Skip to main content
  • Democrat

    Scott Chaplin

  • Local Democrat Scott Chaplin is running a last minute write-in campaign for the state House Position 1 seat against far-right conservative Norma Smith, who voted against the freedom to marry for all loving couples. Chaplin, who was elected twice to the city council in his former hometown of Carbondale, Colorado, formerly ran a social justice non-profit that advocates for LGBTQ equality, and is a strong supporter of clean, renewable energy. Also in the race is Libertarian Michael Scott.

    Chaplin deserves your vote.
    Last updated: 2023-04-05

    Scott Chaplin

    Local Democrat Scott Chaplin is running a last minute write-in campaign for the state House Position 1 seat against far-right conservative Norma Smith, who voted against the freedom to marry for all loving couples.

    Local Democrat Scott Chaplin is running a last minute write-in campaign for the state House Position 1 seat against far-right conservative Norma Smith, who voted against the freedom to marry for all loving couples. Chaplin, who was elected twice to the city council in his former hometown of Carbondale, Colorado, formerly ran a social justice non-profit that advocates for LGBTQ equality, and is a strong supporter of clean, renewable energy. Also in the race is Libertarian Michael Scott.

    Chaplin deserves your vote.

    Scott Chaplin

    Local Democrat Scott Chaplin is running a last minute write-in campaign for the state House Position 1 seat against far-right conservative Norma Smith, who voted against the freedom to marry for all loving couples.

  • VOTE YES

    Vote Yes on I-1433: Raise Up Washington

  • No one who works hard and plays by the rules should still struggle to make ends meet. Yet too many working people, particularly women and people of color, work two or three jobs and still have trouble providing basic necessities like food and shelter for their families. Additionally, Washingtonians should be able to take care of themselves or a sick child without losing a paycheck. Initiative 1433 would give all workers the opportunity to earn paid sick and safe leave and raise the state minimum wage to $13.50 over four years. It would also allow counties and cities - like Seattle and Tacoma - to pass stronger measures. When more workers have more money in their pockets, they spend it at local businesses and boost our economy.

    Vote YES on Initiative 1433 to help businesses, workers, and families across Washington thrive.
    Last updated: 2023-04-05
    No one who works hard and plays by the rules should still struggle to make ends meet. Yet too many working people, particularly women and people of color, work two or three jobs and still have trouble providing basic necessities like food and shelter for their families. Additionally, Washingtonians should be able to take care of themselves or a sick child without losing a paycheck. Initiative 1433 would give all workers the opportunity to earn paid sick and safe leave and raise the state minimum wage to $13.50 over four years. It would also allow counties and cities - like Seattle and Tacoma - to pass stronger measures. When more workers have more money in their pockets, they spend it at local businesses and boost our economy.

    Vote YES on Initiative 1433 to help businesses, workers, and families across Washington thrive.
    No one who works hard and plays by the rules should still struggle to make ends meet. Yet too many working people, particularly women and people of color, work two or three jobs and still have trouble providing basic necessities like food and shelter for their families. Additionally, Washingtonians should be able to take care of themselves or a sick child without losing a paycheck. Initiative 1433 would give all workers the opportunity to earn paid sick and safe leave and raise the state minimum wage to $13.50 over four years. It would also allow counties and cities - like Seattle and Tacoma - to pass stronger measures. When more workers have more money in their pockets, they spend it at local businesses and boost our economy.

    Vote YES on Initiative 1433 to help businesses, workers, and families across Washington thrive.

    Initiative 1433

    No one who works hard and plays by the rules should still struggle to make ends meet. Yet too many working people, particularly women and people of color, work two or three jobs and still have trouble providing basic necessities like food and shelter for their families. Additionally, Washingtonians should be able to take care of themselves or a sick child without losing a paycheck. Initiative 1433 would give all workers the opportunity to earn paid sick and safe leave and raise the state minimum wage to $13.50 over four years.

  • VOTE YES

    Vote YES to Limit Big Money in Politics

  • Initiative 1464, known as Integrity Washington, aims to give ordinary people a stronger voice in our government. I-1464 prohibits lobbyists and government contractors from making big contributions to the candidates they are trying to influence. Notably, I-1464 also features an innovative public financing system that will allow candidates to focus their campaigning and fundraising on ordinary voters rather than the wealthy and well-funded special interests. Modeled in part after “Honest Elections Seattle,” it would give each voter $150 in "Democracy credits" to contribute to candidates of their choice. I-1464 also strengthens enforcement of our existing campaign finance laws. The reforms are mostly funded by repealing a tax loophole for out-of-state shoppers.

    While we strongly support the goals of this initiative, we have some concerns about the details and the potential for unintended consequences that undermine the initiative’s goals. For example, there are concerns that the limits on contributions to candidates will shift more money into attack ads funded by hidden donors, and that it would have been wiser to wait until the similar measure in Seattle had been implemented to work out any problems. If voters approve I-1464, we hope the initiative backers will work closely with state officials to clarify the language and engage more people in the process.

    Despite these issues, we believe that the influence of money in our elections is one of the biggest problems facing our democracy, and that it’s past time to take action. Vote YES on Initiative 1464 to move Washington forward in testing new approaches to limiting the influence of big money on politics.
    Last updated: 2023-04-05
    Initiative 1464, known as Integrity Washington, aims to give ordinary people a stronger voice in our government. I-1464 prohibits lobbyists and government contractors from making big contributions to the candidates they are trying to influence. Notably, I-1464 also features an innovative public financing system that will allow candidates to focus their campaigning and fundraising on ordinary voters rather than the wealthy and well-funded special interests. Modeled in part after “Honest Elections Seattle,” it would give each voter $150 in "Democracy credits" to contribute to candidates of their choice. I-1464 also strengthens enforcement of our existing campaign finance laws. The reforms are mostly funded by repealing a tax loophole for out-of-state shoppers.

    While we strongly support the goals of this initiative, we have some concerns about the details and the potential for unintended consequences that undermine the initiative’s goals. For example, there are concerns that the limits on contributions to candidates will shift more money into attack ads funded by hidden donors, and that it would have been wiser to wait until the similar measure in Seattle had been implemented to work out any problems. If voters approve I-1464, we hope the initiative backers will work closely with state officials to clarify the language and engage more people in the process.

    Despite these issues, we believe that the influence of money in our elections is one of the biggest problems facing our democracy, and that it’s past time to take action. Vote YES on Initiative 1464 to move Washington forward in testing new approaches to limiting the influence of big money on politics.
    Initiative 1464, known as Integrity Washington, aims to give ordinary people a stronger voice in our government. I-1464 prohibits lobbyists and government contractors from making big contributions to the candidates they are trying to influence. Notably, I-1464 also features an innovative public financing system that will allow candidates to focus their campaigning and fundraising on ordinary voters rather than the wealthy and well-funded special interests. Modeled in part after “Honest Elections Seattle,” it would give each voter $150 in "Democracy credits" to contribute to candidates of their choice. I-1464 also strengthens enforcement of our existing campaign finance laws. The reforms are mostly funded by repealing a tax loophole for out-of-state shoppers.

    While we strongly support the goals of this initiative, we have some concerns about the details and the potential for unintended consequences that undermine the initiative’s goals. For example, there are concerns that the limits on contributions to candidates will shift more money into attack ads funded by hidden donors, and that it would have been wiser to wait until the similar measure in Seattle had been implemented to work out any problems. If voters approve I-1464, we hope the initiative backers will work closely with state officials to clarify the language and engage more people in the process.

    Despite these issues, we believe that the influence of money in our elections is one of the biggest problems facing our democracy, and that it’s past time to take action. Vote YES on Initiative 1464 to move Washington forward in testing new approaches to limiting the influence of big money on politics.

    Initiative 1464: Integrity Washington

    Initiative 1464, known as Integrity Washington, aims to give ordinary people a stronger voice in our government. I-1464 prohibits lobbyists and government contractors from making big contributions to the candidates they are trying to influence. Notably, I-1464 also features an innovative public financing system that will allow candidates to focus their campaigning and fundraising on ordinary voters rather than the wealthy and well-funded special interests.

  • Endorsed By League of Women Voters, Young Democrats of Washington, Economic Opportunity Institute, Sightline Institute, and many county and district Democratic organizations.
  • VOTE YES

    Vote Yes To Keep Families Safe

  • I-1491 allows families and law enforcement to ask a judge for an Extreme Risk Protection Order that temporarily removes firearms from individuals showing a demonstrated risk of violent behavior. The vast majority of people who commit a mass shooting or suicide show signs of their intentions. Families are often the first to see those signs, but under our current laws they are often powerless to remove firearms from individuals who display violent intentions. Initiative 1491 will empower families to prevent tragedies by temporarily removing firearms from people who are a danger to themselves or others.

    Vote YES on I-1491 to keep our communities safe and help prevent more tragedies from gun violence.
    Last updated: 2023-04-05
    I-1491 allows families and law enforcement to ask a judge for an Extreme Risk Protection Order that temporarily removes firearms from individuals showing a demonstrated risk of violent behavior. The vast majority of people who commit a mass shooting or suicide show signs of their intentions. Families are often the first to see those signs, but under our current laws they are often powerless to remove firearms from individuals who display violent intentions. Initiative 1491 will empower families to prevent tragedies by temporarily removing firearms from people who are a danger to themselves or others.

    Vote YES on I-1491 to keep our communities safe and help prevent more tragedies from gun violence.
    I-1491 allows families and law enforcement to ask a judge for an Extreme Risk Protection Order that temporarily removes firearms from individuals showing a demonstrated risk of violent behavior. The vast majority of people who commit a mass shooting or suicide show signs of their intentions. Families are often the first to see those signs, but under our current laws they are often powerless to remove firearms from individuals who display violent intentions. Initiative 1491 will empower families to prevent tragedies by temporarily removing firearms from people who are a danger to themselves or others.

    Vote YES on I-1491 to keep our communities safe and help prevent more tragedies from gun violence.

    Initiative 1491

    I-1491 allows families and law enforcement to ask a judge for an Extreme Risk Protection Order that temporarily removes firearms from individuals showing a demonstrated risk of violent behavior. The vast majority of people who commit a mass shooting or suicide show signs of their intentions. Families are often the first to see those signs, but under our current laws they are often powerless to remove firearms from individuals who display violent intentions.

  • VOTE YES

    Vote Yes on I-1501 to Prevent Fraud and Protect Seniors

  • When it comes to consumer fraud and identity theft, we are all at risk – but seniors are especially vulnerable. Initiative 1501 will discourage scams and crack down on criminals who prey on the elderly and vulnerable. I-1501 increases penalties for identity theft and fraud and prevents the state from releasing private information about vulnerable people and their in-home caregivers.

