Skip to main content
  • VOTE YES

    Measure Q: Special Tax for Extended Police and Structural Fire Protection Services

  • According to our analysis, Measure Q’s tax renewal funds emergency services for a region of San Mateo County with increased fire risk.

    About the Race

    This special election is asking voters whether to extend an existing $65 tax that applies to residents of San Mateo County Service Area 1 (CSA 1), which includes Unincorporated San Mateo Highlands, Baywood Park, and Baywood Plaza for an additional four years. The tax is used to pay for enhanced fire department services for the area, which includes a 24/7 fire engine located at Fire Station #17, located on Paul Scannell Drive. CalFire staffs the engine with a minimum of three firefighters, at least one of which is a Paramedic. The tax also funds patrol service of CSA 1 by a Deputy Sheriff, 7 days a week, 18 hours a day.

    According to President of the Highlands Community Association Nicolas Liesje, this measure is being presented to voters in a special election because San Mateo County staff omitted this measure from the March 2020 ballot. It is unclear why this omission was made.

    About the Decision

    Measure Q renews the $65 tax on residents of CSA 1 for four additional years. A YES vote on Measure Q does not change the levels of taxation or services available to CSA 1. A NO vote on Measure Q will mean that CSA 1 will no longer have enhanced fire department and police services, and will also not pay the $65 tax, which is collected alongside local property taxes. Measure Q requires a 2/3 vote to pass.

    About the Service Area

    CSA 1 was established in 1955 to provide enhanced fire service for the San Mateo Highlands, Baywood Park, Baywood Plaza, San Mateo Oaks, Polhemus Heights, Hillside Garden and other neighborhoods in the unincorporated area to the east and west of Polhemus Road. The current population of CSA 1 is estimated at 3,052. The additional police services were added to the tax in 1966. CSA 1 does not administer any other special services.

    About the Official Arguments

    An argument in favor of and an argument against a measure were selected for publication in the Sample Ballot & Official Voter lnformation Pamphlet. The primary argument in favor of Measure Q was filed by President of the Highlands Community Association Nicolas Liesje. He describes the fire and police services funded by the tax as “local emergency services” and points out that it is an extension of an already existing tax that was first passed in 1955. The primary argument against Measure Q was filed by Mark Hinkle, President of the Silicon Valley Taxpayers Association and Jack Hickey, member of the Libertarian Party of San Mateo. They characterize it as a waste of taxpayers’ money. They also point out the costs of the special election itself as wasteful.

    Based on the historical context of how this tax was first proposed and passed, it appears that the police services are in support of the fire emergency response services. The renewal of the police services funded by this tax appear to support emergency response efforts for CSA 1 only, and therefore seems unlikely to significantly impact police funding overall in San Mateo County.

    How to Vote in this Election

    The June 23 election encompasses only County Service Area 1 of San Mateo County and is being administered by San Mateo County’s Registration & Elections Division. To be counted, completed ballots must be received no later than 8 p.m. on Election Day, or be postmarked on or before Election Day and received no later than three days after Election Day. Voters will be able to cast their ballot via mail, or vote in person on paper or the electronic voting machine at a Vote Center. Information about this election can be found at https://www.smcacre.org/current-election.

    Every registered voter in San Mateo County will be mailed a ballot beginning 29 days before Election Day. Voters will have the following options for returning their ballot:

    • Vote in person at the one Vote Center that will be open for this election, located at 40 Tower Road, San Mateo, CA 94402
    • Mail their ballot (postage is pre-paid) so that it is postmarked by Election Day, July 21, 2020
    • Drop their ballot off at marked drop off boxes inside and outside 40 Tower Road, San Mateo, CA 94402.

    Accessible Voting: Voters with disabilities can vote privately and independently by accessing and marking a ballot in a screen-readable format from any computer. Ballots must be printed out and returned to the Registration & Elections Division. Marked ballots cannot be emailed or faxed. The service may be accessed anytime, day or night during an election period by going online to https://www.smcacre.org/my-election-info and entering your information to find a link to your ballot; or emailing registrar@smcacre.org or calling 650.312.5222 to have a link to your ballot emailed to you.

    Register to Vote: To be eligible to vote in this election, your Voter Registration Form must be submitted online by midnight no later than 15 days before June 23rd. If you are mailing a Voter Registration Form, it must be postmarked no later than 15 days before June 23rd and received by the San Mateo County Registration & Elections Division by the close of the polls on June 23rd, Election Day.

    After the June 8th deadline, you can still register and vote under Conditional Voter Registration (CVR), also known as Same Day Voter Registration. Contact your county elections office to learn more about CVR.

    Risk-Limiting Audit: The San Mateo County Registration & Elections Division will be conducting a pilot risk-limiting audit for the June 23, 2020 County Service Area No. 1 Special Mail Ballot Election. More information about the audit is available here.

    San Mateo County Registration & Elections Website: https://www.smcacre.org/election

    According to our analysis, Measure Q’s tax renewal funds emergency services for a region of San Mateo County with increased fire risk.

    About the Race

    This special election is asking voters whether to extend an existing $65 tax that applies to residents of San Mateo County Service Area 1 (CSA 1), which includes Unincorporated San Mateo Highlands, Baywood Park, and Baywood Plaza for an additional four years. The tax is used to pay for enhanced fire department services for the area, which includes a 24/7 fire engine located at Fire Station #17, located on Paul Scannell Drive. CalFire staffs the engine with a minimum of three firefighters, at least one of which is a Paramedic. The tax also funds patrol service of CSA 1 by a Deputy Sheriff, 7 days a week, 18 hours a day.

    According to President of the Highlands Community Association Nicolas Liesje, this measure is being presented to voters in a special election because San Mateo County staff omitted this measure from the March 2020 ballot. It is unclear why this omission was made.

    About the Decision

    Measure Q renews the $65 tax on residents of CSA 1 for four additional years. A YES vote on Measure Q does not change the levels of taxation or services available to CSA 1. A NO vote on Measure Q will mean that CSA 1 will no longer have enhanced fire department and police services, and will also not pay the $65 tax, which is collected alongside local property taxes. Measure Q requires a 2/3 vote to pass.

    About the Service Area

    CSA 1 was established in 1955 to provide enhanced fire service for the San Mateo Highlands, Baywood Park, Baywood Plaza, San Mateo Oaks, Polhemus Heights, Hillside Garden and other neighborhoods in the unincorporated area to the east and west of Polhemus Road. The current population of CSA 1 is estimated at 3,052. The additional police services were added to the tax in 1966. CSA 1 does not administer any other special services.

    About the Official Arguments

    An argument in favor of and an argument against a measure were selected for publication in the Sample Ballot & Official Voter lnformation Pamphlet. The primary argument in favor of Measure Q was filed by President of the Highlands Community Association Nicolas Liesje. He describes the fire and police services funded by the tax as “local emergency services” and points out that it is an extension of an already existing tax that was first passed in 1955. The primary argument against Measure Q was filed by Mark Hinkle, President of the Silicon Valley Taxpayers Association and Jack Hickey, member of the Libertarian Party of San Mateo. They characterize it as a waste of taxpayers’ money. They also point out the costs of the special election itself as wasteful.

    Based on the historical context of how this tax was first proposed and passed, it appears that the police services are in support of the fire emergency response services. The renewal of the police services funded by this tax appear to support emergency response efforts for CSA 1 only, and therefore seems unlikely to significantly impact police funding overall in San Mateo County.

    How to Vote in this Election

    The June 23 election encompasses only County Service Area 1 of San Mateo County and is being administered by San Mateo County’s Registration & Elections Division. To be counted, completed ballots must be received no later than 8 p.m. on Election Day, or be postmarked on or before Election Day and received no later than three days after Election Day. Voters will be able to cast their ballot via mail, or vote in person on paper or the electronic voting machine at a Vote Center. Information about this election can be found at https://www.smcacre.org/current-election.

    Every registered voter in San Mateo County will be mailed a ballot beginning 29 days before Election Day. Voters will have the following options for returning their ballot:

    • Vote in person at the one Vote Center that will be open for this election, located at 40 Tower Road, San Mateo, CA 94402
    • Mail their ballot (postage is pre-paid) so that it is postmarked by Election Day, July 21, 2020
    • Drop their ballot off at marked drop off boxes inside and outside 40 Tower Road, San Mateo, CA 94402.

    Accessible Voting: Voters with disabilities can vote privately and independently by accessing and marking a ballot in a screen-readable format from any computer. Ballots must be printed out and returned to the Registration & Elections Division. Marked ballots cannot be emailed or faxed. The service may be accessed anytime, day or night during an election period by going online to https://www.smcacre.org/my-election-info and entering your information to find a link to your ballot; or emailing registrar@smcacre.org or calling 650.312.5222 to have a link to your ballot emailed to you.

    Register to Vote: To be eligible to vote in this election, your Voter Registration Form must be submitted online by midnight no later than 15 days before June 23rd. If you are mailing a Voter Registration Form, it must be postmarked no later than 15 days before June 23rd and received by the San Mateo County Registration & Elections Division by the close of the polls on June 23rd, Election Day.

    After the June 8th deadline, you can still register and vote under Conditional Voter Registration (CVR), also known as Same Day Voter Registration. Contact your county elections office to learn more about CVR.

    Risk-Limiting Audit: The San Mateo County Registration & Elections Division will be conducting a pilot risk-limiting audit for the June 23, 2020 County Service Area No. 1 Special Mail Ballot Election. More information about the audit is available here.

    San Mateo County Registration & Elections Website: https://www.smcacre.org/election

    According to our analysis, Measure Q’s tax renewal funds emergency services for a region of San Mateo County with increased fire risk.

    About the Race

    This special election is asking voters whether to extend an existing $65 tax that applies to residents of San Mateo County Service Area 1 (CSA 1), which includes Unincorporated San Mateo Highlands, Baywood Park, and Baywood Plaza for an additional four years. The tax is used to pay for enhanced fire department services for the area, which includes a 24/7 fire engine located at Fire Station #17, located on Paul Scannell Drive. CalFire staffs the engine with a minimum of three firefighters, at least one of which is a Paramedic. The tax also funds patrol service of CSA 1 by a Deputy Sheriff, 7 days a week, 18 hours a day.

    According to President of the Highlands Community Association Nicolas Liesje, this measure is being presented to voters in a special election because San Mateo County staff omitted this measure from the March 2020 ballot. It is unclear why this omission was made.

    About the Decision

    Measure Q renews the $65 tax on residents of CSA 1 for four additional years. A YES vote on Measure Q does not change the levels of taxation or services available to CSA 1. A NO vote on Measure Q will mean that CSA 1 will no longer have enhanced fire department and police services, and will also not pay the $65 tax, which is collected alongside local property taxes. Measure Q requires a 2/3 vote to pass.

    About the Service Area

    CSA 1 was established in 1955 to provide enhanced fire service for the San Mateo Highlands, Baywood Park, Baywood Plaza, San Mateo Oaks, Polhemus Heights, Hillside Garden and other neighborhoods in the unincorporated area to the east and west of Polhemus Road. The current population of CSA 1 is estimated at 3,052. The additional police services were added to the tax in 1966. CSA 1 does not administer any other special services.

    About the Official Arguments

    An argument in favor of and an argument against a measure were selected for publication in the Sample Ballot & Official Voter lnformation Pamphlet. The primary argument in favor of Measure Q was filed by President of the Highlands Community Association Nicolas Liesje. He describes the fire and police services funded by the tax as “local emergency services” and points out that it is an extension of an already existing tax that was first passed in 1955. The primary argument against Measure Q was filed by Mark Hinkle, President of the Silicon Valley Taxpayers Association and Jack Hickey, member of the Libertarian Party of San Mateo. They characterize it as a waste of taxpayers’ money. They also point out the costs of the special election itself as wasteful.

    Based on the historical context of how this tax was first proposed and passed, it appears that the police services are in support of the fire emergency response services. The renewal of the police services funded by this tax appear to support emergency response efforts for CSA 1 only, and therefore seems unlikely to significantly impact police funding overall in San Mateo County.

    How to Vote in this Election

    The June 23 election encompasses only County Service Area 1 of San Mateo County and is being administered by San Mateo County’s Registration & Elections Division. To be counted, completed ballots must be received no later than 8 p.m. on Election Day, or be postmarked on or before Election Day and received no later than three days after Election Day. Voters will be able to cast their ballot via mail, or vote in person on paper or the electronic voting machine at a Vote Center. Information about this election can be found at https://www.smcacre.org/current-election.

    Every registered voter in San Mateo County will be mailed a ballot beginning 29 days before Election Day. Voters will have the following options for returning their ballot:

    • Vote in person at the one Vote Center that will be open for this election, located at 40 Tower Road, San Mateo, CA 94402
    • Mail their ballot (postage is pre-paid) so that it is postmarked by Election Day, July 21, 2020
    • Drop their ballot off at marked drop off boxes inside and outside 40 Tower Road, San Mateo, CA 94402.

    Accessible Voting: Voters with disabilities can vote privately and independently by accessing and marking a ballot in a screen-readable format from any computer. Ballots must be printed out and returned to the Registration & Elections Division. Marked ballots cannot be emailed or faxed. The service may be accessed anytime, day or night during an election period by going online to https://www.smcacre.org/my-election-info and entering your information to find a link to your ballot; or emailing registrar@smcacre.org or calling 650.312.5222 to have a link to your ballot emailed to you.

    Register to Vote: To be eligible to vote in this election, your Voter Registration Form must be submitted online by midnight no later than 15 days before June 23rd. If you are mailing a Voter Registration Form, it must be postmarked no later than 15 days before June 23rd and received by the San Mateo County Registration & Elections Division by the close of the polls on June 23rd, Election Day.

    After the June 8th deadline, you can still register and vote under Conditional Voter Registration (CVR), also known as Same Day Voter Registration. Contact your county elections office to learn more about CVR.

    Risk-Limiting Audit: The San Mateo County Registration & Elections Division will be conducting a pilot risk-limiting audit for the June 23, 2020 County Service Area No. 1 Special Mail Ballot Election. More information about the audit is available here.

    San Mateo County Registration & Elections Website: https://www.smcacre.org/election

    Measure Q - Special Tax for Extended Police and Structural Fire Protection Services

    According to our analysis, Measure Q’s tax renewal funds emergency services for a region of San Mateo County with increased fire risk.

    About the Race

    This special election is asking voters whether to extend an existing $65 tax that applies to residents of San Mateo County Service Area 1 (CSA 1), which includes Unincorporated San Mateo Highlands, Baywood Park, and Baywood Plaza for an additional four years. The tax is used to pay for enhanced fire department services for the area, which includes a 24/7 fire engine located at Fire Station #17, located on Paul Scannell Drive. CalFire staffs the engine with a minimum of three firefighters, at least one of which is a Paramedic. The tax also funds patrol service of CSA 1 by a Deputy Sheriff, 7 days a week, 18 hours a day.

    According to President of the Highlands Community Association Nicolas Liesje, this measure is being presented to voters in a special election because San Mateo County staff omitted this measure from the March 2020 ballot. It is unclear why this omission was made.

    About the Decision

    Measure Q renews the $65 tax on residents of CSA 1 for four additional years. A YES vote on Measure Q does not change the levels of taxation or services available to CSA 1. A NO vote on Measure Q will mean that CSA 1 will no longer have enhanced fire department and police services, and will also not pay the $65 tax, which is collected alongside local property taxes. Measure Q requires a 2/3 vote to pass.

    About the Service Area

    CSA 1 was established in 1955 to provide enhanced fire service for the San Mateo Highlands, Baywood Park, Baywood Plaza, San Mateo Oaks, Polhemus Heights, Hillside Garden and other neighborhoods in the unincorporated area to the east and west of Polhemus Road. The current population of CSA 1 is estimated at 3,052. The additional police services were added to the tax in 1966. CSA 1 does not administer any other special services.

    About the Official Arguments

    An argument in favor of and an argument against a measure were selected for publication in the Sample Ballot & Official Voter lnformation Pamphlet. The primary argument in favor of Measure Q was filed by President of the Highlands Community Association Nicolas Liesje. He describes the fire and police services funded by the tax as “local emergency services” and points out that it is an extension of an already existing tax that was first passed in 1955. The primary argument against Measure Q was filed by Mark Hinkle, President of the Silicon Valley Taxpayers Association and Jack Hickey, member of the Libertarian Party of San Mateo. They characterize it as a waste of taxpayers’ money. They also point out the costs of the special election itself as wasteful.

    Based on the historical context of how this tax was first proposed and passed, it appears that the police services are in support of the fire emergency response services. The renewal of the police services funded by this tax appear to support emergency response efforts for CSA 1 only, and therefore seems unlikely to significantly impact police funding overall in San Mateo County.

