, and voting on legislation that addresses issues within their district.

The United States is divided into 435 congressional districts, each with a population of about 710,000 individuals. Each district elects a representative to the House of Representatives for a two-year term. California has 52 congressional representatives, the largest delegation in the country. There is no term limit for this position.

Re-elect Congressional Representative Mark DeSaulnier to keep CD-10 on the right track for progress.

Rep. Mark DeSaulnier’s track record and policy positions demonstrate that he will continue to be a progressive voice for the constituents of CD-10 and will govern effectively in the best interests of this diverse district.

Progressive endorsements: Rep. DeSaulnier has the endorsement of some progressive groups, including California Environmental Voters and Equality California.

Top issues: Health care, transportation and transit, and education and school services.

Priority bills: This year, Rep. DeSaulnier’s priorities for CD-10 have included 19 bills about health care for immunocompromised individuals and those with disabilities, improving education and school services, and developing sustainable and equitable transportation. All currently remain in committee.

Member of the Congressional Progressive Caucus?: Yes.

Committee leadership/membership: Rep. DeSaulnier currently sits on 3 committees, including the House Ethics Committee, the Committee on Education and Labor, and the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure.

Governance and community leadership experience: Rep. DeSaulnier has served in this congressional seat since 2014, when he was elected with over 70% of the vote. In 2022, he won his re-election against a Green Party challenger by 58 points.

Prior to his election to Congress, Rep. DeSaulnier was first a union member with Teamsters International and Hotel Employees and Restaurant Employees International, and then a restaurant manager and owner. He maintains strong connections with organized labor. He was elected to the city council of Concord, CA, in 1991, served as mayor from 1993 to 1994, and was then appointed to the Contra Costa Board of Supervisors, on which he served until 2002. DeSaulnier was then elected to the California State Assembly for one year, followed by the state Senate for one year.

Other background: Rep. DeSaulnier is from Massachusetts and has lived in Concord for more than 3 decades.

The Race

Primary election: There are 7 candidates running in the March 5 primary, including incumbent Rep. Mark DeSaulnier (D), Katherine Piccinini (R), and Nolan Chen (R). The top two vote recipients will advance to the general election on November 5.

Candidate fundraising and pledges: Rep. DeSaulnier’s campaign has raised $226,502 and is not funded by the police. He has accepted donations from corporate PACs, the fossil fuel industry, and the real estate industry.

Opposing candidate: Republican Nolan Chen
Opposing candidate’s fundraising and pledges: Chen has raised $2,850. However, his campaign is largely self-funded, and he has loaned $2,500 of his own money. No other candidate has filed any campaign receipts for the current election cycle.

The District

Counties in district: California’s 10th Congressional District includes parts of Alameda and Contra Costa Counties.

Voter registration: 50% Democrat, 21% Republican, and 23% No Party Preference. Democrats typically hold this district.

District demographics: 13% Latino, 17% Asian, and 5% Black.

Recent election results: CD-10 voted for Joe Biden for president in 2020 by 39 points and Gavin Newsom for governor in 2022 by 30 points.

The Position

Congressmembers represent and advocate for the needs of their district constituents at the United States Capitol. They are responsible for creating, debating, and voting on legislation that addresses issues within their district.

The United States is divided into 435 congressional districts, each with a population of about 710,000 individuals. Each district elects a representative to the House of Representatives for a two-year term. California has 52 congressional representatives, the largest delegation in the country. There is no term limit for this position.

12th Congressional District

Member of the House of Representatives

Democrat

Lateefah Simon

Website Endorsements

Courage California endorses Lateefah Simon for C to keep CD-12 on the right track for progress.

Lateefah Simon’s experience and policy positions demonstrate that she will be a progressive voice for the constituents of CD-12 and will govern effectively in the best interests of this diverse district.

Progressive endorsements: Simon has the endorsement of many progressive groups, including Courage California, California Working Families Party, SEIU, Sister Warrior Action Fund, Congressional Progressive Caucus, and the National Union of Healthcare Workers. She has also received endorsements from some elected officials, including Gov. Gavin Newsom, Attorney General Rob Bonta, State Sen. Nancy Skinner, State Sen. Lola Smallwood-Cuevas, and Assm. Isaac Bryan.

Electoral history: In 2016, Simon ran for the nonpartisan District 7 seat on the Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART) Board of Directors and won with 59% of the vote. She won her re-election bid in 2020 with over 64% of the vote.

Top issues: Homelessness and affordable housing, civil rights, environmental protections, racial justice, transportation, criminal justice and police reform, comprehensive economic improvement, immigration reform, and voting rights.

Priority bills: As a member of the BART Board of Directors, Lateefah Simon has been a strong supporter of efforts to ensure that BART is affordable and designed to support transit-dependent communities. She worked to ensure transit access for essential workers during the early months of the COVID-19 pandemic, and rejected Trump administration deportation efforts by operating BART as a sanctuary public transit system. Throughout her time on the board, she has worked closely with the transit workers union to ensure that city and federal support were aligned to their expectations. Simon served as president of the BART Board of Directors during her first term, providing progressive leadership for the transit system.

Governance and community leadership experience: Simon is a non-profit executive and a social justice activist, which she does to advocate for communities who have not traditionally been centered in public policy. She has had a prodigious service career, which began when she became executive director of the Young Women’s Freedom Center at 19. During her decade with the organization, their work to reduce recidivism and the criminalization of young women and trans youth drew national acclaim, including Simon’s receipt of a Macarthur Genius Fellowship. Simon expanded on this work when she was appointed by then San Francisco District Attorney Kamala Harris to create the Back on Track anti-recidivism initiative, and during her time as executive director of the Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights of the San Francisco Bay Area. She has since served as the program director for the Rosenberg Foundation, and president of the Akonadi Foundation, and she is currently president of MeadowFund. In 2016, she was appointed by then Gov. Brown to sit on the California State University Board of Trustees, and in 2020, she was appointed by Gov. Newsom to serve as a senior advisor on police reform. She is a highly respected professional in the state, and is affiliated with a variety of organizations, including Human Rights Watch, Oxfam, and Tipping Point Foundation. In all her roles, Simon has maintained a commitment to advancing the dialogue on complex issues, and takes a solutions-oriented approach to her advocacy. Racial justice and systems change have been throughlines of Simon’s work and are demonstrative of her ongoing commitment to improving access, outcomes, and equity for individuals who have traditionally been marginalized.

Other background: Simon has lived in CD-12 for over 20 years. She was born legally blind, and has been a strong supporter of accessibility and protections for people with disabilities.

The Race

Primary election: There are 11 candidates running in the March 5 primary, including Lateefah Simon (D), Tony Daysog (D), Tim Sanchez (D), and Jennifer Tran (D). The top two vote recipients will advance to the general election on November 5. This seat is held by longtime Rep. Barbara Lee, who is running for California’s open Senate seat in 2024.

Candidate fundraising and pledges: Simon’s campaign has raised $861,000 as of October 2023, and is not funded by police, real estate, fossil fuel, or corporate PAC interests.

Opposing candidate: Democrat Tony Daysog
Opposing candidate’s fundraising and pledges: Daysog’s campaign has raised $3,000 as of October 2023, and is primarily self-funded.

Opposing candidate: Democrat Tim Sanchez
Opposing candidate’s fundraising and pledges: Sanchez’s campaign has raised $97,000 as of October 2023, and is not funded by fossil fuel, police, real estate, or corporate PAC interests.

Opposing candidate: Democrat Jennifer Tran
Opposing candidate’s fundraising and pledges: Sanchez’s campaign has raised $94,000 as of October 2023, and is not funded by fossil fuel, police, real estate, or corporate PAC interests.

The District

Counties in district: California’s 12th Congressional District includes parts of Alameda County.

Voter registration: 70% Democrat, 5% Republican, and 21% No Party Preference. Democrats typically hold this seat.

District demographics: 15% Latino, 21% Asian, and 20% Black.

Recent election results: CD-12 voted for Joe Biden for president in 2020 by 81 points and Gavin Newsom for governor in 2022 by 80 points.

The Position

Congressmembers represent and advocate for the needs of their district constituents at the United States Capitol. They are responsible for creating, debating, and voting on legislation that addresses issues within their district.

The United States is divided into 435 congressional districts, each with a population of about 710,000 individuals. Each district elects a representative to the House of Representatives for a two-year term. California has 52 congressional representatives, the largest delegation in the country. There is no term limit for this position.

Courage California endorses Lateefah Simon for C to keep CD-12 on the right track for progress.

Lateefah Simon’s experience and policy positions demonstrate that she will be a progressive voice for the constituents of CD-12 and will govern effectively in the best interests of this diverse district.

Progressive endorsements: Simon has the endorsement of many progressive groups, including Courage California, California Working Families Party, SEIU, Sister Warrior Action Fund, Congressional Progressive Caucus, and the National Union of Healthcare Workers. She has also received endorsements from some elected officials, including Gov. Gavin Newsom, Attorney General Rob Bonta, State Sen. Nancy Skinner, State Sen. Lola Smallwood-Cuevas, and Assm. Isaac Bryan.

Electoral history: In 2016, Simon ran for the nonpartisan District 7 seat on the Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART) Board of Directors and won with 59% of the vote. She won her re-election bid in 2020 with over 64% of the vote.

Top issues: Homelessness and affordable housing, civil rights, environmental protections, racial justice, transportation, criminal justice and police reform, comprehensive economic improvement, immigration reform, and voting rights.

Priority bills: As a member of the BART Board of Directors, Lateefah Simon has been a strong supporter of efforts to ensure that BART is affordable and designed to support transit-dependent communities. She worked to ensure transit access for essential workers during the early months of the COVID-19 pandemic, and rejected Trump administration deportation efforts by operating BART as a sanctuary public transit system. Throughout her time on the board, she has worked closely with the transit workers union to ensure that city and federal support were aligned to their expectations. Simon served as president of the BART Board of Directors during her first term, providing progressive leadership for the transit system.

Governance and community leadership experience: Simon is a non-profit executive and a social justice activist, which she does to advocate for communities who have not traditionally been centered in public policy. She has had a prodigious service career, which began when she became executive director of the Young Women’s Freedom Center at 19. During her decade with the organization, their work to reduce recidivism and the criminalization of young women and trans youth drew national acclaim, including Simon’s receipt of a Macarthur Genius Fellowship. Simon expanded on this work when she was appointed by then San Francisco District Attorney Kamala Harris to create the Back on Track anti-recidivism initiative, and during her time as executive director of the Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights of the San Francisco Bay Area. She has since served as the program director for the Rosenberg Foundation, and president of the Akonadi Foundation, and she is currently president of MeadowFund. In 2016, she was appointed by then Gov. Brown to sit on the California State University Board of Trustees, and in 2020, she was appointed by Gov. Newsom to serve as a senior advisor on police reform. She is a highly respected professional in the state, and is affiliated with a variety of organizations, including Human Rights Watch, Oxfam, and Tipping Point Foundation. In all her roles, Simon has maintained a commitment to advancing the dialogue on complex issues, and takes a solutions-oriented approach to her advocacy. Racial justice and systems change have been throughlines of Simon’s work and are demonstrative of her ongoing commitment to improving access, outcomes, and equity for individuals who have traditionally been marginalized.

Other background: Simon has lived in CD-12 for over 20 years. She was born legally blind, and has been a strong supporter of accessibility and protections for people with disabilities.

The Race

Primary election: There are 11 candidates running in the March 5 primary, including Lateefah Simon (D), Tony Daysog (D), Tim Sanchez (D), and Jennifer Tran (D). The top two vote recipients will advance to the general election on November 5. This seat is held by longtime Rep. Barbara Lee, who is running for California’s open Senate seat in 2024.

Candidate fundraising and pledges: Simon’s campaign has raised $861,000 as of October 2023, and is not funded by police, real estate, fossil fuel, or corporate PAC interests.

Opposing candidate: Democrat Tony Daysog
Opposing candidate’s fundraising and pledges: Daysog’s campaign has raised $3,000 as of October 2023, and is primarily self-funded.

Opposing candidate: Democrat Tim Sanchez
Opposing candidate’s fundraising and pledges: Sanchez’s campaign has raised $97,000 as of October 2023, and is not funded by fossil fuel, police, real estate, or corporate PAC interests.

Opposing candidate: Democrat Jennifer Tran
Opposing candidate’s fundraising and pledges: Sanchez’s campaign has raised $94,000 as of October 2023, and is not funded by fossil fuel, police, real estate, or corporate PAC interests.

The District

Counties in district: California’s 12th Congressional District includes parts of Alameda County.

Voter registration: 70% Democrat, 5% Republican, and 21% No Party Preference. Democrats typically hold this seat.

District demographics: 15% Latino, 21% Asian, and 20% Black.

Recent election results: CD-12 voted for Joe Biden for president in 2020 by 81 points and Gavin Newsom for governor in 2022 by 80 points.

The Position

Congressmembers represent and advocate for the needs of their district constituents at the United States Capitol. They are responsible for creating, debating, and voting on legislation that addresses issues within their district.

The United States is divided into 435 congressional districts, each with a population of about 710,000 individuals. Each district elects a representative to the House of Representatives for a two-year term. California has 52 congressional representatives, the largest delegation in the country. There is no term limit for this position.

Endorsed By: Courage California

Courage California endorses Lateefah Simon for C to keep CD-12 on the right track for progress.

Lateefah Simon’s experience and policy positions demonstrate that she will be a progressive voice for the constituents of CD-12 and will govern effectively in the best interests of this diverse district.

Progressive endorsements: Simon has the endorsement of many progressive groups, including Courage California, California Working Families Party, SEIU, Sister Warrior Action Fund, Congressional Progressive Caucus, and the National Union of Healthcare Workers. She has also received endorsements from some elected officials, including Gov. Gavin Newsom, Attorney General Rob Bonta, State Sen. Nancy Skinner, State Sen. Lola Smallwood-Cuevas, and Assm. Isaac Bryan.

Electoral history: In 2016, Simon ran for the nonpartisan District 7 seat on the Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART) Board of Directors and won with 59% of the vote. She won her re-election bid in 2020 with over 64% of the vote.

Top issues: Homelessness and affordable housing, civil rights, environmental protections, racial justice, transportation, criminal justice and police reform, comprehensive economic improvement, immigration reform, and voting rights.

Priority bills: As a member of the BART Board of Directors, Lateefah Simon has been a strong supporter of efforts to ensure that BART is affordable and designed to support transit-dependent communities. She worked to ensure transit access for essential workers during the early months of the COVID-19 pandemic, and rejected Trump administration deportation efforts by operating BART as a sanctuary public transit system. Throughout her time on the board, she has worked closely with the transit workers union to ensure that city and federal support were aligned to their expectations. Simon served as president of the BART Board of Directors during her first term, providing progressive leadership for the transit system.

Governance and community leadership experience: Simon is a non-profit executive and a social justice activist, which she does to advocate for communities who have not traditionally been centered in public policy. She has had a prodigious service career, which began when she became executive director of the Young Women’s Freedom Center at 19. During her decade with the organization, their work to reduce recidivism and the criminalization of young women and trans youth drew national acclaim, including Simon’s receipt of a Macarthur Genius Fellowship. Simon expanded on this work when she was appointed by then San Francisco District Attorney Kamala Harris to create the Back on Track anti-recidivism initiative, and during her time as executive director of the Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights of the San Francisco Bay Area. She has since served as the program director for the Rosenberg Foundation, and president of the Akonadi Foundation, and she is currently president of MeadowFund. In 2016, she was appointed by then Gov. Brown to sit on the California State University Board of Trustees, and in 2020, she was appointed by Gov. Newsom to serve as a senior advisor on police reform. She is a highly respected professional in the state, and is affiliated with a variety of organizations, including Human Rights Watch, Oxfam, and Tipping Point Foundation. In all her roles, Simon has maintained a commitment to advancing the dialogue on complex issues, and takes a solutions-oriented approach to her advocacy. Racial justice and systems change have been throughlines of Simon’s work and are demonstrative of her ongoing commitment to improving access, outcomes, and equity for individuals who have traditionally been marginalized.

Other background: Simon has lived in CD-12 for over 20 years. She was born legally blind, and has been a strong supporter of accessibility and protections for people with disabilities.

The Race

Primary election: There are 11 candidates running in the March 5 primary, including Lateefah Simon (D), Tony Daysog (D), Tim Sanchez (D), and Jennifer Tran (D). The top two vote recipients will advance to the general election on November 5. This seat is held by longtime Rep. Barbara Lee, who is running for California’s open Senate seat in 2024.

Candidate fundraising and pledges: Simon’s campaign has raised $861,000 as of October 2023, and is not funded by police, real estate, fossil fuel, or corporate PAC interests.

Opposing candidate: Democrat Tony Daysog
Opposing candidate’s fundraising and pledges: Daysog’s campaign has raised $3,000 as of October 2023, and is primarily self-funded.

Opposing candidate: Democrat Tim Sanchez
Opposing candidate’s fundraising and pledges: Sanchez’s campaign has raised $97,000 as of October 2023, and is not funded by fossil fuel, police, real estate, or corporate PAC interests.

Opposing candidate: Democrat Jennifer Tran
Opposing candidate’s fundraising and pledges: Sanchez’s campaign has raised $94,000 as of October 2023, and is not funded by fossil fuel, police, real estate, or corporate PAC interests.

The District

Counties in district: California’s 12th Congressional District includes parts of Alameda County.

Voter registration: 70% Democrat, 5% Republican, and 21% No Party Preference. Democrats typically hold this seat.

District demographics: 15% Latino, 21% Asian, and 20% Black.

Recent election results: CD-12 voted for Joe Biden for president in 2020 by 81 points and Gavin Newsom for governor in 2022 by 80 points.

The Position

Congressmembers represent and advocate for the needs of their district constituents at the United States Capitol. They are responsible for creating, debating, and voting on legislation that addresses issues within their district.

The United States is divided into 435 congressional districts, each with a population of about 710,000 individuals. Each district elects a representative to the House of Representatives for a two-year term. California has 52 congressional representatives, the largest delegation in the country. There is no term limit for this position.

Endorsed By: Courage California

14th Congressional District

Member of the House of Representatives

Democrat

Eric Swalwell

Website

Re-elect Congressional Representative Eric Swalwell to keep CD-14 on the right track for progress.

Rep. Eric Swalwell’s track record and policy positions demonstrate that he will continue to be a representative voice for the constituents of CD-14 and will govern effectively in the best interests of this diverse district.

Progressive endorsements: Rep. Swalwell has the endorsement of many progressive groups, including Equality California and California Environmental Voters.

Top issues: Gun control, youth empowerment, and student debt relief.

Priority bills: This year, Rep. Swalwell’s priorities for CD-14 have included four bills about natural disaster protections, transit safety, and journalist protections. All of these bills are currently in committee. He has sponsored legislation to protect journalists and the free press, improve airport infrastructure, and update FEMA’s pre-natural disaster mitigation grant program. Rep. Swalwell has been an outspoken proponent of gun violence prevention, and has sponsored several pieces of legislation to reform firearm safety, including No Guns For Abusers Act, Bipartisan Background Checks Act, Enhanced Background Checks Act, and Assault Weapons Ban of 2021. He has also paid special attention to the issues that affect young people and helped found the Future Forum Caucus, a group of congressional millennials who are focused on addressing the issues affecting their age group—student debt in particular. Swalwell opposes the progressive position of breaking up tech monopolies. He advocates instead for limited oversight of major tech companies and against antitrust legislation for those corporations based on his view that stronger regulation could weaken our national security.