    I-1501 also protects the privacy, names, and contact information of home care workers like health care workers and child care providers, which is why the right-wing Freedom Foundation is strongly opposed to this initiative. They have been working to acquire the names and contact information of home health care workers and child care providers as part of a deceptive campaign to destroy unions, and this initiative would prevent them from acquiring that private personal data from the state.

    Vote YES to protect the privacy and safety of seniors and their in-home caregivers.
    Last updated: 2023-04-05
    When it comes to consumer fraud and identity theft, we are all at risk – but seniors are especially vulnerable. Initiative 1501 will discourage scams and crack down on criminals who prey on the elderly and vulnerable. I-1501 increases penalties for identity theft and fraud and prevents the state from releasing private information about vulnerable people and their in-home caregivers.

    I-1501 also protects the privacy, names, and contact information of home care workers like health care workers and child care providers, which is why the right-wing Freedom Foundation is strongly opposed to this initiative. They have been working to acquire the names and contact information of home health care workers and child care providers as part of a deceptive campaign to destroy unions, and this initiative would prevent them from acquiring that private personal data from the state.

    Vote YES to protect the privacy and safety of seniors and their in-home caregivers.
    When it comes to consumer fraud and identity theft, we are all at risk – but seniors are especially vulnerable. Initiative 1501 will discourage scams and crack down on criminals who prey on the elderly and vulnerable. I-1501 increases penalties for identity theft and fraud and prevents the state from releasing private information about vulnerable people and their in-home caregivers.

    I-1501 also protects the privacy, names, and contact information of home care workers like health care workers and child care providers, which is why the right-wing Freedom Foundation is strongly opposed to this initiative. They have been working to acquire the names and contact information of home health care workers and child care providers as part of a deceptive campaign to destroy unions, and this initiative would prevent them from acquiring that private personal data from the state.

    Vote YES to protect the privacy and safety of seniors and their in-home caregivers.

    Initiative 1501

    When it comes to consumer fraud and identity theft, we are all at risk – but seniors are especially vulnerable. Initiative 1501 will discourage scams and crack down on criminals who prey on the elderly and vulnerable. I-1501 increases penalties for identity theft and fraud and prevents the state from releasing private information about vulnerable people and their in-home caregivers.

  • VOTE NO

    Vote NO on I-732

  • Initiative 732 has divided groups committed to fighting climate change. It would reduce carbon pollution by taxing it and cut other taxes by a similar amount. Although it’s well-intended, puts a strong price on carbon emissions, and tackles an incredibly urgent problem, it has some serious flaws that have generated strong opposition from many progressive groups that are committed to reducing carbon pollution. Opponents have several concerns:
    1. Although I-732 is supposed to be revenue neutral, drafters inadvertently created huge additional tax breaks for companies like Boeing so it would cost more than it will bring in. A recent state budget analysis has determined that these tax breaks would cost taxpayers approximately $797 million over six years. As a result, I-732 would blow a giant hole in the state budget at a time when we are already failing to adequately fund schools, health care, and other essential services.
    2. It fails to invest any carbon tax revenue in clean energy sources. Increasing our use of clean energy like solar and wind power is a critical part of fighting climate change, as well as decreasing our use of fossil fuels. In addition, it fails to limit carbon pollution or to enforce the carbon pollution reductions already required by law.
    3. I-732 proponents failed to engage communities of color and workers – the ones disproportionately impacted by climate change -- in developing an approach to provide an economically just transition away from fossil fuels. The result is an initiative that does not adequately address their priorities and faces strong opposition from groups representing communities of color and labor unions.
    I-732 supporters argue the urgency of fighting climate change compels us to act immediately and that we can’t afford to wait for a different proposal. Although we are highly motivated to reduce carbon pollution and appreciate the sentiments of the initiative's supporters, I-732’s flaws are serious enough that we – like most statewide environmental groups - cannot support the proposal.

    We look forward to working with a wide range of advocates to create and pass a stronger plan to fight climate change in the near future.

    Here are some additional sources of information about I-732:


    The Yes on 732 campaign explains their side of the story here: https://yeson732.org/
    Last updated: 2023-04-05
    Initiative 732 has divided groups committed to fighting climate change. It would reduce carbon pollution by taxing it and cut other taxes by a similar amount. Although it’s well-intended, puts a strong price on carbon emissions, and tackles an incredibly urgent problem, it has some serious flaws that have generated strong opposition from many progressive groups that are committed to reducing carbon pollution. Opponents have several concerns:
    1. Although I-732 is supposed to be revenue neutral, drafters inadvertently created huge additional tax breaks for companies like Boeing so it would cost more than it will bring in. A recent state budget analysis has determined that these tax breaks would cost taxpayers approximately $797 million over six years. As a result, I-732 would blow a giant hole in the state budget at a time when we are already failing to adequately fund schools, health care, and other essential services.
    2. It fails to invest any carbon tax revenue in clean energy sources. Increasing our use of clean energy like solar and wind power is a critical part of fighting climate change, as well as decreasing our use of fossil fuels. In addition, it fails to limit carbon pollution or to enforce the carbon pollution reductions already required by law.
    3. I-732 proponents failed to engage communities of color and workers – the ones disproportionately impacted by climate change -- in developing an approach to provide an economically just transition away from fossil fuels. The result is an initiative that does not adequately address their priorities and faces strong opposition from groups representing communities of color and labor unions.
    I-732 supporters argue the urgency of fighting climate change compels us to act immediately and that we can’t afford to wait for a different proposal. Although we are highly motivated to reduce carbon pollution and appreciate the sentiments of the initiative's supporters, I-732’s flaws are serious enough that we – like most statewide environmental groups - cannot support the proposal.

    We look forward to working with a wide range of advocates to create and pass a stronger plan to fight climate change in the near future.

    Here are some additional sources of information about I-732:


    The Yes on 732 campaign explains their side of the story here: https://yeson732.org/
    Initiative 732 has divided groups committed to fighting climate change. It would reduce carbon pollution by taxing it and cut other taxes by a similar amount. Although it’s well-intended, puts a strong price on carbon emissions, and tackles an incredibly urgent problem, it has some serious flaws that have generated strong opposition from many progressive groups that are committed to reducing carbon pollution. Opponents have several concerns:
    1. Although I-732 is supposed to be revenue neutral, drafters inadvertently created huge additional tax breaks for companies like Boeing so it would cost more than it will bring in. A recent state budget analysis has determined that these tax breaks would cost taxpayers approximately $797 million over six years. As a result, I-732 would blow a giant hole in the state budget at a time when we are already failing to adequately fund schools, health care, and other essential services.
    2. It fails to invest any carbon tax revenue in clean energy sources. Increasing our use of clean energy like solar and wind power is a critical part of fighting climate change, as well as decreasing our use of fossil fuels. In addition, it fails to limit carbon pollution or to enforce the carbon pollution reductions already required by law.
    3. I-732 proponents failed to engage communities of color and workers – the ones disproportionately impacted by climate change -- in developing an approach to provide an economically just transition away from fossil fuels. The result is an initiative that does not adequately address their priorities and faces strong opposition from groups representing communities of color and labor unions.
    I-732 supporters argue the urgency of fighting climate change compels us to act immediately and that we can’t afford to wait for a different proposal. Although we are highly motivated to reduce carbon pollution and appreciate the sentiments of the initiative's supporters, I-732’s flaws are serious enough that we – like most statewide environmental groups - cannot support the proposal.

    We look forward to working with a wide range of advocates to create and pass a stronger plan to fight climate change in the near future.

    Here are some additional sources of information about I-732:


    The Yes on 732 campaign explains their side of the story here: https://yeson732.org/
    Initiative 732 has divided groups committed to fighting climate change. It would reduce carbon pollution by taxing it and cut other taxes by a similar amount. Although it’s well-intended, puts a strong price on carbon emissions, and tackles an incredibly urgent problem, it has some serious flaws that have generated strong opposition from many progressive groups that are committed to reducing carbon pollution. Opponents have several concerns:
    1. Although I-732 is supposed to be revenue neutral, drafters inadvertently created huge additional tax breaks for companies like Boeing so it would cost more than it will bring in. A recent state budget analysis has determined that these tax breaks would cost taxpayers approximately $797 million over six years. As a result, I-732 would blow a giant hole in the state budget at a time when we are already failing to adequately fund schools, health care, and other essential services.
    2. It fails to invest any carbon tax revenue in clean energy sources. Increasing our use of clean energy like solar and wind power is a critical part of fighting climate change, as well as decreasing our use of fossil fuels. In addition, it fails to limit carbon pollution or to enforce the carbon pollution reductions already required by law.
    3. I-732 proponents failed to engage communities of color and workers – the ones disproportionately impacted by climate change -- in developing an approach to provide an economically just transition away from fossil fuels. The result is an initiative that does not adequately address their priorities and faces strong opposition from groups representing communities of color and labor unions.
    I-732 supporters argue the urgency of fighting climate change compels us to act immediately and that we can’t afford to wait for a different proposal. Although we are highly motivated to reduce carbon pollution and appreciate the sentiments of the initiative's supporters, I-732’s flaws are serious enough that we – like most statewide environmental groups - cannot support the proposal.

    We look forward to working with a wide range of advocates to create and pass a stronger plan to fight climate change in the near future.
  • Opposed By Fuse, OneAmerica Votes, Washington State Labor Council, Front and Centered, Puget Sound Sage, Progreso, Children's Alliance <br/><br/> Other groups that do not support I-732: Washington Conservation Voters, Washington Environmental Council, Sierra Club
  • VOTE YES

    Vote YES on I-735 to Get Big Money Out of Politics

  • Corporations are not people. Money is not speech. These are two truths that a huge majority of the public agrees upon, and yet the U.S. Supreme Court ruled the opposite when it made Citizens United the law of the land. Initiative 735, known as WAmend, puts our state on the record calling for an amendment to the U.S. Constitution clarifying that corporations are not people, money is not speech, and political donations should be disclosed.

    Vote YES on I-735 to tell Congress that Washington supports returning power to the people and common sense to our election rules.
    Last updated: 2023-04-05
    Corporations are not people. Money is not speech. These are two truths that a huge majority of the public agrees upon, and yet the U.S. Supreme Court ruled the opposite when it made Citizens United the law of the land. Initiative 735, known as WAmend, puts our state on the record calling for an amendment to the U.S. Constitution clarifying that corporations are not people, money is not speech, and political donations should be disclosed.