    How to Vote in this Election

    The June 23 election encompasses only County Service Area 1 of San Mateo County and is being administered by San Mateo County’s Registration & Elections Division. To be counted, completed ballots must be received no later than 8 p.m. on Election Day, or be postmarked on or before Election Day and received no later than three days after Election Day. Voters will be able to cast their ballot via mail, or vote in person on paper or the electronic voting machine at a Vote Center. Information about this election can be found at https://www.smcacre.org/current-election.

    Every registered voter in San Mateo County will be mailed a ballot beginning 29 days before Election Day. Voters will have the following options for returning their ballot:

    • Vote in person at the one Vote Center that will be open for this election, located at 40 Tower Road, San Mateo, CA 94402
    • Mail their ballot (postage is pre-paid) so that it is postmarked by Election Day, July 21, 2020
    • Drop their ballot off at marked drop off boxes inside and outside 40 Tower Road, San Mateo, CA 94402.

    Accessible Voting: Voters with disabilities can vote privately and independently by accessing and marking a ballot in a screen-readable format from any computer. Ballots must be printed out and returned to the Registration & Elections Division. Marked ballots cannot be emailed or faxed. The service may be accessed anytime, day or night during an election period by going online to https://www.smcacre.org/my-election-info and entering your information to find a link to your ballot; or emailing registrar@smcacre.org or calling 650.312.5222 to have a link to your ballot emailed to you.

    Register to Vote: To be eligible to vote in this election, your Voter Registration Form must be submitted online by midnight no later than 15 days before June 23rd. If you are mailing a Voter Registration Form, it must be postmarked no later than 15 days before June 23rd and received by the San Mateo County Registration & Elections Division by the close of the polls on June 23rd, Election Day.

    After the June 8th deadline, you can still register and vote under Conditional Voter Registration (CVR), also known as Same Day Voter Registration. Contact your county elections office to learn more about CVR.

    Risk-Limiting Audit: The San Mateo County Registration & Elections Division will be conducting a pilot risk-limiting audit for the June 23, 2020 County Service Area No. 1 Special Mail Ballot Election. More information about the audit is available here.

    San Mateo County Registration & Elections Website: https://www.smcacre.org/election

  • Joe Biden and Kamala Harris

    Re-elect President Joe Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris to keep America on track. 



    President Joe Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris have a track record and policy positions that demonstrate that they will continue to govern effectively in the best interests of this diverse nation.

    Progressive endorsements: President Biden and Vice President Harris have the endorsement of some progressive groups, including the Sierra Club, Reproductive Freedom for All America, League of Conservation Voters, National Center for Transgender Equality, and Students Demand Action. They have also received the endorsement of a significant number of labor unions, including United Auto Workers, Actors’ Equity Association, AFL-CIO, IATSE, National Nurses United, and the American Federation of Teachers. President Biden and Vice President Harris also have the backing of the Democratic National Committee and a significant number of current and former Democratic officials, including former President Barack Obama, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, former Climate Envoy John Kerry, 14 current governors, 30 sitting U.S. senators, and over 70 members of the House of Representatives. This list includes California’s elected leaders Gov. Gavin Newsom, Lt. Gov. Eleni Kounalakis, Sen. Alex Padilla, Rep. Katie Porter, Rep. Eric Swalwell, and LA Mayor Karen Bass. 

    Priority policies: The Biden administration has had policy successes across a diversity of issue areas during their first term. Immediately after taking office during the height of the COVID-19 pandemic, President Biden worked to move the American Rescue Plan through Congress and successfully passed legislation to provide stimulus checks, boosts to unemployment payments, and increased funds for education and small-business loans. The plan also ramped up the distribution and administration of vaccines. This legislative effort was followed by the Bi-Partisan Infrastructure Law that made a $1 billion investment in electric vehicle infrastructure, national road and bridge repair, clean drinking water modifications, and power grid updates. In addition to these investments, the administration passed President Biden’s signature Inflation Reduction Act, an expansive bill to provide needed funding to cap prescription drug costs for the elderly, increase corporate taxes, invest in clean energy and climate protections, reduce the federal deficit, and increase tax accountability by provided additional funding to the IRS. The White House has indicated that nearly 170,000 clean energy jobs have been created by this legislation, clean energy investments have increased by $110 billion, and insulin has been capped at $35 a month. After years of inaction from the federal government, President Biden signed a significant gun-safety bill into law, which strengthens background check laws, incentivizes state-based red flag laws, and expands limitations on the acquisition of firearms by perpetrators of domestic abuse. President Biden also signed the CHIPS Act into law to increase domestic production of the semiconductors used in the manufacturing of many of the products Americans use daily. 

    The Biden administration’s economic policies have contributed to the lowest unemployment rate in over 50 years, at 3.4% as of January 2024, economic growth of 3.1% in 2023, and an inflation rate that dropped below 3% at the end of December. The administration has led the U.S. back into the Paris Climate Accord, forgiven $136 billion in education debt, and provided consistent support to striking labor unions across the country. While many of these accomplishments came during the first two years of the administration, when Democrats controlled both chambers of Congress, President Biden and Vice President Harris have worked across the aisle to move impactful legislation forward for the American people with a divided Congress.

    While the administration’s legislative successes have been substantial, they have been subject to significant criticism from progressives during this first term. While President Biden has maintained strong support for Israel during the October 7 Hamas attacks and the Israeli government’s retaliatory attacks on Palestinians in Gaza, the electorate and congressional representatives have expressed concerns about the U.S. government providing continued funding to the Israeli military, and activists and leaders have called on the Biden administration to advocate for a ceasefire in Gaza. On immigration and the southern border, the federal government’s failure to act has effectively continued the anti-immigrant policies enacted under the Trump administration and caused big city mayors and Democratic governors to publicly request that the White House and Congress pass meaningful legislation to reform an increasingly overwhelmed asylum and immigration system. Under Republican control, Congress has not passed any immigration reforms, and Republican leaders have advocated for more punitive and inhumane immigration policies.  

    Governance and community leadership experience: President Biden and Vice President Harris have served in the White House since 2020, when they were elected on a joint ticket with 306 electoral votes and over 51% of the national popular vote. Their campaign won six critical swing states—Michigan, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Georgia, Nevada, and Arizona—to secure the electoral college victory.

    Prior to his election, President Biden had a long and prominent political career. He served two terms as former President Barack Obama’s vice president and was responsible for managing the 2009 economic recovery, helping to expand health care through the Affordable Care Act, and acting as the administration’s liaison to the Senate. Before joining the Obama administration, he spent 36 years representing Delaware in the Senate. He was often critiqued as being an unremarkable, status quo Democrat, and mid-career votes in favor of the Defense of Marriage Act, anti-drug legislation, and the Iraq War reaffirm that characterization. In 1991, Vice President Biden was the chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee and presided over the Supreme Court confirmation hearings for Justice Clarence Thomas, who had been credibly accused of sexual harassment by a former colleague, Anita Hill. Vice President Biden’s mismanagement of the hearing resulted in a targeted and unfair character assassination of Anita Hill and remains a reminder of his complicity in the patriarchal and racist systems on which our American government is built. 

    Prior to her election, Vice President Harris was the first woman of color elected to represent California in the United States Senate. She sponsored legislation on climate and environmental protections, rental and housing protections, women’s health, and pandemic relief. She was also an original cosponsor of the progressive Green New Deal authored by Rep. Alexandria Ocasio Cortez and Sen. Ed Markey.  Before serving in the Senate, Vice President Harris had a long legal career in California, serving for 8 years in the Alameda County District Attorney’s Office before transitioning to a role as a prosecutor in the San Francisco District Attorney’s Office. In 2003, she won her bid to become district attorney of the City and County of San Francisco, where she served two terms before being elected as the attorney general for the state of California in 2010. She was the first woman and the first person of color to hold this seat. Vice President Harris’s record was both progressive for the time and complicated by her moderate approach to policing and criminal justice. She has been criticized for failing to institute comprehensive police accountability measures, for not establishing meaningful prison reform, and for taking a hands-off approach to cases related to police misconduct. However, her lenient approach to policing was often punctuated by decidedly progressive support for social justice issues, including the establishment of an education and workforce reentry program designed to diminish recidivism. 

    Other background: President Biden is from Scranton, PA, and moved to Delaware with his family when he was 10 years old. He has been a resident of Wilmington, Delaware, for most of his adult life. Vice President Harris grew up in Berkeley, CA, and was a longtime resident of Los Angeles. She is the daughter of a Jamaican father and an Indian mother, who both emigrated to the Bay Area in the 1960s.

     

    The Race


    Primary election: Eight candidates are running in the March 5 Democratic primary, including incumbent President Joe Biden (D), Rep. Dean Phillips (D), and Marianne Williamson (D). The candidate who receives the most delegates in the national Democratic primary will formally become the party’s designated Presidential candidate in August 2024.

    Candidate fundraising and pledges: President Biden’s campaign has raised $56 million as of December 2023, and is not funded by police, real estate, corporate PAC, or fossil fuel interests.

    Opposing candidate: Rep. Dean Phillips
    Opposing candidate’s fundraising and pledges: Rep. Phillips’s campaign has not filed any campaign fundraising receipts with the FEC as of December 2023.

    Opposing candidate: Marianne Williamson
    Opposing candidate’s fundraising and pledges: Williamson’s campaign has raised $2.6 million as of December 2023, and is funded by corporate PAC interests. A significant amount of her campaign funding has been through candidate donations and loans taken out by the candidate.

     

    The Position


    The President of the United States is the head of the executive branch of the federal government, and the commander-in-chief for all branches of the armed forces. A president has the power to make diplomatic, executive, and judicial appointments, and can sign into law or veto legislation. Presidential administrations are responsible for both foreign and domestic policy priorities. Presidents are limited to serving two four-year terms in office.


     

    Joe Biden and Kamala Harris

    Re-elect President Joe Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris to keep America on track. 



    President Joe Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris have a track record and policy positions that demonstrate that they will continue to govern effectively in the best interests of this diverse nation.

    Progressive endorsements: President Biden and Vice President Harris have the endorsement of some progressive groups, including the Sierra Club, Reproductive Freedom for All America, League of Conservation Voters, National Center for Transgender Equality, and Students Demand Action. They have also received the endorsement of a significant number of labor unions, including United Auto Workers, Actors’ Equity Association, AFL-CIO, IATSE, National Nurses United, and the American Federation of Teachers. President Biden and Vice President Harris also have the backing of the Democratic National Committee and a significant number of current and former Democratic officials, including former President Barack Obama, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, former Climate Envoy John Kerry, 14 current governors, 30 sitting U.S. senators, and over 70 members of the House of Representatives. This list includes California’s elected leaders Gov. Gavin Newsom, Lt. Gov. Eleni Kounalakis, Sen. Alex Padilla, Rep. Katie Porter, Rep. Eric Swalwell, and LA Mayor Karen Bass. 

    Priority policies: The Biden administration has had policy successes across a diversity of issue areas during their first term. Immediately after taking office during the height of the COVID-19 pandemic, President Biden worked to move the American Rescue Plan through Congress and successfully passed legislation to provide stimulus checks, boosts to unemployment payments, and increased funds for education and small-business loans. The plan also ramped up the distribution and administration of vaccines. This legislative effort was followed by the Bi-Partisan Infrastructure Law that made a $1 billion investment in electric vehicle infrastructure, national road and bridge repair, clean drinking water modifications, and power grid updates. In addition to these investments, the administration passed President Biden’s signature Inflation Reduction Act, an expansive bill to provide needed funding to cap prescription drug costs for the elderly, increase corporate taxes, invest in clean energy and climate protections, reduce the federal deficit, and increase tax accountability by provided additional funding to the IRS. The White House has indicated that nearly 170,000 clean energy jobs have been created by this legislation, clean energy investments have increased by $110 billion, and insulin has been capped at $35 a month. After years of inaction from the federal government, President Biden signed a significant gun-safety bill into law, which strengthens background check laws, incentivizes state-based red flag laws, and expands limitations on the acquisition of firearms by perpetrators of domestic abuse. President Biden also signed the CHIPS Act into law to increase domestic production of the semiconductors used in the manufacturing of many of the products Americans use daily. 

    The Biden administration’s economic policies have contributed to the lowest unemployment rate in over 50 years, at 3.4% as of January 2024, economic growth of 3.1% in 2023, and an inflation rate that dropped below 3% at the end of December. The administration has led the U.S. back into the Paris Climate Accord, forgiven $136 billion in education debt, and provided consistent support to striking labor unions across the country. While many of these accomplishments came during the first two years of the administration, when Democrats controlled both chambers of Congress, President Biden and Vice President Harris have worked across the aisle to move impactful legislation forward for the American people with a divided Congress.

    While the administration’s legislative successes have been substantial, they have been subject to significant criticism from progressives during this first term. While President Biden has maintained strong support for Israel during the October 7 Hamas attacks and the Israeli government’s retaliatory attacks on Palestinians in Gaza, the electorate and congressional representatives have expressed concerns about the U.S. government providing continued funding to the Israeli military, and activists and leaders have called on the Biden administration to advocate for a ceasefire in Gaza. On immigration and the southern border, the federal government’s failure to act has effectively continued the anti-immigrant policies enacted under the Trump administration and caused big city mayors and Democratic governors to publicly request that the White House and Congress pass meaningful legislation to reform an increasingly overwhelmed asylum and immigration system. Under Republican control, Congress has not passed any immigration reforms, and Republican leaders have advocated for more punitive and inhumane immigration policies.  

    Governance and community leadership experience: President Biden and Vice President Harris have served in the White House since 2020, when they were elected on a joint ticket with 306 electoral votes and over 51% of the national popular vote. Their campaign won six critical swing states—Michigan, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Georgia, Nevada, and Arizona—to secure the electoral college victory.

    Prior to his election, President Biden had a long and prominent political career. He served two terms as former President Barack Obama’s vice president and was responsible for managing the 2009 economic recovery, helping to expand health care through the Affordable Care Act, and acting as the administration’s liaison to the Senate. Before joining the Obama administration, he spent 36 years representing Delaware in the Senate. He was often critiqued as being an unremarkable, status quo Democrat, and mid-career votes in favor of the Defense of Marriage Act, anti-drug legislation, and the Iraq War reaffirm that characterization. In 1991, Vice President Biden was the chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee and presided over the Supreme Court confirmation hearings for Justice Clarence Thomas, who had been credibly accused of sexual harassment by a former colleague, Anita Hill. Vice President Biden’s mismanagement of the hearing resulted in a targeted and unfair character assassination of Anita Hill and remains a reminder of his complicity in the patriarchal and racist systems on which our American government is built. 

    Prior to her election, Vice President Harris was the first woman of color elected to represent California in the United States Senate. She sponsored legislation on climate and environmental protections, rental and housing protections, women’s health, and pandemic relief. She was also an original cosponsor of the progressive Green New Deal authored by Rep. Alexandria Ocasio Cortez and Sen. Ed Markey.  Before serving in the Senate, Vice President Harris had a long legal career in California, serving for 8 years in the Alameda County District Attorney’s Office before transitioning to a role as a prosecutor in the San Francisco District Attorney’s Office. In 2003, she won her bid to become district attorney of the City and County of San Francisco, where she served two terms before being elected as the attorney general for the state of California in 2010. She was the first woman and the first person of color to hold this seat. Vice President Harris’s record was both progressive for the time and complicated by her moderate approach to policing and criminal justice. She has been criticized for failing to institute comprehensive police accountability measures, for not establishing meaningful prison reform, and for taking a hands-off approach to cases related to police misconduct. However, her lenient approach to policing was often punctuated by decidedly progressive support for social justice issues, including the establishment of an education and workforce reentry program designed to diminish recidivism. 

    Other background: President Biden is from Scranton, PA, and moved to Delaware with his family when he was 10 years old. He has been a resident of Wilmington, Delaware, for most of his adult life. Vice President Harris grew up in Berkeley, CA, and was a longtime resident of Los Angeles. She is the daughter of a Jamaican father and an Indian mother, who both emigrated to the Bay Area in the 1960s.

     

    The Race


    Primary election: Eight candidates are running in the March 5 Democratic primary, including incumbent President Joe Biden (D), Rep. Dean Phillips (D), and Marianne Williamson (D). The candidate who receives the most delegates in the national Democratic primary will formally become the party’s designated Presidential candidate in August 2024.

    Candidate fundraising and pledges: President Biden’s campaign has raised $56 million as of December 2023, and is not funded by police, real estate, corporate PAC, or fossil fuel interests.

    Opposing candidate: Rep. Dean Phillips
    Opposing candidate’s fundraising and pledges: Rep. Phillips’s campaign has not filed any campaign fundraising receipts with the FEC as of December 2023.