Member of the Congressional Progressive Caucus?: No.

Committee leadership/membership: Rep. Swalwell currently sits on two committees, including Homeland Security, and Judiciary.

Governance and community leadership experience: Rep. Swalwell has served in this congressional seat since 2012, when he was elected with over 52% of the vote. In 2022, he won his re-election against a Republican challenger by 38 points.

Prior to his election to Congress, Rep. Swalwell worked as a prosecutor in the Alameda County District Attorney’s office and served as a member of the Dublin City Council. His interest in politics developed during college, when he was a Capitol Hill congressional intern. During Donald Trump’s second impeachment hearing in 2021, Swalwell served as an impeachment manager.

Other background: Rep. Swalwell grew up in the East Bay, and now lives in Dublin, CA. He was a first-generation college student, and earned his bachelor’s degree and JD at the University of Maryland.

The Race

Primary election: There are five candidates running in the March 5 primary, including Rep. Eric Swalwell (D), Vin Kruttiventi (R), Joseph Grcar (R), Alison Hayden (R), and Luis Reynoso (R). The top two vote recipients will advance to the general election on November 5.

Candidate fundraising and pledges: Rep. Swalwell’s campaign has raised $1.9 million as of October 2023, and is not funded by police interests. He has received problematic donations from corporate PAC, fossil fuel, and real estate interests, including NextEra Energy Inc PAC, National Association of Realtors PAC, Google, Fox Corporation, and AT&T Inc.

Opposing candidate: Republican Vin Kruttiventi
Opposing candidate’s fundraising and pledges: Kruttiventi’s campaign has raised $361,000 as of October 2023, and is almost entirely self-funded.

Opposing candidate’s fundraising and pledges: The other three Republican candidates in this race have not filed any campaign finance receipts with the FEC as of October 2023.

The District

Counties in district: California’s 14th Congressional District includes parts of Alameda County.

Voter registration: 53% Democrat, 16% Republican, and 26% No Party Preference. Democrats typically hold this district.

District demographics: 19% Latino, 32% Asian, and 7% Black.

Recent election results: CD-14 voted for Joe Biden for president in 2020 by 45 points and Gavin Newsom for governor in 2022 by 36 points.

The Position

Congressmembers represent and advocate for the needs of their district constituents at the United States Capitol. They are responsible for creating, debating, and voting on legislation that addresses issues within their district.

The United States is divided into 435 congressional districts, each with a population of about 710,000 individuals. Each district elects a representative to the House of Representatives for a two-year term. California has 52 congressional representatives, the largest delegation in the country. There is no term limit for this position.

Re-elect Congressional Representative Eric Swalwell to keep CD-14 on the right track for progress.

Rep. Eric Swalwell’s track record and policy positions demonstrate that he will continue to be a representative voice for the constituents of CD-14 and will govern effectively in the best interests of this diverse district.

Progressive endorsements: Rep. Swalwell has the endorsement of many progressive groups, including Equality California and California Environmental Voters.

Top issues: Gun control, youth empowerment, and student debt relief.

Priority bills: This year, Rep. Swalwell’s priorities for CD-14 have included four bills about natural disaster protections, transit safety, and journalist protections. All of these bills are currently in committee. He has sponsored legislation to protect journalists and the free press, improve airport infrastructure, and update FEMA’s pre-natural disaster mitigation grant program. Rep. Swalwell has been an outspoken proponent of gun violence prevention, and has sponsored several pieces of legislation to reform firearm safety, including No Guns For Abusers Act, Bipartisan Background Checks Act, Enhanced Background Checks Act, and Assault Weapons Ban of 2021. He has also paid special attention to the issues that affect young people and helped found the Future Forum Caucus, a group of congressional millennials who are focused on addressing the issues affecting their age group—student debt in particular. Swalwell opposes the progressive position of breaking up tech monopolies. He advocates instead for limited oversight of major tech companies and against antitrust legislation for those corporations based on his view that stronger regulation could weaken our national security.

Member of the Congressional Progressive Caucus?: No.

Committee leadership/membership: Rep. Swalwell currently sits on two committees, including Homeland Security, and Judiciary.

Governance and community leadership experience: Rep. Swalwell has served in this congressional seat since 2012, when he was elected with over 52% of the vote. In 2022, he won his re-election against a Republican challenger by 38 points.

Prior to his election to Congress, Rep. Swalwell worked as a prosecutor in the Alameda County District Attorney’s office and served as a member of the Dublin City Council. His interest in politics developed during college, when he was a Capitol Hill congressional intern. During Donald Trump’s second impeachment hearing in 2021, Swalwell served as an impeachment manager.

Other background: Rep. Swalwell grew up in the East Bay, and now lives in Dublin, CA. He was a first-generation college student, and earned his bachelor’s degree and JD at the University of Maryland.

The Race

Primary election: There are five candidates running in the March 5 primary, including Rep. Eric Swalwell (D), Vin Kruttiventi (R), Joseph Grcar (R), Alison Hayden (R), and Luis Reynoso (R). The top two vote recipients will advance to the general election on November 5.

Candidate fundraising and pledges: Rep. Swalwell’s campaign has raised $1.9 million as of October 2023, and is not funded by police interests. He has received problematic donations from corporate PAC, fossil fuel, and real estate interests, including NextEra Energy Inc PAC, National Association of Realtors PAC, Google, Fox Corporation, and AT&T Inc.

Opposing candidate: Republican Vin Kruttiventi
Opposing candidate’s fundraising and pledges: Kruttiventi’s campaign has raised $361,000 as of October 2023, and is almost entirely self-funded.

Opposing candidate’s fundraising and pledges: The other three Republican candidates in this race have not filed any campaign finance receipts with the FEC as of October 2023.

The District

Counties in district: California’s 14th Congressional District includes parts of Alameda County.

Voter registration: 53% Democrat, 16% Republican, and 26% No Party Preference. Democrats typically hold this district.

District demographics: 19% Latino, 32% Asian, and 7% Black.

Recent election results: CD-14 voted for Joe Biden for president in 2020 by 45 points and Gavin Newsom for governor in 2022 by 36 points.

The Position

Congressmembers represent and advocate for the needs of their district constituents at the United States Capitol. They are responsible for creating, debating, and voting on legislation that addresses issues within their district.

The United States is divided into 435 congressional districts, each with a population of about 710,000 individuals. Each district elects a representative to the House of Representatives for a two-year term. California has 52 congressional representatives, the largest delegation in the country. There is no term limit for this position.

Re-elect Congressional Representative Eric Swalwell to keep CD-14 on the right track for progress.

Rep. Eric Swalwell’s track record and policy positions demonstrate that he will continue to be a representative voice for the constituents of CD-14 and will govern effectively in the best interests of this diverse district.

Progressive endorsements: Rep. Swalwell has the endorsement of many progressive groups, including Equality California and California Environmental Voters.

Top issues: Gun control, youth empowerment, and student debt relief.

Priority bills: This year, Rep. Swalwell’s priorities for CD-14 have included four bills about natural disaster protections, transit safety, and journalist protections. All of these bills are currently in committee. He has sponsored legislation to protect journalists and the free press, improve airport infrastructure, and update FEMA’s pre-natural disaster mitigation grant program. Rep. Swalwell has been an outspoken proponent of gun violence prevention, and has sponsored several pieces of legislation to reform firearm safety, including No Guns For Abusers Act, Bipartisan Background Checks Act, Enhanced Background Checks Act, and Assault Weapons Ban of 2021. He has also paid special attention to the issues that affect young people and helped found the Future Forum Caucus, a group of congressional millennials who are focused on addressing the issues affecting their age group—student debt in particular. Swalwell opposes the progressive position of breaking up tech monopolies. He advocates instead for limited oversight of major tech companies and against antitrust legislation for those corporations based on his view that stronger regulation could weaken our national security.

Member of the Congressional Progressive Caucus?: No.

Committee leadership/membership: Rep. Swalwell currently sits on two committees, including Homeland Security, and Judiciary.

Governance and community leadership experience: Rep. Swalwell has served in this congressional seat since 2012, when he was elected with over 52% of the vote. In 2022, he won his re-election against a Republican challenger by 38 points.

Prior to his election to Congress, Rep. Swalwell worked as a prosecutor in the Alameda County District Attorney’s office and served as a member of the Dublin City Council. His interest in politics developed during college, when he was a Capitol Hill congressional intern. During Donald Trump’s second impeachment hearing in 2021, Swalwell served as an impeachment manager.

Other background: Rep. Swalwell grew up in the East Bay, and now lives in Dublin, CA. He was a first-generation college student, and earned his bachelor’s degree and JD at the University of Maryland.

The Race

Primary election: There are five candidates running in the March 5 primary, including Rep. Eric Swalwell (D), Vin Kruttiventi (R), Joseph Grcar (R), Alison Hayden (R), and Luis Reynoso (R). The top two vote recipients will advance to the general election on November 5.

Candidate fundraising and pledges: Rep. Swalwell’s campaign has raised $1.9 million as of October 2023, and is not funded by police interests. He has received problematic donations from corporate PAC, fossil fuel, and real estate interests, including NextEra Energy Inc PAC, National Association of Realtors PAC, Google, Fox Corporation, and AT&T Inc.

Opposing candidate: Republican Vin Kruttiventi
Opposing candidate’s fundraising and pledges: Kruttiventi’s campaign has raised $361,000 as of October 2023, and is almost entirely self-funded.

Opposing candidate’s fundraising and pledges: The other three Republican candidates in this race have not filed any campaign finance receipts with the FEC as of October 2023.

The District

Counties in district: California’s 14th Congressional District includes parts of Alameda County.

Voter registration: 53% Democrat, 16% Republican, and 26% No Party Preference. Democrats typically hold this district.

District demographics: 19% Latino, 32% Asian, and 7% Black.

Recent election results: CD-14 voted for Joe Biden for president in 2020 by 45 points and Gavin Newsom for governor in 2022 by 36 points.

The Position

Congressmembers represent and advocate for the needs of their district constituents at the United States Capitol. They are responsible for creating, debating, and voting on legislation that addresses issues within their district.

The United States is divided into 435 congressional districts, each with a population of about 710,000 individuals. Each district elects a representative to the House of Representatives for a two-year term. California has 52 congressional representatives, the largest delegation in the country. There is no term limit for this position.

State Assembly, 18th District

Member of the State Assembly

Democrat

Mia Bonta

Website

All-Star

Re-elect Assemblymember Mia Bonta to keep AD-18 on the right track for progress.

Assm. Mia Bonta’s track record and policy positions demonstrate that she will continue to be a progressive voice for the constituents of AD-18 and will govern effectively in the best interests of this diverse district.

Progressive endorsements: Assm. Bonta has the endorsement of some progressive groups, including Equality California, California Environmental Voters, and AFSCME California.

Top issues: Public lands and open spaces, homelessness and housing, public education, health-care access, and criminal justice.

Priority bills: This year, Assm. Bonta’s priorities for AD-18 have included 24 bills about public lands, education, worker protections, housing, and health care. Of these, five have been successfully chaptered into law, one has been vetoed, and the rest remain in committee. She has sponsored and passed legislation to prohibit low-income tax credits from increasing monthly rents, establish a mentorship program between young people enrolled in behavior health programs and local community organizations, and adjust child support requirements for justice-involved individuals. She scores a CS of 100 out of 100 on Courage Score, our annual analysis of legislators’ progressive voting records, earning an All-Star distinction. Based on our Courage Score analysis, Assm. Bonta has supported all progressive bills that made it to a vote, and was a contributing author on four of the progressive bills evaluated for this year’s Courage Score.

Committee leadership/membership: Assm. Bonta currently sits on 15 committees, including Budget, Business and Professions, Communications and Conveyance, Human Services, and Public Safety. She serves as chair of the Standing Committee on Health, and chair of the Select Committee on Place Based Systems of Coordinated Care for Children and Families. Assm. Bonta is a member of the California Legislative Progressive Caucus, the California Legislative Black Caucus, and the California Legislative Latino Caucus.

Governance and community leadership experience: Assm. Bonta has served in this assembly seat since 2021, when she won a special election with over 56% of the vote. In 2022, she won her first full term against a Republican challenger by 79 points.

Prior to her election to the Assembly, Assm. Bonta was a nonprofit executive at Oakland Promise, a nonprofit focused on low-income students. She was elected to the Alameda Unified School District School Board in 2018, and served as president of that body. Assm. Bonta has been a longtime supporter of education initiatives, and making the district more affordable and inclusive.

Other background: Assm. Bonta is originally from the Bronx.

The Race

Primary election: There are three candidates running in the March 5 primary, including Assm. Mia Bonta (D), Cheyenne Kenney (R), and Mindy Ruth Pechenuk (R). The top two vote recipients will advance to the general election on November 5.

Candidate fundraising and pledges: Assm. Bonta’s campaign has raised $391,000 as of December 2023, and is not funded by police interests.

Opposing candidate’s fundraising and pledges: Neither of the challengers in this race have filed any campaign fundraising receipts with the Secretary of State’s office as of December 2023.

The District

Counties in district: California’s 18th Assembly District includes parts of Alameda County.

Voter registration: 69% Democrat, 5% Republican, and 21% No Party Preference. Democrats typically hold this seat.

District demographics: 16% Latino, 21% Asian, and 27% Black.

Recent election results: AD-18 voted for Joe Biden for president in 2020 by 80 points and Gavin Newsom for governor in 2022 by 80 points.

The Position

State assemblymembers represent and advocate for the needs of their district constituents at the California State Capitol. They are responsible for creating, debating, and voting on legislation that addresses issues within their district.

The California State Assembly has 80 districts. Each represents a population of at least 465,000 Californians. Representatives are elected to the Assembly for a two-year term. Every two years, all 80 seats are subject to election. Members elected before 2012 are restricted to three two-year terms (six years) in the Assembly. Those elected in or after 2012 are allowed to serve 12 years total across both the state Senate or Assembly. This term, Democrats currently hold a three-quarters supermajority of 60 seats in the California State Assembly, while Republicans hold 19 seats and one seat is held by an Independent.

Re-elect Assemblymember Mia Bonta to keep AD-18 on the right track for progress.

Assm. Mia Bonta’s track record and policy positions demonstrate that she will continue to be a progressive voice for the constituents of AD-18 and will govern effectively in the best interests of this diverse district.

Progressive endorsements: Assm. Bonta has the endorsement of some progressive groups, including Equality California, California Environmental Voters, and AFSCME California.

Top issues: Public lands and open spaces, homelessness and housing, public education, health-care access, and criminal justice.

Priority bills: This year, Assm. Bonta’s priorities for AD-18 have included 24 bills about public lands, education, worker protections, housing, and health care. Of these, five have been successfully chaptered into law, one has been vetoed, and the rest remain in committee. She has sponsored and passed legislation to prohibit low-income tax credits from increasing monthly rents, establish a mentorship program between young people enrolled in behavior health programs and local community organizations, and adjust child support requirements for justice-involved individuals. She scores a CS of 100 out of 100 on Courage Score, our annual analysis of legislators’ progressive voting records, earning an All-Star distinction. Based on our Courage Score analysis, Assm. Bonta has supported all progressive bills that made it to a vote, and was a contributing author on four of the progressive bills evaluated for this year’s Courage Score.

Committee leadership/membership: Assm. Bonta currently sits on 15 committees, including Budget, Business and Professions, Communications and Conveyance, Human Services, and Public Safety. She serves as chair of the Standing Committee on Health, and chair of the Select Committee on Place Based Systems of Coordinated Care for Children and Families. Assm. Bonta is a member of the California Legislative Progressive Caucus, the California Legislative Black Caucus, and the California Legislative Latino Caucus.

Governance and community leadership experience: Assm. Bonta has served in this assembly seat since 2021, when she won a special election with over 56% of the vote. In 2022, she won her first full term against a Republican challenger by 79 points.

Prior to her election to the Assembly, Assm. Bonta was a nonprofit executive at Oakland Promise, a nonprofit focused on low-income students. She was elected to the Alameda Unified School District School Board in 2018, and served as president of that body. Assm. Bonta has been a longtime supporter of education initiatives, and making the district more affordable and inclusive.

Other background: Assm. Bonta is originally from the Bronx.

The Race

Primary election: There are three candidates running in the March 5 primary, including Assm. Mia Bonta (D), Cheyenne Kenney (R), and Mindy Ruth Pechenuk (R). The top two vote recipients will advance to the general election on November 5.

Candidate fundraising and pledges: Assm. Bonta’s campaign has raised $391,000 as of December 2023, and is not funded by police interests.

Opposing candidate’s fundraising and pledges: Neither of the challengers in this race have filed any campaign fundraising receipts with the Secretary of State’s office as of December 2023.

The District

Counties in district: California’s 18th Assembly District includes parts of Alameda County.

Voter registration: 69% Democrat, 5% Republican, and 21% No Party Preference. Democrats typically hold this seat.

District demographics: 16% Latino, 21% Asian, and 27% Black.

Recent election results: AD-18 voted for Joe Biden for president in 2020 by 80 points and Gavin Newsom for governor in 2022 by 80 points.

The Position

State assemblymembers represent and advocate for the needs of their district constituents at the California State Capitol. They are responsible for creating, debating, and voting on legislation that addresses issues within their district.

The California State Assembly has 80 districts. Each represents a population of at least 465,000 Californians. Representatives are elected to the Assembly for a two-year term. Every two years, all 80 seats are subject to election. Members elected before 2012 are restricted to three two-year terms (six years) in the Assembly. Those elected in or after 2012 are allowed to serve 12 years total across both the state Senate or Assembly. This term, Democrats currently hold a three-quarters supermajority of 60 seats in the California State Assembly, while Republicans hold 19 seats and one seat is held by an Independent.

Re-elect Assemblymember Mia Bonta to keep AD-18 on the right track for progress.

Assm. Mia Bonta’s track record and policy positions demonstrate that she will continue to be a progressive voice for the constituents of AD-18 and will govern effectively in the best interests of this diverse district.

Progressive endorsements: Assm. Bonta has the endorsement of some progressive groups, including Equality California, California Environmental Voters, and AFSCME California.

Top issues: Public lands and open spaces, homelessness and housing, public education, health-care access, and criminal justice.

Priority bills: This year, Assm. Bonta’s priorities for AD-18 have included 24 bills about public lands, education, worker protections, housing, and health care. Of these, five have been successfully chaptered into law, one has been vetoed, and the rest remain in committee. She has sponsored and passed legislation to prohibit low-income tax credits from increasing monthly rents, establish a mentorship program between young people enrolled in behavior health programs and local community organizations, and adjust child support requirements for justice-involved individuals. She scores a CS of 100 out of 100 on Courage Score, our annual analysis of legislators’ progressive voting records, earning an All-Star distinction. Based on our Courage Score analysis, Assm. Bonta has supported all progressive bills that made it to a vote, and was a contributing author on four of the progressive bills evaluated for this year’s Courage Score.