    Vote YES on I-735 to tell Congress that Washington supports returning power to the people and common sense to our election rules.
    Corporations are not people. Money is not speech. These are two truths that a huge majority of the public agrees upon, and yet the U.S. Supreme Court ruled the opposite when it made Citizens United the law of the land. Initiative 735, known as WAmend, puts our state on the record calling for an amendment to the U.S. Constitution clarifying that corporations are not people, money is not speech, and political donations should be disclosed.

    Vote YES on I-735 to tell Congress that Washington supports returning power to the people and common sense to our election rules.

    Initiative 735

    Corporations are not people. Money is not speech. These are two truths that a huge majority of the public agrees upon, and yet the U.S. Supreme Court ruled the opposite when it made Citizens United the law of the land. Initiative 735, known as WAmend, puts our state on the record calling for an amendment to the U.S. Constitution clarifying that corporations are not people, money is not speech, and political donations should be disclosed.

    Vote YES on I-735 to tell Congress that Washington supports returning power to the people and common sense to our election rules.

  • VOTE MAINTAINED

    Vote "Maintain" on Tax Advisory Vote No. 14

  • A bipartisan majority of legislators came together earlier this year to clarify that some stand-alone family dental plans can be charged a small insurance premium tax. Legislators passed House Bill 2768 by a vote of 135 to 11. Because of a Tim Eyman initiative, the Legislature is required to submit any bill it passes that closes tax loopholes or raises revenue to a non-binding advisory vote. Vote to "maintain" this measure.
    Last updated: 2023-04-05
    A bipartisan majority of legislators came together earlier this year to clarify that some stand-alone family dental plans can be charged a small insurance premium tax. Legislators passed House Bill 2768 by a vote of 135 to 11. Because of a Tim Eyman initiative, the Legislature is required to submit any bill it passes that closes tax loopholes or raises revenue to a non-binding advisory vote. Vote to "maintain" this measure.
    A bipartisan majority of legislators came together earlier this year to clarify that some stand-alone family dental plans can be charged a small insurance premium tax. Legislators passed House Bill 2768 by a vote of 135 to 11. Because of a Tim Eyman initiative, the Legislature is required to submit any bill it passes that closes tax loopholes or raises revenue to a non-binding advisory vote. Vote to "maintain" this measure.

    Statewide Advisory Vote No. 14

    A bipartisan majority of legislators came together earlier this year to clarify that some stand-alone family dental plans can be charged a small insurance premium tax. Legislators passed House Bill 2768 by a vote of 135 to 11. Because of a Tim Eyman initiative, the Legislature is required to submit any bill it passes that closes tax loopholes or raises revenue to a non-binding advisory vote. Vote to "maintain" this measure.

  • VOTE MAINTAINED

    Vote "Maintain" on Tax Advisory Vote No. 15

  • In order to encourage the use of clean alternative fuel vehicles in Washington, a broad majority of legislators voted to extend an existing tax break for customers who buy the clean energy cars. Legislators voted to pass Second Engrossed House Bill 2778 by a vote of 93 to 47. Because of a Tim Eyman initiative, the Legislature is required to submit any bill it passes that closes tax loopholes or raises revenue to a non-binding advisory vote. Vote to "maintain" this measure.
    Last updated: 2023-04-05
    In order to encourage the use of clean alternative fuel vehicles in Washington, a broad majority of legislators voted to extend an existing tax break for customers who buy the clean energy cars. Legislators voted to pass Second Engrossed House Bill 2778 by a vote of 93 to 47. Because of a Tim Eyman initiative, the Legislature is required to submit any bill it passes that closes tax loopholes or raises revenue to a non-binding advisory vote. Vote to "maintain" this measure.
    In order to encourage the use of clean alternative fuel vehicles in Washington, a broad majority of legislators voted to extend an existing tax break for customers who buy the clean energy cars. Legislators voted to pass Second Engrossed House Bill 2778 by a vote of 93 to 47. Because of a Tim Eyman initiative, the Legislature is required to submit any bill it passes that closes tax loopholes or raises revenue to a non-binding advisory vote. Vote to "maintain" this measure.

    Statewide Advisory Vote No. 15

    In order to encourage the use of clean alternative fuel vehicles in Washington, a broad majority of legislators voted to extend an existing tax break for customers who buy the clean energy cars. Legislators voted to pass Second Engrossed House Bill 2778 by a vote of 93 to 47. Because of a Tim Eyman initiative, the Legislature is required to submit any bill it passes that closes tax loopholes or raises revenue to a non-binding advisory vote. Vote to "maintain" this measure.

  • VOTE APPROVED

    Vote YES for a better redistricting plan

  • Every 10 years, the Washington State Constitution requires a bipartisan commission to update the lines that draw state legislative and congressional districts as the population grows and shifts. Senate Joint Resolution 8210 will shorten the time for the commission to complete a redistricting plan by six weeks, saving taxpayers money and allowing voters more time to provide feedback before spring elections. This common sense reform received a unanimous vote from the state Legislature. Vote YES on SJR 8210.
    Last updated: 2023-04-05
    Every 10 years, the Washington State Constitution requires a bipartisan commission to update the lines that draw state legislative and congressional districts as the population grows and shifts. Senate Joint Resolution 8210 will shorten the time for the commission to complete a redistricting plan by six weeks, saving taxpayers money and allowing voters more time to provide feedback before spring elections. This common sense reform received a unanimous vote from the state Legislature. Vote YES on SJR 8210.
    Every 10 years, the Washington State Constitution requires a bipartisan commission to update the lines that draw state legislative and congressional districts as the population grows and shifts. Senate Joint Resolution 8210 will shorten the time for the commission to complete a redistricting plan by six weeks, saving taxpayers money and allowing voters more time to provide feedback before spring elections. This common sense reform received a unanimous vote from the state Legislature. Vote YES on SJR 8210.

    Senate Joint Resolution No. 8210

    Every 10 years, the Washington State Constitution requires a bipartisan commission to update the lines that draw state legislative and congressional districts as the population grows and shifts. Senate Joint Resolution 8210 will shorten the time for the commission to complete a redistricting plan by six weeks, saving taxpayers money and allowing voters more time to provide feedback before spring elections. This common sense reform received a unanimous vote from the state Legislature. Vote YES on SJR 8210.

Depending on where you live, you may have one of the below ballot measures on your ballot.

  • VOTE APPROVED

    Vote YES for a Human Rights Commission

  • Everyone deserves to be treated fairly and equally under the law, regardless of who they are or who they love.

    This measure would create a Human Rights Commission to advise the County Council, County Executive, and others on matters related to civil liberties and unlawful discrimination, and ensures the existence of the commission well into the future. The commission will comprise of at least one representative from each County Council district. Vote YES on Snohomish County Charter Proposition No. 1 for a Human Rights Commission.
    Last updated: 2023-04-05
    Everyone deserves to be treated fairly and equally under the law, regardless of who they are or who they love.

    This measure would create a Human Rights Commission to advise the County Council, County Executive, and others on matters related to civil liberties and unlawful discrimination, and ensures the existence of the commission well into the future. The commission will comprise of at least one representative from each County Council district. Vote YES on Snohomish County Charter Proposition No. 1 for a Human Rights Commission.
    Everyone deserves to be treated fairly and equally under the law, regardless of who they are or who they love.

    This measure would create a Human Rights Commission to advise the County Council, County Executive, and others on matters related to civil liberties and unlawful discrimination, and ensures the existence of the commission well into the future. The commission will comprise of at least one representative from each County Council district. Vote YES on Snohomish County Charter Proposition No. 1 for a Human Rights Commission.
  • VOTE APPROVED

    Vote YES for a Public Advocate

  • We all want a government that is more accessible, transparent, and responsive to community members.

    Snohomish Proposition No. 2 creates a permanent Office of Public Advocate. The ombudsman-like position will be responsible for responding to, investigating, and addressing the public’s concerns about ethical conduct within government agencies and operations. Vote “Yes” on Snohomish County Charter Proposition No. 2 to ensure transparency and open access within our government.
    Last updated: 2023-04-05
    We all want a government that is more accessible, transparent, and responsive to community members.

    Snohomish Proposition No. 2 creates a permanent Office of Public Advocate. The ombudsman-like position will be responsible for responding to, investigating, and addressing the public’s concerns about ethical conduct within government agencies and operations. Vote “Yes” on Snohomish County Charter Proposition No. 2 to ensure transparency and open access within our government.
    We all want a government that is more accessible, transparent, and responsive to community members.

    Snohomish Proposition No. 2 creates a permanent Office of Public Advocate. The ombudsman-like position will be responsible for responding to, investigating, and addressing the public’s concerns about ethical conduct within government agencies and operations. Vote “Yes” on Snohomish County Charter Proposition No. 2 to ensure transparency and open access within our government.
  • VOTE APPROVED

    Vote YES for Anti-Discrimination Protections

  • Everyone deserves equal protection under the law. This charter amendment ensures residents receive the same anti-discrimination protections offered by state and federal law. It also removes the outdated masculine language in our county documents and replaces it with the consistent use of gender-neutral pronouns. Incorporating gender-neutral language makes the Snohomish County Charter more inclusive to men, women, transgender people, and gender non-conforming persons.

    Vote YES on Snohomish County Charter Proposition No. 3 to ensure that our charter reflects the diversity of our residents.
    Last updated: 2023-04-05
    Everyone deserves equal protection under the law. This charter amendment ensures residents receive the same anti-discrimination protections offered by state and federal law. It also removes the outdated masculine language in our county documents and replaces it with the consistent use of gender-neutral pronouns. Incorporating gender-neutral language makes the Snohomish County Charter more inclusive to men, women, transgender people, and gender non-conforming persons.

    Vote YES on Snohomish County Charter Proposition No. 3 to ensure that our charter reflects the diversity of our residents.
    Everyone deserves equal protection under the law. This charter amendment ensures residents receive the same anti-discrimination protections offered by state and federal law. It also removes the outdated masculine language in our county documents and replaces it with the consistent use of gender-neutral pronouns. Incorporating gender-neutral language makes the Snohomish County Charter more inclusive to men, women, transgender people, and gender non-conforming persons.

    Vote YES on Snohomish County Charter Proposition No. 3 to ensure that our charter reflects the diversity of our residents.

    Snohomish - Nondiscrimination

    Everyone deserves equal protection under the law. This charter amendment ensures residents receive the same anti-discrimination protections offered by state and federal law.