    Opposing candidate: Marianne Williamson
    Opposing candidate’s fundraising and pledges: Williamson’s campaign has raised $2.6 million as of December 2023, and is funded by corporate PAC interests. A significant amount of her campaign funding has been through candidate donations and loans taken out by the candidate.

     

    The Position


    The President of the United States is the head of the executive branch of the federal government, and the commander-in-chief for all branches of the armed forces. A president has the power to make diplomatic, executive, and judicial appointments, and can sign into law or veto legislation. Presidential administrations are responsible for both foreign and domestic policy priorities. Presidents are limited to serving two four-year terms in office.


     

    Joe Biden and Kamala Harris

    Re-elect President Joe Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris to keep America on track. 



    President Joe Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris have a track record and policy positions that demonstrate that they will continue to govern effectively in the best interests of this diverse nation.

    Progressive endorsements: President Biden and Vice President Harris have the endorsement of some progressive groups, including the Sierra Club, Reproductive Freedom for All America, League of Conservation Voters, National Center for Transgender Equality, and Students Demand Action. They have also received the endorsement of a significant number of labor unions, including United Auto Workers, Actors’ Equity Association, AFL-CIO, IATSE, National Nurses United, and the American Federation of Teachers. President Biden and Vice President Harris also have the backing of the Democratic National Committee and a significant number of current and former Democratic officials, including former President Barack Obama, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, former Climate Envoy John Kerry, 14 current governors, 30 sitting U.S. senators, and over 70 members of the House of Representatives. This list includes California’s elected leaders Gov. Gavin Newsom, Lt. Gov. Eleni Kounalakis, Sen. Alex Padilla, Rep. Katie Porter, Rep. Eric Swalwell, and LA Mayor Karen Bass. 

    Priority policies: The Biden administration has had policy successes across a diversity of issue areas during their first term. Immediately after taking office during the height of the COVID-19 pandemic, President Biden worked to move the American Rescue Plan through Congress and successfully passed legislation to provide stimulus checks, boosts to unemployment payments, and increased funds for education and small-business loans. The plan also ramped up the distribution and administration of vaccines. This legislative effort was followed by the Bi-Partisan Infrastructure Law that made a $1 billion investment in electric vehicle infrastructure, national road and bridge repair, clean drinking water modifications, and power grid updates. In addition to these investments, the administration passed President Biden’s signature Inflation Reduction Act, an expansive bill to provide needed funding to cap prescription drug costs for the elderly, increase corporate taxes, invest in clean energy and climate protections, reduce the federal deficit, and increase tax accountability by provided additional funding to the IRS. The White House has indicated that nearly 170,000 clean energy jobs have been created by this legislation, clean energy investments have increased by $110 billion, and insulin has been capped at $35 a month. After years of inaction from the federal government, President Biden signed a significant gun-safety bill into law, which strengthens background check laws, incentivizes state-based red flag laws, and expands limitations on the acquisition of firearms by perpetrators of domestic abuse. President Biden also signed the CHIPS Act into law to increase domestic production of the semiconductors used in the manufacturing of many of the products Americans use daily. 

    The Biden administration’s economic policies have contributed to the lowest unemployment rate in over 50 years, at 3.4% as of January 2024, economic growth of 3.1% in 2023, and an inflation rate that dropped below 3% at the end of December. The administration has led the U.S. back into the Paris Climate Accord, forgiven $136 billion in education debt, and provided consistent support to striking labor unions across the country. While many of these accomplishments came during the first two years of the administration, when Democrats controlled both chambers of Congress, President Biden and Vice President Harris have worked across the aisle to move impactful legislation forward for the American people with a divided Congress.

    While the administration’s legislative successes have been substantial, they have been subject to significant criticism from progressives during this first term. While President Biden has maintained strong support for Israel during the October 7 Hamas attacks and the Israeli government’s retaliatory attacks on Palestinians in Gaza, the electorate and congressional representatives have expressed concerns about the U.S. government providing continued funding to the Israeli military, and activists and leaders have called on the Biden administration to advocate for a ceasefire in Gaza. On immigration and the southern border, the federal government’s failure to act has effectively continued the anti-immigrant policies enacted under the Trump administration and caused big city mayors and Democratic governors to publicly request that the White House and Congress pass meaningful legislation to reform an increasingly overwhelmed asylum and immigration system. Under Republican control, Congress has not passed any immigration reforms, and Republican leaders have advocated for more punitive and inhumane immigration policies.  

    Governance and community leadership experience: President Biden and Vice President Harris have served in the White House since 2020, when they were elected on a joint ticket with 306 electoral votes and over 51% of the national popular vote. Their campaign won six critical swing states—Michigan, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Georgia, Nevada, and Arizona—to secure the electoral college victory.

    Prior to his election, President Biden had a long and prominent political career. He served two terms as former President Barack Obama’s vice president and was responsible for managing the 2009 economic recovery, helping to expand health care through the Affordable Care Act, and acting as the administration’s liaison to the Senate. Before joining the Obama administration, he spent 36 years representing Delaware in the Senate. He was often critiqued as being an unremarkable, status quo Democrat, and mid-career votes in favor of the Defense of Marriage Act, anti-drug legislation, and the Iraq War reaffirm that characterization. In 1991, Vice President Biden was the chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee and presided over the Supreme Court confirmation hearings for Justice Clarence Thomas, who had been credibly accused of sexual harassment by a former colleague, Anita Hill. Vice President Biden’s mismanagement of the hearing resulted in a targeted and unfair character assassination of Anita Hill and remains a reminder of his complicity in the patriarchal and racist systems on which our American government is built. 

    Prior to her election, Vice President Harris was the first woman of color elected to represent California in the United States Senate. She sponsored legislation on climate and environmental protections, rental and housing protections, women’s health, and pandemic relief. She was also an original cosponsor of the progressive Green New Deal authored by Rep. Alexandria Ocasio Cortez and Sen. Ed Markey.  Before serving in the Senate, Vice President Harris had a long legal career in California, serving for 8 years in the Alameda County District Attorney’s Office before transitioning to a role as a prosecutor in the San Francisco District Attorney’s Office. In 2003, she won her bid to become district attorney of the City and County of San Francisco, where she served two terms before being elected as the attorney general for the state of California in 2010. She was the first woman and the first person of color to hold this seat. Vice President Harris’s record was both progressive for the time and complicated by her moderate approach to policing and criminal justice. She has been criticized for failing to institute comprehensive police accountability measures, for not establishing meaningful prison reform, and for taking a hands-off approach to cases related to police misconduct. However, her lenient approach to policing was often punctuated by decidedly progressive support for social justice issues, including the establishment of an education and workforce reentry program designed to diminish recidivism. 

    Other background: President Biden is from Scranton, PA, and moved to Delaware with his family when he was 10 years old. He has been a resident of Wilmington, Delaware, for most of his adult life. Vice President Harris grew up in Berkeley, CA, and was a longtime resident of Los Angeles. She is the daughter of a Jamaican father and an Indian mother, who both emigrated to the Bay Area in the 1960s.

     

    The Race


    Primary election: Eight candidates are running in the March 5 Democratic primary, including incumbent President Joe Biden (D), Rep. Dean Phillips (D), and Marianne Williamson (D). The candidate who receives the most delegates in the national Democratic primary will formally become the party’s designated Presidential candidate in August 2024.

    Candidate fundraising and pledges: President Biden’s campaign has raised $56 million as of December 2023, and is not funded by police, real estate, corporate PAC, or fossil fuel interests.

    Opposing candidate: Rep. Dean Phillips
    Opposing candidate’s fundraising and pledges: Rep. Phillips’s campaign has not filed any campaign fundraising receipts with the FEC as of December 2023.

    Opposing candidate: Marianne Williamson
    Opposing candidate’s fundraising and pledges: Williamson’s campaign has raised $2.6 million as of December 2023, and is funded by corporate PAC interests. A significant amount of her campaign funding has been through candidate donations and loans taken out by the candidate.

     

    The Position


    The President of the United States is the head of the executive branch of the federal government, and the commander-in-chief for all branches of the armed forces. A president has the power to make diplomatic, executive, and judicial appointments, and can sign into law or veto legislation. Presidential administrations are responsible for both foreign and domestic policy priorities. Presidents are limited to serving two four-year terms in office.


     

    Joe Biden and Kamala Harris

    Re-elect President Joe Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris to keep America on track. 



    President Joe Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris have a track record and policy positions that demonstrate that they will continue to govern effectively in the best interests of this diverse nation.

    Progressive endorsements: President Biden and Vice President Harris have the endorsement of some progressive groups, including the Sierra Club, Reproductive Freedom for All America, League of Conservation Voters, National Center for Transgender Equality, and Students Demand Action. They have also received the endorsement of a significant number of labor unions, including United Auto Workers, Actors’ Equity Association, AFL-CIO, IATSE, National Nurses United, and the American Federation of Teachers. President Biden and Vice President Harris also have the backing of the Democratic National Committee and a significant number of current and former Democratic officials, including former President Barack Obama, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, former Climate Envoy John Kerry, 14 current governors, 30 sitting U.S. senators, and over 70 members of the House of Representatives. This list includes California’s elected leaders Gov. Gavin Newsom, Lt. Gov. Eleni Kounalakis, Sen. Alex Padilla, Rep. Katie Porter, Rep. Eric Swalwell, and LA Mayor Karen Bass. 

    Priority policies: The Biden administration has had policy successes across a diversity of issue areas during their first term. Immediately after taking office during the height of the COVID-19 pandemic, President Biden worked to move the American Rescue Plan through Congress and successfully passed legislation to provide stimulus checks, boosts to unemployment payments, and increased funds for education and small-business loans. The plan also ramped up the distribution and administration of vaccines. This legislative effort was followed by the Bi-Partisan Infrastructure Law that made a $1 billion investment in electric vehicle infrastructure, national road and bridge repair, clean drinking water modifications, and power grid updates. In addition to these investments, the administration passed President Biden’s signature Inflation Reduction Act, an expansive bill to provide needed funding to cap prescription drug costs for the elderly, increase corporate taxes, invest in clean energy and climate protections, reduce the federal deficit, and increase tax accountability by provided additional funding to the IRS. The White House has indicated that nearly 170,000 clean energy jobs have been created by this legislation, clean energy investments have increased by $110 billion, and insulin has been capped at $35 a month. After years of inaction from the federal government, President Biden signed a significant gun-safety bill into law, which strengthens background check laws, incentivizes state-based red flag laws, and expands limitations on the acquisition of firearms by perpetrators of domestic abuse. President Biden also signed the CHIPS Act into law to increase domestic production of the semiconductors used in the manufacturing of many of the products Americans use daily. 

    The Biden administration’s economic policies have contributed to the lowest unemployment rate in over 50 years, at 3.4% as of January 2024, economic growth of 3.1% in 2023, and an inflation rate that dropped below 3% at the end of December. The administration has led the U.S. back into the Paris Climate Accord, forgiven $136 billion in education debt, and provided consistent support to striking labor unions across the country. While many of these accomplishments came during the first two years of the administration, when Democrats controlled both chambers of Congress, President Biden and Vice President Harris have worked across the aisle to move impactful legislation forward for the American people with a divided Congress.

    While the administration’s legislative successes have been substantial, they have been subject to significant criticism from progressives during this first term. While President Biden has maintained strong support for Israel during the October 7 Hamas attacks and the Israeli government’s retaliatory attacks on Palestinians in Gaza, the electorate and congressional representatives have expressed concerns about the U.S. government providing continued funding to the Israeli military, and activists and leaders have called on the Biden administration to advocate for a ceasefire in Gaza. On immigration and the southern border, the federal government’s failure to act has effectively continued the anti-immigrant policies enacted under the Trump administration and caused big city mayors and Democratic governors to publicly request that the White House and Congress pass meaningful legislation to reform an increasingly overwhelmed asylum and immigration system. Under Republican control, Congress has not passed any immigration reforms, and Republican leaders have advocated for more punitive and inhumane immigration policies.  

    Governance and community leadership experience: President Biden and Vice President Harris have served in the White House since 2020, when they were elected on a joint ticket with 306 electoral votes and over 51% of the national popular vote. Their campaign won six critical swing states—Michigan, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Georgia, Nevada, and Arizona—to secure the electoral college victory.

    Prior to his election, President Biden had a long and prominent political career. He served two terms as former President Barack Obama’s vice president and was responsible for managing the 2009 economic recovery, helping to expand health care through the Affordable Care Act, and acting as the administration’s liaison to the Senate. Before joining the Obama administration, he spent 36 years representing Delaware in the Senate. He was often critiqued as being an unremarkable, status quo Democrat, and mid-career votes in favor of the Defense of Marriage Act, anti-drug legislation, and the Iraq War reaffirm that characterization. In 1991, Vice President Biden was the chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee and presided over the Supreme Court confirmation hearings for Justice Clarence Thomas, who had been credibly accused of sexual harassment by a former colleague, Anita Hill. Vice President Biden’s mismanagement of the hearing resulted in a targeted and unfair character assassination of Anita Hill and remains a reminder of his complicity in the patriarchal and racist systems on which our American government is built. 

    Prior to her election, Vice President Harris was the first woman of color elected to represent California in the United States Senate. She sponsored legislation on climate and environmental protections, rental and housing protections, women’s health, and pandemic relief. She was also an original cosponsor of the progressive Green New Deal authored by Rep. Alexandria Ocasio Cortez and Sen. Ed Markey.  Before serving in the Senate, Vice President Harris had a long legal career in California, serving for 8 years in the Alameda County District Attorney’s Office before transitioning to a role as a prosecutor in the San Francisco District Attorney’s Office. In 2003, she won her bid to become district attorney of the City and County of San Francisco, where she served two terms before being elected as the attorney general for the state of California in 2010. She was the first woman and the first person of color to hold this seat. Vice President Harris’s record was both progressive for the time and complicated by her moderate approach to policing and criminal justice. She has been criticized for failing to institute comprehensive police accountability measures, for not establishing meaningful prison reform, and for taking a hands-off approach to cases related to police misconduct. However, her lenient approach to policing was often punctuated by decidedly progressive support for social justice issues, including the establishment of an education and workforce reentry program designed to diminish recidivism. 

    Other background: President Biden is from Scranton, PA, and moved to Delaware with his family when he was 10 years old. He has been a resident of Wilmington, Delaware, for most of his adult life. Vice President Harris grew up in Berkeley, CA, and was a longtime resident of Los Angeles. She is the daughter of a Jamaican father and an Indian mother, who both emigrated to the Bay Area in the 1960s.

     

    The Race


    Primary election: Eight candidates are running in the March 5 Democratic primary, including incumbent President Joe Biden (D), Rep. Dean Phillips (D), and Marianne Williamson (D). The candidate who receives the most delegates in the national Democratic primary will formally become the party’s designated Presidential candidate in August 2024.

    Candidate fundraising and pledges: President Biden’s campaign has raised $56 million as of December 2023, and is not funded by police, real estate, corporate PAC, or fossil fuel interests.

    Opposing candidate: Rep. Dean Phillips
    Opposing candidate’s fundraising and pledges: Rep. Phillips’s campaign has not filed any campaign fundraising receipts with the FEC as of December 2023.

    Opposing candidate: Marianne Williamson
    Opposing candidate’s fundraising and pledges: Williamson’s campaign has raised $2.6 million as of December 2023, and is funded by corporate PAC interests. A significant amount of her campaign funding has been through candidate donations and loans taken out by the candidate.

     

    The Position


    The President of the United States is the head of the executive branch of the federal government, and the commander-in-chief for all branches of the armed forces. A president has the power to make diplomatic, executive, and judicial appointments, and can sign into law or veto legislation. Presidential administrations are responsible for both foreign and domestic policy priorities. Presidents are limited to serving two four-year terms in office.


     

No Recommendation

No Recommendation - U.S. Senate

There are 22 candidates running for California’s open U.S. Senate seat. Based on our analysis, three qualified candidates for this position have a distinct vision for the state. We recommend that you choose the candidate who best aligns to your values in this race.




The Race


Primary election: In October 2022, Governor Newsom appointed labor leader, political advisor, and former Emily’s List President Laphonza Butler to serve the remainder of the six-year term of Sen. Dianne Feinstein, who died September 2022 after serving in the U.S. Senate since 1992. There are 22 candidates running in the March 5 primary, including Rep. Barbara Lee (D), Rep. Katie Porter (D), and Rep. Adam Schiff (D). The top two vote recipients will advance to the general election on November 5.