Committee leadership/membership: Assm. Bonta currently sits on 15 committees, including Budget, Business and Professions, Communications and Conveyance, Human Services, and Public Safety. She serves as chair of the Standing Committee on Health, and chair of the Select Committee on Place Based Systems of Coordinated Care for Children and Families. Assm. Bonta is a member of the California Legislative Progressive Caucus, the California Legislative Black Caucus, and the California Legislative Latino Caucus.

Governance and community leadership experience: Assm. Bonta has served in this assembly seat since 2021, when she won a special election with over 56% of the vote. In 2022, she won her first full term against a Republican challenger by 79 points.

Prior to her election to the Assembly, Assm. Bonta was a nonprofit executive at Oakland Promise, a nonprofit focused on low-income students. She was elected to the Alameda Unified School District School Board in 2018, and served as president of that body. Assm. Bonta has been a longtime supporter of education initiatives, and making the district more affordable and inclusive.

Other background: Assm. Bonta is originally from the Bronx.

The Race

Primary election: There are three candidates running in the March 5 primary, including Assm. Mia Bonta (D), Cheyenne Kenney (R), and Mindy Ruth Pechenuk (R). The top two vote recipients will advance to the general election on November 5.

Candidate fundraising and pledges: Assm. Bonta’s campaign has raised $391,000 as of December 2023, and is not funded by police interests.

Opposing candidate’s fundraising and pledges: Neither of the challengers in this race have filed any campaign fundraising receipts with the Secretary of State’s office as of December 2023.

The District

Counties in district: California’s 18th Assembly District includes parts of Alameda County.

Voter registration: 69% Democrat, 5% Republican, and 21% No Party Preference. Democrats typically hold this seat.

District demographics: 16% Latino, 21% Asian, and 27% Black.

Recent election results: AD-18 voted for Joe Biden for president in 2020 by 80 points and Gavin Newsom for governor in 2022 by 80 points.

The Position

State assemblymembers represent and advocate for the needs of their district constituents at the California State Capitol. They are responsible for creating, debating, and voting on legislation that addresses issues within their district.

The California State Assembly has 80 districts. Each represents a population of at least 465,000 Californians. Representatives are elected to the Assembly for a two-year term. Every two years, all 80 seats are subject to election. Members elected before 2012 are restricted to three two-year terms (six years) in the Assembly. Those elected in or after 2012 are allowed to serve 12 years total across both the state Senate or Assembly. This term, Democrats currently hold a three-quarters supermajority of 60 seats in the California State Assembly, while Republicans hold 19 seats and one seat is held by an Independent.

State Senate

Depending on where you live, you may have one of the below State Senate races on your ballot.

State Senator, 7th District

Member of the State Senate

Democrat

Jovanka Beckles

Website Endorsements

Elect Jovanka Beckles and Kathryn Lybarger for State Senate to keep SD-7 on the right track for progress.

Endorsements: Jovanka Beckles has the endorsement of many progressive groups, including Richmond Progressive Alliance, California Environmental Justice Alliance Action, Women in Politics, Berkeley Tenants Union, and East Bay Democratic Socialists of America. She has also received the endorsement of some local leaders, including Richmond Mayor Eduardo Martínez, Pinole Mayor Devin Murphy, Alameda County DA Pamela Price, and many members of the East Bay City Council.

Kathryn Lybarger has the endorsement of many progressive groups, including United Farm Workers, UNITE HERE, Women’s Political Committee Los Angeles, California Legislative LGBTQ Caucus, and many other labor unions. She also has the endorsement of many local leaders, including Assm. Anthony Rendon, State Sen. Maria Elena Durazo, Assm. Liz Ortega, and Hercules Mayor Alex Walker-Griffin.

Key Initiatives: As a member of the Richmond City Council, Beckles has supported initiatives to prevent city contractors from inquiring about past criminal history on job applications, establish a municipal ID program, and increase the minimum wage. She has been a strong advocate for improving housing access and resources, and was instrumental in the passage of rent control and just-cause eviction laws in Richmond. These laws protect tenants’ rights and help keep the city affordable and accessible to individuals and families across income levels. As a member of the Alameda County Transit Board, she has worked to make public transportation more accessible for local residents, maintain service routes, create pandemic protections for drivers and operators, and acknowledge the intersections of racial and transit justice.

As President of the California Labor Federation, Lybarger has been successful in advocating for increasing the minimum wage, equal pay for women, and improving health insurance coverage and the cost of prescription drugs. She represents 2.1 million union members and 1,200 affiliated unions in her role, while also serving as president of AFSCME Local 3299 through her role as a professional gardener at UC Berkeley, where she leads a 30,000 member union. These roles have provided Lybarger with the opportunity to advocate for legislation in Sacramento and provide representative leadership to individuals working across trades and industries.

Governance and Community Leadership Experience: Beckles was elected to the Richmond City Council in 2010 with over 13% of the vote in a 10-person field, and served two terms. In 2020, she was elected to the Alameda County Transit Board Ward 1 seat over the incumbent with 48% of the vote.

Prior to her elected roles, she served on Richmond’s Economic Development Commission, and the Planning Commission. Alongside her public service, Beckles is a mental-health clinician, which she does to support the development of youth and families experiencing hardship. This work has allowed her to create systems and services to meet community needs and improve social and economic advancement. She is a longtime supporter of climate, social, and racial justice, and has used her local leadership roles to bring visibility and resources to these issues.

Lybarger has not run for public office before. She spent her early career as an artist and activist. A member of the queer community, she was involved in efforts to raise awareness for AIDS in the 90s, and has been a consistent supporter of marriage equality and queer family rights. She has spent over 20 years as a blue-collar worker in UC Berkeley’s Facilities division, and has served as head of AFSCME Local 3299 since 2011. She is a longtime supporter of labor organizing, equal treatment, and creating access to living wages for all Californians.

Other background: Beckles is from Panama and immigrated to the United States as a child. If elected, she would be the first queer, Black, Latinx person to serve in the California State Senate.

Lybarger is from the Midwest and has lived in California for nearly 30 years, residing primarily in Berkeley. She and her wife share two adult children with their close friends, a gay couple, and have taken advantage of a recent California law allowing all four adults to establish a legal parental relationship with the children.

The Race

Primary election: There are eight candidates running in the March 5 primary, including Jovanka Beckles (D), Kathryn Lybarger (D), Jesse Arreguín (D), Dan Kalb (D), and Sandré Swanson (D). The top two vote recipients will advance to the general election on November 5.

Candidate fundraising and pledges: Beckles’s campaign has raised $43,000 as of October 2023, and is not funded by real estate, fossil fuel, police, or corporate PAC interests.

Candidate’s fundraising and pledges: Lybarger’s campaign has raised $278,000 as of October 2023, and is not funded by real estate, fossil fuel, police, or corporate PAC interests.

Opponent’s fundraising and pledges: Mayor Arreguín’s campaign has raised $381,000 as of October 2023, and is not funded by real estate, fossil fuel, police, or corporate PAC interests.

Opponent’s fundraising and pledges: Kalb’s campaign has raised $146,000 as of October 2023, and is not funded by real estate, fossil fuel, police, or corporate PAC interests.

Opponent’s fundraising and pledges: Swanson’s campaign has raised $108,000 as of October 2023 and is funded by police donors.

The District

Counties in district: California’s 7th State Senate District includes parts of Contra Costa and Alameda Counties.

Voter registration: 69% Democrat, 6% Republican, and 20% No Party Preference. Democrats typically hold this district.

District demographics: 16% Latino, 21% Asian, and 21% Black.

Recent election results: SD-7 voted for Joe Biden for president in 2020 by 79 points and Gavin Newsom for governor in 2022 by 78 points.

The Position

State senators represent and advocate for the needs of their district constituents at the California State Capitol. They are responsible for creating, debating, and voting on legislation that addresses issues within their district.

The California State Senate has 40 districts. Each represents a population of about 930,000 Californians. Representatives are elected to the Senate for a four-year term. Every two years, half of the Senate's 40 seats are subject to election. Members elected before 2012 are restricted to two four-year terms (eight years) in the Senate. Those elected in or after 2012 are allowed to serve 12 years total across both the state Senate or Assembly. This term, Democrats currently hold a two-thirds supermajority of 31 seats in the California State Senate, while Republicans hold 9 seats.

Elect Jovanka Beckles and Kathryn Lybarger for State Senate to keep SD-7 on the right track for progress.

Endorsements: Jovanka Beckles has the endorsement of many progressive groups, including Richmond Progressive Alliance, California Environmental Justice Alliance Action, Women in Politics, Berkeley Tenants Union, and East Bay Democratic Socialists of America. She has also received the endorsement of some local leaders, including Richmond Mayor Eduardo Martínez, Pinole Mayor Devin Murphy, Alameda County DA Pamela Price, and many members of the East Bay City Council.

Kathryn Lybarger has the endorsement of many progressive groups, including United Farm Workers, UNITE HERE, Women’s Political Committee Los Angeles, California Legislative LGBTQ Caucus, and many other labor unions. She also has the endorsement of many local leaders, including Assm. Anthony Rendon, State Sen. Maria Elena Durazo, Assm. Liz Ortega, and Hercules Mayor Alex Walker-Griffin.

Key Initiatives: As a member of the Richmond City Council, Beckles has supported initiatives to prevent city contractors from inquiring about past criminal history on job applications, establish a municipal ID program, and increase the minimum wage. She has been a strong advocate for improving housing access and resources, and was instrumental in the passage of rent control and just-cause eviction laws in Richmond. These laws protect tenants’ rights and help keep the city affordable and accessible to individuals and families across income levels. As a member of the Alameda County Transit Board, she has worked to make public transportation more accessible for local residents, maintain service routes, create pandemic protections for drivers and operators, and acknowledge the intersections of racial and transit justice.

As President of the California Labor Federation, Lybarger has been successful in advocating for increasing the minimum wage, equal pay for women, and improving health insurance coverage and the cost of prescription drugs. She represents 2.1 million union members and 1,200 affiliated unions in her role, while also serving as president of AFSCME Local 3299 through her role as a professional gardener at UC Berkeley, where she leads a 30,000 member union. These roles have provided Lybarger with the opportunity to advocate for legislation in Sacramento and provide representative leadership to individuals working across trades and industries.

Governance and Community Leadership Experience: Beckles was elected to the Richmond City Council in 2010 with over 13% of the vote in a 10-person field, and served two terms. In 2020, she was elected to the Alameda County Transit Board Ward 1 seat over the incumbent with 48% of the vote.

Prior to her elected roles, she served on Richmond’s Economic Development Commission, and the Planning Commission. Alongside her public service, Beckles is a mental-health clinician, which she does to support the development of youth and families experiencing hardship. This work has allowed her to create systems and services to meet community needs and improve social and economic advancement. She is a longtime supporter of climate, social, and racial justice, and has used her local leadership roles to bring visibility and resources to these issues.

Lybarger has not run for public office before. She spent her early career as an artist and activist. A member of the queer community, she was involved in efforts to raise awareness for AIDS in the 90s, and has been a consistent supporter of marriage equality and queer family rights. She has spent over 20 years as a blue-collar worker in UC Berkeley’s Facilities division, and has served as head of AFSCME Local 3299 since 2011. She is a longtime supporter of labor organizing, equal treatment, and creating access to living wages for all Californians.

Other background: Beckles is from Panama and immigrated to the United States as a child. If elected, she would be the first queer, Black, Latinx person to serve in the California State Senate.

Lybarger is from the Midwest and has lived in California for nearly 30 years, residing primarily in Berkeley. She and her wife share two adult children with their close friends, a gay couple, and have taken advantage of a recent California law allowing all four adults to establish a legal parental relationship with the children.

The Race

Primary election: There are eight candidates running in the March 5 primary, including Jovanka Beckles (D), Kathryn Lybarger (D), Jesse Arreguín (D), Dan Kalb (D), and Sandré Swanson (D). The top two vote recipients will advance to the general election on November 5.

Candidate fundraising and pledges: Beckles’s campaign has raised $43,000 as of October 2023, and is not funded by real estate, fossil fuel, police, or corporate PAC interests.

Candidate’s fundraising and pledges: Lybarger’s campaign has raised $278,000 as of October 2023, and is not funded by real estate, fossil fuel, police, or corporate PAC interests.

Opponent’s fundraising and pledges: Mayor Arreguín’s campaign has raised $381,000 as of October 2023, and is not funded by real estate, fossil fuel, police, or corporate PAC interests.

Opponent’s fundraising and pledges: Kalb’s campaign has raised $146,000 as of October 2023, and is not funded by real estate, fossil fuel, police, or corporate PAC interests.

Opponent’s fundraising and pledges: Swanson’s campaign has raised $108,000 as of October 2023 and is funded by police donors.

The District

Counties in district: California’s 7th State Senate District includes parts of Contra Costa and Alameda Counties.

Voter registration: 69% Democrat, 6% Republican, and 20% No Party Preference. Democrats typically hold this district.

District demographics: 16% Latino, 21% Asian, and 21% Black.

Recent election results: SD-7 voted for Joe Biden for president in 2020 by 79 points and Gavin Newsom for governor in 2022 by 78 points.

The Position

State senators represent and advocate for the needs of their district constituents at the California State Capitol. They are responsible for creating, debating, and voting on legislation that addresses issues within their district.

The California State Senate has 40 districts. Each represents a population of about 930,000 Californians. Representatives are elected to the Senate for a four-year term. Every two years, half of the Senate's 40 seats are subject to election. Members elected before 2012 are restricted to two four-year terms (eight years) in the Senate. Those elected in or after 2012 are allowed to serve 12 years total across both the state Senate or Assembly. This term, Democrats currently hold a two-thirds supermajority of 31 seats in the California State Senate, while Republicans hold 9 seats.

Elect Jovanka Beckles and Kathryn Lybarger for State Senate to keep SD-7 on the right track for progress.

Endorsements: Jovanka Beckles has the endorsement of many progressive groups, including Richmond Progressive Alliance, California Environmental Justice Alliance Action, Women in Politics, Berkeley Tenants Union, and East Bay Democratic Socialists of America. She has also received the endorsement of some local leaders, including Richmond Mayor Eduardo Martínez, Pinole Mayor Devin Murphy, Alameda County DA Pamela Price, and many members of the East Bay City Council.

Kathryn Lybarger has the endorsement of many progressive groups, including United Farm Workers, UNITE HERE, Women’s Political Committee Los Angeles, California Legislative LGBTQ Caucus, and many other labor unions. She also has the endorsement of many local leaders, including Assm. Anthony Rendon, State Sen. Maria Elena Durazo, Assm. Liz Ortega, and Hercules Mayor Alex Walker-Griffin.

Key Initiatives: As a member of the Richmond City Council, Beckles has supported initiatives to prevent city contractors from inquiring about past criminal history on job applications, establish a municipal ID program, and increase the minimum wage. She has been a strong advocate for improving housing access and resources, and was instrumental in the passage of rent control and just-cause eviction laws in Richmond. These laws protect tenants’ rights and help keep the city affordable and accessible to individuals and families across income levels. As a member of the Alameda County Transit Board, she has worked to make public transportation more accessible for local residents, maintain service routes, create pandemic protections for drivers and operators, and acknowledge the intersections of racial and transit justice.

As President of the California Labor Federation, Lybarger has been successful in advocating for increasing the minimum wage, equal pay for women, and improving health insurance coverage and the cost of prescription drugs. She represents 2.1 million union members and 1,200 affiliated unions in her role, while also serving as president of AFSCME Local 3299 through her role as a professional gardener at UC Berkeley, where she leads a 30,000 member union. These roles have provided Lybarger with the opportunity to advocate for legislation in Sacramento and provide representative leadership to individuals working across trades and industries.

Governance and Community Leadership Experience: Beckles was elected to the Richmond City Council in 2010 with over 13% of the vote in a 10-person field, and served two terms. In 2020, she was elected to the Alameda County Transit Board Ward 1 seat over the incumbent with 48% of the vote.

Prior to her elected roles, she served on Richmond’s Economic Development Commission, and the Planning Commission. Alongside her public service, Beckles is a mental-health clinician, which she does to support the development of youth and families experiencing hardship. This work has allowed her to create systems and services to meet community needs and improve social and economic advancement. She is a longtime supporter of climate, social, and racial justice, and has used her local leadership roles to bring visibility and resources to these issues.

Lybarger has not run for public office before. She spent her early career as an artist and activist. A member of the queer community, she was involved in efforts to raise awareness for AIDS in the 90s, and has been a consistent supporter of marriage equality and queer family rights. She has spent over 20 years as a blue-collar worker in UC Berkeley’s Facilities division, and has served as head of AFSCME Local 3299 since 2011. She is a longtime supporter of labor organizing, equal treatment, and creating access to living wages for all Californians.

Other background: Beckles is from Panama and immigrated to the United States as a child. If elected, she would be the first queer, Black, Latinx person to serve in the California State Senate.

Lybarger is from the Midwest and has lived in California for nearly 30 years, residing primarily in Berkeley. She and her wife share two adult children with their close friends, a gay couple, and have taken advantage of a recent California law allowing all four adults to establish a legal parental relationship with the children.

The Race

Primary election: There are eight candidates running in the March 5 primary, including Jovanka Beckles (D), Kathryn Lybarger (D), Jesse Arreguín (D), Dan Kalb (D), and Sandré Swanson (D). The top two vote recipients will advance to the general election on November 5.

Candidate fundraising and pledges: Beckles’s campaign has raised $43,000 as of October 2023, and is not funded by real estate, fossil fuel, police, or corporate PAC interests.

Candidate’s fundraising and pledges: Lybarger’s campaign has raised $278,000 as of October 2023, and is not funded by real estate, fossil fuel, police, or corporate PAC interests.

Opponent’s fundraising and pledges: Mayor Arreguín’s campaign has raised $381,000 as of October 2023, and is not funded by real estate, fossil fuel, police, or corporate PAC interests.

Opponent’s fundraising and pledges: Kalb’s campaign has raised $146,000 as of October 2023, and is not funded by real estate, fossil fuel, police, or corporate PAC interests.

Opponent’s fundraising and pledges: Swanson’s campaign has raised $108,000 as of October 2023 and is funded by police donors.

The District

Counties in district: California’s 7th State Senate District includes parts of Contra Costa and Alameda Counties.

Voter registration: 69% Democrat, 6% Republican, and 20% No Party Preference. Democrats typically hold this district.

District demographics: 16% Latino, 21% Asian, and 21% Black.

Recent election results: SD-7 voted for Joe Biden for president in 2020 by 79 points and Gavin Newsom for governor in 2022 by 78 points.

The Position

State senators represent and advocate for the needs of their district constituents at the California State Capitol. They are responsible for creating, debating, and voting on legislation that addresses issues within their district.

The California State Senate has 40 districts. Each represents a population of about 930,000 Californians. Representatives are elected to the Senate for a four-year term. Every two years, half of the Senate's 40 seats are subject to election. Members elected before 2012 are restricted to two four-year terms (eight years) in the Senate. Those elected in or after 2012 are allowed to serve 12 years total across both the state Senate or Assembly. This term, Democrats currently hold a two-thirds supermajority of 31 seats in the California State Senate, while Republicans hold 9 seats.