  • VOTE APPROVED

    Vote YES for Objective Land Use Decisions

  • The County Council was not elected to play the role of lawyers making complicated land use decisions. Often, though, that is exactly what they are asked to do when developers present their plans. This charter amendment would take land use and other environmental appeals out of the hands of the County Council and create an objective hearing examiner system within the Superior Court.

    Vote YES on Snohomish County Charter Proposition No. 4 for objective land use decisions.
    Last updated: 2023-04-05
    The County Council was not elected to play the role of lawyers making complicated land use decisions. Often, though, that is exactly what they are asked to do when developers present their plans. This charter amendment would take land use and other environmental appeals out of the hands of the County Council and create an objective hearing examiner system within the Superior Court.

    Vote YES on Snohomish County Charter Proposition No. 4 for objective land use decisions.
    The County Council was not elected to play the role of lawyers making complicated land use decisions. Often, though, that is exactly what they are asked to do when developers present their plans. This charter amendment would take land use and other environmental appeals out of the hands of the County Council and create an objective hearing examiner system within the Superior Court.

    Vote YES on Snohomish County Charter Proposition No. 4 for objective land use decisions.
  • VOTE APPROVED

    Vote YES for Evening Meetings

  • Many people who live in Snohomish County work during the day, which makes it difficult to attend County Council meetings. This charter amendment requires the Council to hold at least one evening meeting per year in each county district.

    Vote YES for Snohomish County Charter Proposition No. 5 to create more opportunities for concerned residents to actively participate in local government .
    Last updated: 2023-04-05
    Many people who live in Snohomish County work during the day, which makes it difficult to attend County Council meetings. This charter amendment requires the Council to hold at least one evening meeting per year in each county district.

    Vote YES for Snohomish County Charter Proposition No. 5 to create more opportunities for concerned residents to actively participate in local government .
    Many people who live in Snohomish County work during the day, which makes it difficult to attend County Council meetings. This charter amendment requires the Council to hold at least one evening meeting per year in each county district.

    Vote YES for Snohomish County Charter Proposition No. 5 to create more opportunities for concerned residents to actively participate in local government .
  • VOTE APPROVED

    Vote YES for an Effective CEO Appointment Process

  • Everyone wants an efficient and effective government. This charter amendment would streamline a 60-day time frame for the County Council to confirm or reject CEO appointments by the County Executive. It also prohibits anyone who was rejected by the County from being appointed within one year.

    Vote “YES” for Snohomish County Charter Proposition No. 6 to ensure an efficient and transparent CEO appointment process
    Last updated: 2023-04-05
    Everyone wants an efficient and effective government. This charter amendment would streamline a 60-day time frame for the County Council to confirm or reject CEO appointments by the County Executive. It also prohibits anyone who was rejected by the County from being appointed within one year.

    Vote “YES” for Snohomish County Charter Proposition No. 6 to ensure an efficient and transparent CEO appointment process
    Everyone wants an efficient and effective government. This charter amendment would streamline a 60-day time frame for the County Council to confirm or reject CEO appointments by the County Executive. It also prohibits anyone who was rejected by the County from being appointed within one year.

    Vote “YES” for Snohomish County Charter Proposition No. 6 to ensure an efficient and transparent CEO appointment process

    Snohomish - Revising Procedures for Appointment and Confirmation of CEOs

    Everyone wants an efficient and effective government. This charter amendment would streamline a 60-day time frame for the County Council to confirm or reject CEO appointments by the County Executive. It also prohibits anyone who was rejected by the County from being appointed within one year.

  • VOTE APPROVED

    Vote YES for Fair Redistricting

  • The current process for drawing Snohomish County Council districts is in need of an update. This charter amendment will create a committee and appoint a leader to lead the redistricting process within a timeline. It also provides checks and balances by requiring a supermajority vote from the County Council to overturn redistricting decisions made by the committee, and by limiting the revisions that can be made by the council.

    Vote “YES” for Snohomish County Charter Proposition No. 7 to create a fair and transparent redistricting process.
    Last updated: 2023-04-05
    The current process for drawing Snohomish County Council districts is in need of an update. This charter amendment will create a committee and appoint a leader to lead the redistricting process within a timeline. It also provides checks and balances by requiring a supermajority vote from the County Council to overturn redistricting decisions made by the committee, and by limiting the revisions that can be made by the council.

    Vote “YES” for Snohomish County Charter Proposition No. 7 to create a fair and transparent redistricting process.
    The current process for drawing Snohomish County Council districts is in need of an update. This charter amendment will create a committee and appoint a leader to lead the redistricting process within a timeline. It also provides checks and balances by requiring a supermajority vote from the County Council to overturn redistricting decisions made by the committee, and by limiting the revisions that can be made by the council.

    Vote “YES” for Snohomish County Charter Proposition No. 7 to create a fair and transparent redistricting process.

    Snohomish - Revising County Redistricting Process

    The current process for drawing Snohomish County Council districts is in need of an update. This charter amendment will create a committee and appoint a leader to lead the redistricting process within a timeline.

  • Former Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton made history when she became the first woman nominated by the Democratic Party for president. As President, she will continue her legacy of advocacy for women, children, and families, which began with working at the Children's Defense Fund to provide education to students with disabilities. She also promises to fight for equal pay, protect our environment, expand background checks to more gun sales, support comprehensive immigration reform, and stand up to Republican attacks on President Barack Obama's landmark health care law.

    Her main opponent, Republican Donald Trump, has amassed a troubling track record of actions and positions that are divisive, dishonest, disrespectful to women, and far too uninformed and unstable to lead our nation and be our Commander in Chief. Also in this race is Green Party nominee Jill Stein, a former Lexington, Massachusetts Town Council member, and Gary Johnson, the Libertarian former governor of New Mexico.

    Hillary Rodham Clinton deserves your vote.
    Last updated: 2023-04-05

    Hillary Clinton

    Former Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton made history when she became the first woman nominated by the Democratic Party for president.

    Former Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton made history when she became the first woman nominated by the Democratic Party for president. As President, she will continue her legacy of advocacy for women, children, and families, which began with working at the Children's Defense Fund to provide education to students with disabilities. She also promises to fight for equal pay, protect our environment, expand background checks to more gun sales, support comprehensive immigration reform, and stand up to Republican attacks on President Barack Obama's landmark health care law.

    Her main opponent, Republican Donald Trump, has amassed a troubling track record of actions and positions that are divisive, dishonest, disrespectful to women, and far too uninformed and unstable to lead our nation and be our Commander in Chief. Also in this race is Green Party nominee Jill Stein, a former Lexington, Massachusetts Town Council member, and Gary Johnson, the Libertarian former governor of New Mexico.

    Hillary Rodham Clinton deserves your vote.

    Hillary Clinton

    Former Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton made history when she became the first woman nominated by the Democratic Party for president.

  • Since Patty Murray was first elected in 1992, the "Mom in Tennis Shoes" has been an incredible champion for women, working people, veterans, and an economy that works for everyone. The fourth-ranking Democrat in the Senate, she has earned the respect of Democrats and Republicans alike by forging agreements on the budget, education, women's health, and other critical issues, all while continuing to fight for working people across our state.

    Her opponent is former Washington State Republican Party Chair Chris Vance. Vance, a partisan operative who championed George W. Bush for president, has led a lackluster campaign and does not bring new ideas to the table. Murray's leadership, experience, and progressive values make her the clear choice in this race.
    Last updated: 2023-04-05

    Patty Murray

    Since Patty Murray was first elected in 1992, the "Mom in Tennis Shoes" has been an incredible champion for women, working people, veterans, and an economy that works for everyone.

    Since Patty Murray was first elected in 1992, the "Mom in Tennis Shoes" has been an incredible champion for women, working people, veterans, and an economy that works for everyone. The fourth-ranking Democrat in the Senate, she has earned the respect of Democrats and Republicans alike by forging agreements on the budget, education, women's health, and other critical issues, all while continuing to fight for working people across our state.

    Her opponent is former Washington State Republican Party Chair Chris Vance. Vance, a partisan operative who championed George W. Bush for president, has led a lackluster campaign and does not bring new ideas to the table. Murray's leadership, experience, and progressive values make her the clear choice in this race.

    Patty Murray

    Since Patty Murray was first elected in 1992, the "Mom in Tennis Shoes" has been an incredible champion for women, working people, veterans, and an economy that works for everyone.

Congress

Depending on where you live, you may have one of the below congressional districts on your ballot.

  • Rep. Rick Larsen is a moderate, pragmatic Democrat who has been a strong advocate for jobs, transportation, and infrastructure projects in the 2nd District. Larsen has also led efforts to protect voting rights, fought to reform student loans, and has been a champion of Wall Street reform. Before serving in Congress he served on the Snohomish County Council and worked on economic development for the City of Everett. Unfortunately, Larsen angered many progressives by urging Boeing machinists to vote on Boeing's contract proposal to eliminate workers' hard-earned pension benefits.

    Larsen faces cookie cutter Republican Marc Hennemann. Larsen is the best choice in this race.
    Last updated: 2023-04-05

    Rick Larsen

    Rep. Rick Larsen is a moderate, pragmatic Democrat who has been a strong advocate for jobs, transportation, and infrastructure projects in the 2nd District. Larsen has also led efforts to protect voting rights, fought to reform student loans, and has been a champion of Wall Street reform.

    Rep. Rick Larsen is a moderate, pragmatic Democrat who has been a strong advocate for jobs, transportation, and infrastructure projects in the 2nd District. Larsen has also led efforts to protect voting rights, fought to reform student loans, and has been a champion of Wall Street reform. Before serving in Congress he served on the Snohomish County Council and worked on economic development for the City of Everett. Unfortunately, Larsen angered many progressives by urging Boeing machinists to vote on Boeing's contract proposal to eliminate workers' hard-earned pension benefits.

    Larsen faces cookie cutter Republican Marc Hennemann. Larsen is the best choice in this race.

    Rick Larsen

    Rep. Rick Larsen is a moderate, pragmatic Democrat who has been a strong advocate for jobs, transportation, and infrastructure projects in the 2nd District. Larsen has also led efforts to protect voting rights, fought to reform student loans, and has been a champion of Wall Street reform.

  • Governor Jay Inslee has been a strong, principled leader on the important challenges facing Washington, including tackling transportation problems, increasing the minimum wage, and fighting global warming. He has also worked to fund schools by closing unjust tax loopholes and fought to close the gender pay gap. Before he was elected Governor in 2012, Inslee represented both sides of the Cascades in Congress, opposed the Iraq war, and worked to increase accountability and oversight for Wall Street banks.