The Candidates


Key Initiatives: Representative Barbara Lee is a longtime Congresswoman and has been a consistent progressive voice in Congress. She has been a prolific author of legislation related to ending AIDS/HIV, malaria, and tuberculosis, has moved efforts to reduce poverty forward, and was the only member of Congress to vote against the authorization for the use of military force after the attacks on September 11, 2001, a controversial position at the time. In recent legislative sessions, she has authored and sponsored legislation to curtail CEO overpay, improve research and public awareness of sickle cell disease, address the national backlog of unprocessed rape kits, and improve mental health resources for students. Prior to her election to the House of Representatives, Rep. Lee worked as a social worker and founded a mental-health service organization, Community Health Alliance for Neighborhood Growth and Education, to benefit her local East Bay community. She then spent eleven years working on the staff of Rep. Ron Dellums, eventually serving as his chief of staff. After her tenure in congressional staffing, she founded a facilities-management company. A few years later, in 1990, Rep. Lee launched a successful bid for a seat in the California Assembly, where she served for six years, before she was elected to the state Senate.

Representative Katie Porter is an attorney and public servant and has been a strong advocate for consumer protection, corporate accountability, and government transparency. She has gained notoriety for her meticulous and expert style of questioning in congressional hearings, and exercises this skill during Oversight and Reform Committee sessions. Her legislative successes include bills to lower prescription drug prices, increase the fee oil and gas companies pay to drill on public lands, lower the income threshold for out-of-pocket healthcare costs, and extend mental healthcare coverage. She has also recently supported efforts to ban members of Congress and their families from trading stocks. Prior to her election to Congress, Rep. Porter spent twenty years as a consumer-protection attorney. Ahead of the housing crisis in 2008, she issued early warnings of the financial system’s predatory lending, and has a strong track record of winning cases related to financial regulation. In 2012, then California Attorney General Kamala Harris appointed Rep. Porter to oversee banks as they returned over $18 billion to cheated homeowners in the state. 

Representative Adam Schiff is an attorney and public official and has been a consistent legislator on issues of government accountability, voting access, healthcare, and voting access. He rose to prominence as the Chair of the House Intelligence Committee who led the first impeachment inquiry of the Trump Administration. He has had legislative success on bills to increase pension payments for teachers, expand labor organizing protections, secure nearly $200 million in funding to address affordable housing development and homelessness in the state, create the patient bill of rights, and limit corporate spending to influence elections. He is also the lead author of legislation to end the NRA and the gun industry’s immunity from liability, which prevented victims and their families from seeking legal recourse. Prior to his election to Congress, Rep. Schiff worked as a law clerk and then as Assistant United States Attorney before being elected to California’s State Senate in 1996. He is a longtime supporter of progressive education, immigration, and environmental policies, but has cast unfavorable votes on issues pertaining to military spending and the use of military force, including a 2002 vote in favor of authorizing the use of military force against Iraq. 

Community Leadership Experience, Fundraising, and Endorsements: Rep. Lee has served in Congress since 1998, when she was elected with over 66% of the vote. In 2022, she won her reelection to CD-12 over a Republican challenger by 81 points. Her campaign has raised $3.3 million as of December 2023, and is not funded by police, fossil fuel, or corporate PAC interests. Rep. Lee has the endorsement of many progressive groups, including California Working Families Party, Black Women Organized for Political Action PAC, Gen Z for Change, Feminist Majority PAC, Our Revolution, and Reproductive Freedom for All California (formerly NARAL Pro-Choice California). She has also received the endorsement of some community and elected leaders, including Dolores Huerta, State Attorney General Rob Bonta, State Controller Malia Cohen, California Secretary of State Dr. Shirley Weber, Rep. Ro Khanna, Rep. Pramila Jayapal, State Senator Lola Smallwood-Cuevas, Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass, and San Francisco Mayor London Breed. 

Rep. Porter has served in Congress since 2018, when she was elected with over 52% of the vote. In 2022, she won her reelection against a Republican challenger by 3 points. Her campaign has raised $22 million as of December 2023, and is not funded by police, fossil fuel, or real estate interests. Rep. Porter has the endorsement of many progressive groups, including California Labor Federation, National Union of Healthcare Workers, and Women in Leadership PAC. She has also received the endorsement of many elected leaders, including Sen. Elizabeth Warren, Attorney General Rob Bonta, Assm. Alex Lee, State Sen. Scott Wiener, Rep. Robert Garcia, and State Sen. Catherine Blakespear.

Rep. Schiff has served in Congress since 2000, when he was elected with over 52% of the vote. In 2022, he won his reelection against a Democratic challenger by 42 points. His campaign has raised $21 million as of December 2023, and is not funded by police, or fossil fuel interests. Rep. Schiff has the endorsement of some labor groups, including IATSE California Council, IAFF, and Amalgamated Transit Union. He has also received the endorsement of many elected officials, including former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, Rep. Kamlager-Dove, State Sen. Maria Elena Durazo, Assm. Tina McKinnor, Assm. Rick Chavez Zbur, and San Diego Mayor Todd Gloria.

Other background: Rep. Lee is from El Paso, TX, and moved to the San Fernando Valley when she was a child. She attended Mills College, where she served as president of the Black Student Union and invited Congresswoman Shirley Chisholm to speak on campus. Her interaction with Rep. Chisholm was an early inspiration for her pursuit of a career in public service. 

Rep. Porter is from Fort Dodge, IA, and now resides in Irvine, CA. Along with her legal practice, she is a longtime tenured professor of law at University of California-Irvine.

Rep. Schiff is from the Bay Area. He holds a law degree from Harvard University.


The District


State: California is the most populous state in the United States, and includes 58 counties and 39 million residents.

Voter registration: Of the 22 million registered voters in the state, 47% are Democrat, 24% are Republican, and 22% have no party preference. Democrats have held the Governor’s seat in the state since 2011.

District demographics: 40% Latino, 16% Asian, and 7% Black

Recent election results: California voted for Joe Biden for president in 2020 by 29 points and Gavin Newsom for governor in 2022 by 18 points. Sen. Feinstein won her 2018 reelection against now-Los Angeles City Councilmember Kevin de León by 8 points. 


The Position


Members of the Senate represent and advocate for the needs of their state constituency and share legislative responsibility with the House of Representatives. They are responsible for creating, debating, and voting on legislation that addresses issues of national importance. Senators have the exclusive responsibility of providing advice and consent to the executive branch on treaties, and on the nomination and approval of cabinet secretaries, ambassadors, and federal judges. The Senate also has the sole authority to bring and try an impeachment of a high official, up to and including removal from office with a two-thirds majority vote.

Each state, regardless of population, is represented by two senators. Senate elections are statewide, and senators are elected to serve a six-year term. There is no term limit for this position.

No Recommendation - U.S. Senate

There are 22 candidates running for California’s open U.S. Senate seat. Based on our analysis, three qualified candidates for this position have a distinct vision for the state. We recommend that you choose the candidate who best aligns to your values in this race.




The Race


Primary election: In October 2022, Governor Newsom appointed labor leader, political advisor, and former Emily’s List President Laphonza Butler to serve the remainder of the six-year term of Sen. Dianne Feinstein, who died September 2022 after serving in the U.S. Senate since 1992. There are 22 candidates running in the March 5 primary, including Rep. Barbara Lee (D), Rep. Katie Porter (D), and Rep. Adam Schiff (D). The top two vote recipients will advance to the general election on November 5.


The Candidates


Key Initiatives: Representative Barbara Lee is a longtime Congresswoman and has been a consistent progressive voice in Congress. She has been a prolific author of legislation related to ending AIDS/HIV, malaria, and tuberculosis, has moved efforts to reduce poverty forward, and was the only member of Congress to vote against the authorization for the use of military force after the attacks on September 11, 2001, a controversial position at the time. In recent legislative sessions, she has authored and sponsored legislation to curtail CEO overpay, improve research and public awareness of sickle cell disease, address the national backlog of unprocessed rape kits, and improve mental health resources for students. Prior to her election to the House of Representatives, Rep. Lee worked as a social worker and founded a mental-health service organization, Community Health Alliance for Neighborhood Growth and Education, to benefit her local East Bay community. She then spent eleven years working on the staff of Rep. Ron Dellums, eventually serving as his chief of staff. After her tenure in congressional staffing, she founded a facilities-management company. A few years later, in 1990, Rep. Lee launched a successful bid for a seat in the California Assembly, where she served for six years, before she was elected to the state Senate.

Representative Katie Porter is an attorney and public servant and has been a strong advocate for consumer protection, corporate accountability, and government transparency. She has gained notoriety for her meticulous and expert style of questioning in congressional hearings, and exercises this skill during Oversight and Reform Committee sessions. Her legislative successes include bills to lower prescription drug prices, increase the fee oil and gas companies pay to drill on public lands, lower the income threshold for out-of-pocket healthcare costs, and extend mental healthcare coverage. She has also recently supported efforts to ban members of Congress and their families from trading stocks. Prior to her election to Congress, Rep. Porter spent twenty years as a consumer-protection attorney. Ahead of the housing crisis in 2008, she issued early warnings of the financial system’s predatory lending, and has a strong track record of winning cases related to financial regulation. In 2012, then California Attorney General Kamala Harris appointed Rep. Porter to oversee banks as they returned over $18 billion to cheated homeowners in the state. 

Representative Adam Schiff is an attorney and public official and has been a consistent legislator on issues of government accountability, voting access, healthcare, and voting access. He rose to prominence as the Chair of the House Intelligence Committee who led the first impeachment inquiry of the Trump Administration. He has had legislative success on bills to increase pension payments for teachers, expand labor organizing protections, secure nearly $200 million in funding to address affordable housing development and homelessness in the state, create the patient bill of rights, and limit corporate spending to influence elections. He is also the lead author of legislation to end the NRA and the gun industry’s immunity from liability, which prevented victims and their families from seeking legal recourse. Prior to his election to Congress, Rep. Schiff worked as a law clerk and then as Assistant United States Attorney before being elected to California’s State Senate in 1996. He is a longtime supporter of progressive education, immigration, and environmental policies, but has cast unfavorable votes on issues pertaining to military spending and the use of military force, including a 2002 vote in favor of authorizing the use of military force against Iraq. 

Community Leadership Experience, Fundraising, and Endorsements: Rep. Lee has served in Congress since 1998, when she was elected with over 66% of the vote. In 2022, she won her reelection to CD-12 over a Republican challenger by 81 points. Her campaign has raised $3.3 million as of December 2023, and is not funded by police, fossil fuel, or corporate PAC interests. Rep. Lee has the endorsement of many progressive groups, including California Working Families Party, Black Women Organized for Political Action PAC, Gen Z for Change, Feminist Majority PAC, Our Revolution, and Reproductive Freedom for All California (formerly NARAL Pro-Choice California). She has also received the endorsement of some community and elected leaders, including Dolores Huerta, State Attorney General Rob Bonta, State Controller Malia Cohen, California Secretary of State Dr. Shirley Weber, Rep. Ro Khanna, Rep. Pramila Jayapal, State Senator Lola Smallwood-Cuevas, Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass, and San Francisco Mayor London Breed. 

Rep. Porter has served in Congress since 2018, when she was elected with over 52% of the vote. In 2022, she won her reelection against a Republican challenger by 3 points. Her campaign has raised $22 million as of December 2023, and is not funded by police, fossil fuel, or real estate interests. Rep. Porter has the endorsement of many progressive groups, including California Labor Federation, National Union of Healthcare Workers, and Women in Leadership PAC. She has also received the endorsement of many elected leaders, including Sen. Elizabeth Warren, Attorney General Rob Bonta, Assm. Alex Lee, State Sen. Scott Wiener, Rep. Robert Garcia, and State Sen. Catherine Blakespear.

Rep. Schiff has served in Congress since 2000, when he was elected with over 52% of the vote. In 2022, he won his reelection against a Democratic challenger by 42 points. His campaign has raised $21 million as of December 2023, and is not funded by police, or fossil fuel interests. Rep. Schiff has the endorsement of some labor groups, including IATSE California Council, IAFF, and Amalgamated Transit Union. He has also received the endorsement of many elected officials, including former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, Rep. Kamlager-Dove, State Sen. Maria Elena Durazo, Assm. Tina McKinnor, Assm. Rick Chavez Zbur, and San Diego Mayor Todd Gloria.

Other background: Rep. Lee is from El Paso, TX, and moved to the San Fernando Valley when she was a child. She attended Mills College, where she served as president of the Black Student Union and invited Congresswoman Shirley Chisholm to speak on campus. Her interaction with Rep. Chisholm was an early inspiration for her pursuit of a career in public service. 

Rep. Porter is from Fort Dodge, IA, and now resides in Irvine, CA. Along with her legal practice, she is a longtime tenured professor of law at University of California-Irvine.

Rep. Schiff is from the Bay Area. He holds a law degree from Harvard University.


The District


State: California is the most populous state in the United States, and includes 58 counties and 39 million residents.

Voter registration: Of the 22 million registered voters in the state, 47% are Democrat, 24% are Republican, and 22% have no party preference. Democrats have held the Governor’s seat in the state since 2011.

District demographics: 40% Latino, 16% Asian, and 7% Black

Recent election results: California voted for Joe Biden for president in 2020 by 29 points and Gavin Newsom for governor in 2022 by 18 points. Sen. Feinstein won her 2018 reelection against now-Los Angeles City Councilmember Kevin de León by 8 points. 


The Position


Members of the Senate represent and advocate for the needs of their state constituency and share legislative responsibility with the House of Representatives. They are responsible for creating, debating, and voting on legislation that addresses issues of national importance. Senators have the exclusive responsibility of providing advice and consent to the executive branch on treaties, and on the nomination and approval of cabinet secretaries, ambassadors, and federal judges. The Senate also has the sole authority to bring and try an impeachment of a high official, up to and including removal from office with a two-thirds majority vote.

Each state, regardless of population, is represented by two senators. Senate elections are statewide, and senators are elected to serve a six-year term. There is no term limit for this position.

Congress

Depending on where you live, you may have one of the below congressional districts on your ballot.

  • Kevin Mullin

    Re-elect Congressional Representative Kevin Mullin to keep CD-15 on the right track for progress. 


    Kevin Mullin

    Re-elect Congressional Representative Kevin Mullin to keep CD-15 on the right track for progress. 


    Kevin Mullin

    Re-elect Congressional Representative Kevin Mullin to keep CD-15 on the right track for progress. 


    Kevin Mullin

    Re-elect Congressional Representative Kevin Mullin to keep CD-15 on the right track for progress. 


State Assembly

Depending on where you live, you may have one of the below State Assembly races on your ballot.

No Recommendation

AD19 - No Recommendation

Based on our analysis, the two Democratic candidates for this position have distinct visions for the district. We recommend that you choose the candidate who best aligns to your values in this race.



Endorsements: San Francisco Supervisor Catherine Stefani has the endorsement of some progressive groups, including Planned Parenthood and Equality California, as well as labor unions like SEIU, National Union of Healthcare Workers, San Francisco Labor Council, and California Labor Council. She has also been endorsed by elected officials like State Controller Malia Cohen, Senator Scott Wiener, Assemblymember Matt Haney, and San Francisco Mayor London Breed.

David Lee has the endorsement of some progressive groups, including Clean Water Action and California Faculty Association. He has also been endorsed by elected officials like incumbent Assemblymember Phil Ting, Assemblymember and Speaker Emeritus Anthony Rendon, and San Francisco County Supervisor Connie Chan. 

Key initiatives: As a member of the San Francisco Board of Supervisors, Stefani has chaired the Public Safety and Neighborhood Services Committee. She has supported survivors of domestic violence and authored legislation to provide resources like legal aid and counseling to victims of crimes. Stefani has been a longtime supporter of gun legislation, and founded the San Francisco chapter of Moms Demand Action. On the Board of Supervisors, she passed legislation to ban ghost guns in the city.

Lee has not previously served in elected office.

Governance and community leadership experience: Stefani has served on the Board of Supervisors since 2018, and has been considered the most conservative member of the board. Although she has voiced concern over the housing crisis, her record is mixed. In 2020, she was the only supervisor to vote against a citywide eviction moratorium in the face of the COVID-19 pandemic, and was personally sued by a tenant for wrongful eviction. Stefani has supported more policing and was the first supervisor to endorse the recall of former San Francisco District Attorney Chesa Boudin. She was believed to be a top candidate for Mayor London Breed’s appointment to replace him. Stefani was appointed as the San Francisco County Clerk by the late Mayor Ed Lee in 2016. 

Lee is a lecturer, college administrator, and executive director of the nonprofit Chinese American Voters Education Committee. He has been a longtime supporter of efforts to increase civic engagement for underserved communities. As executive director, Lee has successfully increased Asian American voting participation. He organized voter-registration drives at Asian American cultural centers and community hubs, as well as public service campaigns in Chinese and Tagalog. In addition to his voter registration and engagement work with the Asian American community, he has also advocated for a ballot initiative that would have required a livestream of city government. 