Democrat

Kathryn Lybarger

Website Endorsements

Elect Jovanka Beckles and Kathryn Lybarger for State Senate to keep SD-7 on the right track for progress.

Endorsements: Jovanka Beckles has the endorsement of many progressive groups, including Richmond Progressive Alliance, California Environmental Justice Alliance Action, Women in Politics, Berkeley Tenants Union, and East Bay Democratic Socialists of America. She has also received the endorsement of some local leaders, including Richmond Mayor Eduardo Martínez, Pinole Mayor Devin Murphy, Alameda County DA Pamela Price, and many members of the East Bay City Council.

Kathryn Lybarger has the endorsement of many progressive groups, including United Farm Workers, UNITE HERE, Women’s Political Committee Los Angeles, California Legislative LGBTQ Caucus, and many other labor unions. She also has the endorsement of many local leaders, including Assm. Anthony Rendon, State Sen. Maria Elena Durazo, Assm. Liz Ortega, and Hercules Mayor Alex Walker-Griffin.

Key Initiatives: As a member of the Richmond City Council, Beckles has supported initiatives to prevent city contractors from inquiring about past criminal history on job applications, establish a municipal ID program, and increase the minimum wage. She has been a strong advocate for improving housing access and resources, and was instrumental in the passage of rent control and just-cause eviction laws in Richmond. These laws protect tenants’ rights and help keep the city affordable and accessible to individuals and families across income levels. As a member of the Alameda County Transit Board, she has worked to make public transportation more accessible for local residents, maintain service routes, create pandemic protections for drivers and operators, and acknowledge the intersections of racial and transit justice.

As President of the California Labor Federation, Lybarger has been successful in advocating for increasing the minimum wage, equal pay for women, and improving health insurance coverage and the cost of prescription drugs. She represents 2.1 million union members and 1,200 affiliated unions in her role, while also serving as president of AFSCME Local 3299 through her role as a professional gardener at UC Berkeley, where she leads a 30,000 member union. These roles have provided Lybarger with the opportunity to advocate for legislation in Sacramento and provide representative leadership to individuals working across trades and industries.

Governance and Community Leadership Experience: Beckles was elected to the Richmond City Council in 2010 with over 13% of the vote in a 10-person field, and served two terms. In 2020, she was elected to the Alameda County Transit Board Ward 1 seat over the incumbent with 48% of the vote.

Prior to her elected roles, she served on Richmond’s Economic Development Commission, and the Planning Commission. Alongside her public service, Beckles is a mental-health clinician, which she does to support the development of youth and families experiencing hardship. This work has allowed her to create systems and services to meet community needs and improve social and economic advancement. She is a longtime supporter of climate, social, and racial justice, and has used her local leadership roles to bring visibility and resources to these issues.

Lybarger has not run for public office before. She spent her early career as an artist and activist. A member of the queer community, she was involved in efforts to raise awareness for AIDS in the 90s, and has been a consistent supporter of marriage equality and queer family rights. She has spent over 20 years as a blue-collar worker in UC Berkeley’s Facilities division, and has served as head of AFSCME Local 3299 since 2011. She is a longtime supporter of labor organizing, equal treatment, and creating access to living wages for all Californians.

Other background: Beckles is from Panama and immigrated to the United States as a child. If elected, she would be the first queer, Black, Latinx person to serve in the California State Senate.

Lybarger is from the Midwest and has lived in California for nearly 30 years, residing primarily in Berkeley. She and her wife share two adult children with their close friends, a gay couple, and have taken advantage of a recent California law allowing all four adults to establish a legal parental relationship with the children.

The Race

Primary election: There are eight candidates running in the March 5 primary, including Jovanka Beckles (D), Kathryn Lybarger (D), Jesse Arreguín (D), Dan Kalb (D), and Sandré Swanson (D). The top two vote recipients will advance to the general election on November 5.

Candidate fundraising and pledges: Beckles’s campaign has raised $43,000 as of October 2023, and is not funded by real estate, fossil fuel, police, or corporate PAC interests.

Candidate’s fundraising and pledges: Lybarger’s campaign has raised $278,000 as of October 2023, and is not funded by real estate, fossil fuel, police, or corporate PAC interests.

Opponent’s fundraising and pledges: Mayor Arreguín’s campaign has raised $381,000 as of October 2023, and is not funded by real estate, fossil fuel, police, or corporate PAC interests.

Opponent’s fundraising and pledges: Kalb’s campaign has raised $146,000 as of October 2023, and is not funded by real estate, fossil fuel, police, or corporate PAC interests.

Opponent’s fundraising and pledges: Swanson’s campaign has raised $108,000 as of October 2023 and is funded by police donors.

The District

Counties in district: California’s 7th State Senate District includes parts of Contra Costa and Alameda Counties.

Voter registration: 69% Democrat, 6% Republican, and 20% No Party Preference. Democrats typically hold this district.

District demographics: 16% Latino, 21% Asian, and 21% Black.

Recent election results: SD-7 voted for Joe Biden for president in 2020 by 79 points and Gavin Newsom for governor in 2022 by 78 points.

The Position

State senators represent and advocate for the needs of their district constituents at the California State Capitol. They are responsible for creating, debating, and voting on legislation that addresses issues within their district.

The California State Senate has 40 districts. Each represents a population of about 930,000 Californians. Representatives are elected to the Senate for a four-year term. Every two years, half of the Senate's 40 seats are subject to election. Members elected before 2012 are restricted to two four-year terms (eight years) in the Senate. Those elected in or after 2012 are allowed to serve 12 years total across both the state Senate or Assembly. This term, Democrats currently hold a two-thirds supermajority of 31 seats in the California State Senate, while Republicans hold 9 seats.

Elect Jovanka Beckles and Kathryn Lybarger for State Senate to keep SD-7 on the right track for progress.

Endorsements: Jovanka Beckles has the endorsement of many progressive groups, including Richmond Progressive Alliance, California Environmental Justice Alliance Action, Women in Politics, Berkeley Tenants Union, and East Bay Democratic Socialists of America. She has also received the endorsement of some local leaders, including Richmond Mayor Eduardo Martínez, Pinole Mayor Devin Murphy, Alameda County DA Pamela Price, and many members of the East Bay City Council.

Kathryn Lybarger has the endorsement of many progressive groups, including United Farm Workers, UNITE HERE, Women’s Political Committee Los Angeles, California Legislative LGBTQ Caucus, and many other labor unions. She also has the endorsement of many local leaders, including Assm. Anthony Rendon, State Sen. Maria Elena Durazo, Assm. Liz Ortega, and Hercules Mayor Alex Walker-Griffin.

Key Initiatives: As a member of the Richmond City Council, Beckles has supported initiatives to prevent city contractors from inquiring about past criminal history on job applications, establish a municipal ID program, and increase the minimum wage. She has been a strong advocate for improving housing access and resources, and was instrumental in the passage of rent control and just-cause eviction laws in Richmond. These laws protect tenants’ rights and help keep the city affordable and accessible to individuals and families across income levels. As a member of the Alameda County Transit Board, she has worked to make public transportation more accessible for local residents, maintain service routes, create pandemic protections for drivers and operators, and acknowledge the intersections of racial and transit justice.

As President of the California Labor Federation, Lybarger has been successful in advocating for increasing the minimum wage, equal pay for women, and improving health insurance coverage and the cost of prescription drugs. She represents 2.1 million union members and 1,200 affiliated unions in her role, while also serving as president of AFSCME Local 3299 through her role as a professional gardener at UC Berkeley, where she leads a 30,000 member union. These roles have provided Lybarger with the opportunity to advocate for legislation in Sacramento and provide representative leadership to individuals working across trades and industries.

Governance and Community Leadership Experience: Beckles was elected to the Richmond City Council in 2010 with over 13% of the vote in a 10-person field, and served two terms. In 2020, she was elected to the Alameda County Transit Board Ward 1 seat over the incumbent with 48% of the vote.

Prior to her elected roles, she served on Richmond’s Economic Development Commission, and the Planning Commission. Alongside her public service, Beckles is a mental-health clinician, which she does to support the development of youth and families experiencing hardship. This work has allowed her to create systems and services to meet community needs and improve social and economic advancement. She is a longtime supporter of climate, social, and racial justice, and has used her local leadership roles to bring visibility and resources to these issues.

Lybarger has not run for public office before. She spent her early career as an artist and activist. A member of the queer community, she was involved in efforts to raise awareness for AIDS in the 90s, and has been a consistent supporter of marriage equality and queer family rights. She has spent over 20 years as a blue-collar worker in UC Berkeley’s Facilities division, and has served as head of AFSCME Local 3299 since 2011. She is a longtime supporter of labor organizing, equal treatment, and creating access to living wages for all Californians.

Other background: Beckles is from Panama and immigrated to the United States as a child. If elected, she would be the first queer, Black, Latinx person to serve in the California State Senate.

Lybarger is from the Midwest and has lived in California for nearly 30 years, residing primarily in Berkeley. She and her wife share two adult children with their close friends, a gay couple, and have taken advantage of a recent California law allowing all four adults to establish a legal parental relationship with the children.

The Race

Primary election: There are eight candidates running in the March 5 primary, including Jovanka Beckles (D), Kathryn Lybarger (D), Jesse Arreguín (D), Dan Kalb (D), and Sandré Swanson (D). The top two vote recipients will advance to the general election on November 5.

Candidate fundraising and pledges: Beckles’s campaign has raised $43,000 as of October 2023, and is not funded by real estate, fossil fuel, police, or corporate PAC interests.

Candidate’s fundraising and pledges: Lybarger’s campaign has raised $278,000 as of October 2023, and is not funded by real estate, fossil fuel, police, or corporate PAC interests.

Opponent’s fundraising and pledges: Mayor Arreguín’s campaign has raised $381,000 as of October 2023, and is not funded by real estate, fossil fuel, police, or corporate PAC interests.

Opponent’s fundraising and pledges: Kalb’s campaign has raised $146,000 as of October 2023, and is not funded by real estate, fossil fuel, police, or corporate PAC interests.

Opponent’s fundraising and pledges: Swanson’s campaign has raised $108,000 as of October 2023 and is funded by police donors.

The District

Counties in district: California’s 7th State Senate District includes parts of Contra Costa and Alameda Counties.

Voter registration: 69% Democrat, 6% Republican, and 20% No Party Preference. Democrats typically hold this district.

District demographics: 16% Latino, 21% Asian, and 21% Black.

Recent election results: SD-7 voted for Joe Biden for president in 2020 by 79 points and Gavin Newsom for governor in 2022 by 78 points.

The Position

State senators represent and advocate for the needs of their district constituents at the California State Capitol. They are responsible for creating, debating, and voting on legislation that addresses issues within their district.

The California State Senate has 40 districts. Each represents a population of about 930,000 Californians. Representatives are elected to the Senate for a four-year term. Every two years, half of the Senate's 40 seats are subject to election. Members elected before 2012 are restricted to two four-year terms (eight years) in the Senate. Those elected in or after 2012 are allowed to serve 12 years total across both the state Senate or Assembly. This term, Democrats currently hold a two-thirds supermajority of 31 seats in the California State Senate, while Republicans hold 9 seats.

Elect Jovanka Beckles and Kathryn Lybarger for State Senate to keep SD-7 on the right track for progress.

Endorsements: Jovanka Beckles has the endorsement of many progressive groups, including Richmond Progressive Alliance, California Environmental Justice Alliance Action, Women in Politics, Berkeley Tenants Union, and East Bay Democratic Socialists of America. She has also received the endorsement of some local leaders, including Richmond Mayor Eduardo Martínez, Pinole Mayor Devin Murphy, Alameda County DA Pamela Price, and many members of the East Bay City Council.

Kathryn Lybarger has the endorsement of many progressive groups, including United Farm Workers, UNITE HERE, Women’s Political Committee Los Angeles, California Legislative LGBTQ Caucus, and many other labor unions. She also has the endorsement of many local leaders, including Assm. Anthony Rendon, State Sen. Maria Elena Durazo, Assm. Liz Ortega, and Hercules Mayor Alex Walker-Griffin.

Key Initiatives: As a member of the Richmond City Council, Beckles has supported initiatives to prevent city contractors from inquiring about past criminal history on job applications, establish a municipal ID program, and increase the minimum wage. She has been a strong advocate for improving housing access and resources, and was instrumental in the passage of rent control and just-cause eviction laws in Richmond. These laws protect tenants’ rights and help keep the city affordable and accessible to individuals and families across income levels. As a member of the Alameda County Transit Board, she has worked to make public transportation more accessible for local residents, maintain service routes, create pandemic protections for drivers and operators, and acknowledge the intersections of racial and transit justice.

As President of the California Labor Federation, Lybarger has been successful in advocating for increasing the minimum wage, equal pay for women, and improving health insurance coverage and the cost of prescription drugs. She represents 2.1 million union members and 1,200 affiliated unions in her role, while also serving as president of AFSCME Local 3299 through her role as a professional gardener at UC Berkeley, where she leads a 30,000 member union. These roles have provided Lybarger with the opportunity to advocate for legislation in Sacramento and provide representative leadership to individuals working across trades and industries.

Governance and Community Leadership Experience: Beckles was elected to the Richmond City Council in 2010 with over 13% of the vote in a 10-person field, and served two terms. In 2020, she was elected to the Alameda County Transit Board Ward 1 seat over the incumbent with 48% of the vote.

Prior to her elected roles, she served on Richmond’s Economic Development Commission, and the Planning Commission. Alongside her public service, Beckles is a mental-health clinician, which she does to support the development of youth and families experiencing hardship. This work has allowed her to create systems and services to meet community needs and improve social and economic advancement. She is a longtime supporter of climate, social, and racial justice, and has used her local leadership roles to bring visibility and resources to these issues.

Lybarger has not run for public office before. She spent her early career as an artist and activist. A member of the queer community, she was involved in efforts to raise awareness for AIDS in the 90s, and has been a consistent supporter of marriage equality and queer family rights. She has spent over 20 years as a blue-collar worker in UC Berkeley’s Facilities division, and has served as head of AFSCME Local 3299 since 2011. She is a longtime supporter of labor organizing, equal treatment, and creating access to living wages for all Californians.

Other background: Beckles is from Panama and immigrated to the United States as a child. If elected, she would be the first queer, Black, Latinx person to serve in the California State Senate.

Lybarger is from the Midwest and has lived in California for nearly 30 years, residing primarily in Berkeley. She and her wife share two adult children with their close friends, a gay couple, and have taken advantage of a recent California law allowing all four adults to establish a legal parental relationship with the children.

The Race

Primary election: There are eight candidates running in the March 5 primary, including Jovanka Beckles (D), Kathryn Lybarger (D), Jesse Arreguín (D), Dan Kalb (D), and Sandré Swanson (D). The top two vote recipients will advance to the general election on November 5.

Candidate fundraising and pledges: Beckles’s campaign has raised $43,000 as of October 2023, and is not funded by real estate, fossil fuel, police, or corporate PAC interests.

Candidate’s fundraising and pledges: Lybarger’s campaign has raised $278,000 as of October 2023, and is not funded by real estate, fossil fuel, police, or corporate PAC interests.

Opponent’s fundraising and pledges: Mayor Arreguín’s campaign has raised $381,000 as of October 2023, and is not funded by real estate, fossil fuel, police, or corporate PAC interests.

Opponent’s fundraising and pledges: Kalb’s campaign has raised $146,000 as of October 2023, and is not funded by real estate, fossil fuel, police, or corporate PAC interests.

Opponent’s fundraising and pledges: Swanson’s campaign has raised $108,000 as of October 2023 and is funded by police donors.

The District

Counties in district: California’s 7th State Senate District includes parts of Contra Costa and Alameda Counties.

Voter registration: 69% Democrat, 6% Republican, and 20% No Party Preference. Democrats typically hold this district.

District demographics: 16% Latino, 21% Asian, and 21% Black.

Recent election results: SD-7 voted for Joe Biden for president in 2020 by 79 points and Gavin Newsom for governor in 2022 by 78 points.

The Position

State senators represent and advocate for the needs of their district constituents at the California State Capitol. They are responsible for creating, debating, and voting on legislation that addresses issues within their district.

The California State Senate has 40 districts. Each represents a population of about 930,000 Californians. Representatives are elected to the Senate for a four-year term. Every two years, half of the Senate's 40 seats are subject to election. Members elected before 2012 are restricted to two four-year terms (eight years) in the Senate. Those elected in or after 2012 are allowed to serve 12 years total across both the state Senate or Assembly. This term, Democrats currently hold a two-thirds supermajority of 31 seats in the California State Senate, while Republicans hold 9 seats.

State Senator, 9th District

Member of the State Senate

Democrat

Marisol Rubio

Website Endorsements

Courage California endorses Marisol Rubio for State Senate to put SD-9 on the right track for progress.

Marisol Rubio’s track record and policy positions demonstrate that she will be a progressive voice for the constituents of SD-9 and will govern effectively in the best interests of this diverse district.

Progressive endorsements: Rubio has the endorsement of many progressive groups, including Courage California, California Environmental Voters, Evolve California, Alliance of Californians for Community Empowerment, South Alameda County Progressive Democrats, Our Revolution East Bay, Evolve California, and California Working Families Party, as well as labor unions like California Teachers Association, California School Employees Association, National Union of Healthcare Workers, AFSCME, and SEIU. She has also been endorsed by elected officials, including congressional Rep. Ro Khanna.

Electoral history: Rubio ran for State Senate in 2020, and was defeated in the primary, losing out by 3 points to the Democratic incumbent and Republican challenger. She was elected to the San Ramon City Council in 2022.

Top issues: Environmental protections, reproductive rights, climate change, and housing.

Priority bills: As San Ramon City Councilmember, she has been a strong supporter of action to combat climate change. She helped form the first Ad Hoc Climate Action Council, and also helped direct policy to meet the housing needs of San Ramon.

Governance and community leadership experience: Rubio is a San Ramon City Councilmember, scientific researcher, health care provider, and former teacher. Rubio serves on the Executive Committee of the Democratic Party of Contra Costa County. She co-authored two resolutions that were adopted by the California Democratic Party and helped pass several progressive bills and resolutions including the Green New Deal for California, a call for a climate-focused presidential debate, and support for the public banking movement, which gives localities the ability to open banks to serve marginalized residents. She also advocated for the California Democratic Party to stop accepting money from police and the fossil fuel industry. She has served as a board member for the Sierra Club, an elected delegate to the Democratic National Convention, and is an SEIU Local 2015 member.

Other background: Rubio is from California. She earned her BA in molecular biology from UC Berkeley.

The Race

Primary election: There are 2 candidates running in the March 5 primary: Marisol Rubio and Assemblymember Tim Grayson. The top two vote recipients will advance to the general election on November 5.

Candidate fundraising and pledges: Rubio’s campaign has raised $42,150 and is not funded by corporate PACs, the fossil fuel industry, the real estate industry, or the police.

Opponent’s fundraising and pledges: Assm. Grayson’s campaign has raised $668,599 and is funded by corporate PACs. He has also accepted nearly $40,000 from the real estate industry, nearly $30,000 from the police, and more than $45,000 from the fossil fuel industry.

The District

Counties in district: California’s 9th State Senate District includes parts of Alameda and Contra Costa Counties.