    In contrast, Republican Bill Bryant opposes the Washington Voting Rights Act, is opposed to many public transportation projects, and is an obstacle to closing unjust tax loopholes. While Inslee has his work cut out for him in his second term, we believe his strong moral compass and vision for improving our state makes him the best choice in this race.
    Last updated: 2023-04-05

    Jay Inslee

    Governor Jay Inslee has been a strong, principled leader on the important challenges facing Washington, including tackling transportation problems, increasing the minimum wage, and fighting global warming.

    Governor Jay Inslee has been a strong, principled leader on the important challenges facing Washington, including tackling transportation problems, increasing the minimum wage, and fighting global warming. He has also worked to fund schools by closing unjust tax loopholes and fought to close the gender pay gap. Before he was elected Governor in 2012, Inslee represented both sides of the Cascades in Congress, opposed the Iraq war, and worked to increase accountability and oversight for Wall Street banks.

    In contrast, Republican Bill Bryant opposes the Washington Voting Rights Act, is opposed to many public transportation projects, and is an obstacle to closing unjust tax loopholes. While Inslee has his work cut out for him in his second term, we believe his strong moral compass and vision for improving our state makes him the best choice in this race.

    Jay Inslee

    Governor Jay Inslee has been a strong, principled leader on the important challenges facing Washington, including tackling transportation problems, increasing the minimum wage, and fighting global warming.

  • Tina Podlodowski is running for Secretary of State to increase voter participation and turnout as the state’s chief elections officer. Podlodowski has spent her life fighting for equality and driving forward progress. She understands just how important voting and an equitable election system are to a functioning and flourishing democracy. She is a former Microsoft executive who also served on the Seattle City Council and has a strong track record of non-profit leadership.

    Podlodowski is challenging incumbent Republican Kim Wyman for failing to improve declining voter participation. Wyman has opposed the Washington Voting Rights Act and has refused to support common-sense measures to increase voter participation such as Election Day voter registration and pre-registration for 16- and 17-year-olds. Podlodowski deserves your vote.
    Last updated: 2023-04-05

    Tina Podlodowski

    Tina Podlodowski is running for Secretary of State to increase voter participation and turnout as the state’s chief elections officer. Podlodowski has spent her life fighting for equality and driving forward progress.

    Tina Podlodowski is running for Secretary of State to increase voter participation and turnout as the state’s chief elections officer. Podlodowski has spent her life fighting for equality and driving forward progress. She understands just how important voting and an equitable election system are to a functioning and flourishing democracy. She is a former Microsoft executive who also served on the Seattle City Council and has a strong track record of non-profit leadership.

    Podlodowski is challenging incumbent Republican Kim Wyman for failing to improve declining voter participation. Wyman has opposed the Washington Voting Rights Act and has refused to support common-sense measures to increase voter participation such as Election Day voter registration and pre-registration for 16- and 17-year-olds. Podlodowski deserves your vote.

    Tina Podlodowski

    Tina Podlodowski is running for Secretary of State to increase voter participation and turnout as the state’s chief elections officer. Podlodowski has spent her life fighting for equality and driving forward progress.

  • Elected in 2003, Benton County Treasurer Duane Davidson is the better of two conservative candidates vying to replace outgoing State Treasurer Jim McIntire. Davidson is currently serving his second term as the President of the Washington State Association of County Treasurers and has been endorsed by both Republican and Democratic treasurers as well as most major newspapers from around the state. While we disagree about how to reform our state's upside-down tax code, Davidson brings years of experience with government finance, managing staff, smart investments of taxpayer dollars, and a commitment to transparency and accountability.

    In contrast, banker Michael Waite has no experience overseeing government finances. We have concerns that he would use the office as a platform for anti-tax activism and insert himself into legislative debates outside the scope of the Treasurer’s office. Waite does support safe and legal abortion access and has earned the endorsement of Planned Parenthood Votes Northwest and Hawaii as well as NARAL Pro-Choice Washington.

    We recommend Davidson as the best of two conservative options.
    Last updated: 2023-04-05

    Duane Davidson

    Elected in 2003, Benton County Treasurer Duane Davidson is the better of two conservative candidates vying to replace outgoing State Treasurer Jim McIntire.

    Elected in 2003, Benton County Treasurer Duane Davidson is the better of two conservative candidates vying to replace outgoing State Treasurer Jim McIntire. Davidson is currently serving his second term as the President of the Washington State Association of County Treasurers and has been endorsed by both Republican and Democratic treasurers as well as most major newspapers from around the state. While we disagree about how to reform our state's upside-down tax code, Davidson brings years of experience with government finance, managing staff, smart investments of taxpayer dollars, and a commitment to transparency and accountability.

    In contrast, banker Michael Waite has no experience overseeing government finances. We have concerns that he would use the office as a platform for anti-tax activism and insert himself into legislative debates outside the scope of the Treasurer’s office. Waite does support safe and legal abortion access and has earned the endorsement of Planned Parenthood Votes Northwest and Hawaii as well as NARAL Pro-Choice Washington.

    We recommend Davidson as the best of two conservative options.

    Duane Davidson

    Elected in 2003, Benton County Treasurer Duane Davidson is the better of two conservative candidates vying to replace outgoing State Treasurer Jim McIntire.

  • Current Pierce County Executive Pat McCarthy has run the operations of Pierce County government for eight years, managing 3,000 employees and a $900 million budget. Prior to that, she served as the Pierce County Auditor, where she was honored as the 2005 Washington State Auditor of the Year. McCarthy is running to bring back integrity to the Auditor's office after a criminal indictment derailed Troy Kelley's term, and promises to improve efficiency and transparency in our state government.

    Her opponent is socially-conservative Republican Senator Mark Miloscia. Unfortunately, Miloscia is opposed to safe and legal abortion access and to marriage equality. He supports allowing employers to deny coverage for birth control and co-sponsored a bill that could ban many forms of birth control. We're concerned that if elected, Miloscia could use his office to launch politically-fueled investigations of Planned Parenthood and other women's health groups that receive public funds to provide health care to women.

    Miloscia has been good on labor issues and was endorsed by some of our labor partners, including SEIU 925, SEIU 775, and the Washington State Council of Fire Fighters, as well as a dual endorsement from the Washington Federation of State Employees. However, McCarthy's support is broader and she deserves your vote due to her accomplished record, experience, and trusted values.
    Last updated: 2023-04-05

    Pat McCarthy

    Current Pierce County Executive Pat McCarthy has run the operations of Pierce County government for eight years, managing 3,000 employees and a $900 million budget. Prior to that, she served as the Pierce County Auditor, where she was honored as the 2005 Washington State Auditor of the Year.

    Current Pierce County Executive Pat McCarthy has run the operations of Pierce County government for eight years, managing 3,000 employees and a $900 million budget. Prior to that, she served as the Pierce County Auditor, where she was honored as the 2005 Washington State Auditor of the Year. McCarthy is running to bring back integrity to the Auditor's office after a criminal indictment derailed Troy Kelley's term, and promises to improve efficiency and transparency in our state government.

    Her opponent is socially-conservative Republican Senator Mark Miloscia. Unfortunately, Miloscia is opposed to safe and legal abortion access and to marriage equality. He supports allowing employers to deny coverage for birth control and co-sponsored a bill that could ban many forms of birth control. We're concerned that if elected, Miloscia could use his office to launch politically-fueled investigations of Planned Parenthood and other women's health groups that receive public funds to provide health care to women.

    Miloscia has been good on labor issues and was endorsed by some of our labor partners, including SEIU 925, SEIU 775, and the Washington State Council of Fire Fighters, as well as a dual endorsement from the Washington Federation of State Employees. However, McCarthy's support is broader and she deserves your vote due to her accomplished record, experience, and trusted values.

    Pat McCarthy

    Current Pierce County Executive Pat McCarthy has run the operations of Pierce County government for eight years, managing 3,000 employees and a $900 million budget. Prior to that, she served as the Pierce County Auditor, where she was honored as the 2005 Washington State Auditor of the Year.

  • Attorney General Bob Ferguson's accomplishments in four years are impressive. From delivering millions of dollars back to consumers who were wronged by fraudulent corporations and his ongoing battle with the federal government to clean up the Hanford nuclear waste site to successfully fighting two Tim Eyman initiatives, Ferguson has been a strong and effective advocate for people in Washington.

    Ferguson faces Libertarian Josh Trumbull, who is not running a viable campaign and is not qualified for this office. Ferguson deserves your vote.
    Last updated: 2023-04-05

    Bob Ferguson

    Attorney General Bob Ferguson's accomplishments in four years are impressive.

    Attorney General Bob Ferguson's accomplishments in four years are impressive. From delivering millions of dollars back to consumers who were wronged by fraudulent corporations and his ongoing battle with the federal government to clean up the Hanford nuclear waste site to successfully fighting two Tim Eyman initiatives, Ferguson has been a strong and effective advocate for people in Washington.

    Ferguson faces Libertarian Josh Trumbull, who is not running a viable campaign and is not qualified for this office. Ferguson deserves your vote.

    Bob Ferguson

    Attorney General Bob Ferguson's accomplishments in four years are impressive.

  • Hilary Franz is the Executive Director of Futurewise and former Bainbridge Island Councilmember who brings 20 years of experience working at the state and local level protecting working families and communities that rely on forestry, farmland, and waterways. Franz is a former Washington Environmental Council and Conservation Northwest board member, she sat on the Puget Sound Salmon Recovery Council, and was appointed by Governor Christine Gregoire to the Washington State Climate Action Team. She will prioritize restoring forest health, preventing wildfires, and creating clean energy jobs on our public lands. Franz has the leadership skills to develop solutions that respect the needs of our communities that depend upon timber and shellfish sales while also protecting critical natural and recreational resources.

    Franz faces Republican Steve McLaughlin, an ally of right-wing extremist movements who has claimed that the federal government shouldn’t own land outside of Washington D.C. and aligned himself with numerous global warming deniers in his party. For the future of our state, our health, and our public lands, Hilary Franz deserves your vote.
    Last updated: 2023-04-05

    Hilary Franz

    Hilary Franz is the Executive Director of Futurewise and former Bainbridge Island Councilmember who brings 20 years of experience working at the state and local level protecting working families and communities that rely on forestry, farmland, and waterways.