Other background: Stefani is a former prosecutor and is from Merced, CA. 

Lee is from the Richmond district of San Francisco. 


The Race


Primary election: There are 4 candidates running in the March 5 primary, including Catherine Stefani (D), David Lee (D), and Arjun Sodhani (R). The top two vote recipients will advance to the general election on November 5.

Candidate fundraising and pledges: Stefani’s campaign has raised $528,922 and is not funded by the fossil fuel industry. She has received donations from corporate PACs and the police, and has also accepted nearly $40,000 from the real estate industry. Lee’s campaign has raised $200,400 and is not funded by the fossil fuel industry, corporate PACs, or the police. He has accepted donations from the real estate industry.

Opposing candidate: Republicans Arjun Sodhani and Nadia Flamenco
Opposing candidate’s fundraising and pledges: As of December 2023, neither Republican has filed any donation receipts.


The District


Counties in district: California’s 19th Assembly District includes parts of San Francisco and San Mateo Counties.

Voter registration: 61% Democrat, 9% Republican, and 25% No Party Preference. Democrats typically hold this district.

District demographics: 12% Latino, 43% Asian, and 4% Black. This district is considered to be one of the strong Asian-American seats in the California Assembly delegation.

Recent election results: AD-19 voted for Joe Biden for president in 2020 by 66 points and Gavin Newsom for governor in 2022 by 63 points.


The Position


State assemblymembers represent and advocate for the needs of their district constituents at the California State Capitol. They are responsible for creating, debating, and voting on legislation that addresses issues within their district.

The California State Assembly has 80 districts. Each represents a population of at least 465,000 Californians. Representatives are elected to the Assembly for a two-year term. Every two years, all 80 seats are subject to election. Members elected before 2012 are restricted to three two-year terms (six years) in the Assembly. Those elected in or after 2012 are allowed to serve 12 years total across both the state Senate or Assembly. This term, Democrats currently hold a three-quarters supermajority of 60 seats in the California State Assembly, while Republicans hold 19 seats and one seat is held by an Independent.


AD19 - No Recommendation

Based on our analysis, the two Democratic candidates for this position have distinct visions for the district. We recommend that you choose the candidate who best aligns to your values in this race.



Endorsements: San Francisco Supervisor Catherine Stefani has the endorsement of some progressive groups, including Planned Parenthood and Equality California, as well as labor unions like SEIU, National Union of Healthcare Workers, San Francisco Labor Council, and California Labor Council. She has also been endorsed by elected officials like State Controller Malia Cohen, Senator Scott Wiener, Assemblymember Matt Haney, and San Francisco Mayor London Breed.

David Lee has the endorsement of some progressive groups, including Clean Water Action and California Faculty Association. He has also been endorsed by elected officials like incumbent Assemblymember Phil Ting, Assemblymember and Speaker Emeritus Anthony Rendon, and San Francisco County Supervisor Connie Chan. 

Key initiatives: As a member of the San Francisco Board of Supervisors, Stefani has chaired the Public Safety and Neighborhood Services Committee. She has supported survivors of domestic violence and authored legislation to provide resources like legal aid and counseling to victims of crimes. Stefani has been a longtime supporter of gun legislation, and founded the San Francisco chapter of Moms Demand Action. On the Board of Supervisors, she passed legislation to ban ghost guns in the city.

Lee has not previously served in elected office.

Governance and community leadership experience: Stefani has served on the Board of Supervisors since 2018, and has been considered the most conservative member of the board. Although she has voiced concern over the housing crisis, her record is mixed. In 2020, she was the only supervisor to vote against a citywide eviction moratorium in the face of the COVID-19 pandemic, and was personally sued by a tenant for wrongful eviction. Stefani has supported more policing and was the first supervisor to endorse the recall of former San Francisco District Attorney Chesa Boudin. She was believed to be a top candidate for Mayor London Breed’s appointment to replace him. Stefani was appointed as the San Francisco County Clerk by the late Mayor Ed Lee in 2016. 

Lee is a lecturer, college administrator, and executive director of the nonprofit Chinese American Voters Education Committee. He has been a longtime supporter of efforts to increase civic engagement for underserved communities. As executive director, Lee has successfully increased Asian American voting participation. He organized voter-registration drives at Asian American cultural centers and community hubs, as well as public service campaigns in Chinese and Tagalog. In addition to his voter registration and engagement work with the Asian American community, he has also advocated for a ballot initiative that would have required a livestream of city government. 

Other background: Stefani is a former prosecutor and is from Merced, CA. 

Lee is from the Richmond district of San Francisco. 


The Race


Primary election: There are 4 candidates running in the March 5 primary, including Catherine Stefani (D), David Lee (D), and Arjun Sodhani (R). The top two vote recipients will advance to the general election on November 5.

Candidate fundraising and pledges: Stefani’s campaign has raised $528,922 and is not funded by the fossil fuel industry. She has received donations from corporate PACs and the police, and has also accepted nearly $40,000 from the real estate industry. Lee’s campaign has raised $200,400 and is not funded by the fossil fuel industry, corporate PACs, or the police. He has accepted donations from the real estate industry.

Opposing candidate: Republicans Arjun Sodhani and Nadia Flamenco
Opposing candidate’s fundraising and pledges: As of December 2023, neither Republican has filed any donation receipts.


The District


Counties in district: California’s 19th Assembly District includes parts of San Francisco and San Mateo Counties.

Voter registration: 61% Democrat, 9% Republican, and 25% No Party Preference. Democrats typically hold this district.

District demographics: 12% Latino, 43% Asian, and 4% Black. This district is considered to be one of the strong Asian-American seats in the California Assembly delegation.

Recent election results: AD-19 voted for Joe Biden for president in 2020 by 66 points and Gavin Newsom for governor in 2022 by 63 points.


The Position


State assemblymembers represent and advocate for the needs of their district constituents at the California State Capitol. They are responsible for creating, debating, and voting on legislation that addresses issues within their district.

The California State Assembly has 80 districts. Each represents a population of at least 465,000 Californians. Representatives are elected to the Assembly for a two-year term. Every two years, all 80 seats are subject to election. Members elected before 2012 are restricted to three two-year terms (six years) in the Assembly. Those elected in or after 2012 are allowed to serve 12 years total across both the state Senate or Assembly. This term, Democrats currently hold a three-quarters supermajority of 60 seats in the California State Assembly, while Republicans hold 19 seats and one seat is held by an Independent.


  • Diane Papan

    Re-elect Assemblymember Diane Papan to keep AD-21 on the right track for progress. 



    Assm. Diane Papan’s track record and policy positions demonstrate that she will continue to be a representative voice for the constituents of AD-21 and will govern effectively in the best interests of this diverse district.

    Progressive endorsements: Assm. Papan has the endorsement of some progressive groups, including Equality California, SEIU-United Healthcare Workers West, AFSCME California. In previous elections, Papan has received problematic endorsements from the California Statewide Law Enforcement Association and corporate Democrats Assm. Jim Cooper, State Sen. Susan Rubio, and Assm. Blanca Rubio.


    Top issues: Reproductive justice, wildfire-prevention infrastructure, homelessness and housing, climate protections, and gun violence prevention.

    Priority bills: This year, Assm. Papan’s priorities for AD-21 have included 21 bills about educational technology and cybersecurity, housing, water management, and paid family leave. Of these, six have been successfully chaptered into law, three have been vetoed, and the rest remain in committee. She has sponsored and passed legislation to require water conservation analysis and reporting, to include State Department of Education members in the California Cybersecurity Integration Center, and to require an evaluation of innovative aerial firefighting technology to determine whether it could be utilized in the state. She scores a CS of 82 out of 100 on Courage Score, our annual analysis of legislators’ progressive voting records. Based on our Courage Score analysis, Assm. Papan has supported some progressive bills that made it to a vote. That said, Assm. Papan avoided votes on several critical bills this session, including SB1604 to increase accountability and funding transparency for charter schools, SB770 to advance the effort to establish a single-payer health-care system in the state, and AB1310 to allow resentencing for individuals subject to firearm enhancements. 

    Committee leadership/membership: Assm. Papan currently sits on 10 committees, including Appropriations, Communications and Conveyance, Judiciary, and Privacy and Consumer Protection. She serves as chair of the Standing Committee on Water Parks and Wildlife, and is the assistant majority leader on Policy and Research. 

    Governance and community leadership experience: Assm. Papan has served in this assembly seat since 2022, when she was elected with over 72% of the vote. 

    Prior to her election to the Assembly, Assm. Papan served as a member of the San Mateo City Council, where she was a strong supporter of increasing the availability of subsidized housing, building flood walls to protect against sea-level rise, and funding grade-separation projects to improve train infrastructure. She has served as a nonprofit executive and an attorney in private practice, and was the executive director of John’s Closet, which provides clothing to youth in the area. She has also provided leadership on the City/County Association of Governments of San Mateo County, the San Mateo County Council of Cities, the San Mateo County Express Lanes Joint Powers Authority, and the Flood and Sea Level Rise Resiliency Board. Papan is the daughter of the late influential Assm. Lou Papan, who served for 20 years. She cites her father’s public service and her family’s medical challenges as shaping the sense of service she has carried into her public work.

    Other background: Papan is from Daly City and is a longtime resident of San Mateo. 


    The Race


    Primary election: There are two candidates running in the March 5 primary, including Assm. Diane Papan (D), and Mark Gilham (R). The top two vote recipients will advance to the general election on November 5.

    Candidate fundraising and pledges: Assm. Papan’s campaign has raised $311,000 as of December 2023, and is funded by police, real estate, fossil fuel, and corporate PAC interests.

    Opposing candidate: Republican Mark Gilham
    Opposing candidate’s fundraising and pledges: Gilham’s campaign has not filed any campaign fundraising receipts with the Secretary of State’s office as of December 2023.


    The District


    Counties in district: California’s 21st Assembly District includes parts of San Mateo County.

    Voter registration: 56% Democrat, 14% Republican, and 25% No Party Preference. Democrats typically hold this district.

    District demographics: 20% Latino, 25% Asian, and 3% Black. 

    Recent election results: AD-21 voted for Joe Biden for president in 2020 by 58 points and Gavin Newsom for governor in 2022 by 50 points.


    The Position


    State assemblymembers represent and advocate for the needs of their district constituents at the California State Capitol. They are responsible for creating, debating, and voting on legislation that addresses issues within their district.

    The California State Assembly has 80 districts. Each represents a population of at least 465,000 Californians. Representatives are elected to the Assembly for a two-year term. Every two years, all 80 seats are subject to election. Members elected before 2012 are restricted to three two-year terms (six years) in the Assembly. Those elected in or after 2012 are allowed to serve 12 years total across both the state Senate or Assembly. This term, Democrats currently hold a three-quarters supermajority of 60 seats in the California State Assembly, while Republicans hold 19 seats and one seat is held by an Independent.


    Diane Papan

    Re-elect Assemblymember Diane Papan to keep AD-21 on the right track for progress. 



    Assm. Diane Papan’s track record and policy positions demonstrate that she will continue to be a representative voice for the constituents of AD-21 and will govern effectively in the best interests of this diverse district.

    Progressive endorsements: Assm. Papan has the endorsement of some progressive groups, including Equality California, SEIU-United Healthcare Workers West, AFSCME California. In previous elections, Papan has received problematic endorsements from the California Statewide Law Enforcement Association and corporate Democrats Assm. Jim Cooper, State Sen. Susan Rubio, and Assm. Blanca Rubio.


    Top issues: Reproductive justice, wildfire-prevention infrastructure, homelessness and housing, climate protections, and gun violence prevention.

    Priority bills: This year, Assm. Papan’s priorities for AD-21 have included 21 bills about educational technology and cybersecurity, housing, water management, and paid family leave. Of these, six have been successfully chaptered into law, three have been vetoed, and the rest remain in committee. She has sponsored and passed legislation to require water conservation analysis and reporting, to include State Department of Education members in the California Cybersecurity Integration Center, and to require an evaluation of innovative aerial firefighting technology to determine whether it could be utilized in the state. She scores a CS of 82 out of 100 on Courage Score, our annual analysis of legislators’ progressive voting records. Based on our Courage Score analysis, Assm. Papan has supported some progressive bills that made it to a vote. That said, Assm. Papan avoided votes on several critical bills this session, including SB1604 to increase accountability and funding transparency for charter schools, SB770 to advance the effort to establish a single-payer health-care system in the state, and AB1310 to allow resentencing for individuals subject to firearm enhancements. 

    Committee leadership/membership: Assm. Papan currently sits on 10 committees, including Appropriations, Communications and Conveyance, Judiciary, and Privacy and Consumer Protection. She serves as chair of the Standing Committee on Water Parks and Wildlife, and is the assistant majority leader on Policy and Research. 

    Governance and community leadership experience: Assm. Papan has served in this assembly seat since 2022, when she was elected with over 72% of the vote. 

    Prior to her election to the Assembly, Assm. Papan served as a member of the San Mateo City Council, where she was a strong supporter of increasing the availability of subsidized housing, building flood walls to protect against sea-level rise, and funding grade-separation projects to improve train infrastructure. She has served as a nonprofit executive and an attorney in private practice, and was the executive director of John’s Closet, which provides clothing to youth in the area. She has also provided leadership on the City/County Association of Governments of San Mateo County, the San Mateo County Council of Cities, the San Mateo County Express Lanes Joint Powers Authority, and the Flood and Sea Level Rise Resiliency Board. Papan is the daughter of the late influential Assm. Lou Papan, who served for 20 years. She cites her father’s public service and her family’s medical challenges as shaping the sense of service she has carried into her public work.

    Other background: Papan is from Daly City and is a longtime resident of San Mateo. 


    The Race


    Primary election: There are two candidates running in the March 5 primary, including Assm. Diane Papan (D), and Mark Gilham (R). The top two vote recipients will advance to the general election on November 5.

    Candidate fundraising and pledges: Assm. Papan’s campaign has raised $311,000 as of December 2023, and is funded by police, real estate, fossil fuel, and corporate PAC interests.

    Opposing candidate: Republican Mark Gilham
    Opposing candidate’s fundraising and pledges: Gilham’s campaign has not filed any campaign fundraising receipts with the Secretary of State’s office as of December 2023.


    The District


    Counties in district: California’s 21st Assembly District includes parts of San Mateo County.

    Voter registration: 56% Democrat, 14% Republican, and 25% No Party Preference. Democrats typically hold this district.

    District demographics: 20% Latino, 25% Asian, and 3% Black. 

    Recent election results: AD-21 voted for Joe Biden for president in 2020 by 58 points and Gavin Newsom for governor in 2022 by 50 points.


    The Position


    State assemblymembers represent and advocate for the needs of their district constituents at the California State Capitol. They are responsible for creating, debating, and voting on legislation that addresses issues within their district.

    The California State Assembly has 80 districts. Each represents a population of at least 465,000 Californians. Representatives are elected to the Assembly for a two-year term. Every two years, all 80 seats are subject to election. Members elected before 2012 are restricted to three two-year terms (six years) in the Assembly. Those elected in or after 2012 are allowed to serve 12 years total across both the state Senate or Assembly. This term, Democrats currently hold a three-quarters supermajority of 60 seats in the California State Assembly, while Republicans hold 19 seats and one seat is held by an Independent.


    Diane Papan

    Re-elect Assemblymember Diane Papan to keep AD-21 on the right track for progress. 



    Assm. Diane Papan’s track record and policy positions demonstrate that she will continue to be a representative voice for the constituents of AD-21 and will govern effectively in the best interests of this diverse district.

    Progressive endorsements: Assm. Papan has the endorsement of some progressive groups, including Equality California, SEIU-United Healthcare Workers West, AFSCME California. In previous elections, Papan has received problematic endorsements from the California Statewide Law Enforcement Association and corporate Democrats Assm. Jim Cooper, State Sen. Susan Rubio, and Assm. Blanca Rubio.


    Top issues: Reproductive justice, wildfire-prevention infrastructure, homelessness and housing, climate protections, and gun violence prevention.

    Priority bills: This year, Assm. Papan’s priorities for AD-21 have included 21 bills about educational technology and cybersecurity, housing, water management, and paid family leave. Of these, six have been successfully chaptered into law, three have been vetoed, and the rest remain in committee. She has sponsored and passed legislation to require water conservation analysis and reporting, to include State Department of Education members in the California Cybersecurity Integration Center, and to require an evaluation of innovative aerial firefighting technology to determine whether it could be utilized in the state. She scores a CS of 82 out of 100 on Courage Score, our annual analysis of legislators’ progressive voting records. Based on our Courage Score analysis, Assm. Papan has supported some progressive bills that made it to a vote. That said, Assm. Papan avoided votes on several critical bills this session, including SB1604 to increase accountability and funding transparency for charter schools, SB770 to advance the effort to establish a single-payer health-care system in the state, and AB1310 to allow resentencing for individuals subject to firearm enhancements. 