Voter registration: 53% Democrat, 18% Republican, and 23% No Party Preference. Democrats typically hold this district.

District demographics: 17% Latino, 19% Asian, and 8% Black.

Recent election results: SD-9 voted for Joe Biden for president in 2020 by 45 points and Gavin Newsom for governor in 2022 by 36 points.

The Position

State senators represent and advocate for the needs of their district constituents at the California State Capitol. They are responsible for creating, debating, and voting on legislation that addresses issues within their district.

The California State Senate has 40 districts. Each represents a population of about 930,000 Californians. Representatives are elected to the Senate for a four-year term. Every two years, half of the Senate’s 40 seats are subject to election. Members elected before 2012 are restricted to two four-year terms (eight years) in the Senate. Those elected in or after 2012 are allowed to serve 12 years total across both the state Senate or Assembly. This term, Democrats currently hold a two-thirds supermajority of 31 seats in the California State Senate, while Republicans hold 9 seats.

Courage California endorses Marisol Rubio for State Senate to put SD-9 on the right track for progress.

Marisol Rubio’s track record and policy positions demonstrate that she will be a progressive voice for the constituents of SD-9 and will govern effectively in the best interests of this diverse district.

Progressive endorsements: Rubio has the endorsement of many progressive groups, including Courage California, California Environmental Voters, Evolve California, Alliance of Californians for Community Empowerment, South Alameda County Progressive Democrats, Our Revolution East Bay, Evolve California, and California Working Families Party, as well as labor unions like California Teachers Association, California School Employees Association, National Union of Healthcare Workers, AFSCME, and SEIU. She has also been endorsed by elected officials, including congressional Rep. Ro Khanna.

Electoral history: Rubio ran for State Senate in 2020, and was defeated in the primary, losing out by 3 points to the Democratic incumbent and Republican challenger. She was elected to the San Ramon City Council in 2022.

Top issues: Environmental protections, reproductive rights, climate change, and housing.

Priority bills: As San Ramon City Councilmember, she has been a strong supporter of action to combat climate change. She helped form the first Ad Hoc Climate Action Council, and also helped direct policy to meet the housing needs of San Ramon.

Governance and community leadership experience: Rubio is a San Ramon City Councilmember, scientific researcher, health care provider, and former teacher. Rubio serves on the Executive Committee of the Democratic Party of Contra Costa County. She co-authored two resolutions that were adopted by the California Democratic Party and helped pass several progressive bills and resolutions including the Green New Deal for California, a call for a climate-focused presidential debate, and support for the public banking movement, which gives localities the ability to open banks to serve marginalized residents. She also advocated for the California Democratic Party to stop accepting money from police and the fossil fuel industry. She has served as a board member for the Sierra Club, an elected delegate to the Democratic National Convention, and is an SEIU Local 2015 member.

Other background: Rubio is from California. She earned her BA in molecular biology from UC Berkeley.

The Race

Primary election: There are 2 candidates running in the March 5 primary: Marisol Rubio and Assemblymember Tim Grayson. The top two vote recipients will advance to the general election on November 5.

Candidate fundraising and pledges: Rubio’s campaign has raised $42,150 and is not funded by corporate PACs, the fossil fuel industry, the real estate industry, or the police.

Opponent’s fundraising and pledges: Assm. Grayson’s campaign has raised $668,599 and is funded by corporate PACs. He has also accepted nearly $40,000 from the real estate industry, nearly $30,000 from the police, and more than $45,000 from the fossil fuel industry.

The District

Counties in district: California’s 9th State Senate District includes parts of Alameda and Contra Costa Counties.

Voter registration: 53% Democrat, 18% Republican, and 23% No Party Preference. Democrats typically hold this district.

District demographics: 17% Latino, 19% Asian, and 8% Black.

Recent election results: SD-9 voted for Joe Biden for president in 2020 by 45 points and Gavin Newsom for governor in 2022 by 36 points.

The Position

State senators represent and advocate for the needs of their district constituents at the California State Capitol. They are responsible for creating, debating, and voting on legislation that addresses issues within their district.

The California State Senate has 40 districts. Each represents a population of about 930,000 Californians. Representatives are elected to the Senate for a four-year term. Every two years, half of the Senate’s 40 seats are subject to election. Members elected before 2012 are restricted to two four-year terms (eight years) in the Senate. Those elected in or after 2012 are allowed to serve 12 years total across both the state Senate or Assembly. This term, Democrats currently hold a two-thirds supermajority of 31 seats in the California State Senate, while Republicans hold 9 seats.

Endorsed By: Courage California

Courage California endorses Marisol Rubio for State Senate to put SD-9 on the right track for progress.

Marisol Rubio’s track record and policy positions demonstrate that she will be a progressive voice for the constituents of SD-9 and will govern effectively in the best interests of this diverse district.

Progressive endorsements: Rubio has the endorsement of many progressive groups, including Courage California, California Environmental Voters, Evolve California, Alliance of Californians for Community Empowerment, South Alameda County Progressive Democrats, Our Revolution East Bay, Evolve California, and California Working Families Party, as well as labor unions like California Teachers Association, California School Employees Association, National Union of Healthcare Workers, AFSCME, and SEIU. She has also been endorsed by elected officials, including congressional Rep. Ro Khanna.

Electoral history: Rubio ran for State Senate in 2020, and was defeated in the primary, losing out by 3 points to the Democratic incumbent and Republican challenger. She was elected to the San Ramon City Council in 2022.

Top issues: Environmental protections, reproductive rights, climate change, and housing.

Priority bills: As San Ramon City Councilmember, she has been a strong supporter of action to combat climate change. She helped form the first Ad Hoc Climate Action Council, and also helped direct policy to meet the housing needs of San Ramon.

Governance and community leadership experience: Rubio is a San Ramon City Councilmember, scientific researcher, health care provider, and former teacher. Rubio serves on the Executive Committee of the Democratic Party of Contra Costa County. She co-authored two resolutions that were adopted by the California Democratic Party and helped pass several progressive bills and resolutions including the Green New Deal for California, a call for a climate-focused presidential debate, and support for the public banking movement, which gives localities the ability to open banks to serve marginalized residents. She also advocated for the California Democratic Party to stop accepting money from police and the fossil fuel industry. She has served as a board member for the Sierra Club, an elected delegate to the Democratic National Convention, and is an SEIU Local 2015 member.

Other background: Rubio is from California. She earned her BA in molecular biology from UC Berkeley.

The Race

Primary election: There are 2 candidates running in the March 5 primary: Marisol Rubio and Assemblymember Tim Grayson. The top two vote recipients will advance to the general election on November 5.

Candidate fundraising and pledges: Rubio’s campaign has raised $42,150 and is not funded by corporate PACs, the fossil fuel industry, the real estate industry, or the police.

Opponent’s fundraising and pledges: Assm. Grayson’s campaign has raised $668,599 and is funded by corporate PACs. He has also accepted nearly $40,000 from the real estate industry, nearly $30,000 from the police, and more than $45,000 from the fossil fuel industry.

The District

Counties in district: California’s 9th State Senate District includes parts of Alameda and Contra Costa Counties.

Voter registration: 53% Democrat, 18% Republican, and 23% No Party Preference. Democrats typically hold this district.

District demographics: 17% Latino, 19% Asian, and 8% Black.

Recent election results: SD-9 voted for Joe Biden for president in 2020 by 45 points and Gavin Newsom for governor in 2022 by 36 points.

The Position

State senators represent and advocate for the needs of their district constituents at the California State Capitol. They are responsible for creating, debating, and voting on legislation that addresses issues within their district.

The California State Senate has 40 districts. Each represents a population of about 930,000 Californians. Representatives are elected to the Senate for a four-year term. Every two years, half of the Senate’s 40 seats are subject to election. Members elected before 2012 are restricted to two four-year terms (eight years) in the Senate. Those elected in or after 2012 are allowed to serve 12 years total across both the state Senate or Assembly. This term, Democrats currently hold a two-thirds supermajority of 31 seats in the California State Senate, while Republicans hold 9 seats.

Endorsed By: Courage California

San Francisco County Superior Court

Depending on where you live, you may have one of the below judicial races on your ballot.

San Francisco County, Judge of the Superior Court, Seat #1

Michael Begert

Website Endorsements

Retain Judge Michael Begert to keep San Francisco County on the right track for progress.

Judge Michael Begert’s track record and legal background demonstrates that he will continue to use his judicial prudence effectively in the best interests of this diverse district.

Progressive endorsements: Judge Begert has the endorsement of many local groups, including San Francisco Women’s Political Committee, San Francisco Tenants Union, Affordable Housing Alliance, and several bar associations. He has also received the endorsement of many elected leaders, including State Sen. Scott Wiener, Assm. Phil Ting, BART Director Lateefah Simon, and six members of the San Francisco Board of Supervisors. He has also received the endorsement of San Francisco Sheriff Paul Miyamoto.

Top issues: According to campaign materials, Judge Begert is running for re-election to continue to champion public safety, compassion, and the humanity of all community members on the bench.

Key initiatives: Judge Begert has provided leadership in moving the county forward through his work presiding over courtrooms that focus primarily on social service provisions. He is currently overseeing the Community Assistance, Recovery, and Empowerment (CARE) Court, which was established by Gov. Newsom to create pathways to recovery for individuals struggling with mental health treatment and homelessness. As a judge, he has also served in Drug Treatment Court, Family Court, Community Justice Court, and Veterans Justice Court. Judge Begert has supported the creation of restorative justice programs, and has used his judicial experience to establish connections and accountability with the individuals who come through his courtroom.

Governance and community leadership experience: Judge Begert has served in this seat since 2011, when he was appointed to the seat by former Gov. Arnold Schwartzenegger. He was retained in 2012 and 2018, running unopposed in both elections.

Prior to his election to the judiciary, Judge Begert was an attorney in private practice, specializing in class action and product liability law. He has had a long involvement with many legal community organizations, including National Asian Pacific American Legal Consortium and Asian Americans Advancing Justice.

Other background: Judge Begert is from Washington state, and has lived in San Francisco since he completed law school in 1989. He is the biracial son of an American father and a Japanese mother.

The Race

Primary election: There are two candidates running in the nonpartisan March 5 primary, including Judge Michael Begert, and Chip Zecher. The top two vote recipients will advance to the general election on November 5, unless one candidate receives more than 50% of the vote and wins outright in the primary.

Candidate fundraising and pledges: Judge Begert’s campaign has raised at least $21,000 as of December 2023. He has been the target of opposition donations from Stop Crime Action, a pro-incarceration collective that supported the 2022 recall of former progressive DA Chesa Boudin with the funding of billionaire and Republican mega donor William Oberndorf.

Opposing candidate: Chip Zecher
Opposing candidate’s fundraising and pledges: Zecher’s campaign has raised at least $151,000 as of December 2023, including a six-figure donation from right-wing tech billionaire Chris Larsen and the conservative Stop Crime SF organization.

The District

County: The Superior Court of San Francisco County operates as the trial court for criminal, civil, and other cases filed in the county.

The Position

Judges of the California Superior Courts are elected in nonpartisan, county-wide elections to six-year terms. Once voted in, a judge can run for retention at the expiration of their term. A retention election is a process by which voters decide whether an incumbent judge should remain for another term. If the judge, when not facing an opponent, does not obtain a certain percentage of voters (often 50%), they are removed from the position. Many judges join the court through a gubernatorial appointment. If a judge is appointed, they compete in the next general election following the appointment.

California has 58 trial, or superior courts, one in each county. In the more than 450 courthouses of the superior courts, a judge and sometimes a jury hears witness testimony and other evidence. These courts hear civil, criminal, family, probate, and juvenile cases. The judge decides cases through the application of relevant law to the relevant facts.

Retain Judge Michael Begert to keep San Francisco County on the right track for progress.

Judge Michael Begert’s track record and legal background demonstrates that he will continue to use his judicial prudence effectively in the best interests of this diverse district.

Progressive endorsements: Judge Begert has the endorsement of many local groups, including San Francisco Women’s Political Committee, San Francisco Tenants Union, Affordable Housing Alliance, and several bar associations. He has also received the endorsement of many elected leaders, including State Sen. Scott Wiener, Assm. Phil Ting, BART Director Lateefah Simon, and six members of the San Francisco Board of Supervisors. He has also received the endorsement of San Francisco Sheriff Paul Miyamoto.

Top issues: According to campaign materials, Judge Begert is running for re-election to continue to champion public safety, compassion, and the humanity of all community members on the bench.

Key initiatives: Judge Begert has provided leadership in moving the county forward through his work presiding over courtrooms that focus primarily on social service provisions. He is currently overseeing the Community Assistance, Recovery, and Empowerment (CARE) Court, which was established by Gov. Newsom to create pathways to recovery for individuals struggling with mental health treatment and homelessness. As a judge, he has also served in Drug Treatment Court, Family Court, Community Justice Court, and Veterans Justice Court. Judge Begert has supported the creation of restorative justice programs, and has used his judicial experience to establish connections and accountability with the individuals who come through his courtroom.

Governance and community leadership experience: Judge Begert has served in this seat since 2011, when he was appointed to the seat by former Gov. Arnold Schwartzenegger. He was retained in 2012 and 2018, running unopposed in both elections.

Prior to his election to the judiciary, Judge Begert was an attorney in private practice, specializing in class action and product liability law. He has had a long involvement with many legal community organizations, including National Asian Pacific American Legal Consortium and Asian Americans Advancing Justice.

Other background: Judge Begert is from Washington state, and has lived in San Francisco since he completed law school in 1989. He is the biracial son of an American father and a Japanese mother.

The Race

Primary election: There are two candidates running in the nonpartisan March 5 primary, including Judge Michael Begert, and Chip Zecher. The top two vote recipients will advance to the general election on November 5, unless one candidate receives more than 50% of the vote and wins outright in the primary.

Candidate fundraising and pledges: Judge Begert’s campaign has raised at least $21,000 as of December 2023. He has been the target of opposition donations from Stop Crime Action, a pro-incarceration collective that supported the 2022 recall of former progressive DA Chesa Boudin with the funding of billionaire and Republican mega donor William Oberndorf.

Opposing candidate: Chip Zecher
Opposing candidate’s fundraising and pledges: Zecher’s campaign has raised at least $151,000 as of December 2023, including a six-figure donation from right-wing tech billionaire Chris Larsen and the conservative Stop Crime SF organization.

The District

County: The Superior Court of San Francisco County operates as the trial court for criminal, civil, and other cases filed in the county.

The Position

Judges of the California Superior Courts are elected in nonpartisan, county-wide elections to six-year terms. Once voted in, a judge can run for retention at the expiration of their term. A retention election is a process by which voters decide whether an incumbent judge should remain for another term. If the judge, when not facing an opponent, does not obtain a certain percentage of voters (often 50%), they are removed from the position. Many judges join the court through a gubernatorial appointment. If a judge is appointed, they compete in the next general election following the appointment.

California has 58 trial, or superior courts, one in each county. In the more than 450 courthouses of the superior courts, a judge and sometimes a jury hears witness testimony and other evidence. These courts hear civil, criminal, family, probate, and juvenile cases. The judge decides cases through the application of relevant law to the relevant facts.

Retain Judge Michael Begert to keep San Francisco County on the right track for progress.

Judge Michael Begert’s track record and legal background demonstrates that he will continue to use his judicial prudence effectively in the best interests of this diverse district.

Progressive endorsements: Judge Begert has the endorsement of many local groups, including San Francisco Women’s Political Committee, San Francisco Tenants Union, Affordable Housing Alliance, and several bar associations. He has also received the endorsement of many elected leaders, including State Sen. Scott Wiener, Assm. Phil Ting, BART Director Lateefah Simon, and six members of the San Francisco Board of Supervisors. He has also received the endorsement of San Francisco Sheriff Paul Miyamoto.

Top issues: According to campaign materials, Judge Begert is running for re-election to continue to champion public safety, compassion, and the humanity of all community members on the bench.

Key initiatives: Judge Begert has provided leadership in moving the county forward through his work presiding over courtrooms that focus primarily on social service provisions. He is currently overseeing the Community Assistance, Recovery, and Empowerment (CARE) Court, which was established by Gov. Newsom to create pathways to recovery for individuals struggling with mental health treatment and homelessness. As a judge, he has also served in Drug Treatment Court, Family Court, Community Justice Court, and Veterans Justice Court. Judge Begert has supported the creation of restorative justice programs, and has used his judicial experience to establish connections and accountability with the individuals who come through his courtroom.

Governance and community leadership experience: Judge Begert has served in this seat since 2011, when he was appointed to the seat by former Gov. Arnold Schwartzenegger. He was retained in 2012 and 2018, running unopposed in both elections.

Prior to his election to the judiciary, Judge Begert was an attorney in private practice, specializing in class action and product liability law. He has had a long involvement with many legal community organizations, including National Asian Pacific American Legal Consortium and Asian Americans Advancing Justice.

Other background: Judge Begert is from Washington state, and has lived in San Francisco since he completed law school in 1989. He is the biracial son of an American father and a Japanese mother.

The Race

Primary election: There are two candidates running in the nonpartisan March 5 primary, including Judge Michael Begert, and Chip Zecher. The top two vote recipients will advance to the general election on November 5, unless one candidate receives more than 50% of the vote and wins outright in the primary.

Candidate fundraising and pledges: Judge Begert’s campaign has raised at least $21,000 as of December 2023. He has been the target of opposition donations from Stop Crime Action, a pro-incarceration collective that supported the 2022 recall of former progressive DA Chesa Boudin with the funding of billionaire and Republican mega donor William Oberndorf.

Opposing candidate: Chip Zecher
Opposing candidate’s fundraising and pledges: Zecher’s campaign has raised at least $151,000 as of December 2023, including a six-figure donation from right-wing tech billionaire Chris Larsen and the conservative Stop Crime SF organization.

The District

County: The Superior Court of San Francisco County operates as the trial court for criminal, civil, and other cases filed in the county.

The Position

Judges of the California Superior Courts are elected in nonpartisan, county-wide elections to six-year terms. Once voted in, a judge can run for retention at the expiration of their term. A retention election is a process by which voters decide whether an incumbent judge should remain for another term. If the judge, when not facing an opponent, does not obtain a certain percentage of voters (often 50%), they are removed from the position. Many judges join the court through a gubernatorial appointment. If a judge is appointed, they compete in the next general election following the appointment.

California has 58 trial, or superior courts, one in each county. In the more than 450 courthouses of the superior courts, a judge and sometimes a jury hears witness testimony and other evidence. These courts hear civil, criminal, family, probate, and juvenile cases. The judge decides cases through the application of relevant law to the relevant facts.

San Francisco County, Judge of the Superior Court, Seat #13

Patrick Thompson

Website

Retain Judge Patrick Thompson to keep San Francisco County on the right track for progress.

Judge Patrick Thompson’s track record and legal background demonstrates that he will continue to use his judicial prudence effectively in the best interests of this diverse district.

Progressive endorsements: Judge Thompson has the endorsement of a few progressive groups, including San Francisco Tenants Union. He has received the endorsement of the San Francisco Chronicle and the San Francisco Standard, and has been rated “well qualified” by the Bar Association of San Francisco.