    Hilary Franz is the Executive Director of Futurewise and former Bainbridge Island Councilmember who brings 20 years of experience working at the state and local level protecting working families and communities that rely on forestry, farmland, and waterways. Franz is a former Washington Environmental Council and Conservation Northwest board member, she sat on the Puget Sound Salmon Recovery Council, and was appointed by Governor Christine Gregoire to the Washington State Climate Action Team. She will prioritize restoring forest health, preventing wildfires, and creating clean energy jobs on our public lands. Franz has the leadership skills to develop solutions that respect the needs of our communities that depend upon timber and shellfish sales while also protecting critical natural and recreational resources.

    Franz faces Republican Steve McLaughlin, an ally of right-wing extremist movements who has claimed that the federal government shouldn’t own land outside of Washington D.C. and aligned himself with numerous global warming deniers in his party. For the future of our state, our health, and our public lands, Hilary Franz deserves your vote.

    Hilary Franz

    Hilary Franz is the Executive Director of Futurewise and former Bainbridge Island Councilmember who brings 20 years of experience working at the state and local level protecting working families and communities that rely on forestry, farmland, and waterways.

  • Rep. Chris Reykdal is a progressive legislator from Thurston County who has been an outspoken advocate for education funding and income inequality issues. As a former teacher and school board member who now works in the community college system, Reykdal has seen the struggle schools are facing to get their job done. He supports reforming our state's upside down tax code to ensure our public schools have the funding they need to provide a quality education for every student. Reykdal currently has two children in Washington's public schools.
    Last updated: 2023-04-05

    Chris Reykdal

    Rep. Chris Reykdal is a progressive legislator from Thurston County who has been an outspoken advocate for education funding and income inequality issues.

    Rep. Chris Reykdal is a progressive legislator from Thurston County who has been an outspoken advocate for education funding and income inequality issues. As a former teacher and school board member who now works in the community college system, Reykdal has seen the struggle schools are facing to get their job done. He supports reforming our state's upside down tax code to ensure our public schools have the funding they need to provide a quality education for every student. Reykdal currently has two children in Washington's public schools.

    Chris Reykdal

    Rep. Chris Reykdal is a progressive legislator from Thurston County who has been an outspoken advocate for education funding and income inequality issues.

  • Erin Jones is a teacher of foreign languages and African American studies who has won multiple awards for her innovative work to make learning more accessible for students of color. Jones most recently worked at Tacoma Public Schools as a literacy coach and previously served as Assistant Superintendent of Student Achievement for the state of Washington, where she worked on policy and instruction practices to make schools a place where all students can learn. Jones' three kids attended Washington public schools.

    There are some concerns about the support Jones has received from prominent right-wing Republicans and conservative interest groups. In addition, The Stranger and Equal Rights Washington have raised important concerns about some of Jones' statements and positions on LGBTQ issues and associations with conservative groups opposed to LGBTQ equality. We take those concerns very seriously. After a careful review and a long discussion with her, it’s clear she has changed those positions. Although she had some learning to do on LGTBQ equality, we believe her heart is in the right place.

    While Jones has earned dual endorsements from several of our Progressive Voters Guide partners, we lean toward Reykdal in this race.
    Last updated: 2023-04-05

    Erin Jones

    Erin Jones is a teacher of foreign languages and African American studies who has won multiple awards for her innovative work to make learning more accessible for students of color.

    Erin Jones is a teacher of foreign languages and African American studies who has won multiple awards for her innovative work to make learning more accessible for students of color. Jones most recently worked at Tacoma Public Schools as a literacy coach and previously served as Assistant Superintendent of Student Achievement for the state of Washington, where she worked on policy and instruction practices to make schools a place where all students can learn. Jones' three kids attended Washington public schools.

    There are some concerns about the support Jones has received from prominent right-wing Republicans and conservative interest groups. In addition, The Stranger and Equal Rights Washington have raised important concerns about some of Jones' statements and positions on LGBTQ issues and associations with conservative groups opposed to LGBTQ equality. We take those concerns very seriously. After a careful review and a long discussion with her, it’s clear she has changed those positions. Although she had some learning to do on LGTBQ equality, we believe her heart is in the right place.

    While Jones has earned dual endorsements from several of our Progressive Voters Guide partners, we lean toward Reykdal in this race.

    Erin Jones

    Erin Jones is a teacher of foreign languages and African American studies who has won multiple awards for her innovative work to make learning more accessible for students of color.

  • As the state Insurance Commissioner, Mike Kreidler has brought a range of experience to the position and defended the interests of Washington residents against big insurance companies. Kreidler cut insurance rates, required that contraceptives be included in prescription drug coverage for women, and helped increase the transparency of the health insurance market. If re-elected, Kreidler will work on expanding health care access, limiting insurance company exploitation, and eliminating credit scoring as a determinant of insurance rates.

    Kreidler faces Republican Richard Schrock, who is not running a credible campaign. Kreidler deserves your vote.
    Last updated: 2023-04-05

    Mike Kreidler

    As the state Insurance Commissioner, Mike Kreidler has brought a range of experience to the position and defended the interests of Washington residents against big insurance companies.

    As the state Insurance Commissioner, Mike Kreidler has brought a range of experience to the position and defended the interests of Washington residents against big insurance companies. Kreidler cut insurance rates, required that contraceptives be included in prescription drug coverage for women, and helped increase the transparency of the health insurance market. If re-elected, Kreidler will work on expanding health care access, limiting insurance company exploitation, and eliminating credit scoring as a determinant of insurance rates.

    Kreidler faces Republican Richard Schrock, who is not running a credible campaign. Kreidler deserves your vote.

    Mike Kreidler

    As the state Insurance Commissioner, Mike Kreidler has brought a range of experience to the position and defended the interests of Washington residents against big insurance companies.

  • Local Democrat Scott Chaplin is running a last minute write-in campaign for the state House Position 1 seat against far-right conservative Norma Smith, who voted against the freedom to marry for all loving couples. Chaplin, who was elected twice to the city council in his former hometown of Carbondale, Colorado, formerly ran a social justice non-profit that advocates for LGBTQ equality, and is a strong supporter of clean, renewable energy. Also in the race is Libertarian Michael Scott.

    Chaplin deserves your vote.
    Last updated: 2023-04-05

    Scott Chaplin

    Local Democrat Scott Chaplin is running a last minute write-in campaign for the state House Position 1 seat against far-right conservative Norma Smith, who voted against the freedom to marry for all loving couples.

    Local Democrat Scott Chaplin is running a last minute write-in campaign for the state House Position 1 seat against far-right conservative Norma Smith, who voted against the freedom to marry for all loving couples. Chaplin, who was elected twice to the city council in his former hometown of Carbondale, Colorado, formerly ran a social justice non-profit that advocates for LGBTQ equality, and is a strong supporter of clean, renewable energy. Also in the race is Libertarian Michael Scott.

    Chaplin deserves your vote.

    Scott Chaplin

    Local Democrat Scott Chaplin is running a last minute write-in campaign for the state House Position 1 seat against far-right conservative Norma Smith, who voted against the freedom to marry for all loving couples.

  • Doris Brevoort faces an uphill battle to unseat conservative incumbent David Hayes. Brevoort is an educator and family caregiver who is running to protect our environment and support the working farms of Skagit County.

    Hayes has voted against raising the minimum wage, closing tax loopholes and other forward-thinking legislation. Brevoort is a better choice in this race.
    Last updated: 2023-04-05

    Doris Brevoort

    Doris Brevoort faces an uphill battle to unseat conservative incumbent David Hayes. Brevoort is an educator and family caregiver who is running to protect our environment and support the working farms of Skagit County.

    Doris Brevoort faces an uphill battle to unseat conservative incumbent David Hayes. Brevoort is an educator and family caregiver who is running to protect our environment and support the working farms of Skagit County.

    Hayes has voted against raising the minimum wage, closing tax loopholes and other forward-thinking legislation. Brevoort is a better choice in this race.

    Doris Brevoort

    Doris Brevoort faces an uphill battle to unseat conservative incumbent David Hayes. Brevoort is an educator and family caregiver who is running to protect our environment and support the working farms of Skagit County.

  • Justice Mary Yu served 14 years as a trial court judge in King County, where she presided over hundreds of criminal, civil, and family law cases before Governor Jay Inslee appointed her to Washington’s Supreme Court. As the first Asian American, the first Latina, and the first open member of the LGBTQ community to serve on the Supreme Court, Yu brings a community-based approach and respect for every person to her service.

    Justice Yu is also highly involved in the Washington state law community. She serves as a Co-Chair for the Leadership Institute of UW, the Washington State Minority and Justice Commission, and the Washington State Bar Association.

    Yu faces Gonzaga Law Professor David Dewolf, who is best known for his far-right pro-creationism and anti-evolution views. Because of her remarkable record and extensive experience, Justice Mary Yu is the clear choice for this Supreme Court Justice Position 1.
    Last updated: 2023-04-05

    Mary Yu

    Justice Mary Yu served 14 years as a trial court judge in King County, where she presided over hundreds of criminal, civil, and family law cases before Governor Jay Inslee appointed her to Washington’s Supreme Court.

    Justice Mary Yu served 14 years as a trial court judge in King County, where she presided over hundreds of criminal, civil, and family law cases before Governor Jay Inslee appointed her to Washington’s Supreme Court. As the first Asian American, the first Latina, and the first open member of the LGBTQ community to serve on the Supreme Court, Yu brings a community-based approach and respect for every person to her service.

    Justice Yu is also highly involved in the Washington state law community. She serves as a Co-Chair for the Leadership Institute of UW, the Washington State Minority and Justice Commission, and the Washington State Bar Association.

    Yu faces Gonzaga Law Professor David Dewolf, who is best known for his far-right pro-creationism and anti-evolution views. Because of her remarkable record and extensive experience, Justice Mary Yu is the clear choice for this Supreme Court Justice Position 1.

    Mary Yu

    Justice Mary Yu served 14 years as a trial court judge in King County, where she presided over hundreds of criminal, civil, and family law cases before Governor Jay Inslee appointed her to Washington’s Supreme Court.

  • Endorsed By: American Federation of Teachers - WA, Latino PAC, National Women's Political Caucus of WA, Pro-Choice Washington, OneAmerica Votes, Service Employees International Union, Washington Conservation Action, WA State Council of Firefighters, WA Federation of State Employees, Washington State Labor Council Bar Association Ratings: King County Bar Association: Exceptionally Well Qualified; Latina/o Bar Association: Exceptionally Well Qualified; QLaw: The LGBT Bar Association: Exceptionally Well Qualified
  • Chief Justice Barbara Madsen has led our state Supreme Court in a fair and impartial manner through a series of high profile cases. First elected in 1992, Madsen was only the third woman to ever serve on our highest court. She has won numerous awards for her service, especially for her work creating opportunities for young female lawyers and judges. Despite Republican efforts to politicize our court over rulings about education funding and several Tim Eyman initiatives, Madsen has maintained a steadfast commitment to upholding equal justice under the law.