    Committee leadership/membership: Assm. Papan currently sits on 10 committees, including Appropriations, Communications and Conveyance, Judiciary, and Privacy and Consumer Protection. She serves as chair of the Standing Committee on Water Parks and Wildlife, and is the assistant majority leader on Policy and Research. 

    Governance and community leadership experience: Assm. Papan has served in this assembly seat since 2022, when she was elected with over 72% of the vote. 

    Prior to her election to the Assembly, Assm. Papan served as a member of the San Mateo City Council, where she was a strong supporter of increasing the availability of subsidized housing, building flood walls to protect against sea-level rise, and funding grade-separation projects to improve train infrastructure. She has served as a nonprofit executive and an attorney in private practice, and was the executive director of John’s Closet, which provides clothing to youth in the area. She has also provided leadership on the City/County Association of Governments of San Mateo County, the San Mateo County Council of Cities, the San Mateo County Express Lanes Joint Powers Authority, and the Flood and Sea Level Rise Resiliency Board. Papan is the daughter of the late influential Assm. Lou Papan, who served for 20 years. She cites her father’s public service and her family’s medical challenges as shaping the sense of service she has carried into her public work.

    Other background: Papan is from Daly City and is a longtime resident of San Mateo. 


    The Race


    Primary election: There are two candidates running in the March 5 primary, including Assm. Diane Papan (D), and Mark Gilham (R). The top two vote recipients will advance to the general election on November 5.

    Candidate fundraising and pledges: Assm. Papan’s campaign has raised $311,000 as of December 2023, and is funded by police, real estate, fossil fuel, and corporate PAC interests.

    Opposing candidate: Republican Mark Gilham
    Opposing candidate’s fundraising and pledges: Gilham’s campaign has not filed any campaign fundraising receipts with the Secretary of State’s office as of December 2023.


    The District


    Counties in district: California’s 21st Assembly District includes parts of San Mateo County.

    Voter registration: 56% Democrat, 14% Republican, and 25% No Party Preference. Democrats typically hold this district.

    District demographics: 20% Latino, 25% Asian, and 3% Black. 

    Recent election results: AD-21 voted for Joe Biden for president in 2020 by 58 points and Gavin Newsom for governor in 2022 by 50 points.


    The Position


    State assemblymembers represent and advocate for the needs of their district constituents at the California State Capitol. They are responsible for creating, debating, and voting on legislation that addresses issues within their district.

    The California State Assembly has 80 districts. Each represents a population of at least 465,000 Californians. Representatives are elected to the Assembly for a two-year term. Every two years, all 80 seats are subject to election. Members elected before 2012 are restricted to three two-year terms (six years) in the Assembly. Those elected in or after 2012 are allowed to serve 12 years total across both the state Senate or Assembly. This term, Democrats currently hold a three-quarters supermajority of 60 seats in the California State Assembly, while Republicans hold 19 seats and one seat is held by an Independent.


    Diane Papan

    Re-elect Assemblymember Diane Papan to keep AD-21 on the right track for progress. 



    Assm. Diane Papan’s track record and policy positions demonstrate that she will continue to be a representative voice for the constituents of AD-21 and will govern effectively in the best interests of this diverse district.

    Progressive endorsements: Assm. Papan has the endorsement of some progressive groups, including Equality California, SEIU-United Healthcare Workers West, AFSCME California. In previous elections, Papan has received problematic endorsements from the California Statewide Law Enforcement Association and corporate Democrats Assm. Jim Cooper, State Sen. Susan Rubio, and Assm. Blanca Rubio.


    Top issues: Reproductive justice, wildfire-prevention infrastructure, homelessness and housing, climate protections, and gun violence prevention.

    Priority bills: This year, Assm. Papan’s priorities for AD-21 have included 21 bills about educational technology and cybersecurity, housing, water management, and paid family leave. Of these, six have been successfully chaptered into law, three have been vetoed, and the rest remain in committee. She has sponsored and passed legislation to require water conservation analysis and reporting, to include State Department of Education members in the California Cybersecurity Integration Center, and to require an evaluation of innovative aerial firefighting technology to determine whether it could be utilized in the state. She scores a CS of 82 out of 100 on Courage Score, our annual analysis of legislators’ progressive voting records. Based on our Courage Score analysis, Assm. Papan has supported some progressive bills that made it to a vote. That said, Assm. Papan avoided votes on several critical bills this session, including SB1604 to increase accountability and funding transparency for charter schools, SB770 to advance the effort to establish a single-payer health-care system in the state, and AB1310 to allow resentencing for individuals subject to firearm enhancements. 

    Committee leadership/membership: Assm. Papan currently sits on 10 committees, including Appropriations, Communications and Conveyance, Judiciary, and Privacy and Consumer Protection. She serves as chair of the Standing Committee on Water Parks and Wildlife, and is the assistant majority leader on Policy and Research. 

    Governance and community leadership experience: Assm. Papan has served in this assembly seat since 2022, when she was elected with over 72% of the vote. 

    Prior to her election to the Assembly, Assm. Papan served as a member of the San Mateo City Council, where she was a strong supporter of increasing the availability of subsidized housing, building flood walls to protect against sea-level rise, and funding grade-separation projects to improve train infrastructure. She has served as a nonprofit executive and an attorney in private practice, and was the executive director of John’s Closet, which provides clothing to youth in the area. She has also provided leadership on the City/County Association of Governments of San Mateo County, the San Mateo County Council of Cities, the San Mateo County Express Lanes Joint Powers Authority, and the Flood and Sea Level Rise Resiliency Board. Papan is the daughter of the late influential Assm. Lou Papan, who served for 20 years. She cites her father’s public service and her family’s medical challenges as shaping the sense of service she has carried into her public work.

    Other background: Papan is from Daly City and is a longtime resident of San Mateo. 


    The Race


    Primary election: There are two candidates running in the March 5 primary, including Assm. Diane Papan (D), and Mark Gilham (R). The top two vote recipients will advance to the general election on November 5.

    Candidate fundraising and pledges: Assm. Papan’s campaign has raised $311,000 as of December 2023, and is funded by police, real estate, fossil fuel, and corporate PAC interests.

    Opposing candidate: Republican Mark Gilham
    Opposing candidate’s fundraising and pledges: Gilham’s campaign has not filed any campaign fundraising receipts with the Secretary of State’s office as of December 2023.


    The District


    Counties in district: California’s 21st Assembly District includes parts of San Mateo County.

    Voter registration: 56% Democrat, 14% Republican, and 25% No Party Preference. Democrats typically hold this district.

    District demographics: 20% Latino, 25% Asian, and 3% Black. 

    Recent election results: AD-21 voted for Joe Biden for president in 2020 by 58 points and Gavin Newsom for governor in 2022 by 50 points.


    The Position


    State assemblymembers represent and advocate for the needs of their district constituents at the California State Capitol. They are responsible for creating, debating, and voting on legislation that addresses issues within their district.

    The California State Assembly has 80 districts. Each represents a population of at least 465,000 Californians. Representatives are elected to the Assembly for a two-year term. Every two years, all 80 seats are subject to election. Members elected before 2012 are restricted to three two-year terms (six years) in the Assembly. Those elected in or after 2012 are allowed to serve 12 years total across both the state Senate or Assembly. This term, Democrats currently hold a three-quarters supermajority of 60 seats in the California State Assembly, while Republicans hold 19 seats and one seat is held by an Independent.


  • Marc Berman

    Re-elect Assemblymember Marc Berman to keep AD-23 on the right track for progress. 



    Assm. Marc Berman’s track record and policy positions demonstrate that he will continue to be a representative voice for the constituents of AD-23 and will govern effectively in the best interests of this diverse district.

    Notably, Assm. Berman’s office was named in a workplace-harassment complaint that was made by a former staffer in 2022. The complaint alleged that a supervisor in his Los Altos office consistently made sex-based comments and advances toward female staffers, and provided preferential support to one female member of the staff. Assm. Berman made no staffing changes as a result of the complaint, and has failed to publicly work toward reforming the state legislative workplace-complaint process. Voters should continue to work to hold him accountable for any failures in leadership related to this or other incidents. 

    Progressive endorsements: Assm. Berman has the endorsement of some progressive groups, including Equality California, California Environmental Voters, and SEIU-United Healthcare Workers West. 

    Top issues: Education and STEM programs, firearm and weapons safety, election access and security, health care, and environmental protections

    Priority bills: This year, Assm. Berman’s priorities for AD-23 have included 27 bills about election security, firearm safety, education, and housing and lodging. Of these, 18 have been successfully chaptered into law, and the rest remain in committee. He has sponsored and passed legislation to add academic criteria to the qualification standards for Cal Grant, humanize the language used in the California Uniform Controlled Substances Act, and expand the number of labs eligible to process COVID-19 tests. He scores a CS of 93 out of 100 on Courage Score, our annual analysis of legislators’ progressive voting records. Based on our Courage Score analysis, Assm. Berman has supported the most progressive bills that made it to a vote. That said, Assm. Berman has failed to cast a vote on some critical legislation, including bills to establish the California Housing Authority, create emissions and pollution accountability for corporations, strengthen eviction protections for tenants, and support post-incarceration employment opportunities. Additionally, he failed to support AB1505, which would empower local districts to evaluate charter-school applications based on economic-impact criteria. This is not surprising, considering he has previously accepted campaign donations from California Charter Schools Association Advocates for Great Public Schools. Assemblymember Berman also voted to support AB 1366, which would eliminate critical oversight of telecom companies. He has accepted campaign donations from AT&T Inc, one of the largest telecom providers.

    Committee leadership/membership: Assm. Berman currently sits on four committees, including Governmental Organization, Insurance, and Transportation. He serves as chair of the Standing Committee on Business and Professions, and the Select Committee on the Master Plan for Higher Education in California. Assm. Berman is also a member of the California Legislative Progressive Caucus and the California Legislative Jewish Caucus.

    Governance and community leadership experience: Assm. Berman has served in this assembly seat since 2016, when he was elected with over 54% of the vote. In 2022, he won his re-election against a Republican challenger by 46 points.

    Prior to his election to the State Assembly, Assm. Berman served as an elected member of the Palo Alto City Council, supporting significant improvements to the city’s infrastructure and public safety. Assm. Berman is a longtime supporter of voting rights and reform. During law school, he worked as a summer analyst with the Voting Section of the Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division, and was an author of the Assembly bill that made California a permanent vote-by-mail state. 

    Other background: Assm. Berman is from Palo Alto. Prior to his public service, he was an attorney in private practice and worked with the Silicon Valley Education Foundation, a STEM-focused nonprofit organization. 


    The Race


    Primary election: There are four candidates running in the March 5 primary, including Assm. Marc Berman (D), Lydia Kou (D), Allan Marson (R), and Gus Mattammal (R). The top two vote recipients will advance to the general election on November 5.

    Candidate fundraising and pledges: Assm. Berman’s campaign has raised $557,000 as of December 2023, and is not funded by police interests.

    Opposing candidate: Democrat Lydia Kou
    Opposing candidate’s fundraising and pledges: Kou’s campaign has raised $64,000 as of December 2023, and is funded primarily by individual donors.

    Opposing candidate: Republican Gus Mattammal
    Opposing candidate’s fundraising and pledges: Mattammal’s campaign has raised $22,000 as of December 2023, and is funded by individual donors.


    The District


    Counties in district: California’s 23rd Assembly District includes parts of Santa Clara and San Mateo Counties.

    Voter registration: 54% Democrat, 14% Republican, and 28% No Party Preference. Prior to redistricting, Republicans typically held this seat. It has been held by democratic Assm. Marc Berman since 2022. 

    District demographics: 9% Latino, 27% Asian, and 2% Black. 

    Recent election results: AD-23 voted for Joe Biden for president in 2020 by 59 points and Gavin Newsom for governor in 2022 by 50 points.


    The Position


    State assemblymembers represent and advocate for the needs of their district constituents at the California State Capitol. They are responsible for creating, debating, and voting on legislation that addresses issues within their district.

    The California State Assembly has 80 districts. Each represents a population of at least 465,000 Californians. Representatives are elected to the Assembly for a two-year term. Every two years, all 80 seats are subject to election. Members elected before 2012 are restricted to three two-year terms (six years) in the Assembly. Those elected in or after 2012 are allowed to serve 12 years total across both the state Senate or Assembly. This term, Democrats currently hold a three-quarters supermajority of 60 seats in the California State Assembly, while Republicans hold 19 seats and one seat is held by an Independent.


    Marc Berman

    Re-elect Assemblymember Marc Berman to keep AD-23 on the right track for progress. 



    Assm. Marc Berman’s track record and policy positions demonstrate that he will continue to be a representative voice for the constituents of AD-23 and will govern effectively in the best interests of this diverse district.

    Notably, Assm. Berman’s office was named in a workplace-harassment complaint that was made by a former staffer in 2022. The complaint alleged that a supervisor in his Los Altos office consistently made sex-based comments and advances toward female staffers, and provided preferential support to one female member of the staff. Assm. Berman made no staffing changes as a result of the complaint, and has failed to publicly work toward reforming the state legislative workplace-complaint process. Voters should continue to work to hold him accountable for any failures in leadership related to this or other incidents. 

    Progressive endorsements: Assm. Berman has the endorsement of some progressive groups, including Equality California, California Environmental Voters, and SEIU-United Healthcare Workers West. 

    Top issues: Education and STEM programs, firearm and weapons safety, election access and security, health care, and environmental protections

    Priority bills: This year, Assm. Berman’s priorities for AD-23 have included 27 bills about election security, firearm safety, education, and housing and lodging. Of these, 18 have been successfully chaptered into law, and the rest remain in committee. He has sponsored and passed legislation to add academic criteria to the qualification standards for Cal Grant, humanize the language used in the California Uniform Controlled Substances Act, and expand the number of labs eligible to process COVID-19 tests. He scores a CS of 93 out of 100 on Courage Score, our annual analysis of legislators’ progressive voting records. Based on our Courage Score analysis, Assm. Berman has supported the most progressive bills that made it to a vote. That said, Assm. Berman has failed to cast a vote on some critical legislation, including bills to establish the California Housing Authority, create emissions and pollution accountability for corporations, strengthen eviction protections for tenants, and support post-incarceration employment opportunities. Additionally, he failed to support AB1505, which would empower local districts to evaluate charter-school applications based on economic-impact criteria. This is not surprising, considering he has previously accepted campaign donations from California Charter Schools Association Advocates for Great Public Schools. Assemblymember Berman also voted to support AB 1366, which would eliminate critical oversight of telecom companies. He has accepted campaign donations from AT&T Inc, one of the largest telecom providers.

    Committee leadership/membership: Assm. Berman currently sits on four committees, including Governmental Organization, Insurance, and Transportation. He serves as chair of the Standing Committee on Business and Professions, and the Select Committee on the Master Plan for Higher Education in California. Assm. Berman is also a member of the California Legislative Progressive Caucus and the California Legislative Jewish Caucus.

    Governance and community leadership experience: Assm. Berman has served in this assembly seat since 2016, when he was elected with over 54% of the vote. In 2022, he won his re-election against a Republican challenger by 46 points.

    Prior to his election to the State Assembly, Assm. Berman served as an elected member of the Palo Alto City Council, supporting significant improvements to the city’s infrastructure and public safety. Assm. Berman is a longtime supporter of voting rights and reform. During law school, he worked as a summer analyst with the Voting Section of the Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division, and was an author of the Assembly bill that made California a permanent vote-by-mail state. 

    Other background: Assm. Berman is from Palo Alto. Prior to his public service, he was an attorney in private practice and worked with the Silicon Valley Education Foundation, a STEM-focused nonprofit organization. 


    The Race


    Primary election: There are four candidates running in the March 5 primary, including Assm. Marc Berman (D), Lydia Kou (D), Allan Marson (R), and Gus Mattammal (R). The top two vote recipients will advance to the general election on November 5.

    Candidate fundraising and pledges: Assm. Berman’s campaign has raised $557,000 as of December 2023, and is not funded by police interests.

    Opposing candidate: Democrat Lydia Kou
    Opposing candidate’s fundraising and pledges: Kou’s campaign has raised $64,000 as of December 2023, and is funded primarily by individual donors.

    Opposing candidate: Republican Gus Mattammal
    Opposing candidate’s fundraising and pledges: Mattammal’s campaign has raised $22,000 as of December 2023, and is funded by individual donors.


    The District


    Counties in district: California’s 23rd Assembly District includes parts of Santa Clara and San Mateo Counties.

    Voter registration: 54% Democrat, 14% Republican, and 28% No Party Preference. Prior to redistricting, Republicans typically held this seat. It has been held by democratic Assm. Marc Berman since 2022. 