Top issues: According to campaign materials, Judge Thompson is running for re-election to continue to bring an equitable, by-the-book approach to the bench.

Key initiatives: Judge Thompson has provided leadership in moving the county toward an approach that centers respect for the rule of law. His judicial philosophy is heavily focused on holding attorneys and justice involved individuals to the same standard of courtroom decorum and written law, and ensuring that trial outcomes are equitable and legally consistent.

Governance and community leadership experience: Judge Thompson has served in this seat since 2022, when he was appointed to the bench by Gov. Gavin Newsom. This is his first run for retention.

Prior to his election to the judiciary, Judge Thompson was a corporate attorney in private practice, which helped him build a strong understanding of several unique legal disciplines. During this time, he worked on cases related to antitrust, business regulations, patent infringement, and class-action lawsuits. After his appointment to the Superior Court, he worked in the traffic division, and then moved on to overseeing criminal preliminary hearings. He is also involved in his local community through membership on the California Pacific Medical Center board, the American Conservatory Theater board, and the Grace Cathedral board.

Other background: Judge Thompson is from Michigan, and has lived in California for over 30 years.

The Race

Primary election: There are two candidates running in the nonpartisan March 5 primary: incumbent Judge Patrick Thompson and Jean Roland. The top two vote recipients will advance to the general election on November 5, unless one candidate receives more than 50% of the vote and wins outright in the primary.

Candidate fundraising and pledges: Judge Thompson’s campaign has not filed any campaign fundraising receipts with the county as of January 2024. He has been the target of opposition donations from Stop Crime Action, a pro-incarceration collective that supported the 2022 recall of former progressive DA Chesa Boudin with the funding of billionaire and Republican mega donor William Oberndorf.

Opposing candidate: Jean Roland
Opposing candidate’s fundraising and pledges: Roland’s campaign has not filed any campaign fundraising receipts with the county as of January 2024.

The District

County: The Superior Court of San Francisco County operates as the trial court for criminal, civil, and other cases filed in the county.

The Position

Judges of the California Superior Courts are elected in nonpartisan, county-wide elections to six-year terms. Once voted in, a judge can run for retention at the expiration of their term. A retention election is a process by which voters decide whether an incumbent judge should remain for another term. If the judge, when not facing an opponent, does not obtain a certain percentage of voters (often 50%), they are removed from the position. Many judges join the court through a gubernatorial appointment. If a judge is appointed, they compete in the next general election following the appointment.

California has 58 trial, or superior courts, one in each county. In the more than 450 courthouses of the superior courts, a judge and sometimes a jury hears witness testimony and other evidence. These courts hear civil, criminal, family, probate, and juvenile cases. The judge decides cases through the application of relevant law to the relevant facts.

Retain Judge Patrick Thompson to keep San Francisco County on the right track for progress.

Judge Patrick Thompson’s track record and legal background demonstrates that he will continue to use his judicial prudence effectively in the best interests of this diverse district.

Progressive endorsements: Judge Thompson has the endorsement of a few progressive groups, including San Francisco Tenants Union. He has received the endorsement of the San Francisco Chronicle and the San Francisco Standard, and has been rated “well qualified” by the Bar Association of San Francisco.

Top issues: According to campaign materials, Judge Thompson is running for re-election to continue to bring an equitable, by-the-book approach to the bench.

Key initiatives: Judge Thompson has provided leadership in moving the county toward an approach that centers respect for the rule of law. His judicial philosophy is heavily focused on holding attorneys and justice involved individuals to the same standard of courtroom decorum and written law, and ensuring that trial outcomes are equitable and legally consistent.

Governance and community leadership experience: Judge Thompson has served in this seat since 2022, when he was appointed to the bench by Gov. Gavin Newsom. This is his first run for retention.

Prior to his election to the judiciary, Judge Thompson was a corporate attorney in private practice, which helped him build a strong understanding of several unique legal disciplines. During this time, he worked on cases related to antitrust, business regulations, patent infringement, and class-action lawsuits. After his appointment to the Superior Court, he worked in the traffic division, and then moved on to overseeing criminal preliminary hearings. He is also involved in his local community through membership on the California Pacific Medical Center board, the American Conservatory Theater board, and the Grace Cathedral board.

Other background: Judge Thompson is from Michigan, and has lived in California for over 30 years.

The Race

Primary election: There are two candidates running in the nonpartisan March 5 primary: incumbent Judge Patrick Thompson and Jean Roland. The top two vote recipients will advance to the general election on November 5, unless one candidate receives more than 50% of the vote and wins outright in the primary.

Candidate fundraising and pledges: Judge Thompson’s campaign has not filed any campaign fundraising receipts with the county as of January 2024. He has been the target of opposition donations from Stop Crime Action, a pro-incarceration collective that supported the 2022 recall of former progressive DA Chesa Boudin with the funding of billionaire and Republican mega donor William Oberndorf.

Opposing candidate: Jean Roland
Opposing candidate’s fundraising and pledges: Roland’s campaign has not filed any campaign fundraising receipts with the county as of January 2024.

The District

County: The Superior Court of San Francisco County operates as the trial court for criminal, civil, and other cases filed in the county.

The Position

Judges of the California Superior Courts are elected in nonpartisan, county-wide elections to six-year terms. Once voted in, a judge can run for retention at the expiration of their term. A retention election is a process by which voters decide whether an incumbent judge should remain for another term. If the judge, when not facing an opponent, does not obtain a certain percentage of voters (often 50%), they are removed from the position. Many judges join the court through a gubernatorial appointment. If a judge is appointed, they compete in the next general election following the appointment.

California has 58 trial, or superior courts, one in each county. In the more than 450 courthouses of the superior courts, a judge and sometimes a jury hears witness testimony and other evidence. These courts hear civil, criminal, family, probate, and juvenile cases. The judge decides cases through the application of relevant law to the relevant facts.

Retain Judge Patrick Thompson to keep San Francisco County on the right track for progress.

Judge Patrick Thompson’s track record and legal background demonstrates that he will continue to use his judicial prudence effectively in the best interests of this diverse district.

Progressive endorsements: Judge Thompson has the endorsement of a few progressive groups, including San Francisco Tenants Union. He has received the endorsement of the San Francisco Chronicle and the San Francisco Standard, and has been rated “well qualified” by the Bar Association of San Francisco.

Top issues: According to campaign materials, Judge Thompson is running for re-election to continue to bring an equitable, by-the-book approach to the bench.

Key initiatives: Judge Thompson has provided leadership in moving the county toward an approach that centers respect for the rule of law. His judicial philosophy is heavily focused on holding attorneys and justice involved individuals to the same standard of courtroom decorum and written law, and ensuring that trial outcomes are equitable and legally consistent.

Governance and community leadership experience: Judge Thompson has served in this seat since 2022, when he was appointed to the bench by Gov. Gavin Newsom. This is his first run for retention.

Prior to his election to the judiciary, Judge Thompson was a corporate attorney in private practice, which helped him build a strong understanding of several unique legal disciplines. During this time, he worked on cases related to antitrust, business regulations, patent infringement, and class-action lawsuits. After his appointment to the Superior Court, he worked in the traffic division, and then moved on to overseeing criminal preliminary hearings. He is also involved in his local community through membership on the California Pacific Medical Center board, the American Conservatory Theater board, and the Grace Cathedral board.

Other background: Judge Thompson is from Michigan, and has lived in California for over 30 years.

The Race

Primary election: There are two candidates running in the nonpartisan March 5 primary: incumbent Judge Patrick Thompson and Jean Roland. The top two vote recipients will advance to the general election on November 5, unless one candidate receives more than 50% of the vote and wins outright in the primary.

Candidate fundraising and pledges: Judge Thompson’s campaign has not filed any campaign fundraising receipts with the county as of January 2024. He has been the target of opposition donations from Stop Crime Action, a pro-incarceration collective that supported the 2022 recall of former progressive DA Chesa Boudin with the funding of billionaire and Republican mega donor William Oberndorf.

Opposing candidate: Jean Roland
Opposing candidate’s fundraising and pledges: Roland’s campaign has not filed any campaign fundraising receipts with the county as of January 2024.

The District

County: The Superior Court of San Francisco County operates as the trial court for criminal, civil, and other cases filed in the county.

The Position

Judges of the California Superior Courts are elected in nonpartisan, county-wide elections to six-year terms. Once voted in, a judge can run for retention at the expiration of their term. A retention election is a process by which voters decide whether an incumbent judge should remain for another term. If the judge, when not facing an opponent, does not obtain a certain percentage of voters (often 50%), they are removed from the position. Many judges join the court through a gubernatorial appointment. If a judge is appointed, they compete in the next general election following the appointment.

California has 58 trial, or superior courts, one in each county. In the more than 450 courthouses of the superior courts, a judge and sometimes a jury hears witness testimony and other evidence. These courts hear civil, criminal, family, probate, and juvenile cases. The judge decides cases through the application of relevant law to the relevant facts.

County District Races

Depending on where you live, you may have the below county-districted races on your ballot.

Alameda County, District 4

Alameda County Board of Supervisors, District 4

Non-Partisan

Jennifer Esteen

Website Endorsements

Elect Jennifer Esteen for Supervisor to put Alameda County on the right track for progress.

Jennifer Esteen’s policy positions demonstrate that she will be a progressive voice for the constituents of Alameda County and will govern effectively in the best interests of this diverse district.

Progressive endorsements: Esteen has the endorsement of some progressive groups, including California Working Families Party, Oakland Rising Action, and Our Revolution East Bay. She has also received the endorsement of some local elected leaders, including Livermore Vice Mayor Brittni Kiick, Fremont Councilmember Jenny Kassan, and San Francisco Supervisor Shamann Walton.

Electoral history: Esteen ran for the AD-20 seat in 2022, but came in third in the primary with 22% of the vote behind now Assm. Liz Ortega and another Democratic challenger. She did not advance to the general election.

Top issues: Homelessness, affordable housing development, health care and community-based preventative care, workforce development, job creation, criminal justice reform, and mental health care and addiction support.

Governance and community leadership experience: Esteen is a registered nurse, single working mother, and community activist, and is running for office to advocate for working families and for increased health and safety resources across the community. Her experience as a psychiatric nurse in the San Francisco General Hospital Psychiatric Emergency Room, and seeing firsthand the cycle of disadvantage that patients experience from diminished funding for mental-health care, galvanized her to organize for better access to health care. While serving on a steering committee on mental health in San Francisco, she put together a plan to put a progressive tax on the CEO’s income to fund mental-health services, which passed with voter support. After working five years in the Behavioral Health Center, she fought alongside residents to stop the closure of 41 permanent board and care beds in the Adult Residential Facility. It was after saving those beds that she was appointed vice president of organizing for SEIU 1021. Esteen now serves as vice president of the Alameda Health System Board of Trustees and on the Eden Area Municipal Advisory Council, which allows her to use her deep understanding of the intersections of health care and housing to support better outcomes for residents.

Other background: Jennifer Esteen has lived in the East Bay for 20 years and has been a resident of Ashland since 2015.

The Race

Primary election: There are two candidates running in the nonpartisan March 5 primary: Jennifer Esteen and incumbent Nate Miley. A candidate can win this race outright in the primary if they receive more than 50% of the vote.

Candidate fundraising and pledges: Esteen’s campaign has raised $53,000 as of December 2023, and is not funded by police, fossil fuel, corporate PAC, or real estate interests.

Opposing candidate: Nate Miley
Opposing candidate’s fundraising and pledges: Miley’s campaign has raised $61,000 as of December 2023, and is funded by real estate and police interests.

The District

County: Alameda County is California’s 7th most populous county. District 4 includes Ashland, Pleasanton, Castro Valley, Cherryland, El Portal Ridge, Fairmont Terrace, Fairview, and Hill Crest Knolls.

Governance structure: Alameda County’s Board of Supervisors oversees the needs of 1.6 million people and manages an estimated budget of $4.1 billion annually. According to the County Charter, Alameda County is governed by the elected Board of Supervisors, and they receive support from the county administrator, who acts as their agent.

The Position

Each of the 58 counties in California is governed by a five-person Board of Supervisors. A Board of Supervisors has legislative and executive power to manage county services and resources, including courts, jails, public health, and public lands. They also have quasi-judicial powers, which gives them the right to hold hearings, conduct investigations, and make decisions in a manner similar to judicial courts. Laws passed by Boards of Supervisors are generally called ordinances. Because counties include both incorporated cities which are administered by their own city councils and unincorporated areas which are directly administered by the county, ordinances may or may not apply in different areas of the county. Supervisors are typically ‎limited to 3 terms, or 12 years in office total.

Elect Jennifer Esteen for Supervisor to put Alameda County on the right track for progress.

Jennifer Esteen’s policy positions demonstrate that she will be a progressive voice for the constituents of Alameda County and will govern effectively in the best interests of this diverse district.

Progressive endorsements: Esteen has the endorsement of some progressive groups, including California Working Families Party, Oakland Rising Action, and Our Revolution East Bay. She has also received the endorsement of some local elected leaders, including Livermore Vice Mayor Brittni Kiick, Fremont Councilmember Jenny Kassan, and San Francisco Supervisor Shamann Walton.

Electoral history: Esteen ran for the AD-20 seat in 2022, but came in third in the primary with 22% of the vote behind now Assm. Liz Ortega and another Democratic challenger. She did not advance to the general election.

Top issues: Homelessness, affordable housing development, health care and community-based preventative care, workforce development, job creation, criminal justice reform, and mental health care and addiction support.

Governance and community leadership experience: Esteen is a registered nurse, single working mother, and community activist, and is running for office to advocate for working families and for increased health and safety resources across the community. Her experience as a psychiatric nurse in the San Francisco General Hospital Psychiatric Emergency Room, and seeing firsthand the cycle of disadvantage that patients experience from diminished funding for mental-health care, galvanized her to organize for better access to health care. While serving on a steering committee on mental health in San Francisco, she put together a plan to put a progressive tax on the CEO’s income to fund mental-health services, which passed with voter support. After working five years in the Behavioral Health Center, she fought alongside residents to stop the closure of 41 permanent board and care beds in the Adult Residential Facility. It was after saving those beds that she was appointed vice president of organizing for SEIU 1021. Esteen now serves as vice president of the Alameda Health System Board of Trustees and on the Eden Area Municipal Advisory Council, which allows her to use her deep understanding of the intersections of health care and housing to support better outcomes for residents.

Other background: Jennifer Esteen has lived in the East Bay for 20 years and has been a resident of Ashland since 2015.

The Race

Primary election: There are two candidates running in the nonpartisan March 5 primary: Jennifer Esteen and incumbent Nate Miley. A candidate can win this race outright in the primary if they receive more than 50% of the vote.

Candidate fundraising and pledges: Esteen’s campaign has raised $53,000 as of December 2023, and is not funded by police, fossil fuel, corporate PAC, or real estate interests.

Opposing candidate: Nate Miley
Opposing candidate’s fundraising and pledges: Miley’s campaign has raised $61,000 as of December 2023, and is funded by real estate and police interests.

The District

County: Alameda County is California’s 7th most populous county. District 4 includes Ashland, Pleasanton, Castro Valley, Cherryland, El Portal Ridge, Fairmont Terrace, Fairview, and Hill Crest Knolls.

Governance structure: Alameda County’s Board of Supervisors oversees the needs of 1.6 million people and manages an estimated budget of $4.1 billion annually. According to the County Charter, Alameda County is governed by the elected Board of Supervisors, and they receive support from the county administrator, who acts as their agent.

The Position

Each of the 58 counties in California is governed by a five-person Board of Supervisors. A Board of Supervisors has legislative and executive power to manage county services and resources, including courts, jails, public health, and public lands. They also have quasi-judicial powers, which gives them the right to hold hearings, conduct investigations, and make decisions in a manner similar to judicial courts. Laws passed by Boards of Supervisors are generally called ordinances. Because counties include both incorporated cities which are administered by their own city councils and unincorporated areas which are directly administered by the county, ordinances may or may not apply in different areas of the county. Supervisors are typically ‎limited to 3 terms, or 12 years in office total.

Elect Jennifer Esteen for Supervisor to put Alameda County on the right track for progress.

Jennifer Esteen’s policy positions demonstrate that she will be a progressive voice for the constituents of Alameda County and will govern effectively in the best interests of this diverse district.

Progressive endorsements: Esteen has the endorsement of some progressive groups, including California Working Families Party, Oakland Rising Action, and Our Revolution East Bay. She has also received the endorsement of some local elected leaders, including Livermore Vice Mayor Brittni Kiick, Fremont Councilmember Jenny Kassan, and San Francisco Supervisor Shamann Walton.

Electoral history: Esteen ran for the AD-20 seat in 2022, but came in third in the primary with 22% of the vote behind now Assm. Liz Ortega and another Democratic challenger. She did not advance to the general election.

Top issues: Homelessness, affordable housing development, health care and community-based preventative care, workforce development, job creation, criminal justice reform, and mental health care and addiction support.

Governance and community leadership experience: Esteen is a registered nurse, single working mother, and community activist, and is running for office to advocate for working families and for increased health and safety resources across the community. Her experience as a psychiatric nurse in the San Francisco General Hospital Psychiatric Emergency Room, and seeing firsthand the cycle of disadvantage that patients experience from diminished funding for mental-health care, galvanized her to organize for better access to health care. While serving on a steering committee on mental health in San Francisco, she put together a plan to put a progressive tax on the CEO’s income to fund mental-health services, which passed with voter support. After working five years in the Behavioral Health Center, she fought alongside residents to stop the closure of 41 permanent board and care beds in the Adult Residential Facility. It was after saving those beds that she was appointed vice president of organizing for SEIU 1021. Esteen now serves as vice president of the Alameda Health System Board of Trustees and on the Eden Area Municipal Advisory Council, which allows her to use her deep understanding of the intersections of health care and housing to support better outcomes for residents.

Other background: Jennifer Esteen has lived in the East Bay for 20 years and has been a resident of Ashland since 2015.

The Race

Primary election: There are two candidates running in the nonpartisan March 5 primary: Jennifer Esteen and incumbent Nate Miley. A candidate can win this race outright in the primary if they receive more than 50% of the vote.

Candidate fundraising and pledges: Esteen’s campaign has raised $53,000 as of December 2023, and is not funded by police, fossil fuel, corporate PAC, or real estate interests.

Opposing candidate: Nate Miley
Opposing candidate’s fundraising and pledges: Miley’s campaign has raised $61,000 as of December 2023, and is funded by real estate and police interests.

The District

County: Alameda County is California’s 7th most populous county. District 4 includes Ashland, Pleasanton, Castro Valley, Cherryland, El Portal Ridge, Fairmont Terrace, Fairview, and Hill Crest Knolls.

Governance structure: Alameda County’s Board of Supervisors oversees the needs of 1.6 million people and manages an estimated budget of $4.1 billion annually. According to the County Charter, Alameda County is governed by the elected Board of Supervisors, and they receive support from the county administrator, who acts as their agent.