    Madsen is opposed by Greg Zempel, a Republican prosecutor from Kittitas County. Zempel has said he is running because he disagrees with some recent decisions. Madsen deserves your vote.
    Last updated: 2023-04-05

    Barbara Madsen

    Chief Justice Barbara Madsen has led our state Supreme Court in a fair and impartial manner through a series of high profile cases. First elected in 1992, Madsen was only the third woman to ever serve on our highest court.

    Chief Justice Barbara Madsen has led our state Supreme Court in a fair and impartial manner through a series of high profile cases. First elected in 1992, Madsen was only the third woman to ever serve on our highest court. She has won numerous awards for her service, especially for her work creating opportunities for young female lawyers and judges. Despite Republican efforts to politicize our court over rulings about education funding and several Tim Eyman initiatives, Madsen has maintained a steadfast commitment to upholding equal justice under the law.

    Madsen is opposed by Greg Zempel, a Republican prosecutor from Kittitas County. Zempel has said he is running because he disagrees with some recent decisions. Madsen deserves your vote.

    Barbara Madsen

    Chief Justice Barbara Madsen has led our state Supreme Court in a fair and impartial manner through a series of high profile cases. First elected in 1992, Madsen was only the third woman to ever serve on our highest court.

  • Endorsed By: National Women's Political Caucus of WA, SEIU Healthcare 1199NW, The Stranger, WA State Council of Firefighters, Washington State Labor Council Bar Association Ratings: King County Bar Association: Exceptionally Well Qualified; QLaw: The LGBT Bar Association: Well Qualified; Latina/o Bar Association: Exceptionally Well Qualified
  • Elected in 2010, Justice Charlie Wiggins is highly regarded, bringing his sharp eye for judicial ethics and more than 30 years of law and justice experience to the Supreme Court, where he has written more than 100 court opinions. Justice Wiggins is an active volunteer in his community for Habitat for Humanity and other good causes. He worked to support campaign contribution limits in state judicial elections before he was elected to the court. Wiggins is rated “exceptionally well qualified” by several bar associations.

    Justice Wiggins faces Dave Larson, a Federal Way Municipal Court Judge. Larson is not highly rated by bar associations, and as a Federal Way School Board Member he voted to ban the documentary An Inconvenient Truth from classrooms after a parent complained that the film didn't include the perspective of global-warming deniers. Larson is heavily backed by huge expenditures from conservative interests unhappy with Justice Wiggins' decisions. Ignore their misleading attack ads. Justice Charlie Wiggins' experience, qualifications, and commitment to judicial ethics makes him the best choice for Supreme Court Justice Position 6.
    Last updated: 2023-04-05

    Charles Wiggins

    Elected in 2010, Justice Charlie Wiggins is highly regarded, bringing his sharp eye for judicial ethics and more than 30 years of law and justice experience to the Supreme Court, where he has written more than 100 court opinions.

    Elected in 2010, Justice Charlie Wiggins is highly regarded, bringing his sharp eye for judicial ethics and more than 30 years of law and justice experience to the Supreme Court, where he has written more than 100 court opinions. Justice Wiggins is an active volunteer in his community for Habitat for Humanity and other good causes. He worked to support campaign contribution limits in state judicial elections before he was elected to the court. Wiggins is rated “exceptionally well qualified” by several bar associations.

    Justice Wiggins faces Dave Larson, a Federal Way Municipal Court Judge. Larson is not highly rated by bar associations, and as a Federal Way School Board Member he voted to ban the documentary An Inconvenient Truth from classrooms after a parent complained that the film didn't include the perspective of global-warming deniers. Larson is heavily backed by huge expenditures from conservative interests unhappy with Justice Wiggins' decisions. Ignore their misleading attack ads. Justice Charlie Wiggins' experience, qualifications, and commitment to judicial ethics makes him the best choice for Supreme Court Justice Position 6.

    Charles Wiggins

    Elected in 2010, Justice Charlie Wiggins is highly regarded, bringing his sharp eye for judicial ethics and more than 30 years of law and justice experience to the Supreme Court, where he has written more than 100 court opinions.

  • Endorsed By: Pro-Choice Washington, SEIU 775, Washington Conservation Action, WA State Council of Firefighters, WA Federation of State Employees, Washington State Labor Council Bar Association Ratings: King County Bar Association: Exceptionally Well Qualified; QLaw: The LGBT Bar Association: Well Qualified; Latina/o Bar Association: Exceptionally Well Qualified

Superior Court

Depending on where you live, you may have one of the below court races on your ballot. The Progressive Voters Guide may skip recommendations for unopposed judicial races.

  • Judge Laura Riquelme was appointed to the Skagit Superior Court in 2016 and previously served 12 years as both a prosecutor and a senior deputy public defender in Skagit County. Judge Riquelme is very active in her community, serving as president of the Parent Teacher Association for her son’s school, working with the Skagit Immigrant Rights Council on issues affecting immigrants in the court system, teaching English as a second language classes with Community Action, and serving on the Superior Court Judges' Association Criminal Law and Rules Committee and its Equality and Fairness Committee.

    Judge Riquelme received endorsements from National Women’s Political Caucus and Skagit County Democrats as well as numerous Washington State judges. Her opponent, Skagit District Court Judge David Svaren, is also qualified but has not received support from any of our progressive partners. Due to Riquelme’s continued commitment to making the community a better place to live, she deserves your vote.
    Last updated: 2023-04-05

    Laura Riquelme

    Judge Laura Riquelme was appointed to the Skagit Superior Court in 2016 and previously served 12 years as both a prosecutor and a senior deputy public defender in Skagit County.

    Judge Laura Riquelme was appointed to the Skagit Superior Court in 2016 and previously served 12 years as both a prosecutor and a senior deputy public defender in Skagit County. Judge Riquelme is very active in her community, serving as president of the Parent Teacher Association for her son’s school, working with the Skagit Immigrant Rights Council on issues affecting immigrants in the court system, teaching English as a second language classes with Community Action, and serving on the Superior Court Judges' Association Criminal Law and Rules Committee and its Equality and Fairness Committee.

    Judge Riquelme received endorsements from National Women’s Political Caucus and Skagit County Democrats as well as numerous Washington State judges. Her opponent, Skagit District Court Judge David Svaren, is also qualified but has not received support from any of our progressive partners. Due to Riquelme’s continued commitment to making the community a better place to live, she deserves your vote.

    Laura Riquelme

    Judge Laura Riquelme was appointed to the Skagit Superior Court in 2016 and previously served 12 years as both a prosecutor and a senior deputy public defender in Skagit County.

  • Endorsed By: National Women's Political Caucus of WA, Mount Vernon Firefighters
  • Cindy Larsen served in the Snohomish County Prosecutor's office for more than 19 years, including time in both the Criminal and Civil Divisions. She currently serves as a judge pro tem on a variety of local municipal courts. She has received the endorsement of a number of judges and public safety officials, as well as two of our progressive partners.

    Either Larsen or Tessandore would be a good choice in this race.
    Last updated: 2023-04-05

    Cindy Larsen

    Cindy Larsen served in the Snohomish County Prosecutor's office for more than 19 years, including time in both the Criminal and Civil Divisions. She currently serves as a judge pro tem on a variety of local municipal courts.

    Cindy Larsen served in the Snohomish County Prosecutor's office for more than 19 years, including time in both the Criminal and Civil Divisions. She currently serves as a judge pro tem on a variety of local municipal courts. She has received the endorsement of a number of judges and public safety officials, as well as two of our progressive partners.

    Either Larsen or Tessandore would be a good choice in this race.

    Cindy Larsen

    Cindy Larsen served in the Snohomish County Prosecutor's office for more than 19 years, including time in both the Criminal and Civil Divisions. She currently serves as a judge pro tem on a variety of local municipal courts.

  • Endorsed By: National Women's Political Caucus of WA, WA Federation of State Employees, Everett Firefighters, 10th, 38th, and 39th District Democrats
  • Rico Tessandore is a trial lawyer who has practiced law in Snohomish County for 17 years, representing people who have been injured. He has also protected children and the elderly as a Snohomish County deputy prosecuting attorney in the special victims unit, and served as a judge pro tem in the Snohomish County Superior Court.

    Tessandore has received a large showing of support from progressive legislators in Snohomish County, as well as nearly 28 judges.
    Last updated: 2023-04-05

    Rico Tessandore

    Rico Tessandore is a trial lawyer who has practiced law in Snohomish County for 17 years, representing people who have been injured.

    Rico Tessandore is a trial lawyer who has practiced law in Snohomish County for 17 years, representing people who have been injured. He has also protected children and the elderly as a Snohomish County deputy prosecuting attorney in the special victims unit, and served as a judge pro tem in the Snohomish County Superior Court.

    Tessandore has received a large showing of support from progressive legislators in Snohomish County, as well as nearly 28 judges.

    Rico Tessandore

    Rico Tessandore is a trial lawyer who has practiced law in Snohomish County for 17 years, representing people who have been injured.

  • Endorsed By: SEIU Local 925, Snohomish County Labor Council, Snohomish County Democratic Party
    Bar Association Ratings: Latina/o Bar Association: Exceptionally Well Qualified; QLaw: The LGBT Bar Association of Washington: Well Qualified; Washington Women Lawyers: Well Qualified.

School Districts

Depending on where you live, you may have one of the below school district races on your ballot.

  • VOTE YES

    Vote YES for smaller class sizes in Auburn

  • Quality education is the foundation of our children’s futures. The Auburn School District recommends Proposition No. 1, a four-year, $456 million school construction and general obligation bond to keep our class sizes small as our district’s population continues to grow. This bond is especially important because the Republican-led state Senate has blocked necessary funding for local schools. It would fund two new elementary schools and rebuild Terminal Park, Dick Scobee, Olympic, Pioneer, Chinook, and Lea Hill schools. The cost to taxpayers is $1.03 per $1,000 of assessed value, and if passed, it will receive $79 million in matching state funds.

    As this bond needs 60 percent of the vote to pass, it is critical to vote YES on the Auburn School Bond, or Proposition 1, and ensure we reduce Auburn School District class sizes.
    Last updated: 2023-04-05
    Quality education is the foundation of our children’s futures. The Auburn School District recommends Proposition No. 1, a four-year, $456 million school construction and general obligation bond to keep our class sizes small as our district’s population continues to grow. This bond is especially important because the Republican-led state Senate has blocked necessary funding for local schools. It would fund two new elementary schools and rebuild Terminal Park, Dick Scobee, Olympic, Pioneer, Chinook, and Lea Hill schools. The cost to taxpayers is $1.03 per $1,000 of assessed value, and if passed, it will receive $79 million in matching state funds.