    District demographics: 9% Latino, 27% Asian, and 2% Black. 

    Recent election results: AD-23 voted for Joe Biden for president in 2020 by 59 points and Gavin Newsom for governor in 2022 by 50 points.


    The Position


    State assemblymembers represent and advocate for the needs of their district constituents at the California State Capitol. They are responsible for creating, debating, and voting on legislation that addresses issues within their district.

    The California State Assembly has 80 districts. Each represents a population of at least 465,000 Californians. Representatives are elected to the Assembly for a two-year term. Every two years, all 80 seats are subject to election. Members elected before 2012 are restricted to three two-year terms (six years) in the Assembly. Those elected in or after 2012 are allowed to serve 12 years total across both the state Senate or Assembly. This term, Democrats currently hold a three-quarters supermajority of 60 seats in the California State Assembly, while Republicans hold 19 seats and one seat is held by an Independent.


    Marc Berman

    Re-elect Assemblymember Marc Berman to keep AD-23 on the right track for progress. 



    Assm. Marc Berman’s track record and policy positions demonstrate that he will continue to be a representative voice for the constituents of AD-23 and will govern effectively in the best interests of this diverse district.

    Notably, Assm. Berman’s office was named in a workplace-harassment complaint that was made by a former staffer in 2022. The complaint alleged that a supervisor in his Los Altos office consistently made sex-based comments and advances toward female staffers, and provided preferential support to one female member of the staff. Assm. Berman made no staffing changes as a result of the complaint, and has failed to publicly work toward reforming the state legislative workplace-complaint process. Voters should continue to work to hold him accountable for any failures in leadership related to this or other incidents. 

    Progressive endorsements: Assm. Berman has the endorsement of some progressive groups, including Equality California, California Environmental Voters, and SEIU-United Healthcare Workers West. 

    Top issues: Education and STEM programs, firearm and weapons safety, election access and security, health care, and environmental protections

    Priority bills: This year, Assm. Berman’s priorities for AD-23 have included 27 bills about election security, firearm safety, education, and housing and lodging. Of these, 18 have been successfully chaptered into law, and the rest remain in committee. He has sponsored and passed legislation to add academic criteria to the qualification standards for Cal Grant, humanize the language used in the California Uniform Controlled Substances Act, and expand the number of labs eligible to process COVID-19 tests. He scores a CS of 93 out of 100 on Courage Score, our annual analysis of legislators’ progressive voting records. Based on our Courage Score analysis, Assm. Berman has supported the most progressive bills that made it to a vote. That said, Assm. Berman has failed to cast a vote on some critical legislation, including bills to establish the California Housing Authority, create emissions and pollution accountability for corporations, strengthen eviction protections for tenants, and support post-incarceration employment opportunities. Additionally, he failed to support AB1505, which would empower local districts to evaluate charter-school applications based on economic-impact criteria. This is not surprising, considering he has previously accepted campaign donations from California Charter Schools Association Advocates for Great Public Schools. Assemblymember Berman also voted to support AB 1366, which would eliminate critical oversight of telecom companies. He has accepted campaign donations from AT&T Inc, one of the largest telecom providers.

    Committee leadership/membership: Assm. Berman currently sits on four committees, including Governmental Organization, Insurance, and Transportation. He serves as chair of the Standing Committee on Business and Professions, and the Select Committee on the Master Plan for Higher Education in California. Assm. Berman is also a member of the California Legislative Progressive Caucus and the California Legislative Jewish Caucus.

    Governance and community leadership experience: Assm. Berman has served in this assembly seat since 2016, when he was elected with over 54% of the vote. In 2022, he won his re-election against a Republican challenger by 46 points.

    Prior to his election to the State Assembly, Assm. Berman served as an elected member of the Palo Alto City Council, supporting significant improvements to the city’s infrastructure and public safety. Assm. Berman is a longtime supporter of voting rights and reform. During law school, he worked as a summer analyst with the Voting Section of the Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division, and was an author of the Assembly bill that made California a permanent vote-by-mail state. 

    Other background: Assm. Berman is from Palo Alto. Prior to his public service, he was an attorney in private practice and worked with the Silicon Valley Education Foundation, a STEM-focused nonprofit organization. 


    The Race


    Primary election: There are four candidates running in the March 5 primary, including Assm. Marc Berman (D), Lydia Kou (D), Allan Marson (R), and Gus Mattammal (R). The top two vote recipients will advance to the general election on November 5.

    Candidate fundraising and pledges: Assm. Berman’s campaign has raised $557,000 as of December 2023, and is not funded by police interests.

    Opposing candidate: Democrat Lydia Kou
    Opposing candidate’s fundraising and pledges: Kou’s campaign has raised $64,000 as of December 2023, and is funded primarily by individual donors.

    Opposing candidate: Republican Gus Mattammal
    Opposing candidate’s fundraising and pledges: Mattammal’s campaign has raised $22,000 as of December 2023, and is funded by individual donors.


    The District


    Counties in district: California’s 23rd Assembly District includes parts of Santa Clara and San Mateo Counties.

    Voter registration: 54% Democrat, 14% Republican, and 28% No Party Preference. Prior to redistricting, Republicans typically held this seat. It has been held by democratic Assm. Marc Berman since 2022. 

    District demographics: 9% Latino, 27% Asian, and 2% Black. 

    Recent election results: AD-23 voted for Joe Biden for president in 2020 by 59 points and Gavin Newsom for governor in 2022 by 50 points.


    The Position


    State assemblymembers represent and advocate for the needs of their district constituents at the California State Capitol. They are responsible for creating, debating, and voting on legislation that addresses issues within their district.

    The California State Assembly has 80 districts. Each represents a population of at least 465,000 Californians. Representatives are elected to the Assembly for a two-year term. Every two years, all 80 seats are subject to election. Members elected before 2012 are restricted to three two-year terms (six years) in the Assembly. Those elected in or after 2012 are allowed to serve 12 years total across both the state Senate or Assembly. This term, Democrats currently hold a three-quarters supermajority of 60 seats in the California State Assembly, while Republicans hold 19 seats and one seat is held by an Independent.


    Marc Berman

    Re-elect Assemblymember Marc Berman to keep AD-23 on the right track for progress. 



    Assm. Marc Berman’s track record and policy positions demonstrate that he will continue to be a representative voice for the constituents of AD-23 and will govern effectively in the best interests of this diverse district.

    Notably, Assm. Berman’s office was named in a workplace-harassment complaint that was made by a former staffer in 2022. The complaint alleged that a supervisor in his Los Altos office consistently made sex-based comments and advances toward female staffers, and provided preferential support to one female member of the staff. Assm. Berman made no staffing changes as a result of the complaint, and has failed to publicly work toward reforming the state legislative workplace-complaint process. Voters should continue to work to hold him accountable for any failures in leadership related to this or other incidents. 

    Progressive endorsements: Assm. Berman has the endorsement of some progressive groups, including Equality California, California Environmental Voters, and SEIU-United Healthcare Workers West. 

    Top issues: Education and STEM programs, firearm and weapons safety, election access and security, health care, and environmental protections

    Priority bills: This year, Assm. Berman’s priorities for AD-23 have included 27 bills about election security, firearm safety, education, and housing and lodging. Of these, 18 have been successfully chaptered into law, and the rest remain in committee. He has sponsored and passed legislation to add academic criteria to the qualification standards for Cal Grant, humanize the language used in the California Uniform Controlled Substances Act, and expand the number of labs eligible to process COVID-19 tests. He scores a CS of 93 out of 100 on Courage Score, our annual analysis of legislators’ progressive voting records. Based on our Courage Score analysis, Assm. Berman has supported the most progressive bills that made it to a vote. That said, Assm. Berman has failed to cast a vote on some critical legislation, including bills to establish the California Housing Authority, create emissions and pollution accountability for corporations, strengthen eviction protections for tenants, and support post-incarceration employment opportunities. Additionally, he failed to support AB1505, which would empower local districts to evaluate charter-school applications based on economic-impact criteria. This is not surprising, considering he has previously accepted campaign donations from California Charter Schools Association Advocates for Great Public Schools. Assemblymember Berman also voted to support AB 1366, which would eliminate critical oversight of telecom companies. He has accepted campaign donations from AT&T Inc, one of the largest telecom providers.

    Committee leadership/membership: Assm. Berman currently sits on four committees, including Governmental Organization, Insurance, and Transportation. He serves as chair of the Standing Committee on Business and Professions, and the Select Committee on the Master Plan for Higher Education in California. Assm. Berman is also a member of the California Legislative Progressive Caucus and the California Legislative Jewish Caucus.

    Governance and community leadership experience: Assm. Berman has served in this assembly seat since 2016, when he was elected with over 54% of the vote. In 2022, he won his re-election against a Republican challenger by 46 points.

    Prior to his election to the State Assembly, Assm. Berman served as an elected member of the Palo Alto City Council, supporting significant improvements to the city’s infrastructure and public safety. Assm. Berman is a longtime supporter of voting rights and reform. During law school, he worked as a summer analyst with the Voting Section of the Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division, and was an author of the Assembly bill that made California a permanent vote-by-mail state. 

    Other background: Assm. Berman is from Palo Alto. Prior to his public service, he was an attorney in private practice and worked with the Silicon Valley Education Foundation, a STEM-focused nonprofit organization. 


    The Race


    Primary election: There are four candidates running in the March 5 primary, including Assm. Marc Berman (D), Lydia Kou (D), Allan Marson (R), and Gus Mattammal (R). The top two vote recipients will advance to the general election on November 5.

    Candidate fundraising and pledges: Assm. Berman’s campaign has raised $557,000 as of December 2023, and is not funded by police interests.

    Opposing candidate: Democrat Lydia Kou
    Opposing candidate’s fundraising and pledges: Kou’s campaign has raised $64,000 as of December 2023, and is funded primarily by individual donors.

    Opposing candidate: Republican Gus Mattammal
    Opposing candidate’s fundraising and pledges: Mattammal’s campaign has raised $22,000 as of December 2023, and is funded by individual donors.


    The District


    Counties in district: California’s 23rd Assembly District includes parts of Santa Clara and San Mateo Counties.

    Voter registration: 54% Democrat, 14% Republican, and 28% No Party Preference. Prior to redistricting, Republicans typically held this seat. It has been held by democratic Assm. Marc Berman since 2022. 

    District demographics: 9% Latino, 27% Asian, and 2% Black. 

    Recent election results: AD-23 voted for Joe Biden for president in 2020 by 59 points and Gavin Newsom for governor in 2022 by 50 points.


    The Position


    State assemblymembers represent and advocate for the needs of their district constituents at the California State Capitol. They are responsible for creating, debating, and voting on legislation that addresses issues within their district.

    The California State Assembly has 80 districts. Each represents a population of at least 465,000 Californians. Representatives are elected to the Assembly for a two-year term. Every two years, all 80 seats are subject to election. Members elected before 2012 are restricted to three two-year terms (six years) in the Assembly. Those elected in or after 2012 are allowed to serve 12 years total across both the state Senate or Assembly. This term, Democrats currently hold a three-quarters supermajority of 60 seats in the California State Assembly, while Republicans hold 19 seats and one seat is held by an Independent.


State Senate

Depending on where you live, you may have one of the below State Senate races on your ballot.

  • Scott Wiener

    Re-elect State Senator Scott Wiener to keep SD-11 on the right track for progress. 


    Scott Wiener

    Re-elect State Senator Scott Wiener to keep SD-11 on the right track for progress. 


    Scott Wiener

    Re-elect State Senator Scott Wiener to keep SD-11 on the right track for progress. 


    Scott Wiener

    Re-elect State Senator Scott Wiener to keep SD-11 on the right track for progress. 


  • Josh Becker

    Re-elect State Senator Josh Becker to keep SD-13 on the right track for progress. 


    Josh Becker

    Re-elect State Senator Josh Becker to keep SD-13 on the right track for progress. 


    Josh Becker

    Re-elect State Senator Josh Becker to keep SD-13 on the right track for progress. 


    Josh Becker

    Re-elect State Senator Josh Becker to keep SD-13 on the right track for progress. 


Depending on where you live, you may have the below county-districted races on your ballot.

  • Lisa Gauthier

    Elect Lisa Gauthier to put San Mateo County on the right track for progress. 



    Lisa Gauthier’s track record and policy positions demonstrate that she will be a progressive voice for the constituents of San Mateo County and will govern effectively in the best interests of this diverse district.

    Progressive endorsements: Gauthier has the endorsement of some progressive groups, including Planned Parenthood Advocates Mar Monte, SEIU Local 521, and Reach Coalition Ally. She has also received the endorsement of many elected leaders, including State Controller Malia Cohen, Rep. Anna Eshoo, State Sen. Josh Becker, State Sen. Aisha Wahab, and three members of the San Mateo County Board of Supervisors. 

    Electoral history: Gauthier won her race for East Palo Alto City Council in 2012 after earning over 15% of the vote. She has been reelected twice, in 2016 and 2020, when she earned 29% of the vote and 17% of the vote, respectively.  

    Top issues: Public safety, access to affordable health care, homelessness and affordable housing, climate change, and social equity.

    Governance and community leadership experience: Gauthier is a member of the East Palo Alto City Council, which she does to provide strong leadership on the issues facing her community. She recently completed her third term as mayor, and has been instrumental in supporting the development of a 185 unit housing development on Bayshore Road that opened last year. In addition to her public role, Gauthier serves as a senior vice president for Silicon Valley Leadership Group, where she supports initiatives related to workforce development, education, racial equity, and health-care policy. 

    Other background: Gauthnier is a lifelong resident of East Palo Alto. She returned to school as an adult learner and obtained her bachelor’s degree while serving as mayor of East Palo Alto in 2019.


    The Race


    Primary election: There are five candidates running in the nonpartisan March 5 primary, including Lisa Gauthier, Antonio Lopez, Celeste Brevard, Paul Bocanegra, and Maggie Cornejo. The top two vote recipients will advance to the general election on November 5, unless one candidate receives more than 50% of the vote and wins outright in the primary.

    Candidate fundraising and pledges: Gauthier’s campaign has raised $40,000 as of December 2023, and is not funded by police, corporate PAC, fossil fuel, or real estate interests.

    Opposing candidate: Antonio Lopez
    Opposing candidate’s fundraising and pledges: Lopez’s campaign has raised $14,000 as of December 2023, and is not funded by police, corporate PAC, fossil fuel, or real estate interests.

    Opposing candidate: Paul Bocanegra
    Opposing candidate’s fundraising and pledges: Bocanegra’s campaign has raised $4,000 as of December 2023, and is not funded by police, corporate PAC, fossil fuel, or real estate interests.

    Opposing candidate: Maggie Cornejo
    Opposing candidate’s fundraising and pledges: Cornejo’s campaign has raised $1,000 as of December 2023, and is not funded by police, corporate PAC, fossil fuel, or real estate interests.


    The District


    County: San Mateo County is California’s 15th most populous county. District 4 includes Redwood City, East Palo Alto, Menlo Park, and unincorporated areas. 

    Governance structure: San Mateo County’s Board of Supervisors oversees the needs of 750,000 people and manages an estimated budget of $4.4 billion annually. According to the County Charter, San Mateo County is governed by the five-person Board of Supervisors and a county executive, who acts as their agent.


    The Position


    Each of the 58 counties in California is governed by a five-person Board of Supervisors. A Board of Supervisors has legislative and executive power to manage county services and resources, including courts, jails, public health, and public lands. They also have quasi-judicial powers, which gives them the right to hold hearings, conduct investigations, and make decisions in a manner similar to judicial courts. Laws passed by Boards of Supervisors are generally called ordinances. Because counties include both incorporated cities, which are administered by their own city councils, and unincorporated areas, which are directly administered by the county, ordinances may or may not apply in different areas of the county. Supervisors are typically ‎limited to 3 terms, or 12 years in office total. 


    Lisa Gauthier

    Elect Lisa Gauthier to put San Mateo County on the right track for progress. 



    Lisa Gauthier’s track record and policy positions demonstrate that she will be a progressive voice for the constituents of San Mateo County and will govern effectively in the best interests of this diverse district.

    Progressive endorsements: Gauthier has the endorsement of some progressive groups, including Planned Parenthood Advocates Mar Monte, SEIU Local 521, and Reach Coalition Ally. She has also received the endorsement of many elected leaders, including State Controller Malia Cohen, Rep. Anna Eshoo, State Sen. Josh Becker, State Sen. Aisha Wahab, and three members of the San Mateo County Board of Supervisors. 

    Electoral history: Gauthier won her race for East Palo Alto City Council in 2012 after earning over 15% of the vote. She has been reelected twice, in 2016 and 2020, when she earned 29% of the vote and 17% of the vote, respectively.  