The Position

Each of the 58 counties in California is governed by a five-person Board of Supervisors. A Board of Supervisors has legislative and executive power to manage county services and resources, including courts, jails, public health, and public lands. They also have quasi-judicial powers, which gives them the right to hold hearings, conduct investigations, and make decisions in a manner similar to judicial courts. Laws passed by Boards of Supervisors are generally called ordinances. Because counties include both incorporated cities which are administered by their own city councils and unincorporated areas which are directly administered by the county, ordinances may or may not apply in different areas of the county. Supervisors are typically ‎limited to 3 terms, or 12 years in office total.

Alameda County, District 5

Alameda County Board of Supervisors, District 5

Non-Partisan

Nikki Fortunato Bas

Website

Elect Nikki Fortunato Bas to put Alameda County on the right track for progress.

Nikki Fortunato Bas’s track record and policy positions demonstrate that she will be a progressive voice for the constituents of Alameda County and will govern effectively in the best interests of this diverse district.

Progressive endorsements: Fortunato Bas has the endorsement of some local groups, including Bay Rising Action, Oakland Rising Action, and Building and Construction Trades Council of Alameda County. She has also received the endorsement of several elected leaders, including State Sen. Nancy Skinner and Oakland City Councilmember Kevin Jenkins.

Electoral history: Fortunato Bas has run for office previously, and won her 2018 race for Oakland City Council with 54% of the vote. She was reelected in 2022 after earning over 67% of the vote.

Top issues: Homelessness and housing, job creation, and expanding mental health care.

Governance and community leadership experience: Fortunato Bas is a community organizer and public official, which she does to advocate for policies that will bring progressive change to the Oakland community. During her two terms on the Oakland City Council, she has supported several housing initiatives, including the establishment of robust eviction protections, the opening of a tiny-home program for unhoused residents, and the creation of a fund to support first-time homeownership. She has worked to improve the function of emergency personnel by launching a nonviolent crisis-response program, and improving violence-prevention programs in the community. She has also supported funding for youth-development programs, a progressive taxation ballot measure, and infrastructure improvements. Prior to her election, Fortunato Bas advocated for change through her nonprofit leadership roles with Partnership for Working Families and East Bay Alliance for a Sustainable Economy. She is a longtime supporter of economic improvements, including minimum-wage increases, paid sick leave, and creating local jobs through redevelopment.

Other background: Fortunato Bas has lived in Oakland’s Grand Lake neighborhood for over 25 years. She is Filipina-American.

The Race

Primary election: There are nine candidates running in the nonpartisan March 5 primary, including Nikki Fortunato Bas, Ben Bartlett, John Bauters, Ken Berrick, Omar Farmer, Gregory Hodge, Chris Moore, Gerald Pechenuk, and Lorrel Plimier. The top two vote recipients will advance to the general election on November 5, unless one candidate receives more than 50% of the vote and wins outright in the primary.

Candidate fundraising and pledges: Nikki Fortunato Bas’s campaign has raised $34,000 as of December 2023, and is not funded by police, real estate, fossil fuel, or corporate PAC interests.

Opposing candidate: Ben Bartlett
Opposing candidate’s fundraising and pledges: Bartlett’s campaign has raised $53,000 as of December 2023, and is not funded by police, real estate, fossil fuel, or corporate PAC interests.

Opposing candidate: John Bauters
Opposing candidate’s fundraising and pledges: Bauters’s campaign has raised $73,000 as of December 2023, and is not funded by police, real estate, fossil fuel, or corporate PAC interests.

Opposing candidate: Ken Berrick
Opposing candidate’s fundraising and pledges: Berrick’s campaign has raised $55,000 as of December 2023, and is not funded by police, real estate, fossil fuel, or corporate PAC interests.

The District

County: Alameda County is California's 7th most populous county. District 5 includes the cities of Albany, Berkeley, Emeryville, Piedmont, West Oakland, North Oakland, Rockridge, and Grand Lake.

Governance structure: Alameda County’s Board of Supervisors oversees the needs of 1.6 million people and manages an estimated budget of $4.1 billion annually. According to the County Charter, Alameda County is governed by the elected Board of Supervisors and the county administrator, who acts as their agent.

The Position

Each of the 58 counties in California is governed by a five-person Board of Supervisors. A Board of Supervisors has legislative and executive power to manage county services and resources, including courts, jails, public health, and public lands. They also have quasi-judicial powers, which gives them the right to hold hearings, conduct investigations, and make decisions in a manner similar to judicial courts. Laws passed by Boards of Supervisors are generally called ordinances. Because counties include both incorporated cities, which are administered by their own city councils, and unincorporated areas, which are directly administered by the county, ordinances may or may not apply in different areas of the county. Supervisors are typically ‎limited to 3 terms, or 12 years in office total.

Elect Nikki Fortunato Bas to put Alameda County on the right track for progress.

Nikki Fortunato Bas’s track record and policy positions demonstrate that she will be a progressive voice for the constituents of Alameda County and will govern effectively in the best interests of this diverse district.

Progressive endorsements: Fortunato Bas has the endorsement of some local groups, including Bay Rising Action, Oakland Rising Action, and Building and Construction Trades Council of Alameda County. She has also received the endorsement of several elected leaders, including State Sen. Nancy Skinner and Oakland City Councilmember Kevin Jenkins.

Electoral history: Fortunato Bas has run for office previously, and won her 2018 race for Oakland City Council with 54% of the vote. She was reelected in 2022 after earning over 67% of the vote.

Top issues: Homelessness and housing, job creation, and expanding mental health care.

Governance and community leadership experience: Fortunato Bas is a community organizer and public official, which she does to advocate for policies that will bring progressive change to the Oakland community. During her two terms on the Oakland City Council, she has supported several housing initiatives, including the establishment of robust eviction protections, the opening of a tiny-home program for unhoused residents, and the creation of a fund to support first-time homeownership. She has worked to improve the function of emergency personnel by launching a nonviolent crisis-response program, and improving violence-prevention programs in the community. She has also supported funding for youth-development programs, a progressive taxation ballot measure, and infrastructure improvements. Prior to her election, Fortunato Bas advocated for change through her nonprofit leadership roles with Partnership for Working Families and East Bay Alliance for a Sustainable Economy. She is a longtime supporter of economic improvements, including minimum-wage increases, paid sick leave, and creating local jobs through redevelopment.

Other background: Fortunato Bas has lived in Oakland’s Grand Lake neighborhood for over 25 years. She is Filipina-American.

The Race

Primary election: There are nine candidates running in the nonpartisan March 5 primary, including Nikki Fortunato Bas, Ben Bartlett, John Bauters, Ken Berrick, Omar Farmer, Gregory Hodge, Chris Moore, Gerald Pechenuk, and Lorrel Plimier. The top two vote recipients will advance to the general election on November 5, unless one candidate receives more than 50% of the vote and wins outright in the primary.

Candidate fundraising and pledges: Nikki Fortunato Bas’s campaign has raised $34,000 as of December 2023, and is not funded by police, real estate, fossil fuel, or corporate PAC interests.

Opposing candidate: Ben Bartlett
Opposing candidate’s fundraising and pledges: Bartlett’s campaign has raised $53,000 as of December 2023, and is not funded by police, real estate, fossil fuel, or corporate PAC interests.

Opposing candidate: John Bauters
Opposing candidate’s fundraising and pledges: Bauters’s campaign has raised $73,000 as of December 2023, and is not funded by police, real estate, fossil fuel, or corporate PAC interests.

Opposing candidate: Ken Berrick
Opposing candidate’s fundraising and pledges: Berrick’s campaign has raised $55,000 as of December 2023, and is not funded by police, real estate, fossil fuel, or corporate PAC interests.

The District

County: Alameda County is California's 7th most populous county. District 5 includes the cities of Albany, Berkeley, Emeryville, Piedmont, West Oakland, North Oakland, Rockridge, and Grand Lake.

Governance structure: Alameda County’s Board of Supervisors oversees the needs of 1.6 million people and manages an estimated budget of $4.1 billion annually. According to the County Charter, Alameda County is governed by the elected Board of Supervisors and the county administrator, who acts as their agent.

The Position

Each of the 58 counties in California is governed by a five-person Board of Supervisors. A Board of Supervisors has legislative and executive power to manage county services and resources, including courts, jails, public health, and public lands. They also have quasi-judicial powers, which gives them the right to hold hearings, conduct investigations, and make decisions in a manner similar to judicial courts. Laws passed by Boards of Supervisors are generally called ordinances. Because counties include both incorporated cities, which are administered by their own city councils, and unincorporated areas, which are directly administered by the county, ordinances may or may not apply in different areas of the county. Supervisors are typically ‎limited to 3 terms, or 12 years in office total.

Elect Nikki Fortunato Bas to put Alameda County on the right track for progress.

Nikki Fortunato Bas’s track record and policy positions demonstrate that she will be a progressive voice for the constituents of Alameda County and will govern effectively in the best interests of this diverse district.

Progressive endorsements: Fortunato Bas has the endorsement of some local groups, including Bay Rising Action, Oakland Rising Action, and Building and Construction Trades Council of Alameda County. She has also received the endorsement of several elected leaders, including State Sen. Nancy Skinner and Oakland City Councilmember Kevin Jenkins.

Electoral history: Fortunato Bas has run for office previously, and won her 2018 race for Oakland City Council with 54% of the vote. She was reelected in 2022 after earning over 67% of the vote.

Top issues: Homelessness and housing, job creation, and expanding mental health care.

Governance and community leadership experience: Fortunato Bas is a community organizer and public official, which she does to advocate for policies that will bring progressive change to the Oakland community. During her two terms on the Oakland City Council, she has supported several housing initiatives, including the establishment of robust eviction protections, the opening of a tiny-home program for unhoused residents, and the creation of a fund to support first-time homeownership. She has worked to improve the function of emergency personnel by launching a nonviolent crisis-response program, and improving violence-prevention programs in the community. She has also supported funding for youth-development programs, a progressive taxation ballot measure, and infrastructure improvements. Prior to her election, Fortunato Bas advocated for change through her nonprofit leadership roles with Partnership for Working Families and East Bay Alliance for a Sustainable Economy. She is a longtime supporter of economic improvements, including minimum-wage increases, paid sick leave, and creating local jobs through redevelopment.

Other background: Fortunato Bas has lived in Oakland’s Grand Lake neighborhood for over 25 years. She is Filipina-American.

The Race

Primary election: There are nine candidates running in the nonpartisan March 5 primary, including Nikki Fortunato Bas, Ben Bartlett, John Bauters, Ken Berrick, Omar Farmer, Gregory Hodge, Chris Moore, Gerald Pechenuk, and Lorrel Plimier. The top two vote recipients will advance to the general election on November 5, unless one candidate receives more than 50% of the vote and wins outright in the primary.

Candidate fundraising and pledges: Nikki Fortunato Bas’s campaign has raised $34,000 as of December 2023, and is not funded by police, real estate, fossil fuel, or corporate PAC interests.

Opposing candidate: Ben Bartlett
Opposing candidate’s fundraising and pledges: Bartlett’s campaign has raised $53,000 as of December 2023, and is not funded by police, real estate, fossil fuel, or corporate PAC interests.

Opposing candidate: John Bauters
Opposing candidate’s fundraising and pledges: Bauters’s campaign has raised $73,000 as of December 2023, and is not funded by police, real estate, fossil fuel, or corporate PAC interests.

Opposing candidate: Ken Berrick
Opposing candidate’s fundraising and pledges: Berrick’s campaign has raised $55,000 as of December 2023, and is not funded by police, real estate, fossil fuel, or corporate PAC interests.

The District

County: Alameda County is California's 7th most populous county. District 5 includes the cities of Albany, Berkeley, Emeryville, Piedmont, West Oakland, North Oakland, Rockridge, and Grand Lake.

Governance structure: Alameda County’s Board of Supervisors oversees the needs of 1.6 million people and manages an estimated budget of $4.1 billion annually. According to the County Charter, Alameda County is governed by the elected Board of Supervisors and the county administrator, who acts as their agent.

The Position

Each of the 58 counties in California is governed by a five-person Board of Supervisors. A Board of Supervisors has legislative and executive power to manage county services and resources, including courts, jails, public health, and public lands. They also have quasi-judicial powers, which gives them the right to hold hearings, conduct investigations, and make decisions in a manner similar to judicial courts. Laws passed by Boards of Supervisors are generally called ordinances. Because counties include both incorporated cities, which are administered by their own city councils, and unincorporated areas, which are directly administered by the county, ordinances may or may not apply in different areas of the county. Supervisors are typically ‎limited to 3 terms, or 12 years in office total.

Statewide Ballot Measures

Proposition #1

No Position

Vote on Proposition 1

Proposition 1 will establish a $6.4 billion bond to fund an increase in the number of treatment beds and housing units the state provides to individuals struggling with mental health and addiction, and to direct counties to reallocate their Mental Health Services Act funding to address the local housing shortage.

In an effort to address an ongoing housing shortage and addiction crisis in the state, Gov. Gavin Newsom signed two bills—SB326 and AB531—to send a $6.4 billion bond measure to voters in March. This bond would be used to increase capacity in health care and housing across the state by adding 6,800 behavioral health treatment beds, building 4,300 housing units, and creating 26,000 outpatient treatment slots for Californians. Proposition 1 would also require each county to redirect 30% of its Mental Health Services Act funding to housing, including creating new real estate development, and the provision of rental subsidies. Mental Health Services Act funds are raised through a tax on millionaires in the state, and the reallocated portion is expected to total $1 billion annually across the state. Overall, Proposition 1 aims to reduce homelessness and tent encampments, and provide support to individuals who do not have the resources to address behavioral health challenges.

Top support for Proposition 1:

- The legislation that sent Proposition 1 to voters received overwhelming support from the state legislature. SB326 received a unanimous floor vote in the Senate, and earned 68 floor votes in the Assembly. AB531 received 35 floor votes in the Senate, and 66 floor votes in the Assembly.
- YES ON 1 has received over $10.7 million in donations, primarily through Yes on Prop 1—Governor Newsom’s Ballot Measure Committee. The committee has received donations from police, fossil fuel, real estate, and corporate PAC interests, including from California Correctional Peace Officers Association Truth in American Government Fund, AirBnB, Google, and PG&E.
- Gov. Gavin Newsom has enthusiastically supported Proposition 1, arguing that the establishment of more treatment options and housing units has the potential to have a significant impact on marginalized populations within the state over time, and is a humane approach to this ongoing public health crisis.

Top opposition to Proposition 1:

- Groups like Disability Rights California and the League of Women Voters California are concerned that this policy could be interpreted to permit involuntary treatment of mental health and addiction patients in locked facilities. They argue that this aspect of the bill is regressive and is the result of hasty passage, a lack of meaningful legislative debate, and limited input from community groups. Republican activist Carl DeMaio, his conservative PAC Reform California, and the anti-tax Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association are also opposing Proposition 1.
- Some housing and homeless advocates have criticized Proposition 1’s narrow projected impact on a statewide homeless population that is estimated to include 180,000 people. With over half of the proposed new housing units earmarked for veterans, the number of homeless civilians who will benefit from this program is statistically insignificant.
- Proposition 1 has raised concerns among opponents—including several counties and county leaders—around its mandate that 30% of county Mental Health Services Act funding be allocated to address local housing shortages. Stripping funding out of this budget line to fund housing programs will disrupt existing and effective county mental health programs, many of which are tailored to serve marginalized local populations, including Indigenous communities, members of the LGBTQIA+ community, and people of color.

Proposition 1 will establish a $6.4 billion bond to fund an increase in the number of treatment beds and housing units the state provides to individuals struggling with mental health and addiction, and to direct counties to reallocate their Mental Health Services Act funding to address the local housing shortage.

In an effort to address an ongoing housing shortage and addiction crisis in the state, Gov. Gavin Newsom signed two bills—SB326 and AB531—to send a $6.4 billion bond measure to voters in March. This bond would be used to increase capacity in health care and housing across the state by adding 6,800 behavioral health treatment beds, building 4,300 housing units, and creating 26,000 outpatient treatment slots for Californians. Proposition 1 would also require each county to redirect 30% of its Mental Health Services Act funding to housing, including creating new real estate development, and the provision of rental subsidies. Mental Health Services Act funds are raised through a tax on millionaires in the state, and the reallocated portion is expected to total $1 billion annually across the state. Overall, Proposition 1 aims to reduce homelessness and tent encampments, and provide support to individuals who do not have the resources to address behavioral health challenges.

Top support for Proposition 1:

- The legislation that sent Proposition 1 to voters received overwhelming support from the state legislature. SB326 received a unanimous floor vote in the Senate, and earned 68 floor votes in the Assembly. AB531 received 35 floor votes in the Senate, and 66 floor votes in the Assembly.
- YES ON 1 has received over $10.7 million in donations, primarily through Yes on Prop 1—Governor Newsom’s Ballot Measure Committee. The committee has received donations from police, fossil fuel, real estate, and corporate PAC interests, including from California Correctional Peace Officers Association Truth in American Government Fund, AirBnB, Google, and PG&E.
- Gov. Gavin Newsom has enthusiastically supported Proposition 1, arguing that the establishment of more treatment options and housing units has the potential to have a significant impact on marginalized populations within the state over time, and is a humane approach to this ongoing public health crisis.

Top opposition to Proposition 1:

- Groups like Disability Rights California and the League of Women Voters California are concerned that this policy could be interpreted to permit involuntary treatment of mental health and addiction patients in locked facilities. They argue that this aspect of the bill is regressive and is the result of hasty passage, a lack of meaningful legislative debate, and limited input from community groups. Republican activist Carl DeMaio, his conservative PAC Reform California, and the anti-tax Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association are also opposing Proposition 1.
- Some housing and homeless advocates have criticized Proposition 1’s narrow projected impact on a statewide homeless population that is estimated to include 180,000 people. With over half of the proposed new housing units earmarked for veterans, the number of homeless civilians who will benefit from this program is statistically insignificant.
- Proposition 1 has raised concerns among opponents—including several counties and county leaders—around its mandate that 30% of county Mental Health Services Act funding be allocated to address local housing shortages. Stripping funding out of this budget line to fund housing programs will disrupt existing and effective county mental health programs, many of which are tailored to serve marginalized local populations, including Indigenous communities, members of the LGBTQIA+ community, and people of color.

County Ballot Measures

Depending on where you live, you may have one of the below ballot measures on your ballot.

Alameda County Ballot Measures

Have questions about voting in Alameda County? Read our guide to voting in Alameda County.

County Charter Amendment B

No Position

Vote on Measure B

Measure B would replace the county’s recall rules with the existing statewide recall standards.

In an attempt to realign the county’s recall standards with the statewide requirements—as is the case with most counties in California—the Alameda County Board of Supervisors voted in favor of adopting the state’s recall standards in place of the county rules outlined in the county charter in November 2023. This change to Section 62 of the county charter now goes to voters as Measure B, which would make three significant changes to the county’s recall process. First, it would strike the requirement that signature gatherers be registered voters of Alameda County. Second, it would increase the number of signatures required to qualify a recall for the ballot, from 15% of voter turnout for the last election to 10% of registered voters. Third, it would give the Board of Supervisors the power to appoint a replacement for a recalled official instead of allowing voters to elect one. A vote in favor of Measure B affirms these changes, and a vote against Measure B maintains the existing county charter language governing recall elections.

The outcome of this measure may affect the recall effort launched in June 2023 against Alameda County District Attorney Pamela Price, who was elected in November 2022.