    As this bond needs 60 percent of the vote to pass, it is critical to vote YES on the Auburn School Bond, or Proposition 1, and ensure we reduce Auburn School District class sizes.
    Quality education is the foundation of our children’s futures. The Auburn School District recommends Proposition No. 1, a four-year, $456 million school construction and general obligation bond to keep our class sizes small as our district’s population continues to grow. This bond is especially important because the Republican-led state Senate has blocked necessary funding for local schools. It would fund two new elementary schools and rebuild Terminal Park, Dick Scobee, Olympic, Pioneer, Chinook, and Lea Hill schools. The cost to taxpayers is $1.03 per $1,000 of assessed value, and if passed, it will receive $79 million in matching state funds.

    As this bond needs 60 percent of the vote to pass, it is critical to vote YES on the Auburn School Bond, or Proposition 1, and ensure we reduce Auburn School District class sizes.

    Auburn School Bond Proposition No. 1

    Quality education is the foundation of our children’s futures. The Auburn School District recommends Proposition No. 1, a four-year, $456 million school construction and general obligation bond to keep our class sizes small as our district’s population continues to grow.

  • VOTE YES

    Vote YES for Franklin Pierce Schools

  • Quality schools and a well-rounded education are the foundation of our children's futures. The Franklin Pierce School District proposes Proposition No. 1, a $157 million bond which would improve every school in the district. Proposition 1 will replace five aging elementary schools, reduce class sizes, fund safety upgrades, and pay for new Science, Technology, Engineering and Math labs at the local high schools to prepare students for 21st century jobs. The cost to taxpayers is an estimated $2.82 per $1,000 of assessed home value per year and will not change the current property tax rate.

    Vote YES for Franklin Pierce Proposition 1 and give every student a chance for a brighter future.
    Last updated: 2023-04-05
    Quality schools and a well-rounded education are the foundation of our children's futures. The Franklin Pierce School District proposes Proposition No. 1, a $157 million bond which would improve every school in the district. Proposition 1 will replace five aging elementary schools, reduce class sizes, fund safety upgrades, and pay for new Science, Technology, Engineering and Math labs at the local high schools to prepare students for 21st century jobs. The cost to taxpayers is an estimated $2.82 per $1,000 of assessed home value per year and will not change the current property tax rate.

    Vote YES for Franklin Pierce Proposition 1 and give every student a chance for a brighter future.
    Quality schools and a well-rounded education are the foundation of our children's futures. The Franklin Pierce School District proposes Proposition No. 1, a $157 million bond which would improve every school in the district. Proposition 1 will replace five aging elementary schools, reduce class sizes, fund safety upgrades, and pay for new Science, Technology, Engineering and Math labs at the local high schools to prepare students for 21st century jobs. The cost to taxpayers is an estimated $2.82 per $1,000 of assessed home value per year and will not change the current property tax rate.

    Vote YES for Franklin Pierce Proposition 1 and give every student a chance for a brighter future.

    Franklin Pierce Proposition 1

    Quality schools and a well-rounded education are the foundation of our children's futures. The Franklin Pierce School District proposes Proposition No. 1, a $157 million bond which would improve every school in the district.

  • VOTE YES

    Vote YES for safety and smaller classes at Highline schools

  • Our schools are the foundations of our kids’ futures. Highline’s Proposition No. 1 is a community-led $299 million bond that will provide our students with safer schools, smaller class sizes, and room to learn. Dozens of schools in the Highline School District are structurally falling apart. This bond funds basic needs like emergency repairs and security improvements at all schools in the district. It also funds the rebuild of Highline High School, a new middle school at Glacier, the renovation of Olympic, and the design of Evergreen, Tyee, and Pacific schools. The cost to taxpayers is estimated at 79 cents per $1,000 of your home’s assessed value, or $197.50 per year.

    Vote “Yes” on the Highline School Bond to ensure a bright and safe future for our children.
    Last updated: 2023-04-05
    Our schools are the foundations of our kids’ futures. Highline’s Proposition No. 1 is a community-led $299 million bond that will provide our students with safer schools, smaller class sizes, and room to learn. Dozens of schools in the Highline School District are structurally falling apart. This bond funds basic needs like emergency repairs and security improvements at all schools in the district. It also funds the rebuild of Highline High School, a new middle school at Glacier, the renovation of Olympic, and the design of Evergreen, Tyee, and Pacific schools. The cost to taxpayers is estimated at 79 cents per $1,000 of your home’s assessed value, or $197.50 per year.

    Vote “Yes” on the Highline School Bond to ensure a bright and safe future for our children.
    Our schools are the foundations of our kids’ futures. Highline’s Proposition No. 1 is a community-led $299 million bond that will provide our students with safer schools, smaller class sizes, and room to learn. Dozens of schools in the Highline School District are structurally falling apart. This bond funds basic needs like emergency repairs and security improvements at all schools in the district. It also funds the rebuild of Highline High School, a new middle school at Glacier, the renovation of Olympic, and the design of Evergreen, Tyee, and Pacific schools. The cost to taxpayers is estimated at 79 cents per $1,000 of your home’s assessed value, or $197.50 per year.

    Vote “Yes” on the Highline School Bond to ensure a bright and safe future for our children.

    Highline School Bond

    Our schools are the foundations of our kids’ futures. Highline’s Proposition No. 1 is a community-led $299 million bond that will provide our students with safer schools, smaller class sizes, and room to learn. Dozens of schools in the Highline School District are structurally falling apart.

  • VOTE YES

    Vote YES to reduce overcrowding in Kent schools

  • Our schools are the foundation of our children's futures. The Kent School District is proposing a $252 million bond to reduce overcrowding and improve schools. It will be used to make practical structural improvements to over a dozen schools in the Kent School District. Specifically, it will finance two new elementary schools and 20 additional classrooms to accommodate the ever-increasing enrollment. Additionally, this measure would pay for new fire alarm systems, upgrades to disability access ramps, new roofs, renovations to athletic facilities, as well as upgrades to heating, ventilation and energy management systems at schools located across the school district. Approving this proposal would maintain the current tax rate.

    Vote to reduce overcrowding and approve the Kent School Bond, Proposition No. 1.
    Last updated: 2023-04-05
    Our schools are the foundation of our children's futures. The Kent School District is proposing a $252 million bond to reduce overcrowding and improve schools. It will be used to make practical structural improvements to over a dozen schools in the Kent School District. Specifically, it will finance two new elementary schools and 20 additional classrooms to accommodate the ever-increasing enrollment. Additionally, this measure would pay for new fire alarm systems, upgrades to disability access ramps, new roofs, renovations to athletic facilities, as well as upgrades to heating, ventilation and energy management systems at schools located across the school district. Approving this proposal would maintain the current tax rate.

    Vote to reduce overcrowding and approve the Kent School Bond, Proposition No. 1.
    Our schools are the foundation of our children's futures. The Kent School District is proposing a $252 million bond to reduce overcrowding and improve schools. It will be used to make practical structural improvements to over a dozen schools in the Kent School District. Specifically, it will finance two new elementary schools and 20 additional classrooms to accommodate the ever-increasing enrollment. Additionally, this measure would pay for new fire alarm systems, upgrades to disability access ramps, new roofs, renovations to athletic facilities, as well as upgrades to heating, ventilation and energy management systems at schools located across the school district. Approving this proposal would maintain the current tax rate.

    Vote to reduce overcrowding and approve the Kent School Bond, Proposition No. 1.

    Kent School Bond

    Our schools are the foundation of our children's futures. The Kent School District is proposing a $252 million bond to reduce overcrowding and improve schools. It will be used to make practical structural improvements to over a dozen schools in the Kent School District.

  • VOTE APPROVED

    Vote YES for Proposition 1

  • The rapid growth of our region has left Puget Sound families stuck in traffic gridlock every day. With a million more people expected to move to our region over the next two decades, traffic will only get worse. Proposition 1 will expand light rail, bus rapid transit, commuter rail, and express bus service. The plan includes expanding light rail service to Ballard, West Seattle, Issaquah, Kirkland, Federal Way, Tacoma, Lynnwood and Everett. It will also provide expanded Sounder commuter rail in Pierce County and more bus rapid transit in North King and Snohomish Counties. It will cost the average taxpayer $14 per month. Other funding sources such as bonds and matching federal transportation funds will also be used to support the system's expansion.

    We know it's not cheap, but we believe that our region can’t afford to wait any longer. Investing now in safe, fast and reliable transit will give us more options to get out of traffic, provide jobs, improve our quality of life and protect our environment. Vote YES for Proposition 1.
    Last updated: 2023-04-05
    The rapid growth of our region has left Puget Sound families stuck in traffic gridlock every day. With a million more people expected to move to our region over the next two decades, traffic will only get worse. Proposition 1 will expand light rail, bus rapid transit, commuter rail, and express bus service. The plan includes expanding light rail service to Ballard, West Seattle, Issaquah, Kirkland, Federal Way, Tacoma, Lynnwood and Everett. It will also provide expanded Sounder commuter rail in Pierce County and more bus rapid transit in North King and Snohomish Counties. It will cost the average taxpayer $14 per month. Other funding sources such as bonds and matching federal transportation funds will also be used to support the system's expansion.

    We know it's not cheap, but we believe that our region can’t afford to wait any longer. Investing now in safe, fast and reliable transit will give us more options to get out of traffic, provide jobs, improve our quality of life and protect our environment. Vote YES for Proposition 1.
    The rapid growth of our region has left Puget Sound families stuck in traffic gridlock every day. With a million more people expected to move to our region over the next two decades, traffic will only get worse. Proposition 1 will expand light rail, bus rapid transit, commuter rail, and express bus service. The plan includes expanding light rail service to Ballard, West Seattle, Issaquah, Kirkland, Federal Way, Tacoma, Lynnwood and Everett. It will also provide expanded Sounder commuter rail in Pierce County and more bus rapid transit in North King and Snohomish Counties. It will cost the average taxpayer $14 per month. Other funding sources such as bonds and matching federal transportation funds will also be used to support the system's expansion.

    We know it's not cheap, but we believe that our region can’t afford to wait any longer. Investing now in safe, fast and reliable transit will give us more options to get out of traffic, provide jobs, improve our quality of life and protect our environment. Vote YES for Proposition 1.