    Top issues: Public safety, access to affordable health care, homelessness and affordable housing, climate change, and social equity.

    Governance and community leadership experience: Gauthier is a member of the East Palo Alto City Council, which she does to provide strong leadership on the issues facing her community. She recently completed her third term as mayor, and has been instrumental in supporting the development of a 185 unit housing development on Bayshore Road that opened last year. In addition to her public role, Gauthier serves as a senior vice president for Silicon Valley Leadership Group, where she supports initiatives related to workforce development, education, racial equity, and health-care policy. 

    Other background: Gauthnier is a lifelong resident of East Palo Alto. She returned to school as an adult learner and obtained her bachelor’s degree while serving as mayor of East Palo Alto in 2019.


    The Race


    Primary election: There are five candidates running in the nonpartisan March 5 primary, including Lisa Gauthier, Antonio Lopez, Celeste Brevard, Paul Bocanegra, and Maggie Cornejo. The top two vote recipients will advance to the general election on November 5, unless one candidate receives more than 50% of the vote and wins outright in the primary.

    Candidate fundraising and pledges: Gauthier’s campaign has raised $40,000 as of December 2023, and is not funded by police, corporate PAC, fossil fuel, or real estate interests.

    Opposing candidate: Antonio Lopez
    Opposing candidate’s fundraising and pledges: Lopez’s campaign has raised $14,000 as of December 2023, and is not funded by police, corporate PAC, fossil fuel, or real estate interests.

    Opposing candidate: Paul Bocanegra
    Opposing candidate’s fundraising and pledges: Bocanegra’s campaign has raised $4,000 as of December 2023, and is not funded by police, corporate PAC, fossil fuel, or real estate interests.

    Opposing candidate: Maggie Cornejo
    Opposing candidate’s fundraising and pledges: Cornejo’s campaign has raised $1,000 as of December 2023, and is not funded by police, corporate PAC, fossil fuel, or real estate interests.


    The District


    County: San Mateo County is California’s 15th most populous county. District 4 includes Redwood City, East Palo Alto, Menlo Park, and unincorporated areas. 

    Governance structure: San Mateo County’s Board of Supervisors oversees the needs of 750,000 people and manages an estimated budget of $4.4 billion annually. According to the County Charter, San Mateo County is governed by the five-person Board of Supervisors and a county executive, who acts as their agent.


    The Position


    Each of the 58 counties in California is governed by a five-person Board of Supervisors. A Board of Supervisors has legislative and executive power to manage county services and resources, including courts, jails, public health, and public lands. They also have quasi-judicial powers, which gives them the right to hold hearings, conduct investigations, and make decisions in a manner similar to judicial courts. Laws passed by Boards of Supervisors are generally called ordinances. Because counties include both incorporated cities, which are administered by their own city councils, and unincorporated areas, which are directly administered by the county, ordinances may or may not apply in different areas of the county. Supervisors are typically ‎limited to 3 terms, or 12 years in office total. 


    Lisa Gauthier

    Elect Lisa Gauthier to put San Mateo County on the right track for progress. 



    Lisa Gauthier’s track record and policy positions demonstrate that she will be a progressive voice for the constituents of San Mateo County and will govern effectively in the best interests of this diverse district.

    Progressive endorsements: Gauthier has the endorsement of some progressive groups, including Planned Parenthood Advocates Mar Monte, SEIU Local 521, and Reach Coalition Ally. She has also received the endorsement of many elected leaders, including State Controller Malia Cohen, Rep. Anna Eshoo, State Sen. Josh Becker, State Sen. Aisha Wahab, and three members of the San Mateo County Board of Supervisors. 

    Electoral history: Gauthier won her race for East Palo Alto City Council in 2012 after earning over 15% of the vote. She has been reelected twice, in 2016 and 2020, when she earned 29% of the vote and 17% of the vote, respectively.  

    Top issues: Public safety, access to affordable health care, homelessness and affordable housing, climate change, and social equity.

    Governance and community leadership experience: Gauthier is a member of the East Palo Alto City Council, which she does to provide strong leadership on the issues facing her community. She recently completed her third term as mayor, and has been instrumental in supporting the development of a 185 unit housing development on Bayshore Road that opened last year. In addition to her public role, Gauthier serves as a senior vice president for Silicon Valley Leadership Group, where she supports initiatives related to workforce development, education, racial equity, and health-care policy. 

    Other background: Gauthnier is a lifelong resident of East Palo Alto. She returned to school as an adult learner and obtained her bachelor’s degree while serving as mayor of East Palo Alto in 2019.


    The Race


    Primary election: There are five candidates running in the nonpartisan March 5 primary, including Lisa Gauthier, Antonio Lopez, Celeste Brevard, Paul Bocanegra, and Maggie Cornejo. The top two vote recipients will advance to the general election on November 5, unless one candidate receives more than 50% of the vote and wins outright in the primary.

    Candidate fundraising and pledges: Gauthier’s campaign has raised $40,000 as of December 2023, and is not funded by police, corporate PAC, fossil fuel, or real estate interests.

    Opposing candidate: Antonio Lopez
    Opposing candidate’s fundraising and pledges: Lopez’s campaign has raised $14,000 as of December 2023, and is not funded by police, corporate PAC, fossil fuel, or real estate interests.

    Opposing candidate: Paul Bocanegra
    Opposing candidate’s fundraising and pledges: Bocanegra’s campaign has raised $4,000 as of December 2023, and is not funded by police, corporate PAC, fossil fuel, or real estate interests.

    Opposing candidate: Maggie Cornejo
    Opposing candidate’s fundraising and pledges: Cornejo’s campaign has raised $1,000 as of December 2023, and is not funded by police, corporate PAC, fossil fuel, or real estate interests.


    The District


    County: San Mateo County is California’s 15th most populous county. District 4 includes Redwood City, East Palo Alto, Menlo Park, and unincorporated areas. 

    Governance structure: San Mateo County’s Board of Supervisors oversees the needs of 750,000 people and manages an estimated budget of $4.4 billion annually. According to the County Charter, San Mateo County is governed by the five-person Board of Supervisors and a county executive, who acts as their agent.


    The Position


    Each of the 58 counties in California is governed by a five-person Board of Supervisors. A Board of Supervisors has legislative and executive power to manage county services and resources, including courts, jails, public health, and public lands. They also have quasi-judicial powers, which gives them the right to hold hearings, conduct investigations, and make decisions in a manner similar to judicial courts. Laws passed by Boards of Supervisors are generally called ordinances. Because counties include both incorporated cities, which are administered by their own city councils, and unincorporated areas, which are directly administered by the county, ordinances may or may not apply in different areas of the county. Supervisors are typically ‎limited to 3 terms, or 12 years in office total. 


    Lisa Gauthier

    Elect Lisa Gauthier to put San Mateo County on the right track for progress. 



    Lisa Gauthier’s track record and policy positions demonstrate that she will be a progressive voice for the constituents of San Mateo County and will govern effectively in the best interests of this diverse district.

    Progressive endorsements: Gauthier has the endorsement of some progressive groups, including Planned Parenthood Advocates Mar Monte, SEIU Local 521, and Reach Coalition Ally. She has also received the endorsement of many elected leaders, including State Controller Malia Cohen, Rep. Anna Eshoo, State Sen. Josh Becker, State Sen. Aisha Wahab, and three members of the San Mateo County Board of Supervisors. 

    Electoral history: Gauthier won her race for East Palo Alto City Council in 2012 after earning over 15% of the vote. She has been reelected twice, in 2016 and 2020, when she earned 29% of the vote and 17% of the vote, respectively.  

    Top issues: Public safety, access to affordable health care, homelessness and affordable housing, climate change, and social equity.

    Governance and community leadership experience: Gauthier is a member of the East Palo Alto City Council, which she does to provide strong leadership on the issues facing her community. She recently completed her third term as mayor, and has been instrumental in supporting the development of a 185 unit housing development on Bayshore Road that opened last year. In addition to her public role, Gauthier serves as a senior vice president for Silicon Valley Leadership Group, where she supports initiatives related to workforce development, education, racial equity, and health-care policy. 

    Other background: Gauthnier is a lifelong resident of East Palo Alto. She returned to school as an adult learner and obtained her bachelor’s degree while serving as mayor of East Palo Alto in 2019.


    The Race


    Primary election: There are five candidates running in the nonpartisan March 5 primary, including Lisa Gauthier, Antonio Lopez, Celeste Brevard, Paul Bocanegra, and Maggie Cornejo. The top two vote recipients will advance to the general election on November 5, unless one candidate receives more than 50% of the vote and wins outright in the primary.

    Candidate fundraising and pledges: Gauthier’s campaign has raised $40,000 as of December 2023, and is not funded by police, corporate PAC, fossil fuel, or real estate interests.

    Opposing candidate: Antonio Lopez
    Opposing candidate’s fundraising and pledges: Lopez’s campaign has raised $14,000 as of December 2023, and is not funded by police, corporate PAC, fossil fuel, or real estate interests.

    Opposing candidate: Paul Bocanegra
    Opposing candidate’s fundraising and pledges: Bocanegra’s campaign has raised $4,000 as of December 2023, and is not funded by police, corporate PAC, fossil fuel, or real estate interests.

    Opposing candidate: Maggie Cornejo
    Opposing candidate’s fundraising and pledges: Cornejo’s campaign has raised $1,000 as of December 2023, and is not funded by police, corporate PAC, fossil fuel, or real estate interests.


    The District


    County: San Mateo County is California’s 15th most populous county. District 4 includes Redwood City, East Palo Alto, Menlo Park, and unincorporated areas. 

    Governance structure: San Mateo County’s Board of Supervisors oversees the needs of 750,000 people and manages an estimated budget of $4.4 billion annually. According to the County Charter, San Mateo County is governed by the five-person Board of Supervisors and a county executive, who acts as their agent.


    The Position


    Each of the 58 counties in California is governed by a five-person Board of Supervisors. A Board of Supervisors has legislative and executive power to manage county services and resources, including courts, jails, public health, and public lands. They also have quasi-judicial powers, which gives them the right to hold hearings, conduct investigations, and make decisions in a manner similar to judicial courts. Laws passed by Boards of Supervisors are generally called ordinances. Because counties include both incorporated cities, which are administered by their own city councils, and unincorporated areas, which are directly administered by the county, ordinances may or may not apply in different areas of the county. Supervisors are typically ‎limited to 3 terms, or 12 years in office total. 


  • Courage Score: https://couragescore.org
  • No Position

    Vote on Proposition 1

  • Proposition 1 will establish a $6.4 billion bond to fund an increase in the number of treatment beds and housing units the state provides to individuals struggling with mental health and addiction, and to direct counties to reallocate their Mental Health Services Act funding to address the local housing shortage.



    In an effort to address an ongoing housing shortage and addiction crisis in the state, Gov. Gavin Newsom signed two bills—SB326 and AB531—to send a $6.4 billion bond measure to voters in March. This bond would be used to increase capacity in health care and housing across the state by adding 6,800 behavioral health treatment beds, building 4,300 housing units, and creating 26,000 outpatient treatment slots for Californians. Proposition 1 would also require each county to redirect 30% of its Mental Health Services Act funding to housing, including creating new real estate development, and the provision of rental subsidies. Mental Health Services Act funds are raised through a tax on millionaires in the state, and the reallocated portion is expected to total $1 billion annually across the state. Overall, Proposition 1 aims to reduce homelessness and tent encampments, and provide support to individuals who do not have the resources to address behavioral health challenges. 

    Top support for Proposition 1:


    - The legislation that sent Proposition 1 to voters received overwhelming support from the state legislature. SB326 received a unanimous floor vote in the Senate, and earned 68 floor votes in the Assembly. AB531 received 35 floor votes in the Senate, and 66 floor votes in the Assembly. 
    - YES ON 1 has received over $10.7 million in donations, primarily through Yes on Prop 1—Governor Newsom’s Ballot Measure Committee. The committee has received donations from police, fossil fuel, real estate, and corporate PAC interests, including from California Correctional Peace Officers Association Truth in American Government Fund, AirBnB, Google, and PG&E. 
    - Gov. Gavin Newsom has enthusiastically supported Proposition 1, arguing that the establishment of more treatment options and housing units has the potential to have a significant impact on marginalized populations within the state over time, and is a humane approach to this ongoing public health crisis. 

    Top opposition to Proposition 1:


    - Groups like Disability Rights California and the League of Women Voters California are concerned that this policy could be interpreted to permit involuntary treatment of mental health and addiction patients in locked facilities. They argue that this aspect of the bill is regressive and is the result of hasty passage, a lack of meaningful legislative debate, and limited input from community groups. Republican activist Carl DeMaio, his conservative PAC Reform California, and the anti-tax Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association are also opposing Proposition 1.
    - Some housing and homeless advocates have criticized Proposition 1’s narrow projected impact on a statewide homeless population that is estimated to include 180,000 people. With over half of the proposed new housing units earmarked for veterans, the number of homeless civilians who will benefit from this program is statistically insignificant.
    - Proposition 1 has raised concerns among opponents—including several counties and county leaders—around its mandate that 30% of county Mental Health Services Act funding be allocated to address local housing shortages. Stripping funding out of this budget line to fund housing programs will disrupt existing and effective county mental health programs, many of which are tailored to serve marginalized local populations, including Indigenous communities, members of the LGBTQIA+ community, and people of color. 

    Proposition 1 will establish a $6.4 billion bond to fund an increase in the number of treatment beds and housing units the state provides to individuals struggling with mental health and addiction, and to direct counties to reallocate their Mental Health Services Act funding to address the local housing shortage.



    In an effort to address an ongoing housing shortage and addiction crisis in the state, Gov. Gavin Newsom signed two bills—SB326 and AB531—to send a $6.4 billion bond measure to voters in March. This bond would be used to increase capacity in health care and housing across the state by adding 6,800 behavioral health treatment beds, building 4,300 housing units, and creating 26,000 outpatient treatment slots for Californians. Proposition 1 would also require each county to redirect 30% of its Mental Health Services Act funding to housing, including creating new real estate development, and the provision of rental subsidies. Mental Health Services Act funds are raised through a tax on millionaires in the state, and the reallocated portion is expected to total $1 billion annually across the state. Overall, Proposition 1 aims to reduce homelessness and tent encampments, and provide support to individuals who do not have the resources to address behavioral health challenges. 

    Top support for Proposition 1:


    - The legislation that sent Proposition 1 to voters received overwhelming support from the state legislature. SB326 received a unanimous floor vote in the Senate, and earned 68 floor votes in the Assembly. AB531 received 35 floor votes in the Senate, and 66 floor votes in the Assembly. 
    - YES ON 1 has received over $10.7 million in donations, primarily through Yes on Prop 1—Governor Newsom’s Ballot Measure Committee. The committee has received donations from police, fossil fuel, real estate, and corporate PAC interests, including from California Correctional Peace Officers Association Truth in American Government Fund, AirBnB, Google, and PG&E. 
    - Gov. Gavin Newsom has enthusiastically supported Proposition 1, arguing that the establishment of more treatment options and housing units has the potential to have a significant impact on marginalized populations within the state over time, and is a humane approach to this ongoing public health crisis. 

    Top opposition to Proposition 1:


    - Groups like Disability Rights California and the League of Women Voters California are concerned that this policy could be interpreted to permit involuntary treatment of mental health and addiction patients in locked facilities. They argue that this aspect of the bill is regressive and is the result of hasty passage, a lack of meaningful legislative debate, and limited input from community groups. Republican activist Carl DeMaio, his conservative PAC Reform California, and the anti-tax Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association are also opposing Proposition 1.
    - Some housing and homeless advocates have criticized Proposition 1’s narrow projected impact on a statewide homeless population that is estimated to include 180,000 people. With over half of the proposed new housing units earmarked for veterans, the number of homeless civilians who will benefit from this program is statistically insignificant.
    - Proposition 1 has raised concerns among opponents—including several counties and county leaders—around its mandate that 30% of county Mental Health Services Act funding be allocated to address local housing shortages. Stripping funding out of this budget line to fund housing programs will disrupt existing and effective county mental health programs, many of which are tailored to serve marginalized local populations, including Indigenous communities, members of the LGBTQIA+ community, and people of color. 

    Proposition 1

    Proposition 1 will establish a $6.4 billion bond to fund an increase in the number of treatment beds and housing units the state provides to individuals struggling with mental health and addiction, and to direct counties to reallocate their Mental Health Services Act funding to address t

    Proposition 1

    Proposition 1 will establish a $6.4 billion bond to fund an increase in the number of treatment beds and housing units the state provides to individuals struggling with mental health and addiction, and to direct counties to reallocate their Mental Health Services Act funding to address t