Top funders of Measure B:

- There are no committees supporting or opposing Measure B.

Measure B would replace the county’s recall rules with the existing statewide recall standards.

In an attempt to realign the county’s recall standards with the statewide requirements—as is the case with most counties in California—the Alameda County Board of Supervisors voted in favor of adopting the state’s recall standards in place of the county rules outlined in the county charter in November 2023. This change to Section 62 of the county charter now goes to voters as Measure B, which would make three significant changes to the county’s recall process. First, it would strike the requirement that signature gatherers be registered voters of Alameda County. Second, it would increase the number of signatures required to qualify a recall for the ballot, from 15% of voter turnout for the last election to 10% of registered voters. Third, it would give the Board of Supervisors the power to appoint a replacement for a recalled official instead of allowing voters to elect one. A vote in favor of Measure B affirms these changes, and a vote against Measure B maintains the existing county charter language governing recall elections.

The outcome of this measure may affect the recall effort launched in June 2023 against Alameda County District Attorney Pamela Price, who was elected in November 2022.

Top funders of Measure B:

- There are no committees supporting or opposing Measure B.

San Francisco County Ballot Measures

Voting has changed in San Francisco County this year. The Voter’s Choice Act was enacted in the county to make voting more convenient. Changes include an expanded period of in-person early voting, every registered voter in the county will receive a vote-by-mail ballot, and every registered voter in the county is able to vote in-person at any Vote Center in their county. Also, in-person voters in San Francisco County will have the opportunity to use the new voting system, Democracy Suite, a touchscreen tablet with audio features, to mark their ballots. Have questions about the changes to voting in San Francisco County? Find out how to vote in San Francisco County.

Proposition B

No Position

Vote on Proposition B

Proposition B will increase police staffing level minimums on the condition that voters also approve a new tax or amend an existing tax to fund the changes.

As of September 2023, the San Francisco Police Department is experiencing historically low staffing levels. Supervisor Matt Dorsey originally proposed Proposition B to mandate minimum police staffing, then Supervisor Ahsha Safai amended the measure to require new funding to support staffing and retention. Passing Proposition B would set an increased minimum staffing level for SFPD, mandate that the Police Commission request enough funds to pay for the increased staffing level, mandate that the city budget include funding for the new staffing level for at least five years, allow SFPD to amend its internal budget, and create a new fund to support police recruitment over five to ten years. If passed, the implementation of Proposition B is conditioned on the separate passage of a new tax or an amendment to an existing tax to provide funding for these provisions.

Top support for Proposition B:

- Proponents argue that the historic understaffing of SFPD results in extended response times, wasteful spending on expensive overtime hours, and inefficiency in resolving and deterring crime. They also argue that passage of Proposition B would provide SFPD with the personnel and financial resources necessary to realign the department’s priorities and daily operations.
- YES ON B has raised $605,000 from a variety of organized labor donors, including $400,000 from SEIU Local 1021, which represents government, nonprofit, and school members. An additional $200,000 was donated by International Federation of Professional and Technical Engineers 21 Issues PAC.
- Sup. Ahsha Safaí, who is also running for mayor, has argued that Proposition B will maintain transparency in how increased police staffing is funded. Requiring a voter-approved tax change to power Proposition B will ensure that other city programs are not defunded in an effort to boost policing.

Top opposition to Proposition B:

- Sup. Matt Dorsey has strongly opposed Proposition B, arguing that requiring a secondary vote on a new tax or amended tax to fund increased resources for SFPD is a poison pill that renders the plan ineffective.
- STOP THE COP TAX has raised $105,000, with a primary donation from Neighbors for a Better San Francisco Advocacy, which has received substantial support from GOP donor William Obendorf, and strongly supported the 2022 recall of progressive SF DA Chesa Boudin.
- Opponents of Proposition B have characterized the format as requiring a “cop tax” that burdens taxpayers with funding a police department that should be provided to them as a public service through existing budget lines.

Proposition B will increase police staffing level minimums on the condition that voters also approve a new tax or amend an existing tax to fund the changes.

As of September 2023, the San Francisco Police Department is experiencing historically low staffing levels. Supervisor Matt Dorsey originally proposed Proposition B to mandate minimum police staffing, then Supervisor Ahsha Safai amended the measure to require new funding to support staffing and retention. Passing Proposition B would set an increased minimum staffing level for SFPD, mandate that the Police Commission request enough funds to pay for the increased staffing level, mandate that the city budget include funding for the new staffing level for at least five years, allow SFPD to amend its internal budget, and create a new fund to support police recruitment over five to ten years. If passed, the implementation of Proposition B is conditioned on the separate passage of a new tax or an amendment to an existing tax to provide funding for these provisions.

Top support for Proposition B:

- Proponents argue that the historic understaffing of SFPD results in extended response times, wasteful spending on expensive overtime hours, and inefficiency in resolving and deterring crime. They also argue that passage of Proposition B would provide SFPD with the personnel and financial resources necessary to realign the department’s priorities and daily operations.
- YES ON B has raised $605,000 from a variety of organized labor donors, including $400,000 from SEIU Local 1021, which represents government, nonprofit, and school members. An additional $200,000 was donated by International Federation of Professional and Technical Engineers 21 Issues PAC.
- Sup. Ahsha Safaí, who is also running for mayor, has argued that Proposition B will maintain transparency in how increased police staffing is funded. Requiring a voter-approved tax change to power Proposition B will ensure that other city programs are not defunded in an effort to boost policing.

Top opposition to Proposition B:

- Sup. Matt Dorsey has strongly opposed Proposition B, arguing that requiring a secondary vote on a new tax or amended tax to fund increased resources for SFPD is a poison pill that renders the plan ineffective.
- STOP THE COP TAX has raised $105,000, with a primary donation from Neighbors for a Better San Francisco Advocacy, which has received substantial support from GOP donor William Obendorf, and strongly supported the 2022 recall of progressive SF DA Chesa Boudin.
- Opponents of Proposition B have characterized the format as requiring a “cop tax” that burdens taxpayers with funding a police department that should be provided to them as a public service through existing budget lines.

Proposition E

VOTE NO

Vote No on expanding SFPD's use of surveillance technology

Vote NO on Proposition E to prohibit the expansion of the use of surveillance technology by the San Francisco Police Department, and maintain the discipline and oversight authority of the Police Commission.

As part of an ongoing effort to regulate crime in San Francisco, Mayor London Breed sponsored a petition to place Proposition E on the March ballot. Proposition E seeks to change the authority of policing in several significant ways, including restricting the time that officers are permitted to spend on administrative tasks, reducing the requirements for documenting use-of-force incidents, substituting body camera footage for written incident reports, allowing the use of drones, facial recognition, and other surveillance equipment without Police Commission approval, and expanding the use of vehicular pursuits.

Why voting NO on Proposition E matters:

- Expanding police access to public and private surveillance cameras, and allowing the department to make determinations about the use of facial-recognition software without the approval of the Police Commission, could result in the infringement of the privacy rights of local citizens. Voting NO on Proposition E will maintain guardrails to ensure that surveillance does not compromise the constitutional rights of San Francisco residents.
- Requiring administrative reports only for use-of-force incidents that result in physical injury or the drawing of a service firearm will substantially lessen the capacity of justice-involved citizens to hold the SFPD accountable for their actions. Voting NO will ensure that administrative reporting and documentation requirements remain in place, and that police misconduct cannot be easily obscured.
- Increased use of surveillance would result in a significant investment in the local tech industry, which is both partially responsible for the growing wealth gap in the city and a strong supporter of this proposition. Voting NO on Proposition E will prevent a larger portion of the public police budget from further enriching the private tech industry.
- Using increased surveillance to address systemic policing issues, like low staffing and ineffective training, is unlikely to resolve the challenges facing San Francisco. Voting NO will deny the city’s effort to erroneously substitute surveillance as a proxy for more holistic police reform.

Top funders of Proposition E:

- Proposition E has received over $489,000 in donations as of December 2023, with nearly $450,000 donated by individuals with close ties to the crypto and tech industries.
- The primary donor is billionaire Chris Larsen, who has donated $250,000 in support of the proposition. Larsen has long been an investor in tech start-ups, and is the co-founder and executive chairman of Ripple, a blockchain and cryptocurrency technology company.
- Venture capitalist Ron Conway has donated $100,000, building on his long record of political donations to support tech-friendly political agendas.
- Mayoral candidate Daniel Lurie, a philanthropist and an heir to the Levi Strauss Co. fortune, has donated $125,000.

Top opposition to Proposition E:

- The Prado Group, a real estate development and affordable housing company, has donated $50,000 to the campaign in opposition to Proposition E.
- Strada Investment Group, which specializes in real estate investment and development, has donated $50,000 to the campaign in opposition to Proposition E.
- Proposition E has also been publicly opposed by ACLU of Northern California, Police Commission President Cindy Elias, and several additional members of the Police Commission.

Vote NO on Proposition E to prohibit the expansion of the use of surveillance technology by the San Francisco Police Department, and maintain the discipline and oversight authority of the Police Commission.

As part of an ongoing effort to regulate crime in San Francisco, Mayor London Breed sponsored a petition to place Proposition E on the March ballot. Proposition E seeks to change the authority of policing in several significant ways, including restricting the time that officers are permitted to spend on administrative tasks, reducing the requirements for documenting use-of-force incidents, substituting body camera footage for written incident reports, allowing the use of drones, facial recognition, and other surveillance equipment without Police Commission approval, and expanding the use of vehicular pursuits.

Why voting NO on Proposition E matters:

- Expanding police access to public and private surveillance cameras, and allowing the department to make determinations about the use of facial-recognition software without the approval of the Police Commission, could result in the infringement of the privacy rights of local citizens. Voting NO on Proposition E will maintain guardrails to ensure that surveillance does not compromise the constitutional rights of San Francisco residents.
- Requiring administrative reports only for use-of-force incidents that result in physical injury or the drawing of a service firearm will substantially lessen the capacity of justice-involved citizens to hold the SFPD accountable for their actions. Voting NO will ensure that administrative reporting and documentation requirements remain in place, and that police misconduct cannot be easily obscured.
- Increased use of surveillance would result in a significant investment in the local tech industry, which is both partially responsible for the growing wealth gap in the city and a strong supporter of this proposition. Voting NO on Proposition E will prevent a larger portion of the public police budget from further enriching the private tech industry.
- Using increased surveillance to address systemic policing issues, like low staffing and ineffective training, is unlikely to resolve the challenges facing San Francisco. Voting NO will deny the city’s effort to erroneously substitute surveillance as a proxy for more holistic police reform.

Top funders of Proposition E:

- Proposition E has received over $489,000 in donations as of December 2023, with nearly $450,000 donated by individuals with close ties to the crypto and tech industries.
- The primary donor is billionaire Chris Larsen, who has donated $250,000 in support of the proposition. Larsen has long been an investor in tech start-ups, and is the co-founder and executive chairman of Ripple, a blockchain and cryptocurrency technology company.
- Venture capitalist Ron Conway has donated $100,000, building on his long record of political donations to support tech-friendly political agendas.
- Mayoral candidate Daniel Lurie, a philanthropist and an heir to the Levi Strauss Co. fortune, has donated $125,000.

Top opposition to Proposition E:

- The Prado Group, a real estate development and affordable housing company, has donated $50,000 to the campaign in opposition to Proposition E.
- Strada Investment Group, which specializes in real estate investment and development, has donated $50,000 to the campaign in opposition to Proposition E.
- Proposition E has also been publicly opposed by ACLU of Northern California, Police Commission President Cindy Elias, and several additional members of the Police Commission.

Proposition F

VOTE NO

Vote No to oppose the use of substance abuse testing as a condition for receiving public assistance

Vote NO on Proposition F to prevent the city from conditioning the receipt of public assistance on submitting to substance abuse screening, evaluation, and treatment.

As part of an ongoing effort to curb drug use and fentanyl overdoses in San Francisco, Mayor London Breed sponsored a petition to place Proposition F on the March ballot. Proposition F would require that adults under the age of 65 with no dependent children be subject to illegal drug screening, evaluation, and necessary treatment to continue to receive funds from the County Adult Assistance Program (CAAP). The text of the proposition specifies that individuals can be subject to this process if they are reasonably suspected of having a drug dependency.

Why voting NO on Proposition F matters:

- Opponents of Proposition F have cited research that indicates that forcing individuals into drug treatment programs is unlikely to result in the successful rehabilitation of a drug addiction, and can increase the instance of overdose deaths and suicide. Voting NO on Proposition F will deny the city the ability to enforce this ineffective approach to curbing addiction.
- Adding drug testing to the tedious administrative processes that are required of public assistance recipients increases the bureaucratic burden on an already marginalized population. Voting NO on Proposition F will allow individuals to continue to receive public assistance without added red tape.
- San Francisco’s current substance abuse treatment and supportive housing capacity is unlikely to be sufficient for the volume of individuals who would be filtered into those services under Proposition F. Voting NO on Proposition F will allow the city the opportunity to increase resources and capacity within these systems without the stress of providing mandated care to a high volume of individuals.
- Removing public assistance from individuals based on their drug use status is likely to destabilize households and create more vulnerability that leads to homelessness and financial stress. Voting NO on Proposition F will allow individuals to maintain stability in their economic status.

Top funders of Proposition F:

- Proposition F has received over $289,000 in donations as of December 2023, with nearly $275,000 donated by individuals with close ties to the crypto and tech industries.
- The primary donor is billionaire Chris Larsen, who has donated $250,000 in support of the proposition. Larsen has long been an investor in tech start-ups, and is the co-founder and executive chairman of Ripple, a blockchain and cryptocurrency technology company.
- Asheesh Birla, a vice president at Larsen’s Ripple, has donated $25,000. Birla is also a candidate for San Francisco’s Democratic County Central Committee (DCCC), which is the governing body of the local Democratic party.
- Mayor London Breed introduced and supports Proposition F, and it has received the endorsement of the San Francisco Republican Party.

Top opposition to Proposition F:

- As of December 2023, no fundraising has been recorded in opposition to Proposition F with the San Francisco Ethics Commission.
- Former Public Health Commissioner Roma Guy has spoken out against Proposition F, the San Francisco Democratic Party has endorsed a no vote, and several members of the Democratic County Central Committee have expressed concerns about its impacts.

Vote NO on Proposition F to prevent the city from conditioning the receipt of public assistance on submitting to substance abuse screening, evaluation, and treatment.

As part of an ongoing effort to curb drug use and fentanyl overdoses in San Francisco, Mayor London Breed sponsored a petition to place Proposition F on the March ballot. Proposition F would require that adults under the age of 65 with no dependent children be subject to illegal drug screening, evaluation, and necessary treatment to continue to receive funds from the County Adult Assistance Program (CAAP). The text of the proposition specifies that individuals can be subject to this process if they are reasonably suspected of having a drug dependency.

Why voting NO on Proposition F matters:

- Opponents of Proposition F have cited research that indicates that forcing individuals into drug treatment programs is unlikely to result in the successful rehabilitation of a drug addiction, and can increase the instance of overdose deaths and suicide. Voting NO on Proposition F will deny the city the ability to enforce this ineffective approach to curbing addiction.
- Adding drug testing to the tedious administrative processes that are required of public assistance recipients increases the bureaucratic burden on an already marginalized population. Voting NO on Proposition F will allow individuals to continue to receive public assistance without added red tape.
- San Francisco’s current substance abuse treatment and supportive housing capacity is unlikely to be sufficient for the volume of individuals who would be filtered into those services under Proposition F. Voting NO on Proposition F will allow the city the opportunity to increase resources and capacity within these systems without the stress of providing mandated care to a high volume of individuals.
- Removing public assistance from individuals based on their drug use status is likely to destabilize households and create more vulnerability that leads to homelessness and financial stress. Voting NO on Proposition F will allow individuals to maintain stability in their economic status.

Top funders of Proposition F:

- Proposition F has received over $289,000 in donations as of December 2023, with nearly $275,000 donated by individuals with close ties to the crypto and tech industries.
- The primary donor is billionaire Chris Larsen, who has donated $250,000 in support of the proposition. Larsen has long been an investor in tech start-ups, and is the co-founder and executive chairman of Ripple, a blockchain and cryptocurrency technology company.
- Asheesh Birla, a vice president at Larsen’s Ripple, has donated $25,000. Birla is also a candidate for San Francisco’s Democratic County Central Committee (DCCC), which is the governing body of the local Democratic party.
- Mayor London Breed introduced and supports Proposition F, and it has received the endorsement of the San Francisco Republican Party.

Top opposition to Proposition F:

- As of December 2023, no fundraising has been recorded in opposition to Proposition F with the San Francisco Ethics Commission.
- Former Public Health Commissioner Roma Guy has spoken out against Proposition F, the San Francisco Democratic Party has endorsed a no vote, and several members of the Democratic County Central Committee have expressed concerns about its impacts.

Search

Mia Bonta

Re-elect Assemblymember Mia Bonta to keep AD-18 on the right track for progress.

The Race

The District

The Position

Re-elect Assemblymember Mia Bonta to keep AD-18 on the right track for progress.

The Race

The District

The Position

Mia Bonta

Re-elect Assemblymember Mia Bonta to keep AD-18 on the right track for progress.

The Race

The District

The Position

18th Assembly District

Re-elect President Joe Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris to keep America on track.

The Race

The Position

Re-elect President Joe Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris to keep America on track.

The Race

The Position

Re-elect President Joe Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris to keep America on track.

The Race

The Position

There are 22 candidates running for California’s open U.S. Senate seat. Based on our analysis, three qualified candidates for this position have a distinct vision for the state. We recommend that you choose the candidate who best aligns to your values in this race.

The Race

The Candidates

The District

The Position

There are 22 candidates running for California’s open U.S. Senate seat. Based on our analysis, three qualified candidates for this position have a distinct vision for the state. We recommend that you choose the candidate who best aligns to your values in this race.

The Race

The Candidates

The District

The Position

Re-elect Congressional Representative Mark DeSaulnier to keep CD-10 on the right track for progress.

The Race

The District

The Position

Re-elect Congressional Representative Mark DeSaulnier to keep CD-10 on the right track for progress.

The Race

The District

The Position

Re-elect Congressional Representative Mark DeSaulnier to keep CD-10 on the right track for progress.

The Race

The District

The Position

Courage California endorses Lateefah Simon for C to keep CD-12 on the right track for progress.

The Race

The District

The Position

Courage California endorses Lateefah Simon for C to keep CD-12 on the right track for progress.

The Race

The District

The Position

Selected Endorsements

Courage California endorses Lateefah Simon for C to keep CD-12 on the right track for progress.

The Race

The District

The Position

Selected Endorsements

Re-elect Congressional Representative Eric Swalwell to keep CD-14 on the right track for progress.

The Race

The District

The Position

Re-elect Congressional Representative Eric Swalwell to keep CD-14 on the right track for progress.

The Race

The District

The Position

Re-elect Congressional Representative Eric Swalwell to keep CD-14 on the right track for progress.

The Race

The District

The Position

Re-elect Assemblymember Mia Bonta to keep AD-18 on the right track for progress.

The Race

The District

The Position

Re-elect Assemblymember Mia Bonta to keep AD-18 on the right track for progress.

The Race

The District